Effectiveness of budesonide nebulising suspension compared to disodium cromoglycate in early childhood asthma
ABSTRACT Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compa...
Saved in:
Published in | Current medical research and opinion Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 367 - 373 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Informa UK Ltd
01.02.2006
Taylor & Francis Informa Healthcare |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | ABSTRACT
Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months.
Research design and methods: 82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6–31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules*) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months.
*Pulmicort and Respules are registered trade names of the AstraZeneca group of companies
Main outcome measures and results: Patients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively ( p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively ( p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups.
Conclusions: Inhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6‐month follow-up. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months.
82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6-31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months.
Patients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively (p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively (p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups.
Inhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6-month follow-up. ABSTRACT Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months. Research design and methods: 82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6–31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules*) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months. *Pulmicort and Respules are registered trade names of the AstraZeneca group of companies Main outcome measures and results: Patients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively ( p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively ( p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups. Conclusions: Inhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6‐month follow-up. OBJECTIVEThe optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6-31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTSPatients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively (p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively (p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups.CONCLUSIONSInhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6-month follow-up. Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months. Research design and methods: 82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6-31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules * ) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months. * Pulmicort and Respules are registered trade names of the AstraZeneca group of companies Main outcome measures and results: Patients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively ( p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively ( p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups. Conclusions: Inhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6-month follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) in children aged > 2 years. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was to compare the effectiveness of nebulised BUD and DSCG in asthmatic children aged < 36 months.Research design and methods: 82 infants (mean age 18.0 months [range, 11.6-31.2 months]) with suspected asthma (three exacerbations of dyspnoea and wheezing during the past 12 months, with one or more exacerbations in the past 3 months) were treated for 3 months with nebulised BUD (Pulmicort Respules) 0.5 mg/2 mL bid or DSCG 20 mg/2 mL tid. Follow-up was at 6 months.Main outcome measures and results: Patients treated with BUD had a lower exacerbation rate than DSCG-treated patients after 3 months of treatment (5.4% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.003) and towards the end of follow-up (30% vs. 49%; p = 0.062). During treatment, days without cough were 80% and 65% for BUD and DSCG, respectively (p = 0.014), and nights without cough were 89% and 78%, respectively (p = 0.016). Side-effects were mild and of similar frequency in both groups.CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled nebulised BUD was well tolerated and more effective than nebulised DSCG in reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations and days with symptoms. These beneficial effects of BUD were maintained throughout the 6-month follow-up. |
Author | Reichenbach, J. Zielen, S. Hofmann, D. Rose, M. A. Jarisch, A. Bez, C. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: S. surname: Zielen fullname: Zielen, S. email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany – sequence: 2 givenname: M. A. surname: Rose fullname: Rose, M. A. email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany – sequence: 3 givenname: C. surname: Bez fullname: Bez, C. email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany – sequence: 4 givenname: A. surname: Jarisch fullname: Jarisch, A. email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany – sequence: 5 givenname: J. surname: Reichenbach fullname: Reichenbach, J. email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany – sequence: 6 givenname: D. surname: Hofmann fullname: Hofmann, D. email: Markus.Rose@kgu.de organization: J. W. Goethe-University, Children's Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16466609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kc1r3DAQxUVJSDZpzr0V0UNvbiTZkqzeSkg_IJBLC70ZWRrFCrK0leyU_e-rZRdCAznNYX7vMW_eBTqJKQJC7yj5RGnPr0lLiFSKiN-9kq16gza0k23T9VKeoM1-29Q1P0cXpTwSQlmv1Bk6p6ITQhC1QfOtc2AW_wQRSsHJ4XG1UFL0FnCEcQ2--PiAy1q2EItPEZs0b3UGi5eErS_J-nXGJqc5PYSd0QtgHzHoHHbYTD7YKSWLdVmmWb9Fp06HAlfHeYl-fb39efO9ubv_9uPmy11jOtYuDe17y0fKmTC2phqh5VLzHixzgkshuWkZMaofCeuE46OjghMGNRGzlhvZXqKPB99tTn9WKMsw-2IgBB0hrWUQUnSSyT344QX4mNYc620D2z9W1BdW6PoA1ZClZHDDNvtZ591AybCvYXhRQ1W8P9qu4wz2mT_-vQKfD4CPLuVZ_0052GHRu5CyyzoaX4b2dXf1n3gCHZbJ1E6er39N-w8UT6p7 |
CODEN | CMROCX |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1398_9995_2007_01586_x crossref_primary_10_1016_S0104_4230_11_70077_X crossref_primary_10_1016_S2255_4823_11_70077_7 crossref_primary_10_1590_S0104_42302011000400006 crossref_primary_10_1186_1824_7288_38_29 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1998.tb00374.x 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70058-8 10.1164/rccm.200410-1404OC 10.1164/ajrccm.164.5.2012125 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90077-4 10.1542/peds.109.5.866 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12891-7 10.1056/NEJM199501193320301 10.1378/chest.108.5.1228 10.1164/ajrccm.164.11.2103075 10.1016/S0091-6749(96)70221-X 10.1016/S0091-6749(97)80007-3 10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70112-5 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00148.x 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03915.x 10.1136/thx.53.11.933 10.1016/S0091-6749(00)90062-9 10.1136/thorax.57.8.751-b 10.1001/archpedi.158.5.460 10.1081/JAS-120000805 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)05333-6 10.1136/thorax.55.11.913 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1999.tb04384.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2006 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2006 Copyright Librapharm Feb 2006 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2006 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2006 – notice: Copyright Librapharm Feb 2006 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 88I 8AF 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. M0S M1P M2P PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U S0X 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1185/030079906X89739 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Science Database (Alumni Edition) STEM Database ProQuest Pharma Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Science Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic SIRS Editorial MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials SIRS Editorial ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest AP Science ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest Central Student |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1473-4877 |
EndPage | 373 |
ExternalDocumentID | 1143904921 10_1185_030079906X89739 16466609 11172467 |
Genre | Original Article Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article Comparative Study |
GeographicLocations | Germany |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Germany |
GroupedDBID | --- .55 .GJ 00X 03L 08R 0BK 0R~ 29F 34G 39C 3V. 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 88I 8AF 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AAJNR AALIY AALUX AAMIU AAPUL AAPXX AAQRR AAUGY AAWTL ABBAB ABBKH ABEIZ ABIVO ABLJU ABLKL ABOCM ABPTK ABUPF ABUWG ABWCV ABZEW ACENM ACFUF ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACKZS ACLSK ADBBV ADCVX ADFCX ADFOM ADFZZ ADRBQ AECIN AEIIZ AENEX AEOZL AEYQI AFKRA AFLEI AFWLO AGDLA AGFJD AGRBW AGYJP AHMBA AIJEM AIRBT AJVHN AKBVH ALIIL ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AMDAE AZQEC BABNJ BENPR BLEHA BOHLJ BPHCQ BRMBE BVXVI CAG CCCUG COF CS3 CYYVM CZDIS DKSSO DRXRE DU5 DWQXO DWTOO EBS EJD F5P FYUFA GNUQQ H13 HCIFZ HZ~ IPNFZ J5H JENTW KRBQP KSSTO KWAYT KYCEM L7B LJTGL M1P M2P M2Q M44 M4Z O9- P2P PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PROAC PSQYO Q2X QQXMO RIG RNANH RVRKI RWL S0X SJN TAE TFDNU TFL TFW UEQFS UKHRP V1S X7M ZGI ~1N AAORF ABJNI ABLIJ ABXYU ACIEZ ALIPV ALYBC CCPQU CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF EMOBN HMCUK NPM NUSFT TBQAZ TDBHL TERGH TUROJ AAYXX CITATION 7XB 8FK K9. PRINS Q9U 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-188d5b1526cd739be357a58ed2f657675c320c98b0246f5bf16502e6602dd5c73 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 0300-7995 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 08:10:01 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 17:39:43 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 16:50:13 EDT 2024 Tue Oct 15 23:31:17 EDT 2024 Tue Jun 13 19:59:23 EDT 2023 Wed Jun 21 08:14:39 EDT 2023 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c423t-188d5b1526cd739be357a58ed2f657675c320c98b0246f5bf16502e6602dd5c73 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
PMID | 16466609 |
PQID | 207996030 |
PQPubID | 48040 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_67647277 crossref_primary_10_1185_030079906X89739 pubmed_primary_16466609 proquest_journals_207996030 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1185_030079906X89739 informahealthcare_journals_10_1185_030079906X89739 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2006-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2006-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2006 text: 2006-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Newbury |
PublicationTitle | Current medical research and opinion |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Curr Med Res Opin |
PublicationYear | 2006 |
Publisher | Informa UK Ltd Taylor & Francis Informa Healthcare |
Publisher_xml | – name: Informa UK Ltd – name: Taylor & Francis – name: Informa Healthcare |
References | CIT0010 CIT0012 CIT0014 CIT0013 CIT0016 CIT0015 Agertoft L (CIT0019) 2000; 343 CIT0018 CIT0017 CIT0021 CIT0020 CIT0023 Van Essen-Zandvliet EE (CIT0028) 1994; 7 CIT0022 CIT0003 CIT0025 CIT0024 Luyt DK (CIT0002) 1993; 306 CIT0005 Mintz M (CIT0011) 2004; 70 CIT0027 CIT0026 CIT0007 CIT0029 CIT0006 CIT0009 CIT0008 |
References_xml | – ident: CIT0023 doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1998.tb00374.x – ident: CIT0005 doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70058-8 – ident: CIT0027 doi: 10.1164/rccm.200410-1404OC – volume: 306 start-page: 1386 year: 1993 ident: CIT0002 publication-title: Epidemiological study of wheeze, doctor diagnosed asthma, and cough in preschool children in Leicestershire. BMJ contributor: fullname: Luyt DK – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.5.2012125 – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90077-4 – ident: CIT0020 doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.866 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12891-7 – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1056/NEJM199501193320301 – ident: CIT0009 doi: 10.1378/chest.108.5.1228 – ident: CIT0018 doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.11.2103075 – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(96)70221-X – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(97)80007-3 – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70112-5 – volume: 343 start-page: 1054 year: 2000 ident: CIT0019 publication-title: The Childhood Asthma Management Program Research Group. N Engl J Med contributor: fullname: Agertoft L – ident: CIT0021 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00148.x – volume: 70 start-page: 1061 year: 2004 ident: CIT0011 publication-title: Medical management. Am Fam Physicians contributor: fullname: Mintz M – ident: CIT0024 doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03915.x – ident: CIT0010 doi: 10.1136/thx.53.11.933 – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(00)90062-9 – ident: CIT0013 doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.8.751-b – volume: 7 start-page: 63 year: 1994 ident: CIT0028 publication-title: al. Remission of childhood asthma after long-term treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide): can it be achieved? Dutch CNSLD Study Group. Eur Respir J contributor: fullname: Van Essen-Zandvliet EE – ident: CIT0029 doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.5.460 – ident: CIT0017 doi: 10.1081/JAS-120000805 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)05333-6 – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.11.913 – ident: CIT0025 doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1999.tb04384.x |
SSID | ssj0012899 |
Score | 1.8149997 |
Snippet | ABSTRACT
Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and... Objective: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over... The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over disodium... OBJECTIVE: The optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over... OBJECTIVEThe optimal treatment for early childhood asthma remains controversial. Budesonide (BUD) has shown superiority over placebo in infants, and over... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed informaworld informahealthcare |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 367 |
SubjectTerms | Anti-Asthmatic Agents - administration & dosage Anti-Asthmatic Agents - therapeutic use Asthma Asthma - drug therapy Bronchodilator Agents - administration & dosage Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use Budesonide - administration & dosage Budesonide - therapeutic use Child, Preschool Cromolyn Sodium - administration & dosage Cromolyn Sodium - therapeutic use Disodium cromoglycate Double-Blind Method Female Germany Growth Humans Infant Male Nebulised budesonide Nebulizers and Vaporizers Preschool children Treatment Outcome |
Title | Effectiveness of budesonide nebulising suspension compared to disodium cromoglycate in early childhood asthma |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1185/030079906X89739 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16466609 https://www.proquest.com/docview/207996030 https://search.proquest.com/docview/67647277 |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Na9wwEB2SDYReSr7abtMkOvSQi6hXXsnaU2lDQggklNLA3oy-3Cxk7W1t___O2PImpGyuNpaRRta8mXl-A_DZGicw6DI8hGzGp0ZLbkXquFbOOMQf1nW_i93eqev76c1cziM3p460yuFM7A5qXznKkVMmhIRE0uTr6g-nplFUXI0dNLZhR2CgkIxg5_vl3Y-f6zICRRN9GSHhpHwWtX3QR32ha3gpUXM9y6hV-DO3tBdFSx_WFKwXQqab4Wjnlq724G3Ek-xbvwH2YSuUB7B7Gyvmh7Ds5YnjmcaqgtnWBwTZCx9YGSz1Q0fvxeq2XhGXvSrZQEtnTcWIbOQX7ZJ1tL3fj5TuCWxRskDCyMwNwsjM1M3D0hzB_dXlr4trHlsscIc4quETrb206MOV87gKNqQyM1IHLwolSefFpSJxM23RlatC2mKCiE4EpRLhvXRZ-g5GZVWGD8C0tDIJophYV0yNm9hOh1II6xFB4LBjOB9WOF_1Shp5F4Fomb8wxhjEfxbI47dVb34ofW6ivOkyHkXfniRPNz51PFjy6Q3rvTaGs_Vd_OyolmLKULV1rjLS3c9wVu978z_NSU0xJExmH18d-Rje9MkcIsZ8glHztw0nCG8aewrb2Tw7jVv5Hz9w-MM |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,12068,21400,27936,27937,31731,31732,33756,33757,43322,43817,74079,74636 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3PT9swFLYYSBuXiTG2dcDqAwcuFolTO-4JoQlUoOUEUm-Rf2VUokm3JP8_7yVOQUzl6iiO7Gf7fe_5y_cIOTHacgi6NPM-HbORVoIZnlimpNUW8Iex7e9iszs5eRjdzMU8cHOqQKvsz8T2oHalxRw5ZkJQSCSJzld_GRaNwsvVUEHjA9lBGS4sYJDO1_FWjLFEd4kQMdQ9C8o-4KHOsA2aIjlX4xQLhb9ySntBsvRxTcB6I2O6GYy2Tulqj3wOaJJedOb_QrZ8sU8-zsJ9-Vey7MSJw4lGy5yaxnmA2AvnaeENVkMH30Wrplohk70saE9Kp3VJkWrkFs2StqS9P0-Y7PF0UVCPssjU9rLIVFf141IfkIery_vfExYKLDALKKpmsVJOGPDg0jqYBeMTkWqhvOO5FKjyYhMe2bEy4MhlLkweA57jXsqIOydsmnwj20VZ-B-EKmFE5HkeG5uPtI1Nq0LJuXGAH6DbATntZzhbdToaWRt_KJG9McaA8P8skIWdVW1-KXltoqxu8x15V5wkSza-ddhb8uUL65U2IMP1U9h0eJOiC182VSZTVN1PYVTfO_O_jEmOICCMxj_f7XlIPk3uZ9Nsen13e0h2u7QOUmSOyHb9r_HHAHRq86tdzs8LR_ln |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT9wwELboIqFeKkpLWZaCDz30YpE4a8d7QlXpirc4gLS3yK-UldhkS5L_z0ziLAi0vTqKI3vGnm8e-YaQH0ZbDk6XZt6nEzbWSjDDE8uUtNoC_jC2_V3s-kae3Y8vZmIWKIWqUFbZ34ntRe1KizFyjIQgkUgSHeehKuL2dHqy_MewgRQmWkM3jQ9kMwUnBRU8na18rxj9ii6hEDHkQAssP2CtjnEMhiI5U5MUm4a_MlDbgb70YVWM9YbSdD0wbQ3UdJt8CsiS_upU4TPZ8MUO2boOufMvZNERFYfbjZY5NY3zALfnztPCG-yMDnaMVk21xKr2sqB9gTqtS4plR27eLGhbwPf3EQM_ns4L6pEimdqeIpnqqn5Y6K_kfvrn7vcZC80WmAVEVbNYKScMWHNpHeyC8YlItVDe8VwKZHyxCY_sRBkw6jIXJo8B23EvZcSdEzZNdsmgKAu_R6gSRkSe57Gx-Vjb2LSMlJwbB1gCph2Sn_0OZ8uOUyNrfRElsjfCGBL-TgJZOGXV-peS1yLK6jb2kXeNSrJk7VujXpIvX1hp3ZAcrZ7CAcSsii582VSZTJGBP4VVfevE_7ImOQbnMJrs_3fmI7IFmpxdnd9cjsjHLsKD1TIHZFA_Nf47YJ7aHLba_Az15_2l |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness+of+budesonide+nebulising+suspension+compared+to+disodium+cromoglycate+in+early+childhood+asthma&rft.jtitle=Current+medical+research+and+opinion&rft.au=Zielen%2C+S&rft.au=Rose%2C+M+A&rft.au=Bez%2C+C&rft.au=Jarisch%2C+A&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.issn=0300-7995&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1185%2F030079906X89739&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0300-7995&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0300-7995&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0300-7995&client=summon |