Effectiveness of budesonide nebulising suspension compared to disodium cromoglycate in early childhood asthma

ABSTRACT Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent medical research and opinion Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 367 - 373
Main Authors Zielen, S., Rose, M. A., Bez, C., Jarisch, A., Reichenbach, J., Hofmann, D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Informa UK Ltd 01.02.2006
Taylor & Francis
Informa Healthcare
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract ABSTRACT Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months. Research design and methods: 82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6–31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules*) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months. *Pulmicort and Respules are registered trade names of the AstraZeneca group of companies Main outcome measures and results: Patients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively ( p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively ( p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups. Conclusions: Inhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6‐month follow-up.
AbstractList The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months. 82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6-31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months. Patients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively (p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively (p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups. Inhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6-month follow-up.
ABSTRACT Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months. Research design and methods: 82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6–31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules*) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months. *Pulmicort and Respules are registered trade names of the AstraZeneca group of companies Main outcome measures and results: Patients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively ( p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively ( p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups. Conclusions: Inhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6‐month follow-up.
OBJECTIVEThe optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6-31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTSPatients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively (p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively (p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups.CONCLUSIONSInhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6-month follow-up.
Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months. Research design and methods: 82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6-31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules * ) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months. * Pulmicort and Respules are registered trade names of the AstraZeneca group of companies Main outcome measures and results: Patients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively ( p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively ( p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups. Conclusions: Inhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6-month follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months.Research design and methods: 82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6-31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months.Main outcome measures and results: Patients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively (p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively (p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups.CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6-month follow-up.
Author Reichenbach, J.
Zielen, S.
Hofmann, D.
Rose, M. A.
Jarisch, A.
Bez, C.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: S.
  surname: Zielen
  fullname: Zielen, S.
  email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de
  organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
– sequence: 2
  givenname: M. A.
  surname: Rose
  fullname: Rose, M. A.
  email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de
  organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
– sequence: 3
  givenname: C.
  surname: Bez
  fullname: Bez, C.
  email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de
  organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
– sequence: 4
  givenname: A.
  surname: Jarisch
  fullname: Jarisch, A.
  email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de
  organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
– sequence: 5
  givenname: J.
  surname: Reichenbach
  fullname: Reichenbach, J.
  email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de
  organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
– sequence: 6
  givenname: D.
  surname: Hofmann
  fullname: Hofmann, D.
  email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de
  organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16466609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kc1r3DAQxUVJSDZpzr0V0UNvbiTZkqzeSkg_IJBLC70ZWRrFCrK0leyU_e-rZRdCAznNYX7vMW_eBTqJKQJC7yj5RGnPr0lLiFSKiN-9kq16gza0k23T9VKeoM1-29Q1P0cXpTwSQlmv1Bk6p6ITQhC1QfOtc2AW_wQRSsHJ4XG1UFL0FnCEcQ2--PiAy1q2EItPEZs0b3UGi5eErS_J-nXGJqc5PYSd0QtgHzHoHHbYTD7YKSWLdVmmWb9Fp06HAlfHeYl-fb39efO9ubv_9uPmy11jOtYuDe17y0fKmTC2phqh5VLzHixzgkshuWkZMaofCeuE46OjghMGNRGzlhvZXqKPB99tTn9WKMsw-2IgBB0hrWUQUnSSyT344QX4mNYc620D2z9W1BdW6PoA1ZClZHDDNvtZ591AybCvYXhRQ1W8P9qu4wz2mT_-vQKfD4CPLuVZ_0052GHRu5CyyzoaX4b2dXf1n3gCHZbJ1E6er39N-w8UT6p7
CODEN CMROCX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1398_9995_2007_01586_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0104_4230_11_70077_X
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2255_4823_11_70077_7
crossref_primary_10_1590_S0104_42302011000400006
crossref_primary_10_1186_1824_7288_38_29
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1998.tb00374.x
10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70058-8
10.1164/rccm.200410-1404OC
10.1164/ajrccm.164.5.2012125
10.1016/0091-6749(81)90077-4
10.1542/peds.109.5.866
10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12891-7
10.1056/NEJM199501193320301
10.1378/chest.108.5.1228
10.1164/ajrccm.164.11.2103075
10.1016/S0091-6749(96)70221-X
10.1016/S0091-6749(97)80007-3
10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70112-5
10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00148.x
10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03915.x
10.1136/thx.53.11.933
10.1016/S0091-6749(00)90062-9
10.1136/thorax.57.8.751-b
10.1001/archpedi.158.5.460
10.1081/JAS-120000805
10.1016/S0140-6736(97)05333-6
10.1136/thorax.55.11.913
10.1111/j.1398-9995.1999.tb04384.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2006 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2006
Copyright Librapharm Feb 2006
Copyright_xml – notice: 2006 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2006
– notice: Copyright Librapharm Feb 2006
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
M0S
M1P
M2P
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
S0X
7X8
DOI 10.1185/030079906X89739
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
STEM Database
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Science Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
SIRS Editorial
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
SIRS Editorial
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest AP Science
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic

ProQuest Central Student
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1473-4877
EndPage 373
ExternalDocumentID 1143904921
10_1185_030079906X89739
16466609
11172467
Genre Original Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations Germany
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Germany
GroupedDBID ---
.55
.GJ
00X
03L
08R
0BK
0R~
29F
34G
39C
3V.
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
AAJNR
AALIY
AALUX
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAPXX
AAQRR
AAUGY
AAWTL
ABBAB
ABBKH
ABEIZ
ABIVO
ABLJU
ABLKL
ABOCM
ABPTK
ABUPF
ABUWG
ABWCV
ABZEW
ACENM
ACFUF
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACKZS
ACLSK
ADBBV
ADCVX
ADFCX
ADFOM
ADFZZ
ADRBQ
AECIN
AEIIZ
AENEX
AEOZL
AEYQI
AFKRA
AFLEI
AFWLO
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AHMBA
AIJEM
AIRBT
AJVHN
AKBVH
ALIIL
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AMDAE
AZQEC
BABNJ
BENPR
BLEHA
BOHLJ
BPHCQ
BRMBE
BVXVI
CAG
CCCUG
COF
CS3
CYYVM
CZDIS
DKSSO
DRXRE
DU5
DWQXO
DWTOO
EBS
EJD
F5P
FYUFA
GNUQQ
H13
HCIFZ
HZ~
IPNFZ
J5H
JENTW
KRBQP
KSSTO
KWAYT
KYCEM
L7B
LJTGL
M1P
M2P
M2Q
M44
M4Z
O9-
P2P
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
QQXMO
RIG
RNANH
RVRKI
RWL
S0X
SJN
TAE
TFDNU
TFL
TFW
UEQFS
UKHRP
V1S
X7M
ZGI
~1N
AAORF
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABXYU
ACIEZ
ALIPV
ALYBC
CCPQU
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
EMOBN
HMCUK
NPM
NUSFT
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TUROJ
AAYXX
CITATION
7XB
8FK
K9.
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-188d5b1526cd739be357a58ed2f657675c320c98b0246f5bf16502e6602dd5c73
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0300-7995
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 08:10:01 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 17:39:43 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 26 16:50:13 EDT 2024
Tue Oct 15 23:31:17 EDT 2024
Tue Jun 13 19:59:23 EDT 2023
Wed Jun 21 08:14:39 EDT 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c423t-188d5b1526cd739be357a58ed2f657675c320c98b0246f5bf16502e6602dd5c73
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
PMID 16466609
PQID 207996030
PQPubID 48040
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_67647277
crossref_primary_10_1185_030079906X89739
pubmed_primary_16466609
proquest_journals_207996030
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1185_030079906X89739
informahealthcare_journals_10_1185_030079906X89739
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2006-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2006-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2006
  text: 2006-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Newbury
PublicationTitle Current medical research and opinion
PublicationTitleAlternate Curr Med Res Opin
PublicationYear 2006
Publisher Informa UK Ltd
Taylor & Francis
Informa Healthcare
Publisher_xml – name: Informa UK Ltd
– name: Taylor & Francis
– name: Informa Healthcare
References CIT0010
CIT0012
CIT0014
CIT0013
CIT0016
CIT0015
Agertoft L (CIT0019) 2000; 343
CIT0018
CIT0017
CIT0021
CIT0020
CIT0023
Van Essen-Zandvliet EE (CIT0028) 1994; 7
CIT0022
CIT0003
CIT0025
CIT0024
Luyt DK (CIT0002) 1993; 306
CIT0005
Mintz M (CIT0011) 2004; 70
CIT0027
CIT0026
CIT0007
CIT0029
CIT0006
CIT0009
CIT0008
References_xml – ident: CIT0023
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1998.tb00374.x
– ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70058-8
– ident: CIT0027
  doi: 10.1164/rccm.200410-1404OC
– volume: 306
  start-page: 1386
  year: 1993
  ident: CIT0002
  publication-title: Epidemiological study of wheeze, doctor diagnosed asthma, and cough in preschool children in Leicestershire. BMJ
  contributor:
    fullname: Luyt DK
– ident: CIT0026
  doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.5.2012125
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90077-4
– ident: CIT0020
  doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.866
– ident: CIT0016
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12891-7
– ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM199501193320301
– ident: CIT0009
  doi: 10.1378/chest.108.5.1228
– ident: CIT0018
  doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.11.2103075
– ident: CIT0015
  doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(96)70221-X
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(97)80007-3
– ident: CIT0022
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70112-5
– volume: 343
  start-page: 1054
  year: 2000
  ident: CIT0019
  publication-title: The Childhood Asthma Management Program Research Group. N Engl J Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Agertoft L
– ident: CIT0021
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00148.x
– volume: 70
  start-page: 1061
  year: 2004
  ident: CIT0011
  publication-title: Medical management. Am Fam Physicians
  contributor:
    fullname: Mintz M
– ident: CIT0024
  doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03915.x
– ident: CIT0010
  doi: 10.1136/thx.53.11.933
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(00)90062-9
– ident: CIT0013
  doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.8.751-b
– volume: 7
  start-page: 63
  year: 1994
  ident: CIT0028
  publication-title: al. Remission of childhood asthma after long-term treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide): can it be achieved? Dutch CNSLD Study Group. Eur Respir J
  contributor:
    fullname: Van Essen-Zandvliet EE
– ident: CIT0029
  doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.5.460
– ident: CIT0017
  doi: 10.1081/JAS-120000805
– ident: CIT0012
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)05333-6
– ident: CIT0014
  doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.11.913
– ident: CIT0025
  doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1999.tb04384.x
SSID ssj0012899
Score 1.8149997
Snippet ABSTRACT Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and...
Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over...
The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium...
OBJECTIVE: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over...
OBJECTIVEThe optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
informaworld
informahealthcare
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 367
SubjectTerms Anti-Asthmatic Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Asthmatic Agents - therapeutic use
Asthma
Asthma - drug therapy
Bronchodilator Agents - administration & dosage
Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use
Budesonide - administration & dosage
Budesonide - therapeutic use
Child, Preschool
Cromolyn Sodium - administration & dosage
Cromolyn Sodium - therapeutic use
Disodium cromoglycate
Double-Blind Method
Female
Germany
Growth
Humans
Infant
Male
Nebulised budesonide
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Preschool children
Treatment Outcome
Title Effectiveness of budesonide nebulising suspension compared to disodium cromoglycate in early childhood asthma
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1185/030079906X89739
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16466609
https://www.proquest.com/docview/207996030
https://search.proquest.com/docview/67647277
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Na9wwEB2SDYReSr7abtMkOvSQi6hXXsnaU2lDQggklNLA3oy-3Cxk7W1t___O2PImpGyuNpaRRta8mXl-A_DZGicw6DI8hGzGp0ZLbkXquFbOOMQf1nW_i93eqev76c1cziM3p460yuFM7A5qXznKkVMmhIRE0uTr6g-nplFUXI0dNLZhR2CgkIxg5_vl3Y-f6zICRRN9GSHhpHwWtX3QR32ha3gpUXM9y6hV-DO3tBdFSx_WFKwXQqab4Wjnlq724G3Ek-xbvwH2YSuUB7B7Gyvmh7Ds5YnjmcaqgtnWBwTZCx9YGSz1Q0fvxeq2XhGXvSrZQEtnTcWIbOQX7ZJ1tL3fj5TuCWxRskDCyMwNwsjM1M3D0hzB_dXlr4trHlsscIc4quETrb206MOV87gKNqQyM1IHLwolSefFpSJxM23RlatC2mKCiE4EpRLhvXRZ-g5GZVWGD8C0tDIJophYV0yNm9hOh1II6xFB4LBjOB9WOF_1Shp5F4Fomb8wxhjEfxbI47dVb34ofW6ivOkyHkXfniRPNz51PFjy6Q3rvTaGs_Vd_OyolmLKULV1rjLS3c9wVu978z_NSU0xJExmH18d-Rje9MkcIsZ8glHztw0nCG8aewrb2Tw7jVv5Hz9w-MM
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,12068,21400,27936,27937,31731,31732,33756,33757,43322,43817,74079,74636
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3PT9swFLYYSBuXiTG2dcDqAwcuFolTO-4JoQlUoOUEUm-Rf2VUokm3JP8_7yVOQUzl6iiO7Gf7fe_5y_cIOTHacgi6NPM-HbORVoIZnlimpNUW8Iex7e9iszs5eRjdzMU8cHOqQKvsz8T2oHalxRw5ZkJQSCSJzld_GRaNwsvVUEHjA9lBGS4sYJDO1_FWjLFEd4kQMdQ9C8o-4KHOsA2aIjlX4xQLhb9ySntBsvRxTcB6I2O6GYy2Tulqj3wOaJJedOb_QrZ8sU8-zsJ9-Vey7MSJw4lGy5yaxnmA2AvnaeENVkMH30Wrplohk70saE9Kp3VJkWrkFs2StqS9P0-Y7PF0UVCPssjU9rLIVFf141IfkIery_vfExYKLDALKKpmsVJOGPDg0jqYBeMTkWqhvOO5FKjyYhMe2bEy4MhlLkweA57jXsqIOydsmnwj20VZ-B-EKmFE5HkeG5uPtI1Nq0LJuXGAH6DbATntZzhbdToaWRt_KJG9McaA8P8skIWdVW1-KXltoqxu8x15V5wkSza-ddhb8uUL65U2IMP1U9h0eJOiC182VSZTVN1PYVTfO_O_jEmOICCMxj_f7XlIPk3uZ9Nsen13e0h2u7QOUmSOyHb9r_HHAHRq86tdzs8LR_ln
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT9wwELboIqFeKkpLWZaCDz30YpE4a8d7QlXpirc4gLS3yK-UldhkS5L_z0ziLAi0vTqKI3vGnm8e-YaQH0ZbDk6XZt6nEzbWSjDDE8uUtNoC_jC2_V3s-kae3Y8vZmIWKIWqUFbZ34ntRe1KizFyjIQgkUgSHeehKuL2dHqy_MewgRQmWkM3jQ9kMwUnBRU8na18rxj9ii6hEDHkQAssP2CtjnEMhiI5U5MUm4a_MlDbgb70YVWM9YbSdD0wbQ3UdJt8CsiS_upU4TPZ8MUO2boOufMvZNERFYfbjZY5NY3zALfnztPCG-yMDnaMVk21xKr2sqB9gTqtS4plR27eLGhbwPf3EQM_ns4L6pEimdqeIpnqqn5Y6K_kfvrn7vcZC80WmAVEVbNYKScMWHNpHeyC8YlItVDe8VwKZHyxCY_sRBkw6jIXJo8B23EvZcSdEzZNdsmgKAu_R6gSRkSe57Gx-Vjb2LSMlJwbB1gCph2Sn_0OZ8uOUyNrfRElsjfCGBL-TgJZOGXV-peS1yLK6jb2kXeNSrJk7VujXpIvX1hp3ZAcrZ7CAcSsii582VSZTJGBP4VVfevE_7ImOQbnMJrs_3fmI7IFmpxdnd9cjsjHLsKD1TIHZFA_Nf47YJ7aHLba_Az15_2l
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness+of+budesonide+nebulising+suspension+compared+to+disodium+cromoglycate+in+early+childhood+asthma&rft.jtitle=Current+medical+research+and+opinion&rft.au=Zielen%2C+S&rft.au=Rose%2C+M+A&rft.au=Bez%2C+C&rft.au=Jarisch%2C+A&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.issn=0300-7995&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1185%2F030079906X89739&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0300-7995&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0300-7995&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0300-7995&client=summon