Natural regeneration in the context of large-scale forest and landscape restoration in the tropics

Large-scale and long-term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, miti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiotropica Vol. 48; no. 6; pp. 709 - 715
Main Authors Chazdon, Robin L., Uriarte, María
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2016
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0006-3606
1744-7429
DOI10.1111/btp.12409

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Large-scale and long-term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, mitigate effects of climate change, increase food security, and safeguard soil and water resources. Despite rapidly growing knowledge regarding the extent and feasibility of natural regeneration and the environmental and economic benefits of naturally regenerating forests in the tropics, tree planting remains the major focus of restoration programs. Natural regeneration is often ignored as a viable land-use option. Here, we assemble a set of 16 original papers that provide an overview of the ecological, economic, and social dimensions of forest and landscape restoration (FLR), a relatively new approach to forest restoration that aims to regain ecological integrity and enhance human well-being in deforested or degraded forest landscapes. The papers describe how spontaneous (passive) and assisted natural regeneration can contribute to achieving multiple social and ecological benefits. Forest and landscape restoration is centered on the people who live and work in the landscape and whose livelihoods will benefit and diversify through restoration activities inside and outside of farms. Given the scale of degraded forestland and the need to mitigate climate change and meet human development needs in the tropics, harnessing the potential of natural regeneration will play an essential role in achieving the ambitious goals that motivate global restoration initiatives.
AbstractList Large‐scale and long‐term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, mitigate effects of climate change, increase food security, and safeguard soil and water resources. Despite rapidly growing knowledge regarding the extent and feasibility of natural regeneration and the environmental and economic benefits of naturally regenerating forests in the tropics, tree planting remains the major focus of restoration programs. Natural regeneration is often ignored as a viable land‐use option. Here, we assemble a set of 16 original papers that provide an overview of the ecological, economic, and social dimensions of forest and landscape restoration ( FLR ), a relatively new approach to forest restoration that aims to regain ecological integrity and enhance human well‐being in deforested or degraded forest landscapes. The papers describe how spontaneous (passive) and assisted natural regeneration can contribute to achieving multiple social and ecological benefits. Forest and landscape restoration is centered on the people who live and work in the landscape and whose livelihoods will benefit and diversify through restoration activities inside and outside of farms. Given the scale of degraded forestland and the need to mitigate climate change and meet human development needs in the tropics, harnessing the potential of natural regeneration will play an essential role in achieving the ambitious goals that motivate global restoration initiatives. Revertir la perdida y degradación de bosques a nivel global requerirá la restauración forestal a escala de paisaje y a largo plazo. Esta estrategia ofrece beneficios sociales, ambientales, y económicos que pueden sustentar poblaciones rurales, mitigar efectos del cambio climático, aumentar la seguridad alimenticia, y proteger suelos y cuencas. A pesar del demostrado alcance y viabilidad de la regeneración natural como herramienta de restauración de paisajes degradados, la mayoría de proyectos de restauración se han enfocado en plantaciones. En la mayoría de los casos se ha ignorado la regeneración natural como una opción viable. En esta edición especial de Biotropica presentamos una colección de 16 artículos que ilustran las dimensiones ecológicas, económicas y sociales de la restauración de bosques a nivel de paisaje ( FLR ). FLR es un enfoque a la restauración relativamente nuevo que aspira a recuperar la integridad ecológica de paisajes deforestados ó degradados y al mismo tiempo aumentar el bienestar humano. Los artículos documentan como la regeneración natural, tanto pasiva como activa, puede lograr beneficios sociales y ecológicos. FLR se enfoca en las poblaciones que viven y trabajan en el paisaje y cuyo bienestar la restauración puede mejorar y diversificar. Dada la magnitud de degradación forestal y la necesidad de mitigar el cambio climático y sustentar el bienestar humano, es fundamental aprovechar el potencial de la regeneración natural para conseguir las ambiciosas metas que motivan iniciativas globales de restauración. Esforços em escala global e em longo prazo são urgentemente necessários para reverter tendências globais históricas de desmatamento e degradação florestal nos trópicos. A restauração de paisagens florestais oferece múltiplos benefícios sociais, economicos e ambientais para melhorar a qualidade de vida das populações locais, mitigar os efeitos das mudanças climáticas, aumentar a segurança alimentar e proteger os recursos do solo e hídricos. Apesar do rápido crescimento do conhecimento sobre a extensão e viabilidade da regeneração natural e os benefícios ambientais e econômicos da regeneração natural de florestas nos tropicais, o reflorestamento continua sendo o maior foco de programas de restauração. A regeneração natural é normalmente ignorada como uma opção viável para o uso da terra. Nesta edição especial da Biotropica , apresentados um conjunto de 16 artigos originais que fornecem uma visão geral da dimensão ecológica, econômica e social da restauração em paisagens florestais, uma abordagem relativamente nova de restauração florestal que busca recuperar a integridade ecológica e aumentar a qualidade de vida das pessoas em paisagens florestais desmatadas ou degradas. Esses artigos descrevem como a regeneração natural espontânea (passiva) ou assistida contribui para alcançar múltiplos benefícios sociais e ecológicos. A restauração florestal e em paisagens florestais tem como foco a população que vive e trabalha no campo e cujo sustento será beneficiado a partir de atividades de restauração dentro e fora de suas propriedades. Dada a magnitude da degradação florestal e a necessidade de mitigar as mudanças climáticas sem prejudicar o desenvolvimento humano em regiões tropicais, aproveitar o potencial da regenerção natural torna‐se essencial para conseguir atingir os objetivos ambiciosos que motivam as iniciativas globais de restauração.
Large‐scale and long‐term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, mitigate effects of climate change, increase food security, and safeguard soil and water resources. Despite rapidly growing knowledge regarding the extent and feasibility of natural regeneration and the environmental and economic benefits of naturally regenerating forests in the tropics, tree planting remains the major focus of restoration programs. Natural regeneration is often ignored as a viable land‐use option. Here, we assemble a set of 16 original papers that provide an overview of the ecological, economic, and social dimensions of forest and landscape restoration (FLR), a relatively new approach to forest restoration that aims to regain ecological integrity and enhance human well‐being in deforested or degraded forest landscapes. The papers describe how spontaneous (passive) and assisted natural regeneration can contribute to achieving multiple social and ecological benefits. Forest and landscape restoration is centered on the people who live and work in the landscape and whose livelihoods will benefit and diversify through restoration activities inside and outside of farms. Given the scale of degraded forestland and the need to mitigate climate change and meet human development needs in the tropics, harnessing the potential of natural regeneration will play an essential role in achieving the ambitious goals that motivate global restoration initiatives.
Large‐scale and long‐term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, mitigate effects of climate change, increase food security, and safeguard soil and water resources. Despite rapidly growing knowledge regarding the extent and feasibility of natural regeneration and the environmental and economic benefits of naturally regenerating forests in the tropics, tree planting remains the major focus of restoration programs. Natural regeneration is often ignored as a viable land‐use option. Here, we assemble a set of 16 original papers that provide an overview of the ecological, economic, and social dimensions of forest and landscape restoration (FLR), a relatively new approach to forest restoration that aims to regain ecological integrity and enhance human well‐being in deforested or degraded forest landscapes. The papers describe how spontaneous (passive) and assisted natural regeneration can contribute to achieving multiple social and ecological benefits. Forest and landscape restoration is centered on the people who live and work in the landscape and whose livelihoods will benefit and diversify through restoration activities inside and outside of farms. Given the scale of degraded forestland and the need to mitigate climate change and meet human development needs in the tropics, harnessing the potential of natural regeneration will play an essential role in achieving the ambitious goals that motivate global restoration initiatives. RESUMEN Revertir la perdida y degradación de bosques a nivel global requerirá la restauración forestal a escala de paisaje y a largo plazo. Esta estrategia ofrece beneficios sociales, ambientales, y económicos que pueden sustentar poblaciones rurales, mitigar efectos del cambio climático, aumentar la seguridad alimenticia, y proteger suelos y cuencas. A pesar del demostrado alcance y viabilidad de la regeneración natural como herramienta de restauración de paisajes degradados, la mayoría de proyectos de restauración se han enfocado en plantaciones. En la mayoría de los casos se ha ignorado la regeneración natural como una opción viable. En esta edición especial de Biotropica presentamos una colección de 16 artículos que ilustran las dimensiones ecológicas, económicas y sociales de la restauración de bosques a nivel de paisaje (FLR). FLR es un enfoque a la restauración relativamente nuevo que aspira a recuperar la integridad ecológica de paisajes deforestados ó degradados y al mismo tiempo aumentar el bienestar humano. Los artículos documentan como la regeneración natural, tanto pasiva como activa, puede lograr beneficios sociales y ecológicos. FLR se enfoca en las poblaciones que viven y trabajan en el paisaje y cuyo bienestar la restauración puede mejorar y diversificar. Dada la magnitud de degradación forestal y la necesidad de mitigar el cambio climático y sustentar el bienestar humano, es fundamental aprovechar el potencial de la regeneración natural para conseguir las ambiciosas metas que motivan iniciativas globales de restauración. RESUMO Esforços em escala global e em longo prazo são urgentemente necessários para reverter tendências globais históricas de desmatamento e degradação florestal nos trópicos. A restauração de paisagens florestais oferece múltiplos benefícios sociais, economicos e ambientais para melhorar a qualidade de vida das populações locais, mitigar os efeitos das mudanças climáticas, aumentar a segurança alimentar e proteger os recursos do solo e hídricos. Apesar do rápido crescimento do conhecimento sobre a extensão e viabilidade da regeneração natural e os benefícios ambientais e econômicos da regeneração natural de florestas nos tropicais, o reflorestamento continua sendo o maior foco de programas de restauração. A regeneração natural é normalmente ignorada como uma opção viável para o uso da terra. Nesta edição especial da Biotropica, apresentados um conjunto de 16 artigos originais que fornecem uma visão geral da dimensão ecológica, econômica e social da restauração em paisagens florestais, uma abordagem relativamente nova de restauração florestal que busca recuperar a integridade ecológica e aumentar a qualidade de vida das pessoas em paisagens florestais desmatadas ou degradas. Esses artigos descrevem como a regeneração natural espontânea (passiva) ou assistida contribui para alcançar múltiplos benefícios sociais e ecológicos. A restauração florestal e em paisagens florestais tem como foco a população que vive e trabalha no campo e cujo sustento será beneficiado a partir de atividades de restauração dentro e fora de suas propriedades. Dada a magnitude da degradação florestal e a necessidade de mitigar as mudanças climáticas sem prejudicar o desenvolvimento humano em regiões tropicais, aproveitar o potencial da regenerção natural torna‐se essencial para conseguir atingir os objetivos ambiciosos que motivam as iniciativas globais de restauração.
Large-scale and long-term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, mitigate effects of climate change, increase food security, and safeguard soil and water resources. Despite rapidly growing knowledge regarding the extent and feasibility of natural regeneration and the environmental and economic benefits of naturally regenerating forests in the tropics, tree planting remains the major focus of restoration programs. Natural regeneration is often ignored as a viable land-use option. Here, we assemble a set of 16 original papers that provide an overview of the ecological, economic, and social dimensions of forest and landscape restoration (FLR), a relatively new approach to forest restoration that aims to regain ecological integrity and enhance human well-being in deforested or degraded forest landscapes. The papers describe how spontaneous (passive) and assisted natural regeneration can contribute to achieving multiple social and ecological benefits. Forest and landscape restoration is centered on the people who live and work in the landscape and whose livelihoods will benefit and diversify through restoration activities inside and outside of farms. Given the scale of degraded forestland and the need to mitigate climate change and meet human development needs in the tropics, harnessing the potential of natural regeneration will play an essential role in achieving the ambitious goals that motivate global restoration initiatives. RESUMEN Revertir la perdida y degradación de bosques a nivel global requerirá la restauración forestal a escala de paisaje y a largo plazo. Esta estrategia ofrece beneficios sociales, ambientales, y económicos que pueden sustentar poblaciones rurales, mitigar efectos del cambio climático, aumentar la seguridad alimenticia, y proteger suelos y cuencas. A pesar del demostrado alcance y viabilidad de la regeneración natural como herramienta de restauración de paisajes degradados, la mayoría de proyectos de restauración se han enfocado en plantaciones. En la mayoría de los casos se ha ignorado la regeneración natural como una opción viable. En esta edición especial de Biotropica presentamos una colección de 16 artículos que ilustran las dimensiones ecológicas, económicas y sociales de la restauración de bosques a nivel de paisaje (FLR). FLR es un enfoque a la restauración relativamente nuevo que aspira a recuperar la integridad ecológica de paisajes deforestados ó degradados y al mismo tiempo aumentar el bienestar humano. Los artículos documentan como la regeneración natural, tanto pasiva como activa, puede lograr beneficios sociales y ecológicos. FLR se enfoca en las poblaciones que viven y trabajan en el paisaje y cuyo bienestar la restauración puede mejorar y diversificar. Dada la magnitud de degradación forestal y la necesidad de mitigar el cambio climático y sustentar el bienestar humano, es fundamental aprovechar el potencial de la regeneración natural para conseguir las ambiciosas metas que motivan iniciativas globales de restauración. RESUMO Esforços em escala global e em longo prazo são urgentemente necessários para reverter tendências globais históricas de desmatamento e degradação florestal nos trópicos. A restauração de paisagens florestais oferece múltiplos benefícios sociais, economicos e ambientais para melhorar a qualidade de vida das populações locais, mitigar os efeitos das mudanças climáticas, aumentar a segurança alimentar e proteger os recursos do solo e hídricos. Apesar do rápido crescimento do conhecimento sobre a extensão e viabilidade da regeneração natural e os benefícios ambientais e econômicos da regeneração natural de florestas nos tropicais, o reflorestamento continua sendo o maior foco de programas de restauração. A regeneração natural é normalmente ignorada como uma opção viável para o uso da terra. Nesta edição especial da Biotropica, apresentados um conjunto de 16 artigos originais que fornecem uma visão geral da dimensão ecológica, econômica e social da restauração em paisagens florestais, uma abordagem relativamente nova de restauração florestal que busca recuperar a integridade ecológica e aumentar a qualidade de vida das pessoas em paisagens florestais desmatadas ou degradas. Esses artigos descrevem como a regeneração natural espontânea (passiva) ou assistida contribui para alcançar múltiplos benefícios sociais e ecológicos. A restauração florestal e em paisagens florestais tem como foco a população que vive e trabalha no campo e cujo sustento será beneficiado a partir de atividades de restauração dentro e fora de suas propriedades. Dada a magnitude da degradação florestal e a necessidade de mitigar as mudanças climáticas sem prejudicar o desenvolvimento humano em regiões tropicais, aproveitar o potencial da regenerção natural torna-se essencial para conseguir atingir os objetivos ambiciosos que motivam as iniciativas globais de restauração.
Author Chazdon, Robin L.
Uriarte, María
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Robin L.
  surname: Chazdon
  fullname: Chazdon, Robin L.
  email: robin.chazdon@uconn.edu, robin.chazdon@uconn.edu
  organization: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 75 N. Eagleville Road, Unit 3043, Storrs, CT, 06268-3043, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: María
  surname: Uriarte
  fullname: Uriarte, María
  organization: Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1113 Schermerhorn Ext. 1200 Amsterdam Ave., NY, New York, 10027 USA
BookMark eNqFkV1PHSEQhkmjSY_ai_6AJiS9sRersMvCclm1fqTG9sK2l4RlB8vpClvgpPrvZT3WpKZGEkKYed7JzLxbaMMHDwi9pWSPlrPf52mP1ozIV2hBBWOVYLXcQAtCCK8aTvhrtJXSsnxlS9gC9Rc6r6IecYQr8BB1dsFj53H-CdgEn-Em42DxqOMVVMnoEbANEVLG2g8l7IcSnADPofCvPMcwOZN20KbVY4I3D-82-nb86fLwtDr_cnJ2-PG8MqxuZCWBNABdJ-Ug7cDboZF9Q3srjKCGQt0T3hNmtbE95YQBb2nPREvLtYxQ0myj3XXdKYbfq9KOunbJwFh6hLBKqi5DMyo7Sl9EadcSIbpasIK-f4Iuwyr6Mkih2NyAEKJQ-2vKxJBSBKuMy_fLyFG7UVGiZntUsUfd21MUH54opuiudbz9L_tQ_Y8b4fZ5UB1cfv2reLdWLGdXHhWsawVvxbyrap13qTj8mNfxl-KiEa36cXGijo9KvSP-WX1v7gCDjLlR
CODEN BTROAZ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s11252_018_0777_3
crossref_primary_10_3390_land10010028
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_15613
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_023_01694_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2021_109224
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12706
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_023_11749_x
crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_201218
crossref_primary_10_1002_rse2_262
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaridenv_2019_103995
crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_4781
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40415_020_00579_7
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0253284
crossref_primary_10_3390_su12187786
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11852_023_00964_w
crossref_primary_10_3390_land13030303
crossref_primary_10_1080_01426397_2019_1674266
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_83030_5
crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_2585
crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10248
crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_13022
crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2022_929281
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoser_2023_101567
crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_1653
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2018_10_049
crossref_primary_10_3390_land10080768
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119453
crossref_primary_10_5433_1679_0359_2020v41n5supl1p1837
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2017_11_013
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13021_018_0110_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118858
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11056_017_9586_4
crossref_primary_10_31413_nat_v12i3_17428
crossref_primary_10_3390_su15032017
crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10084
crossref_primary_10_3390_f12081022
crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_13124
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2018_03_034
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12559
crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12678
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_018_0730_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12391
crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12393
crossref_primary_10_3417_2016035
crossref_primary_10_3417_2017006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10764_022_00303_0
crossref_primary_10_3390_su142316165
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_14471
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14036
crossref_primary_10_1080_21580103_2023_2237985
crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12388
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2017_10_009
crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12387
crossref_primary_10_4236_gep_2020_811003
crossref_primary_10_3390_challe14040051
crossref_primary_10_3390_f15020274
crossref_primary_10_21829_abm129_2022_2019
crossref_primary_10_21829_abm129_2022_1965
crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12382
crossref_primary_10_1080_14693062_2019_1598838
crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12381
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0193752
crossref_primary_10_1002_jwmg_22532
crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12385
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10113_024_02198_4
crossref_primary_10_1111_aec_12626
crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2021_605925
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2022_106033
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_167558
crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_5445
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_118932
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12662
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actao_2020_103658
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40823_020_00056_7
crossref_primary_10_3390_f15040653
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_122306
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gloenvcha_2019_101988
crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12411
crossref_primary_10_1126_science_abl4649
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119088
crossref_primary_10_1038_s43247_024_01737_5
crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_aa6658
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_020_01023_7
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13955
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs13010032
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2019_02_024
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14240
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forpol_2017_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10342_024_01726_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrurstud_2019_04_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2023_121311
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_15498
crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2024_1412075
crossref_primary_10_1057_s41287_021_00403_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2022_109673
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12882
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118816
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms13030590
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2023_106879
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cosust_2018_04_002
crossref_primary_10_3390_su13116097
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118294
crossref_primary_10_1080_10549811_2022_2059517
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs14122729
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_29243_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2019_01_042
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13781
crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2023_1071495
crossref_primary_10_1111_aec_13114
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13828
crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_2208
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rse_2021_112829
crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ab79e6
crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13558
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2024_110593
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoforum_2025_104241
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2019_03_046
crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2024_1382198
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2021_109154
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gloenvcha_2018_12_001
crossref_primary_10_1051_bioconf_20249901003
Cites_doi 10.1073/pnas.1003369107
10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.003
10.1111/btp.12384
10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.011
10.1111/btp.12361
10.1111/rec.12209
10.1111/gcb.13284
10.1111/btp.12386
10.1073/pnas.1602893113
10.1007/s00267-015-0469-1
10.1111/btp.12391
10.1111/btp.12389
10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.004
10.1007/s11842‐016‐9344‐z
10.1080/10549811.2013.817339
10.4324/9780203071649
10.1890/09-0714.1
10.1111/btp.12388
10.1111/btp.12385
10.1111/btp.12390
10.1111/btp.12383
10.7208/chicago/9780226118109.001.0001
10.1126/sciadv.1501639
10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00274.x
10.1111/btp.12387
10.1038/nclimate2869
10.1126/science.1172460
10.1017/S0376892915000247
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00863.x
10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00471.x
10.1111/btp.12392
10.1073/pnas.1210595110
10.1126/science.aaa9932
10.3390/f5123022
10.1111/rec.12098
10.1111/btp.12380
10.1111/btp.12382
10.1007/s10531‐016‐1186‐7
10.1111/conl.12220
10.1111/btp.12411
10.1111/btp.12360
10.1126/science.1155365
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
7QG
7QR
7SN
7SS
7ST
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H95
L.G
P64
SOI
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1111/btp.12409
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Environment Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Entomology Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Technology Research Database
Animal Behavior Abstracts
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Ecology Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Environment Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
AGRICOLA
Ecology Abstracts


Entomology Abstracts
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
Ecology
Economics
EISSN 1744-7429
EndPage 715
ExternalDocumentID 4265725381
10_1111_btp_12409
BTP12409
48576570
ark_67375_WNG_FDBTPD6K_V
Genre article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: U.S. National Science Foundation
  funderid: NSF DEB 1313788
GroupedDBID -DZ
-JH
-~X
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
23N
2AX
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
42X
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
6J9
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHBH
AAHHS
AAHKG
AAISJ
AAKGQ
AANLZ
AAONW
AAPSS
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABBHK
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPLY
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABTAH
ABTLG
ABXSQ
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACSTJ
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADACV
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADHSS
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADULT
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEPYG
AEQDE
AEUPB
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFAZZ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFIJ
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFNWH
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AGUYK
AHBTC
AHXOZ
AI.
AIAGR
AILXY
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
AKPMI
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
AQVQM
ASPBG
AS~
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
CAG
CBGCD
COF
CS3
CUYZI
D-E
D-F
DC7
DCZOG
DEVKO
DOOOF
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
ECGQY
EDH
EJD
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
G-S
G.N
GODZA
GTFYD
H.T
H.X
H13
HF~
HGD
HGLYW
HQ2
HTVGU
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IPSME
IX1
J0M
JAAYA
JBMMH
JBS
JEB
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLS
JLXEF
JPM
JSODD
JST
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MVM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NEJ
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PQ0
Q.N
Q11
Q5J
QB0
R.K
RBO
ROL
RX1
SA0
SUPJJ
TN5
UB1
V8K
VH1
VQA
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WIH
WIK
WNSPC
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
ZCA
ZXP
ZY4
ZZTAW
~IA
~KM
~WT
AAHQN
AAMMB
AAMNL
AAYCA
ABSQW
ACHIC
ACYXJ
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AFWVQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
ALVPJ
AANHP
ACRPL
ADNMO
AAYXX
ADXHL
CITATION
7QG
7QR
7SN
7SS
7ST
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H95
L.G
P64
SOI
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4239-9e03ee8899d9fd65d39b31bf7c71c1e2b06b04facfb1604e651b4751475f40103
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0006-3606
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 18:35:30 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 05:33:30 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:30:54 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:59:01 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:22:49 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:46:34 EST 2025
Thu Jul 03 22:17:00 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:52:51 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4239-9e03ee8899d9fd65d39b31bf7c71c1e2b06b04facfb1604e651b4751475f40103
Notes U.S. National Science Foundation - No. NSF DEB 1313788
istex:049457170AFED6F3664E88F07E86BFE5D28B6688
ark:/67375/WNG-FDBTPD6K-V
APPENDIX S1. Rio Call to Promote Natural Regeneration in Forest and Landscape Restoration. APPENDIX S2. Acordo do Rio para Promover a Regeneração Natural na Restauração de Florestas e Paisagens. APPENDIX S3. Acuerdo de Río para Promover la Regeneración Natural en la Restauración de Bosques y Territorios.
ArticleID:BTP12409
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PQID 1844751777
PQPubID 976347
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2000419811
proquest_miscellaneous_1850778274
proquest_journals_1844751777
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_btp_12409
crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12409
wiley_primary_10_1111_btp_12409_BTP12409
jstor_primary_48576570
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_FDBTPD6K_V
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-11
20161101
November 2016
2016-11-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-11
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Hoboken
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Biotropica
PublicationTitleAlternate Biotropica
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References Lamb, D. 2014. Large-scale forest restoration. Routledge, London.
Latawiec, A. E., R. Crouzeilles, P. H. S. Brancalion, R. R. Rodrigues, J. B. B. Sansevero, J. S. Dos Santos,... B. B. N. Strassburg. 2016. Natural regeneration and biodiversity: A global meta-analysis and implications for spatial planning. Biotropica 46: 844-855.
Lazos, E., J. Zinda, A. Bennet-Curry, P. Balvanera, G. Bloomfield, C. A. Lindell, and C. Negra. 2016. Stakeholders and tropical reforestation: Challenges, tradeoffs, and strategies in dynamic environments. Biotropica 48: 900-914.
Brancalion, P., D. Schweizer, U. Gaudare, J. Mangueira, F. Lamonato, F. Farah,... R. Rodrigues. 2016. Balancing economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: The case of Brazil. Biotropica 48: 856-867.
Rey Benayas, J., A. Newton, A. Diaz, and J. Bullock. 2009. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325: 1121-1124.
De Souza, S. E. X. F., E. Vidal, G. D. F. Chagas, A. T. Elgar, and P. H. S. Brancalion. 2016. Ecological outcomes and livelihood benefits of community-managed agroforests and second-growth forests in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica 48: 868-881.
Mukul, S. A., J. Herbohn, and J. Firn. 2016. Co-benefits of biodiversity and carbon sequestration from regenerating secondary forests in the Philippines uplands: Implications for forest landscape restoration. Biotropica 48: 882-889.
Chazdon, R. L., and M. R. Guariguata. 2016. Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: Prospects and challenges. Biotropica 48: 844-855.
IUCN and WRI. 2014. A guide to the restoration opportunities assessment methodology (ROAM): Assessing forest landscape restoration opportunities at the national or sub-national level. Working Paper (Road-test edition). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Holl, K. D., and T. M. Aide. 2011. When and where to actively restore ecosystems? For. Ecol. Manage. 261: 1558-1563.
Elliott, S.. 2016. The potential for automating assisted natural regeneration of tropical forest ecosystems. Biotropica 48: 825-833.
MMA (Ministério De Meio Ambiente). 2013. Plano nacional de recuperação da vegetação nativa, Versão Preliminar. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas, Departamento de Conservação da Biodiversidade, Brasilia.
Chazdon, R. L., E. N. Broadbent, D. M. A. Rozendaal, F. Bongers, A. M. A. Zambrano, T. M. Aide, and L. Poorter. 2016. Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics. Sci. Adv. 2: e1501639.
Martínez-Ramos, M., I. A. Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. Piñero, R. Dirzo, and J. Sarukhán. 2016a. Anthropogenic disturbances jeopardize biodiversity conservation within tropical rainforest reserves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113: 5323-5328.
Bechara, F. C., S. J. Dickens, E. C. Farrer, L. Larios, E. N. Spotswood, P. Mariotte, and K. N. Suding. 2016. Neotropical rainforest restoration: Comparing passive, plantation and nucleation approaches. Biodivers. Conserv. 25: 2021. doi:10.1007/s10531-016-1186-7.
Cole, R. J., K. D. Holl, and R. A. Zahawi. 2010. Seed rain under tree islands planted to restore degraded lands in a tropical agricultural landscape. Ecol. Appl. 20: 1255-1269.
Uriarte, M., N. B. Schwartz, J. S. Powers, E. Marin-Spiotta, W. Liao, and L. Werden. 2016. Impacts of climate variability on tree demography in second-growth tropical forests: The importance of regional context for predicting successional trajectories. Biotropica 48: 731-744.
Guariguata, M. R., and P. H. Brancalion. 2014. Current challenges and perspectives for governing forest restoration. Forests 5: 3022-3030.
Omeja, P. A. O., M. J. Lawes, A. Corriveau, K. V. Valenta, D. Sarkar, F. P. Paim, and C. A. C. Chapman. 2016. Recovery of tree and mammal communities during large-scale forest regeneration in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Biotropica 48: 770-779.
Catterall, C. P.. 2016. Roles of non-native species in large-scale regeneration of moist tropical forests on anthropogenic grassland. Biotropica 48: 809-824.
Maginnis, S., and W. Jackson. 2005. Balancing restoration and development. ITTO Trop. For. Update 15: 4-6.
Martínez-Ramos, M., A. Pingarroni, J. Rodríguez-Velázquez, L. Toledo Chelala, I. Zermeño-Hernández, and F. Bongers. 2016b. Natural forest regeneration and ecological restoration in human modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 48: 745-757.
Uriarte, M., and R. L. Chazdon. 2016. Incorporating natural regeneration in forest landscape restoration in tropical regions: Synthesis and key research gaps. Biotropica 48: 915-924.
SER. 2004. The SER international primer on ecological restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group & Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, Arizona.
Urzedo, D., E. Vidal, E. Sills, F. Pina-Rodrigues, and R. Junqueira. 2016. Tropical forest seeds in the household economy: Effects of market participation among three sociocultural groups in the Upper Xingu region of the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Conserv. 43: 13-23.
Strassburg, B. N., F. S. M. Barros, R. Couzeilles, A. Iribarrem, J. S. Santos, D. Silva,... A. Latawiec. 2016. The role of natural regeneration to ecosystem services provision and habitat availability: A case study in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica Special Issue 48: 890-899.
Verdone, M. 2015. A cost-benefit framework for analyzing forest landscape restoration decisions. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland.
Houghton, R., B. Byers, and A. A. Nassikas. 2015. A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5: 1022-1023.
Hall, J. S., M. S. Ashton, E. J. Garen, and S. Jose. 2011. The ecology and ecosystem services of native trees: Implications for reforestation and land restoration in Mesoamerica. For. Ecol. Manage. 261: 1553-1557.
Chazdon, R. L., C. A. Harvey, O. Komar, D. M. Griffith, B. G. Ferguson, M. Martínez-Ramos, and S. M. Philpott. 2009. Beyond reserves: A research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 41: 142-153.
Gregorio, N., J. Herbohn, S. Harrison, A. Pasa, and A. Ferraren. 2016. Regulating the quality of seedlings for forest restoration: Lessons from the National Greening Program in the Philippines. Small-scale For. (in press) doi:10.1007/s11842-016-9344-z.
Reed, J., J. Van Vianen, E. L. Deakin, J. Barlow, and T. Sunderland. 2016. Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: Learning from the past to guide the future. Glob. Change Biol. 22: 2540-2554.
Chazdon, R. L. 2008. Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320: 1458-1460.
Reij, C., and D. Garrity. 2016. Scaling up farmer-managed natural regeneration in Africa to restore degraded landscapes. Biotropica 48: 834-843.
Chazdon, R. L. 2014. Second growth: The promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Gilman, A., S. Letcher, R. M. Fincher, A. Perez, T. Madell, A. Finkelstein, and F. Corrales-Araya. 2016. Recovery of floristic diversity and basal area in natural forest regeneration and planted plots in a Costa Rican wet forest. Biotropica 48: 798-808.
Sayer, J., T. Sunderland, J. Ghazoul, J.-L. Pfund, D. Sheil, E. Meijaard, and C. Garcia. 2013. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110: 8349-8356.
Evans, M. C., J. Carwardine, R. J. Fensham, D. W. Butler, K. A. Wilson, H. P. Possingham, and T. G. Martin. 2015. Carbon farming via assisted natural regeneration as a cost-effective mechanism for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Environ. Sci. Policy 50: 114-129.
Brancalion, P. H., R. A. Viani, M. Calmon, H. Carrascosa, and R. R. Rodrigues. 2013. How to organize a large-scale ecological restoration program? The framework developed by the Atlantic Forest restoration pact in Brazil J. Sustain. For. 32: 728-744.
Weston, P., R. Hong, C. Kaboré, and C. A. Kull. 2015. Farmer-managed natural regeneration enhances rural livelihoods in dryland west Africa. Environ. Manage. 55: 1402-1417.
Locatelli, B., C. P. Catterall, P. Imbach, C. Kumar, R. Lasco, E. Marín-Spiotta,... M. Uriarte. 2015. Tropical reforestation and climate change: Beyond carbon. Restor. Ecol. 23: 337-343.
Verdone, M.. 2014. Economic impacts of FLR. Arborvitae 45: 14.
Instituto Escolhas. 2016. Quanto custa reflorestar 12 milhões de hectares na Amazônia e Mata Atlântica? Instituto Escolhas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Laestadius, L., S. Maginnis, S. Minnemeyer, P. Potapov, C. Saint-Laurent, and N. Sizer. 2012. Mapping opportunities for forest landscape restoration. Unasylva 62: 47-48.
Adams, C., S. Rodrigues, M. Calmon, and C. Kumar. 2016. Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: What we know and do not know. Biotropica 48: 731-744.
Lewis, S. L., D. P. Edwards, and D. Galbraith. 2015. Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science 349: 827-832.
Lu, X., R. Z. Zang, Y. Ding, and J. H. Huang. 2016. Changes in biotic and abiotic drivers of seedling species composition during forest recovery following shifting cultivation on Hainan Island, China. Biotropica 48: 758-769.
Chazdon, R. L., P. H. Brancalion, D. Lamb, L. Laestadius, M. Calmon, and C. Kumar. 2015. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conserv. Lett. (in press). doi: 10.1111/conl.12220.
Shono, K., E. A. Cadaweng, and P. B. Durst. 2007. Application of assisted natural regeneration to restore degraded tropical forestlands. Restor. Ecol. 15: 620-626.
Harvey, C. A., O. Komar, R. Chazdon, B. G. Ferguson, B. Finegan, D. M. Griffith,... L. Soto-Pinto. 2008. Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conserv. Biol. 22: 8-15.
Zahawi, R. A., J. L. Reid, and K.
2009; 41
2015; 5
2010; 107
2010
2015; 50
2015; 55
2007
2004
2015; 349
2008; 320
2014; 45
2014; 22
2007; 15
2015; 23
2010; 20
2014; 5
2016b; 48
2016; 2
2013; 32
2016; 43
2016
2015
2008; 22
2014
2013; 110
2013
2005; 15
2011; 261
2016; 48
2016a; 113
2016; 25
2016; 46
2009; 325
2012; 62
2016; 22
e_1_2_8_24_1
Instituto Escolhas (e_1_2_8_26_1) 2016
IUCN and WRI (e_1_2_8_27_1) 2014
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_20_1
e_1_2_8_43_1
Strassburg B. N. (e_1_2_8_49_1) 2016; 48
e_1_2_8_22_1
e_1_2_8_45_1
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_38_1
Nawir A. A. (e_1_2_8_41_1) 2016
SER (e_1_2_8_47_1) 2004
e_1_2_8_32_1
e_1_2_8_55_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
Lamb D. (e_1_2_8_29_1) 2007
e_1_2_8_34_1
MMA (Ministério De Meio Ambiente) (e_1_2_8_39_1) 2013
Laestadius L. (e_1_2_8_28_1) 2012; 62
e_1_2_8_51_1
Chazdon R. L. (e_1_2_8_13_1) 2016; 48
e_1_2_8_30_1
Verdone M. (e_1_2_8_54_1) 2015
e_1_2_8_25_1
e_1_2_8_46_1
e_1_2_8_48_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
Verdone M. (e_1_2_8_53_1) 2014; 45
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_21_1
e_1_2_8_42_1
Maginnis S. (e_1_2_8_36_1) 2005; 15
e_1_2_8_23_1
e_1_2_8_44_1
e_1_2_8_40_1
e_1_2_8_18_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_35_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
e_1_2_8_37_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_31_1
e_1_2_8_56_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
e_1_2_8_33_1
e_1_2_8_52_1
e_1_2_8_50_1
References_xml – reference: Gregorio, N., J. Herbohn, S. Harrison, A. Pasa, and A. Ferraren. 2016. Regulating the quality of seedlings for forest restoration: Lessons from the National Greening Program in the Philippines. Small-scale For. (in press) doi:10.1007/s11842-016-9344-z.
– reference: Mukul, S. A., J. Herbohn, and J. Firn. 2016. Co-benefits of biodiversity and carbon sequestration from regenerating secondary forests in the Philippines uplands: Implications for forest landscape restoration. Biotropica 48: 882-889.
– reference: Zahawi, R. A., J. L. Reid, and K. D. Holl. 2014. Hidden costs of passive restoration. Restor. Ecol. 22: 284-287.
– reference: Locatelli, B., C. P. Catterall, P. Imbach, C. Kumar, R. Lasco, E. Marín-Spiotta,... M. Uriarte. 2015. Tropical reforestation and climate change: Beyond carbon. Restor. Ecol. 23: 337-343.
– reference: Instituto Escolhas. 2016. Quanto custa reflorestar 12 milhões de hectares na Amazônia e Mata Atlântica? Instituto Escolhas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
– reference: Lewis, S. L., D. P. Edwards, and D. Galbraith. 2015. Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science 349: 827-832.
– reference: Chazdon, R. L., and M. R. Guariguata. 2016. Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: Prospects and challenges. Biotropica 48: 844-855.
– reference: Lu, X., R. Z. Zang, Y. Ding, and J. H. Huang. 2016. Changes in biotic and abiotic drivers of seedling species composition during forest recovery following shifting cultivation on Hainan Island, China. Biotropica 48: 758-769.
– reference: Guariguata, M. R., and P. H. Brancalion. 2014. Current challenges and perspectives for governing forest restoration. Forests 5: 3022-3030.
– reference: Elliott, S.. 2016. The potential for automating assisted natural regeneration of tropical forest ecosystems. Biotropica 48: 825-833.
– reference: Chazdon, R. L., C. A. Harvey, O. Komar, D. M. Griffith, B. G. Ferguson, M. Martínez-Ramos, and S. M. Philpott. 2009. Beyond reserves: A research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 41: 142-153.
– reference: De Souza, S. E. X. F., E. Vidal, G. D. F. Chagas, A. T. Elgar, and P. H. S. Brancalion. 2016. Ecological outcomes and livelihood benefits of community-managed agroforests and second-growth forests in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica 48: 868-881.
– reference: Laestadius, L., S. Maginnis, S. Minnemeyer, P. Potapov, C. Saint-Laurent, and N. Sizer. 2012. Mapping opportunities for forest landscape restoration. Unasylva 62: 47-48.
– reference: Uriarte, M., N. B. Schwartz, J. S. Powers, E. Marin-Spiotta, W. Liao, and L. Werden. 2016. Impacts of climate variability on tree demography in second-growth tropical forests: The importance of regional context for predicting successional trajectories. Biotropica 48: 731-744.
– reference: Chazdon, R. L. 2014. Second growth: The promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
– reference: Verdone, M.. 2014. Economic impacts of FLR. Arborvitae 45: 14.
– reference: Chazdon, R. L. 2008. Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320: 1458-1460.
– reference: Martínez-Ramos, M., A. Pingarroni, J. Rodríguez-Velázquez, L. Toledo Chelala, I. Zermeño-Hernández, and F. Bongers. 2016b. Natural forest regeneration and ecological restoration in human modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 48: 745-757.
– reference: SER. 2004. The SER international primer on ecological restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group & Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, Arizona.
– reference: Sayer, J., T. Sunderland, J. Ghazoul, J.-L. Pfund, D. Sheil, E. Meijaard, and C. Garcia. 2013. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110: 8349-8356.
– reference: Holl, K. D., and T. M. Aide. 2011. When and where to actively restore ecosystems? For. Ecol. Manage. 261: 1558-1563.
– reference: Cole, R. J., K. D. Holl, and R. A. Zahawi. 2010. Seed rain under tree islands planted to restore degraded lands in a tropical agricultural landscape. Ecol. Appl. 20: 1255-1269.
– reference: Catterall, C. P.. 2016. Roles of non-native species in large-scale regeneration of moist tropical forests on anthropogenic grassland. Biotropica 48: 809-824.
– reference: Harvey, C. A., O. Komar, R. Chazdon, B. G. Ferguson, B. Finegan, D. M. Griffith,... L. Soto-Pinto. 2008. Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conserv. Biol. 22: 8-15.
– reference: Weston, P., R. Hong, C. Kaboré, and C. A. Kull. 2015. Farmer-managed natural regeneration enhances rural livelihoods in dryland west Africa. Environ. Manage. 55: 1402-1417.
– reference: Latawiec, A. E., R. Crouzeilles, P. H. S. Brancalion, R. R. Rodrigues, J. B. B. Sansevero, J. S. Dos Santos,... B. B. N. Strassburg. 2016. Natural regeneration and biodiversity: A global meta-analysis and implications for spatial planning. Biotropica 46: 844-855.
– reference: Reed, J., J. Van Vianen, E. L. Deakin, J. Barlow, and T. Sunderland. 2016. Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: Learning from the past to guide the future. Glob. Change Biol. 22: 2540-2554.
– reference: Houghton, R., B. Byers, and A. A. Nassikas. 2015. A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5: 1022-1023.
– reference: Brancalion, P., D. Schweizer, U. Gaudare, J. Mangueira, F. Lamonato, F. Farah,... R. Rodrigues. 2016. Balancing economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: The case of Brazil. Biotropica 48: 856-867.
– reference: Adams, C., S. Rodrigues, M. Calmon, and C. Kumar. 2016. Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: What we know and do not know. Biotropica 48: 731-744.
– reference: Urzedo, D., E. Vidal, E. Sills, F. Pina-Rodrigues, and R. Junqueira. 2016. Tropical forest seeds in the household economy: Effects of market participation among three sociocultural groups in the Upper Xingu region of the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Conserv. 43: 13-23.
– reference: Verdone, M. 2015. A cost-benefit framework for analyzing forest landscape restoration decisions. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland.
– reference: Chazdon, R. L., E. N. Broadbent, D. M. A. Rozendaal, F. Bongers, A. M. A. Zambrano, T. M. Aide, and L. Poorter. 2016. Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics. Sci. Adv. 2: e1501639.
– reference: Bechara, F. C., S. J. Dickens, E. C. Farrer, L. Larios, E. N. Spotswood, P. Mariotte, and K. N. Suding. 2016. Neotropical rainforest restoration: Comparing passive, plantation and nucleation approaches. Biodivers. Conserv. 25: 2021. doi:10.1007/s10531-016-1186-7.
– reference: Strassburg, B. N., F. S. M. Barros, R. Couzeilles, A. Iribarrem, J. S. Santos, D. Silva,... A. Latawiec. 2016. The role of natural regeneration to ecosystem services provision and habitat availability: A case study in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica Special Issue 48: 890-899.
– reference: Brancalion, P. H., R. A. Viani, M. Calmon, H. Carrascosa, and R. R. Rodrigues. 2013. How to organize a large-scale ecological restoration program? The framework developed by the Atlantic Forest restoration pact in Brazil J. Sustain. For. 32: 728-744.
– reference: Hall, J. S., M. S. Ashton, E. J. Garen, and S. Jose. 2011. The ecology and ecosystem services of native trees: Implications for reforestation and land restoration in Mesoamerica. For. Ecol. Manage. 261: 1553-1557.
– reference: Martínez-Ramos, M., I. A. Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. Piñero, R. Dirzo, and J. Sarukhán. 2016a. Anthropogenic disturbances jeopardize biodiversity conservation within tropical rainforest reserves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113: 5323-5328.
– reference: Lazos, E., J. Zinda, A. Bennet-Curry, P. Balvanera, G. Bloomfield, C. A. Lindell, and C. Negra. 2016. Stakeholders and tropical reforestation: Challenges, tradeoffs, and strategies in dynamic environments. Biotropica 48: 900-914.
– reference: Uriarte, M., and R. L. Chazdon. 2016. Incorporating natural regeneration in forest landscape restoration in tropical regions: Synthesis and key research gaps. Biotropica 48: 915-924.
– reference: Gilman, A., S. Letcher, R. M. Fincher, A. Perez, T. Madell, A. Finkelstein, and F. Corrales-Araya. 2016. Recovery of floristic diversity and basal area in natural forest regeneration and planted plots in a Costa Rican wet forest. Biotropica 48: 798-808.
– reference: Chazdon, R. L., P. H. Brancalion, D. Lamb, L. Laestadius, M. Calmon, and C. Kumar. 2015. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conserv. Lett. (in press). doi: 10.1111/conl.12220.
– reference: MMA (Ministério De Meio Ambiente). 2013. Plano nacional de recuperação da vegetação nativa, Versão Preliminar. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas, Departamento de Conservação da Biodiversidade, Brasilia.
– reference: Reij, C., and D. Garrity. 2016. Scaling up farmer-managed natural regeneration in Africa to restore degraded landscapes. Biotropica 48: 834-843.
– reference: Shono, K., E. A. Cadaweng, and P. B. Durst. 2007. Application of assisted natural regeneration to restore degraded tropical forestlands. Restor. Ecol. 15: 620-626.
– reference: Evans, M. C., J. Carwardine, R. J. Fensham, D. W. Butler, K. A. Wilson, H. P. Possingham, and T. G. Martin. 2015. Carbon farming via assisted natural regeneration as a cost-effective mechanism for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Environ. Sci. Policy 50: 114-129.
– reference: Lamb, D. 2014. Large-scale forest restoration. Routledge, London.
– reference: Maginnis, S., and W. Jackson. 2005. Balancing restoration and development. ITTO Trop. For. Update 15: 4-6.
– reference: Rey Benayas, J., A. Newton, A. Diaz, and J. Bullock. 2009. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325: 1121-1124.
– reference: Omeja, P. A. O., M. J. Lawes, A. Corriveau, K. V. Valenta, D. Sarkar, F. P. Paim, and C. A. C. Chapman. 2016. Recovery of tree and mammal communities during large-scale forest regeneration in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Biotropica 48: 770-779.
– reference: IUCN and WRI. 2014. A guide to the restoration opportunities assessment methodology (ROAM): Assessing forest landscape restoration opportunities at the national or sub-national level. Working Paper (Road-test edition). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 731
  year: 2016
  end-page: 744
  article-title: Impacts of large‐scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: What we know and do not know
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 23
  start-page: 337
  year: 2015
  end-page: 343
  article-title: Tropical reforestation and climate change: Beyond carbon
  publication-title: Restor. Ecol.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 731
  year: 2016
  end-page: 744
  article-title: Impacts of climate variability on tree demography in second‐growth tropical forests: The importance of regional context for predicting successional trajectories
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 110
  start-page: 8349
  year: 2013
  end-page: 8356
  article-title: Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses
  publication-title: Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
– start-page: 71
  year: 2007
  end-page: 82
– volume: 46
  start-page: 844
  year: 2016
  end-page: 855
  article-title: Natural regeneration and biodiversity: A global meta‐analysis and implications for spatial planning
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 261
  start-page: 1558
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1563
  article-title: When and where to actively restore ecosystems?
  publication-title: For. Ecol. Manage.
– start-page: 53
  year: 2016
  end-page: 78
– volume: 62
  start-page: 47
  year: 2012
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Mapping opportunities for forest landscape restoration
  publication-title: Unasylva
– year: 2014
– volume: 15
  start-page: 4
  year: 2005
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Balancing restoration and development
  publication-title: ITTO Trop. For. Update
– volume: 45
  start-page: 14
  year: 2014
  article-title: Economic impacts of FLR
  publication-title: Arborvitae
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1402
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1417
  article-title: Farmer‐managed natural regeneration enhances rural livelihoods in dryland west Africa
  publication-title: Environ. Manage.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 915
  year: 2016
  end-page: 924
  article-title: Incorporating natural regeneration in forest landscape restoration in tropical regions: Synthesis and key research gaps
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 22
  start-page: 284
  year: 2014
  end-page: 287
  article-title: Hidden costs of passive restoration
  publication-title: Restor. Ecol.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2021
  year: 2016
  article-title: Neotropical rainforest restoration: Comparing passive, plantation and nucleation approaches
  publication-title: Biodivers. Conserv.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 825
  year: 2016
  end-page: 833
  article-title: The potential for automating assisted natural regeneration of tropical forest ecosystems
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 15
  start-page: 620
  year: 2007
  end-page: 626
  article-title: Application of assisted natural regeneration to restore degraded tropical forestlands
  publication-title: Restor. Ecol.
– year: 2015
  article-title: A policy‐driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration
  publication-title: Conserv. Lett.
– year: 2004
– volume: 48
  start-page: 758
  year: 2016
  end-page: 769
  article-title: Changes in biotic and abiotic drivers of seedling species composition during forest recovery following shifting cultivation on Hainan Island, China
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 113
  start-page: 5323
  year: 2016a
  end-page: 5328
  article-title: Anthropogenic disturbances jeopardize biodiversity conservation within tropical rainforest reserves
  publication-title: Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
– volume: 48
  start-page: 770
  year: 2016
  end-page: 779
  article-title: Recovery of tree and mammal communities during large‐scale forest regeneration in Kibale National Park, Uganda
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 325
  start-page: 1121
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1124
  article-title: Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 48
  start-page: 868
  year: 2016
  end-page: 881
  article-title: Ecological outcomes and livelihood benefits of community‐managed agroforests and second‐growth forests in Southeast Brazil
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 48
  start-page: 745
  year: 2016b
  end-page: 757
  article-title: Natural forest regeneration and ecological restoration in human modified tropical landscapes
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 48
  start-page: 856
  year: 2016
  end-page: 867
  article-title: Balancing economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: The case of Brazil
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 48
  start-page: 882
  year: 2016
  end-page: 889
  article-title: Co‐benefits of biodiversity and carbon sequestration from regenerating secondary forests in the Philippines uplands: Implications for forest landscape restoration
  publication-title: Biotropica
– year: 2015
– volume: 50
  start-page: 114
  year: 2015
  end-page: 129
  article-title: Carbon farming via assisted natural regeneration as a cost‐effective mechanism for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes
  publication-title: Environ. Sci. Policy
– volume: 48
  start-page: 834
  year: 2016
  end-page: 843
  article-title: Scaling up farmer‐managed natural regeneration in Africa to restore degraded landscapes
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 349
  start-page: 827
  year: 2015
  end-page: 832
  article-title: Increasing human dominance of tropical forests
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 5
  start-page: 3022
  year: 2014
  end-page: 3030
  article-title: Current challenges and perspectives for governing forest restoration
  publication-title: Forests
– volume: 41
  start-page: 142
  year: 2009
  end-page: 153
  article-title: Beyond reserves: A research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human‐modified tropical landscapes
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 48
  start-page: 844
  year: 2016
  end-page: 855
  article-title: Natural regeneration as a tool for large‐scale forest restoration in the tropics: Prospects and challenges
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 261
  start-page: 1553
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1557
  article-title: The ecology and ecosystem services of native trees: Implications for reforestation and land restoration in Mesoamerica
  publication-title: For. Ecol. Manage.
– volume: 320
  start-page: 1458
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1460
  article-title: Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1255
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1269
  article-title: Seed rain under tree islands planted to restore degraded lands in a tropical agricultural landscape
  publication-title: Ecol. Appl.
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1022
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1023
  article-title: A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2
  publication-title: Nat. Clim. Chang.
– volume: 32
  start-page: 728
  year: 2013
  end-page: 744
  article-title: How to organize a large‐scale ecological restoration program? The framework developed by the Atlantic Forest restoration pact in Brazil
  publication-title: J. Sustain. For.
– year: 2016
– volume: 48
  start-page: 900
  year: 2016
  end-page: 914
  article-title: Stakeholders and tropical reforestation: Challenges, tradeoffs, and strategies in dynamic environments
  publication-title: Biotropica
– year: 2010
– volume: 2
  start-page: e1501639
  year: 2016
  article-title: Carbon sequestration potential of second‐growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics
  publication-title: Sci. Adv.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 809
  year: 2016
  end-page: 824
  article-title: Roles of non‐native species in large‐scale regeneration of moist tropical forests on anthropogenic grassland
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 22
  start-page: 2540
  year: 2016
  end-page: 2554
  article-title: Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: Learning from the past to guide the future
  publication-title: Glob. Change Biol.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 798
  year: 2016
  end-page: 808
  article-title: Recovery of floristic diversity and basal area in natural forest regeneration and planted plots in a Costa Rican wet forest
  publication-title: Biotropica
– volume: 107
  start-page: 21925
  year: 2010
  end-page: 21930
– volume: 48
  start-page: 890
  year: 2016
  end-page: 899
  article-title: The role of natural regeneration to ecosystem services provision and habitat availability: A case study in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
  publication-title: Biotropica Special Issue
– volume: 22
  start-page: 8
  year: 2008
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot
  publication-title: Conserv. Biol.
– year: 2016
  article-title: Regulating the quality of seedlings for forest restoration: Lessons from the National Greening Program in the Philippines
  publication-title: Small‐scale For.
– volume: 43
  start-page: 13
  year: 2016
  end-page: 23
  article-title: Tropical forest seeds in the household economy: Effects of market participation among three sociocultural groups in the Upper Xingu region of the Brazilian Amazon
  publication-title: Environ. Conserv.
– year: 2013
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003369107
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.003
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12384
– ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.011
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12361
– start-page: 53
  volume-title: Forest landscape restoration for Asia‐Pacific forests
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_8_41_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_34_1
  doi: 10.1111/rec.12209
– ident: e_1_2_8_43_1
  doi: 10.1111/gcb.13284
– volume: 62
  start-page: 47
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
  article-title: Mapping opportunities for forest landscape restoration
  publication-title: Unasylva
– ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12386
– ident: e_1_2_8_37_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602893113
– ident: e_1_2_8_55_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0469-1
– ident: e_1_2_8_32_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12391
– ident: e_1_2_8_40_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12389
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.004
– volume-title: A guide to the restoration opportunities assessment methodology (ROAM): Assessing forest landscape restoration opportunities at the national or sub‐national level
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11842‐016‐9344‐z
– volume-title: The SER international primer on ecological restoration
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_8_47_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1080/10549811.2013.817339
– ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
  doi: 10.4324/9780203071649
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.1890/09-0714.1
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12388
– volume: 45
  start-page: 14
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_8_53_1
  article-title: Economic impacts of FLR
  publication-title: Arborvitae
– volume: 48
  start-page: 890
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_8_49_1
  article-title: The role of natural regeneration to ecosystem services provision and habitat availability: A case study in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
  publication-title: Biotropica Special Issue
– volume: 15
  start-page: 4
  year: 2005
  ident: e_1_2_8_36_1
  article-title: Balancing restoration and development
  publication-title: ITTO Trop. For. Update
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12385
– ident: e_1_2_8_44_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12390
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12383
– volume-title: Quanto custa reflorestar 12 milhões de hectares na Amazônia e Mata Atlântica?
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226118109.001.0001
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501639
– ident: e_1_2_8_48_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00274.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12387
– start-page: 71
  volume-title: The forest landscape restoration handbook
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
  doi: 10.1038/nclimate2869
– volume-title: A cost‐benefit framework for analyzing forest landscape restoration decisions
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_8_54_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_45_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.1172460
– ident: e_1_2_8_52_1
  doi: 10.1017/S0376892915000247
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00863.x
– volume-title: Plano nacional de recuperação da vegetação nativa, Versão Preliminar
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_8_39_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00471.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_35_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12392
– ident: e_1_2_8_46_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210595110
– ident: e_1_2_8_33_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9932
– ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
  doi: 10.3390/f5123022
– ident: e_1_2_8_56_1
  doi: 10.1111/rec.12098
– ident: e_1_2_8_51_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12380
– volume: 48
  start-page: 844
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  article-title: Natural regeneration as a tool for large‐scale forest restoration in the tropics: Prospects and challenges
  publication-title: Biotropica
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_38_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12382
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10531‐016‐1186‐7
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/conl.12220
– ident: e_1_2_8_50_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12411
– ident: e_1_2_8_42_1
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12360
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.1155365
SSID ssj0009504
Score 2.5083025
Snippet Large-scale and long-term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics....
Large‐scale and long‐term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics....
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
jstor
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 709
SubjectTerms Climate change
Climate change mitigation
Climate effects
Deforestation
Economics
Ecosystem integrity
ecosystem services
Environmental restoration
farms
financial economics
Food security
forest and landscape restoration
forest damage
Forest degradation
forest restoration
forests
human development
humans
INTRODUCTION
Land use
Landscape
landscape management
landscapes
livelihood
mosaic restoration
mosaico de restauração
natural regeneration
people
planting
regeneración natural espontanea
regeneração natural espontânea
restauración de mosaícos
restauración forestal a escala de paisaje
restauração em larga escala
restauração florestal e em paisagens florestais
servicios ecosistémicos
serviços ecossistêmicos
soil
spontaneous natural regeneration
sustainable land use
Tree planting
trees
Tropical environments
tropics
uso sustentable del paisaje
uso sustentável da terra
Water resources
wide-scale restoration
Title Natural regeneration in the context of large-scale forest and landscape restoration in the tropics
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-FDBTPD6K-V/fulltext.pdf
https://www.jstor.org/stable/48576570
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fbtp.12409
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1844751777
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1850778274
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2000419811
Volume 48
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fa9RAEB5KpeCL1dZibC2rFPElR5Lb7Db4pG3PUulRpNU-CEs2uyulJXfkcmB98k_wb_QvcWbzgztpQXwLZBJ2d3Yy39598w3AnkZUXmip0QMuDXlqRIhJOAsT6wymu8wkvur9dCyOL_jJZXq5Am-7WphGH6L_wY0iw3-vKcBzPVsIcl1PB5icfPEecbUIEH1KFgR3o0aBmbhdiNJbVSFi8fRPLuWiB7Ss3zta4hLgXIStPu-M1uFrN-KGbnI9mNd6UPz4S8zxP6f0GB61eJS9azbQE1ix5QasNR0qb_HqyKta326CGedeooNV9puXqiaPsquSIYJkRHjHrzybOHZD1PLfP3_N0PmWISTGubG8NMwXFRPdilW-m83SC-pqMr0qZk_hYnR0fnActi0awoKUA8PMRkNr9_HQZjJnRGqGmR7G2slCxkVsEx0JHXGXF07HIuJWpLHmEkGaTB2nFhNbsFpOSvsMmJe9kQnPnbGYMUmKCx80SeY1-EUSwJvOWapo9cupjcaN6s4xuHzKL18Ar3rTaSPacZfRa-_x3iKvronlJlP1ZfxBjQ7fn58dio_qcwBbfkv0hhwHRIyhAHa6PaLayJ8pPDHTBKWUAbzsb2PM0h8xeWknc7JBFI7QTPL7baiEisfZfhzjxP2muX8qCofqL57_u-k2PETsJ5qyyh1Yrau5fYH4qta7PpD-AAaXHz8
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fa9RAEB9Ki-hL679i2qqriPiSI8ltsg34ol7P07aHyFX7Iks2u1tKS-7I5aD1yY_gZ_STOLP5w51YEN8CmYSdnZ3MbzczvwF4oRCV50ootICNfR7rxMcgnPqRsRrDXaojV_V-PE5GJ_zjaXy6Bq_bWpiaH6I7cCPPcN9rcnA6kF7yclXNehidqHpvgzp6U_-CwedoiXI3qDmYKbsLcXrDK0R5PN2jK9Fogyb2qk1MXIGcy8DVRZ7hFnxrx1wnnFz0FpXq5d__oHP8X6XuwmYDSdmbeg3dgzVT3IdbdZPKa7w6cMTW1w9AjzPH0sFKc-bYqsmo7LxgCCIZ5bzjh55NLbuk7PJfP37O0f6GISpG5VhWaObqiinjipWuoc3KC6pyOjvP5w_hZHgweTfymy4Nfk7kgX5qgr4x-7hv06nVSaz7qeqHyopchHloIhUkKuA2y60Kk4AbtJTiAnGaiC2nLhPbsF5MC_MImGO-ERHPrDYYNImNCx_UUepo-JPIg1ettWTeUJhTJ41L2W5lcPqkmz4Pnneis5q3429CL53JO4msvKBENxHLr-P3cjh4O_k0SA7lFw-23ZroBDkOiJKGPNhrF4lsnH8ucdNMCgohPHjW3Ua3pX8xWWGmC5JBII7oTPCbZaiKiofpfhii4m7V3KyKxKG6i51_F30Kt0eT4yN59GF8uAt3EAomdZXlHqxX5cI8RrhVqSfOq34D4fgjWQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fa9RAEB9Ki-KL9V8xtuoqIr7kSHKb3Qaf1OtZrR5FWu1DYclmd6W05I5cDqxPfgQ_o5_Emc0f7sSC-BbIbNjZ2cn8Npn5DcAzjai80FKjBVwa8tSIEINwFibWGQx3mUl81fvHidg_5u9P0pM1eNnVwjT8EP0HN_IM_74mB58Zt-Tkup4NMDhR8d4GF-gshIg-JUuMu1FDwUzJXQjTW1ohSuPph64Eow1a129dXuIK4lzGrT7wjDfhtJtyk29yPljUelB8_4PN8T91ugU3W0DKXjU76Das2fIOXGtaVF7i1Z6ntb68C2aSe44OVtmvnquaTMrOSoYQklHGO77m2dSxC8ot__Xj5xytbxliYtSN5aVhvqqY8q1Y5dvZrDygrqazs2J-D47He0dv9sO2R0NYEHVgmNloaO0untpM5oxIzTDTw1g7Wci4iG2iI6Ej7vLC6VhE3Io01lwiSpOp49RjYgvWy2lp7wPzvDcy4bkzFkMmcXHhQJNknoRfJAG86IylipbAnPpoXKjuIIPLp_zyBfC0F501rB1_E3ruLd5L5NU5pbnJVH2ZvFXj0eujw5E4UJ8D2PJbohfkOCFKGQpgp9sjqnX9ucIjMykopQzgSX8bnZb-xOSlnS5IBmE4YjPJr5ahGioeZ7txjIr7TXO1Kgqn6i8e_LvoY7h-OBqrD-8mB9twA3GgaEosd2C9rhb2IWKtWj_yPvUbepUiEQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural+regeneration+in+the+context+of+large-scale+forest+and+landscape+restoration+in+the+tropics&rft.jtitle=Biotropica&rft.au=Chazdon%2C+Robin+L&rft.au=Uriarte%2C+Mar%C3%ADa&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=0006-3606&rft.eissn=1744-7429&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=709&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fbtp.12409&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=4265725381
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0006-3606&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0006-3606&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0006-3606&client=summon