Natural regeneration in the context of large-scale forest and landscape restoration in the tropics
Large-scale and long-term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, miti...
Saved in:
Published in | Biotropica Vol. 48; no. 6; pp. 709 - 715 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.11.2016
Wiley Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0006-3606 1744-7429 |
DOI | 10.1111/btp.12409 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Large-scale and long-term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, mitigate effects of climate change, increase food security, and safeguard soil and water resources. Despite rapidly growing knowledge regarding the extent and feasibility of natural regeneration and the environmental and economic benefits of naturally regenerating forests in the tropics, tree planting remains the major focus of restoration programs. Natural regeneration is often ignored as a viable land-use option. Here, we assemble a set of 16 original papers that provide an overview of the ecological, economic, and social dimensions of forest and landscape restoration (FLR), a relatively new approach to forest restoration that aims to regain ecological integrity and enhance human well-being in deforested or degraded forest landscapes. The papers describe how spontaneous (passive) and assisted natural regeneration can contribute to achieving multiple social and ecological benefits. Forest and landscape restoration is centered on the people who live and work in the landscape and whose livelihoods will benefit and diversify through restoration activities inside and outside of farms. Given the scale of degraded forestland and the need to mitigate climate change and meet human development needs in the tropics, harnessing the potential of natural regeneration will play an essential role in achieving the ambitious goals that motivate global restoration initiatives. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Large‐scale and long‐term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, mitigate effects of climate change, increase food security, and safeguard soil and water resources. Despite rapidly growing knowledge regarding the extent and feasibility of natural regeneration and the environmental and economic benefits of naturally regenerating forests in the tropics, tree planting remains the major focus of restoration programs. Natural regeneration is often ignored as a viable land‐use option. Here, we assemble a set of 16 original papers that provide an overview of the ecological, economic, and social dimensions of forest and landscape restoration (
FLR
), a relatively new approach to forest restoration that aims to regain ecological integrity and enhance human well‐being in deforested or degraded forest landscapes. The papers describe how spontaneous (passive) and assisted natural regeneration can contribute to achieving multiple social and ecological benefits. Forest and landscape restoration is centered on the people who live and work in the landscape and whose livelihoods will benefit and diversify through restoration activities inside and outside of farms. Given the scale of degraded forestland and the need to mitigate climate change and meet human development needs in the tropics, harnessing the potential of natural regeneration will play an essential role in achieving the ambitious goals that motivate global restoration initiatives.
Revertir la perdida y degradación de bosques a nivel global requerirá la restauración forestal a escala de paisaje y a largo plazo. Esta estrategia ofrece beneficios sociales, ambientales, y económicos que pueden sustentar poblaciones rurales, mitigar efectos del cambio climático, aumentar la seguridad alimenticia, y proteger suelos y cuencas. A pesar del demostrado alcance y viabilidad de la regeneración natural como herramienta de restauración de paisajes degradados, la mayoría de proyectos de restauración se han enfocado en plantaciones. En la mayoría de los casos se ha ignorado la regeneración natural como una opción viable. En esta edición especial de Biotropica presentamos una colección de 16 artículos que ilustran las dimensiones ecológicas, económicas y sociales de la restauración de bosques a nivel de paisaje (
FLR
).
FLR
es un enfoque a la restauración relativamente nuevo que aspira a recuperar la integridad ecológica de paisajes deforestados ó degradados y al mismo tiempo aumentar el bienestar humano. Los artículos documentan como la regeneración natural, tanto pasiva como activa, puede lograr beneficios sociales y ecológicos.
FLR
se enfoca en las poblaciones que viven y trabajan en el paisaje y cuyo bienestar la restauración puede mejorar y diversificar. Dada la magnitud de degradación forestal y la necesidad de mitigar el cambio climático y sustentar el bienestar humano, es fundamental aprovechar el potencial de la regeneración natural para conseguir las ambiciosas metas que motivan iniciativas globales de restauración.
Esforços em escala global e em longo prazo são urgentemente necessários para reverter tendências globais históricas de desmatamento e degradação florestal nos trópicos. A restauração de paisagens florestais oferece múltiplos benefícios sociais, economicos e ambientais para melhorar a qualidade de vida das populações locais, mitigar os efeitos das mudanças climáticas, aumentar a segurança alimentar e proteger os recursos do solo e hídricos. Apesar do rápido crescimento do conhecimento sobre a extensão e viabilidade da regeneração natural e os benefícios ambientais e econômicos da regeneração natural de florestas nos tropicais, o reflorestamento continua sendo o maior foco de programas de restauração. A regeneração natural é normalmente ignorada como uma opção viável para o uso da terra. Nesta edição especial da
Biotropica
, apresentados um conjunto de 16 artigos originais que fornecem uma visão geral da dimensão ecológica, econômica e social da restauração em paisagens florestais, uma abordagem relativamente nova de restauração florestal que busca recuperar a integridade ecológica e aumentar a qualidade de vida das pessoas em paisagens florestais desmatadas ou degradas. Esses artigos descrevem como a regeneração natural espontânea (passiva) ou assistida contribui para alcançar múltiplos benefícios sociais e ecológicos. A restauração florestal e em paisagens florestais tem como foco a população que vive e trabalha no campo e cujo sustento será beneficiado a partir de atividades de restauração dentro e fora de suas propriedades. Dada a magnitude da degradação florestal e a necessidade de mitigar as mudanças climáticas sem prejudicar o desenvolvimento humano em regiões tropicais, aproveitar o potencial da regenerção natural torna‐se essencial para conseguir atingir os objetivos ambiciosos que motivam as iniciativas globais de restauração. Large‐scale and long‐term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, mitigate effects of climate change, increase food security, and safeguard soil and water resources. Despite rapidly growing knowledge regarding the extent and feasibility of natural regeneration and the environmental and economic benefits of naturally regenerating forests in the tropics, tree planting remains the major focus of restoration programs. Natural regeneration is often ignored as a viable land‐use option. Here, we assemble a set of 16 original papers that provide an overview of the ecological, economic, and social dimensions of forest and landscape restoration (FLR), a relatively new approach to forest restoration that aims to regain ecological integrity and enhance human well‐being in deforested or degraded forest landscapes. The papers describe how spontaneous (passive) and assisted natural regeneration can contribute to achieving multiple social and ecological benefits. Forest and landscape restoration is centered on the people who live and work in the landscape and whose livelihoods will benefit and diversify through restoration activities inside and outside of farms. Given the scale of degraded forestland and the need to mitigate climate change and meet human development needs in the tropics, harnessing the potential of natural regeneration will play an essential role in achieving the ambitious goals that motivate global restoration initiatives. Large‐scale and long‐term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, mitigate effects of climate change, increase food security, and safeguard soil and water resources. Despite rapidly growing knowledge regarding the extent and feasibility of natural regeneration and the environmental and economic benefits of naturally regenerating forests in the tropics, tree planting remains the major focus of restoration programs. Natural regeneration is often ignored as a viable land‐use option. Here, we assemble a set of 16 original papers that provide an overview of the ecological, economic, and social dimensions of forest and landscape restoration (FLR), a relatively new approach to forest restoration that aims to regain ecological integrity and enhance human well‐being in deforested or degraded forest landscapes. The papers describe how spontaneous (passive) and assisted natural regeneration can contribute to achieving multiple social and ecological benefits. Forest and landscape restoration is centered on the people who live and work in the landscape and whose livelihoods will benefit and diversify through restoration activities inside and outside of farms. Given the scale of degraded forestland and the need to mitigate climate change and meet human development needs in the tropics, harnessing the potential of natural regeneration will play an essential role in achieving the ambitious goals that motivate global restoration initiatives. RESUMEN Revertir la perdida y degradación de bosques a nivel global requerirá la restauración forestal a escala de paisaje y a largo plazo. Esta estrategia ofrece beneficios sociales, ambientales, y económicos que pueden sustentar poblaciones rurales, mitigar efectos del cambio climático, aumentar la seguridad alimenticia, y proteger suelos y cuencas. A pesar del demostrado alcance y viabilidad de la regeneración natural como herramienta de restauración de paisajes degradados, la mayoría de proyectos de restauración se han enfocado en plantaciones. En la mayoría de los casos se ha ignorado la regeneración natural como una opción viable. En esta edición especial de Biotropica presentamos una colección de 16 artículos que ilustran las dimensiones ecológicas, económicas y sociales de la restauración de bosques a nivel de paisaje (FLR). FLR es un enfoque a la restauración relativamente nuevo que aspira a recuperar la integridad ecológica de paisajes deforestados ó degradados y al mismo tiempo aumentar el bienestar humano. Los artículos documentan como la regeneración natural, tanto pasiva como activa, puede lograr beneficios sociales y ecológicos. FLR se enfoca en las poblaciones que viven y trabajan en el paisaje y cuyo bienestar la restauración puede mejorar y diversificar. Dada la magnitud de degradación forestal y la necesidad de mitigar el cambio climático y sustentar el bienestar humano, es fundamental aprovechar el potencial de la regeneración natural para conseguir las ambiciosas metas que motivan iniciativas globales de restauración. RESUMO Esforços em escala global e em longo prazo são urgentemente necessários para reverter tendências globais históricas de desmatamento e degradação florestal nos trópicos. A restauração de paisagens florestais oferece múltiplos benefícios sociais, economicos e ambientais para melhorar a qualidade de vida das populações locais, mitigar os efeitos das mudanças climáticas, aumentar a segurança alimentar e proteger os recursos do solo e hídricos. Apesar do rápido crescimento do conhecimento sobre a extensão e viabilidade da regeneração natural e os benefícios ambientais e econômicos da regeneração natural de florestas nos tropicais, o reflorestamento continua sendo o maior foco de programas de restauração. A regeneração natural é normalmente ignorada como uma opção viável para o uso da terra. Nesta edição especial da Biotropica, apresentados um conjunto de 16 artigos originais que fornecem uma visão geral da dimensão ecológica, econômica e social da restauração em paisagens florestais, uma abordagem relativamente nova de restauração florestal que busca recuperar a integridade ecológica e aumentar a qualidade de vida das pessoas em paisagens florestais desmatadas ou degradas. Esses artigos descrevem como a regeneração natural espontânea (passiva) ou assistida contribui para alcançar múltiplos benefícios sociais e ecológicos. A restauração florestal e em paisagens florestais tem como foco a população que vive e trabalha no campo e cujo sustento será beneficiado a partir de atividades de restauração dentro e fora de suas propriedades. Dada a magnitude da degradação florestal e a necessidade de mitigar as mudanças climáticas sem prejudicar o desenvolvimento humano em regiões tropicais, aproveitar o potencial da regenerção natural torna‐se essencial para conseguir atingir os objetivos ambiciosos que motivam as iniciativas globais de restauração. Large-scale and long-term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Restoration of forests within landscapes offers multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits that enhance lives of local people, mitigate effects of climate change, increase food security, and safeguard soil and water resources. Despite rapidly growing knowledge regarding the extent and feasibility of natural regeneration and the environmental and economic benefits of naturally regenerating forests in the tropics, tree planting remains the major focus of restoration programs. Natural regeneration is often ignored as a viable land-use option. Here, we assemble a set of 16 original papers that provide an overview of the ecological, economic, and social dimensions of forest and landscape restoration (FLR), a relatively new approach to forest restoration that aims to regain ecological integrity and enhance human well-being in deforested or degraded forest landscapes. The papers describe how spontaneous (passive) and assisted natural regeneration can contribute to achieving multiple social and ecological benefits. Forest and landscape restoration is centered on the people who live and work in the landscape and whose livelihoods will benefit and diversify through restoration activities inside and outside of farms. Given the scale of degraded forestland and the need to mitigate climate change and meet human development needs in the tropics, harnessing the potential of natural regeneration will play an essential role in achieving the ambitious goals that motivate global restoration initiatives. RESUMEN Revertir la perdida y degradación de bosques a nivel global requerirá la restauración forestal a escala de paisaje y a largo plazo. Esta estrategia ofrece beneficios sociales, ambientales, y económicos que pueden sustentar poblaciones rurales, mitigar efectos del cambio climático, aumentar la seguridad alimenticia, y proteger suelos y cuencas. A pesar del demostrado alcance y viabilidad de la regeneración natural como herramienta de restauración de paisajes degradados, la mayoría de proyectos de restauración se han enfocado en plantaciones. En la mayoría de los casos se ha ignorado la regeneración natural como una opción viable. En esta edición especial de Biotropica presentamos una colección de 16 artículos que ilustran las dimensiones ecológicas, económicas y sociales de la restauración de bosques a nivel de paisaje (FLR). FLR es un enfoque a la restauración relativamente nuevo que aspira a recuperar la integridad ecológica de paisajes deforestados ó degradados y al mismo tiempo aumentar el bienestar humano. Los artículos documentan como la regeneración natural, tanto pasiva como activa, puede lograr beneficios sociales y ecológicos. FLR se enfoca en las poblaciones que viven y trabajan en el paisaje y cuyo bienestar la restauración puede mejorar y diversificar. Dada la magnitud de degradación forestal y la necesidad de mitigar el cambio climático y sustentar el bienestar humano, es fundamental aprovechar el potencial de la regeneración natural para conseguir las ambiciosas metas que motivan iniciativas globales de restauración. RESUMO Esforços em escala global e em longo prazo são urgentemente necessários para reverter tendências globais históricas de desmatamento e degradação florestal nos trópicos. A restauração de paisagens florestais oferece múltiplos benefícios sociais, economicos e ambientais para melhorar a qualidade de vida das populações locais, mitigar os efeitos das mudanças climáticas, aumentar a segurança alimentar e proteger os recursos do solo e hídricos. Apesar do rápido crescimento do conhecimento sobre a extensão e viabilidade da regeneração natural e os benefícios ambientais e econômicos da regeneração natural de florestas nos tropicais, o reflorestamento continua sendo o maior foco de programas de restauração. A regeneração natural é normalmente ignorada como uma opção viável para o uso da terra. Nesta edição especial da Biotropica, apresentados um conjunto de 16 artigos originais que fornecem uma visão geral da dimensão ecológica, econômica e social da restauração em paisagens florestais, uma abordagem relativamente nova de restauração florestal que busca recuperar a integridade ecológica e aumentar a qualidade de vida das pessoas em paisagens florestais desmatadas ou degradas. Esses artigos descrevem como a regeneração natural espontânea (passiva) ou assistida contribui para alcançar múltiplos benefícios sociais e ecológicos. A restauração florestal e em paisagens florestais tem como foco a população que vive e trabalha no campo e cujo sustento será beneficiado a partir de atividades de restauração dentro e fora de suas propriedades. Dada a magnitude da degradação florestal e a necessidade de mitigar as mudanças climáticas sem prejudicar o desenvolvimento humano em regiões tropicais, aproveitar o potencial da regenerção natural torna-se essencial para conseguir atingir os objetivos ambiciosos que motivam as iniciativas globais de restauração. |
Author | Chazdon, Robin L. Uriarte, María |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Robin L. surname: Chazdon fullname: Chazdon, Robin L. email: robin.chazdon@uconn.edu, robin.chazdon@uconn.edu organization: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 75 N. Eagleville Road, Unit 3043, Storrs, CT, 06268-3043, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: María surname: Uriarte fullname: Uriarte, María organization: Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1113 Schermerhorn Ext. 1200 Amsterdam Ave., NY, New York, 10027 USA |
BookMark | eNqFkV1PHSEQhkmjSY_ai_6AJiS9sRersMvCclm1fqTG9sK2l4RlB8vpClvgpPrvZT3WpKZGEkKYed7JzLxbaMMHDwi9pWSPlrPf52mP1ozIV2hBBWOVYLXcQAtCCK8aTvhrtJXSsnxlS9gC9Rc6r6IecYQr8BB1dsFj53H-CdgEn-Em42DxqOMVVMnoEbANEVLG2g8l7IcSnADPofCvPMcwOZN20KbVY4I3D-82-nb86fLwtDr_cnJ2-PG8MqxuZCWBNABdJ-Ug7cDboZF9Q3srjKCGQt0T3hNmtbE95YQBb2nPREvLtYxQ0myj3XXdKYbfq9KOunbJwFh6hLBKqi5DMyo7Sl9EadcSIbpasIK-f4Iuwyr6Mkih2NyAEKJQ-2vKxJBSBKuMy_fLyFG7UVGiZntUsUfd21MUH54opuiudbz9L_tQ_Y8b4fZ5UB1cfv2reLdWLGdXHhWsawVvxbyrap13qTj8mNfxl-KiEa36cXGijo9KvSP-WX1v7gCDjLlR |
CODEN | BTROAZ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11252_018_0777_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_land10010028 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_15613 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_023_01694_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2021_109224 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12706 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_023_11749_x crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_201218 crossref_primary_10_1002_rse2_262 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaridenv_2019_103995 crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_4781 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40415_020_00579_7 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0253284 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12187786 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11852_023_00964_w crossref_primary_10_3390_land13030303 crossref_primary_10_1080_01426397_2019_1674266 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_83030_5 crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_2585 crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10248 crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_13022 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2022_929281 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoser_2023_101567 crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_1653 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2018_10_049 crossref_primary_10_3390_land10080768 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119453 crossref_primary_10_5433_1679_0359_2020v41n5supl1p1837 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2017_11_013 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13021_018_0110_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118858 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11056_017_9586_4 crossref_primary_10_31413_nat_v12i3_17428 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15032017 crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10084 crossref_primary_10_3390_f12081022 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_13124 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2018_03_034 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12559 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12678 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_018_0730_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12391 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12393 crossref_primary_10_3417_2016035 crossref_primary_10_3417_2017006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10764_022_00303_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_su142316165 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_14471 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14036 crossref_primary_10_1080_21580103_2023_2237985 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12388 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2017_10_009 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12387 crossref_primary_10_4236_gep_2020_811003 crossref_primary_10_3390_challe14040051 crossref_primary_10_3390_f15020274 crossref_primary_10_21829_abm129_2022_2019 crossref_primary_10_21829_abm129_2022_1965 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12382 crossref_primary_10_1080_14693062_2019_1598838 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12381 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0193752 crossref_primary_10_1002_jwmg_22532 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12385 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10113_024_02198_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_aec_12626 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2021_605925 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2022_106033 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_167558 crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_5445 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_118932 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12662 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actao_2020_103658 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40823_020_00056_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_f15040653 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_122306 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gloenvcha_2019_101988 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12411 crossref_primary_10_1126_science_abl4649 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119088 crossref_primary_10_1038_s43247_024_01737_5 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_aa6658 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_020_01023_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13955 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs13010032 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2019_02_024 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14240 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forpol_2017_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10342_024_01726_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrurstud_2019_04_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2023_121311 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_15498 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2024_1412075 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41287_021_00403_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2022_109673 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12882 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118816 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms13030590 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2023_106879 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cosust_2018_04_002 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13116097 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118294 crossref_primary_10_1080_10549811_2022_2059517 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs14122729 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_29243_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2019_01_042 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13781 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2023_1071495 crossref_primary_10_1111_aec_13114 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13828 crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_2208 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rse_2021_112829 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ab79e6 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13558 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2024_110593 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoforum_2025_104241 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2019_03_046 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2024_1382198 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2021_109154 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gloenvcha_2018_12_001 crossref_primary_10_1051_bioconf_20249901003 |
Cites_doi | 10.1073/pnas.1003369107 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.003 10.1111/btp.12384 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.011 10.1111/btp.12361 10.1111/rec.12209 10.1111/gcb.13284 10.1111/btp.12386 10.1073/pnas.1602893113 10.1007/s00267-015-0469-1 10.1111/btp.12391 10.1111/btp.12389 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.004 10.1007/s11842‐016‐9344‐z 10.1080/10549811.2013.817339 10.4324/9780203071649 10.1890/09-0714.1 10.1111/btp.12388 10.1111/btp.12385 10.1111/btp.12390 10.1111/btp.12383 10.7208/chicago/9780226118109.001.0001 10.1126/sciadv.1501639 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00274.x 10.1111/btp.12387 10.1038/nclimate2869 10.1126/science.1172460 10.1017/S0376892915000247 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00863.x 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00471.x 10.1111/btp.12392 10.1073/pnas.1210595110 10.1126/science.aaa9932 10.3390/f5123022 10.1111/rec.12098 10.1111/btp.12380 10.1111/btp.12382 10.1007/s10531‐016‐1186‐7 10.1111/conl.12220 10.1111/btp.12411 10.1111/btp.12360 10.1126/science.1155365 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2016 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2016 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION 7QG 7QR 7SN 7SS 7ST 8FD C1K F1W FR3 H95 L.G P64 SOI 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1111/btp.12409 |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Animal Behavior Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environment Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Entomology Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Technology Research Database Animal Behavior Abstracts ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Environment Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef AGRICOLA Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology Ecology Economics |
EISSN | 1744-7429 |
EndPage | 715 |
ExternalDocumentID | 4265725381 10_1111_btp_12409 BTP12409 48576570 ark_67375_WNG_FDBTPD6K_V |
Genre | article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: U.S. National Science Foundation funderid: NSF DEB 1313788 |
GroupedDBID | -DZ -JH -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 23N 2AX 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 42X 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6J9 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHHS AAHKG AAISJ AAKGQ AANLZ AAONW AAPSS AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABBHK ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPLY ABPPZ ABPVW ABTAH ABTLG ABXSQ ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACSTJ ACXBN ACXQS ADACV ADBBV ADEOM ADHSS ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADULT ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEPYG AEQDE AEUPB AEUQT AEUYR AFAZZ AFBPY AFEBI AFFIJ AFFPM AFGKR AFNWH AFPWT AFRAH AFZJQ AGUYK AHBTC AHXOZ AI. AIAGR AILXY AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR AKPMI ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB AQVQM ASPBG AS~ ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CAG CBGCD COF CS3 CUYZI D-E D-F DC7 DCZOG DEVKO DOOOF DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS ECGQY EDH EJD F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE G-S G.N GODZA GTFYD H.T H.X H13 HF~ HGD HGLYW HQ2 HTVGU HVGLF HZI HZ~ IPSME IX1 J0M JAAYA JBMMH JBS JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JSODD JST K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MVM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NEJ NF~ O66 O9- OIG P2P P2W P2X P4D PQ0 Q.N Q11 Q5J QB0 R.K RBO ROL RX1 SA0 SUPJJ TN5 UB1 V8K VH1 VQA W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WIH WIK WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 ZCA ZXP ZY4 ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~WT AAHQN AAMMB AAMNL AAYCA ABSQW ACHIC ACYXJ AEFGJ AEYWJ AFWVQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AIDQK AIDYY ALVPJ AANHP ACRPL ADNMO AAYXX ADXHL CITATION 7QG 7QR 7SN 7SS 7ST 8FD C1K F1W FR3 H95 L.G P64 SOI 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4239-9e03ee8899d9fd65d39b31bf7c71c1e2b06b04facfb1604e651b4751475f40103 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0006-3606 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 18:35:30 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 05:33:30 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:30:54 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:01 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:22:49 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:46:34 EST 2025 Thu Jul 03 22:17:00 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:52:51 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4239-9e03ee8899d9fd65d39b31bf7c71c1e2b06b04facfb1604e651b4751475f40103 |
Notes | U.S. National Science Foundation - No. NSF DEB 1313788 istex:049457170AFED6F3664E88F07E86BFE5D28B6688 ark:/67375/WNG-FDBTPD6K-V APPENDIX S1. Rio Call to Promote Natural Regeneration in Forest and Landscape Restoration. APPENDIX S2. Acordo do Rio para Promover a Regeneração Natural na Restauração de Florestas e Paisagens. APPENDIX S3. Acuerdo de Río para Promover la Regeneración Natural en la Restauración de Bosques y Territorios. ArticleID:BTP12409 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
PQID | 1844751777 |
PQPubID | 976347 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2000419811 proquest_miscellaneous_1850778274 proquest_journals_1844751777 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_btp_12409 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_12409 wiley_primary_10_1111_btp_12409_BTP12409 jstor_primary_48576570 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_FDBTPD6K_V |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-11 20161101 November 2016 2016-11-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2016 text: 2016-11 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Hoboken |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | Biotropica |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Biotropica |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | Lamb, D. 2014. Large-scale forest restoration. Routledge, London. Latawiec, A. E., R. Crouzeilles, P. H. S. Brancalion, R. R. Rodrigues, J. B. B. Sansevero, J. S. Dos Santos,... B. B. N. Strassburg. 2016. Natural regeneration and biodiversity: A global meta-analysis and implications for spatial planning. Biotropica 46: 844-855. Lazos, E., J. Zinda, A. Bennet-Curry, P. Balvanera, G. Bloomfield, C. A. Lindell, and C. Negra. 2016. Stakeholders and tropical reforestation: Challenges, tradeoffs, and strategies in dynamic environments. Biotropica 48: 900-914. Brancalion, P., D. Schweizer, U. Gaudare, J. Mangueira, F. Lamonato, F. Farah,... R. Rodrigues. 2016. Balancing economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: The case of Brazil. Biotropica 48: 856-867. Rey Benayas, J., A. Newton, A. Diaz, and J. Bullock. 2009. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325: 1121-1124. De Souza, S. E. X. F., E. Vidal, G. D. F. Chagas, A. T. Elgar, and P. H. S. Brancalion. 2016. Ecological outcomes and livelihood benefits of community-managed agroforests and second-growth forests in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica 48: 868-881. Mukul, S. A., J. Herbohn, and J. Firn. 2016. Co-benefits of biodiversity and carbon sequestration from regenerating secondary forests in the Philippines uplands: Implications for forest landscape restoration. Biotropica 48: 882-889. Chazdon, R. L., and M. R. Guariguata. 2016. Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: Prospects and challenges. Biotropica 48: 844-855. IUCN and WRI. 2014. A guide to the restoration opportunities assessment methodology (ROAM): Assessing forest landscape restoration opportunities at the national or sub-national level. Working Paper (Road-test edition). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Holl, K. D., and T. M. Aide. 2011. When and where to actively restore ecosystems? For. Ecol. Manage. 261: 1558-1563. Elliott, S.. 2016. The potential for automating assisted natural regeneration of tropical forest ecosystems. Biotropica 48: 825-833. MMA (Ministério De Meio Ambiente). 2013. Plano nacional de recuperação da vegetação nativa, Versão Preliminar. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas, Departamento de Conservação da Biodiversidade, Brasilia. Chazdon, R. L., E. N. Broadbent, D. M. A. Rozendaal, F. Bongers, A. M. A. Zambrano, T. M. Aide, and L. Poorter. 2016. Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics. Sci. Adv. 2: e1501639. Martínez-Ramos, M., I. A. Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. Piñero, R. Dirzo, and J. Sarukhán. 2016a. Anthropogenic disturbances jeopardize biodiversity conservation within tropical rainforest reserves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113: 5323-5328. Bechara, F. C., S. J. Dickens, E. C. Farrer, L. Larios, E. N. Spotswood, P. Mariotte, and K. N. Suding. 2016. Neotropical rainforest restoration: Comparing passive, plantation and nucleation approaches. Biodivers. Conserv. 25: 2021. doi:10.1007/s10531-016-1186-7. Cole, R. J., K. D. Holl, and R. A. Zahawi. 2010. Seed rain under tree islands planted to restore degraded lands in a tropical agricultural landscape. Ecol. Appl. 20: 1255-1269. Uriarte, M., N. B. Schwartz, J. S. Powers, E. Marin-Spiotta, W. Liao, and L. Werden. 2016. Impacts of climate variability on tree demography in second-growth tropical forests: The importance of regional context for predicting successional trajectories. Biotropica 48: 731-744. Guariguata, M. R., and P. H. Brancalion. 2014. Current challenges and perspectives for governing forest restoration. Forests 5: 3022-3030. Omeja, P. A. O., M. J. Lawes, A. Corriveau, K. V. Valenta, D. Sarkar, F. P. Paim, and C. A. C. Chapman. 2016. Recovery of tree and mammal communities during large-scale forest regeneration in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Biotropica 48: 770-779. Catterall, C. P.. 2016. Roles of non-native species in large-scale regeneration of moist tropical forests on anthropogenic grassland. Biotropica 48: 809-824. Maginnis, S., and W. Jackson. 2005. Balancing restoration and development. ITTO Trop. For. Update 15: 4-6. Martínez-Ramos, M., A. Pingarroni, J. Rodríguez-Velázquez, L. Toledo Chelala, I. Zermeño-Hernández, and F. Bongers. 2016b. Natural forest regeneration and ecological restoration in human modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 48: 745-757. Uriarte, M., and R. L. Chazdon. 2016. Incorporating natural regeneration in forest landscape restoration in tropical regions: Synthesis and key research gaps. Biotropica 48: 915-924. SER. 2004. The SER international primer on ecological restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group & Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, Arizona. Urzedo, D., E. Vidal, E. Sills, F. Pina-Rodrigues, and R. Junqueira. 2016. Tropical forest seeds in the household economy: Effects of market participation among three sociocultural groups in the Upper Xingu region of the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Conserv. 43: 13-23. Strassburg, B. N., F. S. M. Barros, R. Couzeilles, A. Iribarrem, J. S. Santos, D. Silva,... A. Latawiec. 2016. The role of natural regeneration to ecosystem services provision and habitat availability: A case study in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica Special Issue 48: 890-899. Verdone, M. 2015. A cost-benefit framework for analyzing forest landscape restoration decisions. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland. Houghton, R., B. Byers, and A. A. Nassikas. 2015. A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5: 1022-1023. Hall, J. S., M. S. Ashton, E. J. Garen, and S. Jose. 2011. The ecology and ecosystem services of native trees: Implications for reforestation and land restoration in Mesoamerica. For. Ecol. Manage. 261: 1553-1557. Chazdon, R. L., C. A. Harvey, O. Komar, D. M. Griffith, B. G. Ferguson, M. Martínez-Ramos, and S. M. Philpott. 2009. Beyond reserves: A research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 41: 142-153. Gregorio, N., J. Herbohn, S. Harrison, A. Pasa, and A. Ferraren. 2016. Regulating the quality of seedlings for forest restoration: Lessons from the National Greening Program in the Philippines. Small-scale For. (in press) doi:10.1007/s11842-016-9344-z. Reed, J., J. Van Vianen, E. L. Deakin, J. Barlow, and T. Sunderland. 2016. Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: Learning from the past to guide the future. Glob. Change Biol. 22: 2540-2554. Chazdon, R. L. 2008. Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320: 1458-1460. Reij, C., and D. Garrity. 2016. Scaling up farmer-managed natural regeneration in Africa to restore degraded landscapes. Biotropica 48: 834-843. Chazdon, R. L. 2014. Second growth: The promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Gilman, A., S. Letcher, R. M. Fincher, A. Perez, T. Madell, A. Finkelstein, and F. Corrales-Araya. 2016. Recovery of floristic diversity and basal area in natural forest regeneration and planted plots in a Costa Rican wet forest. Biotropica 48: 798-808. Sayer, J., T. Sunderland, J. Ghazoul, J.-L. Pfund, D. Sheil, E. Meijaard, and C. Garcia. 2013. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110: 8349-8356. Evans, M. C., J. Carwardine, R. J. Fensham, D. W. Butler, K. A. Wilson, H. P. Possingham, and T. G. Martin. 2015. Carbon farming via assisted natural regeneration as a cost-effective mechanism for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Environ. Sci. Policy 50: 114-129. Brancalion, P. H., R. A. Viani, M. Calmon, H. Carrascosa, and R. R. Rodrigues. 2013. How to organize a large-scale ecological restoration program? The framework developed by the Atlantic Forest restoration pact in Brazil J. Sustain. For. 32: 728-744. Weston, P., R. Hong, C. Kaboré, and C. A. Kull. 2015. Farmer-managed natural regeneration enhances rural livelihoods in dryland west Africa. Environ. Manage. 55: 1402-1417. Locatelli, B., C. P. Catterall, P. Imbach, C. Kumar, R. Lasco, E. Marín-Spiotta,... M. Uriarte. 2015. Tropical reforestation and climate change: Beyond carbon. Restor. Ecol. 23: 337-343. Verdone, M.. 2014. Economic impacts of FLR. Arborvitae 45: 14. Instituto Escolhas. 2016. Quanto custa reflorestar 12 milhões de hectares na Amazônia e Mata Atlântica? Instituto Escolhas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Laestadius, L., S. Maginnis, S. Minnemeyer, P. Potapov, C. Saint-Laurent, and N. Sizer. 2012. Mapping opportunities for forest landscape restoration. Unasylva 62: 47-48. Adams, C., S. Rodrigues, M. Calmon, and C. Kumar. 2016. Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: What we know and do not know. Biotropica 48: 731-744. Lewis, S. L., D. P. Edwards, and D. Galbraith. 2015. Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science 349: 827-832. Lu, X., R. Z. Zang, Y. Ding, and J. H. Huang. 2016. Changes in biotic and abiotic drivers of seedling species composition during forest recovery following shifting cultivation on Hainan Island, China. Biotropica 48: 758-769. Chazdon, R. L., P. H. Brancalion, D. Lamb, L. Laestadius, M. Calmon, and C. Kumar. 2015. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conserv. Lett. (in press). doi: 10.1111/conl.12220. Shono, K., E. A. Cadaweng, and P. B. Durst. 2007. Application of assisted natural regeneration to restore degraded tropical forestlands. Restor. Ecol. 15: 620-626. Harvey, C. A., O. Komar, R. Chazdon, B. G. Ferguson, B. Finegan, D. M. Griffith,... L. Soto-Pinto. 2008. Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conserv. Biol. 22: 8-15. Zahawi, R. A., J. L. Reid, and K. 2009; 41 2015; 5 2010; 107 2010 2015; 50 2015; 55 2007 2004 2015; 349 2008; 320 2014; 45 2014; 22 2007; 15 2015; 23 2010; 20 2014; 5 2016b; 48 2016; 2 2013; 32 2016; 43 2016 2015 2008; 22 2014 2013; 110 2013 2005; 15 2011; 261 2016; 48 2016a; 113 2016; 25 2016; 46 2009; 325 2012; 62 2016; 22 e_1_2_8_24_1 Instituto Escolhas (e_1_2_8_26_1) 2016 IUCN and WRI (e_1_2_8_27_1) 2014 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_43_1 Strassburg B. N. (e_1_2_8_49_1) 2016; 48 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_45_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_38_1 Nawir A. A. (e_1_2_8_41_1) 2016 SER (e_1_2_8_47_1) 2004 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_55_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 Lamb D. (e_1_2_8_29_1) 2007 e_1_2_8_34_1 MMA (Ministério De Meio Ambiente) (e_1_2_8_39_1) 2013 Laestadius L. (e_1_2_8_28_1) 2012; 62 e_1_2_8_51_1 Chazdon R. L. (e_1_2_8_13_1) 2016; 48 e_1_2_8_30_1 Verdone M. (e_1_2_8_54_1) 2015 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_46_1 e_1_2_8_48_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 Verdone M. (e_1_2_8_53_1) 2014; 45 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_42_1 Maginnis S. (e_1_2_8_36_1) 2005; 15 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_44_1 e_1_2_8_40_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 e_1_2_8_37_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_56_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 e_1_2_8_33_1 e_1_2_8_52_1 e_1_2_8_50_1 |
References_xml | – reference: Gregorio, N., J. Herbohn, S. Harrison, A. Pasa, and A. Ferraren. 2016. Regulating the quality of seedlings for forest restoration: Lessons from the National Greening Program in the Philippines. Small-scale For. (in press) doi:10.1007/s11842-016-9344-z. – reference: Mukul, S. A., J. Herbohn, and J. Firn. 2016. Co-benefits of biodiversity and carbon sequestration from regenerating secondary forests in the Philippines uplands: Implications for forest landscape restoration. Biotropica 48: 882-889. – reference: Zahawi, R. A., J. L. Reid, and K. D. Holl. 2014. Hidden costs of passive restoration. Restor. Ecol. 22: 284-287. – reference: Locatelli, B., C. P. Catterall, P. Imbach, C. Kumar, R. Lasco, E. Marín-Spiotta,... M. Uriarte. 2015. Tropical reforestation and climate change: Beyond carbon. Restor. Ecol. 23: 337-343. – reference: Instituto Escolhas. 2016. Quanto custa reflorestar 12 milhões de hectares na Amazônia e Mata Atlântica? Instituto Escolhas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. – reference: Lewis, S. L., D. P. Edwards, and D. Galbraith. 2015. Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science 349: 827-832. – reference: Chazdon, R. L., and M. R. Guariguata. 2016. Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: Prospects and challenges. Biotropica 48: 844-855. – reference: Lu, X., R. Z. Zang, Y. Ding, and J. H. Huang. 2016. Changes in biotic and abiotic drivers of seedling species composition during forest recovery following shifting cultivation on Hainan Island, China. Biotropica 48: 758-769. – reference: Guariguata, M. R., and P. H. Brancalion. 2014. Current challenges and perspectives for governing forest restoration. Forests 5: 3022-3030. – reference: Elliott, S.. 2016. The potential for automating assisted natural regeneration of tropical forest ecosystems. Biotropica 48: 825-833. – reference: Chazdon, R. L., C. A. Harvey, O. Komar, D. M. Griffith, B. G. Ferguson, M. Martínez-Ramos, and S. M. Philpott. 2009. Beyond reserves: A research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 41: 142-153. – reference: De Souza, S. E. X. F., E. Vidal, G. D. F. Chagas, A. T. Elgar, and P. H. S. Brancalion. 2016. Ecological outcomes and livelihood benefits of community-managed agroforests and second-growth forests in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica 48: 868-881. – reference: Laestadius, L., S. Maginnis, S. Minnemeyer, P. Potapov, C. Saint-Laurent, and N. Sizer. 2012. Mapping opportunities for forest landscape restoration. Unasylva 62: 47-48. – reference: Uriarte, M., N. B. Schwartz, J. S. Powers, E. Marin-Spiotta, W. Liao, and L. Werden. 2016. Impacts of climate variability on tree demography in second-growth tropical forests: The importance of regional context for predicting successional trajectories. Biotropica 48: 731-744. – reference: Chazdon, R. L. 2014. Second growth: The promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. – reference: Verdone, M.. 2014. Economic impacts of FLR. Arborvitae 45: 14. – reference: Chazdon, R. L. 2008. Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320: 1458-1460. – reference: Martínez-Ramos, M., A. Pingarroni, J. Rodríguez-Velázquez, L. Toledo Chelala, I. Zermeño-Hernández, and F. Bongers. 2016b. Natural forest regeneration and ecological restoration in human modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 48: 745-757. – reference: SER. 2004. The SER international primer on ecological restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group & Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, Arizona. – reference: Sayer, J., T. Sunderland, J. Ghazoul, J.-L. Pfund, D. Sheil, E. Meijaard, and C. Garcia. 2013. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110: 8349-8356. – reference: Holl, K. D., and T. M. Aide. 2011. When and where to actively restore ecosystems? For. Ecol. Manage. 261: 1558-1563. – reference: Cole, R. J., K. D. Holl, and R. A. Zahawi. 2010. Seed rain under tree islands planted to restore degraded lands in a tropical agricultural landscape. Ecol. Appl. 20: 1255-1269. – reference: Catterall, C. P.. 2016. Roles of non-native species in large-scale regeneration of moist tropical forests on anthropogenic grassland. Biotropica 48: 809-824. – reference: Harvey, C. A., O. Komar, R. Chazdon, B. G. Ferguson, B. Finegan, D. M. Griffith,... L. Soto-Pinto. 2008. Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conserv. Biol. 22: 8-15. – reference: Weston, P., R. Hong, C. Kaboré, and C. A. Kull. 2015. Farmer-managed natural regeneration enhances rural livelihoods in dryland west Africa. Environ. Manage. 55: 1402-1417. – reference: Latawiec, A. E., R. Crouzeilles, P. H. S. Brancalion, R. R. Rodrigues, J. B. B. Sansevero, J. S. Dos Santos,... B. B. N. Strassburg. 2016. Natural regeneration and biodiversity: A global meta-analysis and implications for spatial planning. Biotropica 46: 844-855. – reference: Reed, J., J. Van Vianen, E. L. Deakin, J. Barlow, and T. Sunderland. 2016. Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: Learning from the past to guide the future. Glob. Change Biol. 22: 2540-2554. – reference: Houghton, R., B. Byers, and A. A. Nassikas. 2015. A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5: 1022-1023. – reference: Brancalion, P., D. Schweizer, U. Gaudare, J. Mangueira, F. Lamonato, F. Farah,... R. Rodrigues. 2016. Balancing economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: The case of Brazil. Biotropica 48: 856-867. – reference: Adams, C., S. Rodrigues, M. Calmon, and C. Kumar. 2016. Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: What we know and do not know. Biotropica 48: 731-744. – reference: Urzedo, D., E. Vidal, E. Sills, F. Pina-Rodrigues, and R. Junqueira. 2016. Tropical forest seeds in the household economy: Effects of market participation among three sociocultural groups in the Upper Xingu region of the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Conserv. 43: 13-23. – reference: Verdone, M. 2015. A cost-benefit framework for analyzing forest landscape restoration decisions. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland. – reference: Chazdon, R. L., E. N. Broadbent, D. M. A. Rozendaal, F. Bongers, A. M. A. Zambrano, T. M. Aide, and L. Poorter. 2016. Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics. Sci. Adv. 2: e1501639. – reference: Bechara, F. C., S. J. Dickens, E. C. Farrer, L. Larios, E. N. Spotswood, P. Mariotte, and K. N. Suding. 2016. Neotropical rainforest restoration: Comparing passive, plantation and nucleation approaches. Biodivers. Conserv. 25: 2021. doi:10.1007/s10531-016-1186-7. – reference: Strassburg, B. N., F. S. M. Barros, R. Couzeilles, A. Iribarrem, J. S. Santos, D. Silva,... A. Latawiec. 2016. The role of natural regeneration to ecosystem services provision and habitat availability: A case study in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica Special Issue 48: 890-899. – reference: Brancalion, P. H., R. A. Viani, M. Calmon, H. Carrascosa, and R. R. Rodrigues. 2013. How to organize a large-scale ecological restoration program? The framework developed by the Atlantic Forest restoration pact in Brazil J. Sustain. For. 32: 728-744. – reference: Hall, J. S., M. S. Ashton, E. J. Garen, and S. Jose. 2011. The ecology and ecosystem services of native trees: Implications for reforestation and land restoration in Mesoamerica. For. Ecol. Manage. 261: 1553-1557. – reference: Martínez-Ramos, M., I. A. Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. Piñero, R. Dirzo, and J. Sarukhán. 2016a. Anthropogenic disturbances jeopardize biodiversity conservation within tropical rainforest reserves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113: 5323-5328. – reference: Lazos, E., J. Zinda, A. Bennet-Curry, P. Balvanera, G. Bloomfield, C. A. Lindell, and C. Negra. 2016. Stakeholders and tropical reforestation: Challenges, tradeoffs, and strategies in dynamic environments. Biotropica 48: 900-914. – reference: Uriarte, M., and R. L. Chazdon. 2016. Incorporating natural regeneration in forest landscape restoration in tropical regions: Synthesis and key research gaps. Biotropica 48: 915-924. – reference: Gilman, A., S. Letcher, R. M. Fincher, A. Perez, T. Madell, A. Finkelstein, and F. Corrales-Araya. 2016. Recovery of floristic diversity and basal area in natural forest regeneration and planted plots in a Costa Rican wet forest. Biotropica 48: 798-808. – reference: Chazdon, R. L., P. H. Brancalion, D. Lamb, L. Laestadius, M. Calmon, and C. Kumar. 2015. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conserv. Lett. (in press). doi: 10.1111/conl.12220. – reference: MMA (Ministério De Meio Ambiente). 2013. Plano nacional de recuperação da vegetação nativa, Versão Preliminar. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas, Departamento de Conservação da Biodiversidade, Brasilia. – reference: Reij, C., and D. Garrity. 2016. Scaling up farmer-managed natural regeneration in Africa to restore degraded landscapes. Biotropica 48: 834-843. – reference: Shono, K., E. A. Cadaweng, and P. B. Durst. 2007. Application of assisted natural regeneration to restore degraded tropical forestlands. Restor. Ecol. 15: 620-626. – reference: Evans, M. C., J. Carwardine, R. J. Fensham, D. W. Butler, K. A. Wilson, H. P. Possingham, and T. G. Martin. 2015. Carbon farming via assisted natural regeneration as a cost-effective mechanism for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Environ. Sci. Policy 50: 114-129. – reference: Lamb, D. 2014. Large-scale forest restoration. Routledge, London. – reference: Maginnis, S., and W. Jackson. 2005. Balancing restoration and development. ITTO Trop. For. Update 15: 4-6. – reference: Rey Benayas, J., A. Newton, A. Diaz, and J. Bullock. 2009. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325: 1121-1124. – reference: Omeja, P. A. O., M. J. Lawes, A. Corriveau, K. V. Valenta, D. Sarkar, F. P. Paim, and C. A. C. Chapman. 2016. Recovery of tree and mammal communities during large-scale forest regeneration in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Biotropica 48: 770-779. – reference: IUCN and WRI. 2014. A guide to the restoration opportunities assessment methodology (ROAM): Assessing forest landscape restoration opportunities at the national or sub-national level. Working Paper (Road-test edition). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. – volume: 48 start-page: 731 year: 2016 end-page: 744 article-title: Impacts of large‐scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: What we know and do not know publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 23 start-page: 337 year: 2015 end-page: 343 article-title: Tropical reforestation and climate change: Beyond carbon publication-title: Restor. Ecol. – volume: 48 start-page: 731 year: 2016 end-page: 744 article-title: Impacts of climate variability on tree demography in second‐growth tropical forests: The importance of regional context for predicting successional trajectories publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 110 start-page: 8349 year: 2013 end-page: 8356 article-title: Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses publication-title: Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA – start-page: 71 year: 2007 end-page: 82 – volume: 46 start-page: 844 year: 2016 end-page: 855 article-title: Natural regeneration and biodiversity: A global meta‐analysis and implications for spatial planning publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 261 start-page: 1558 year: 2011 end-page: 1563 article-title: When and where to actively restore ecosystems? publication-title: For. Ecol. Manage. – start-page: 53 year: 2016 end-page: 78 – volume: 62 start-page: 47 year: 2012 end-page: 48 article-title: Mapping opportunities for forest landscape restoration publication-title: Unasylva – year: 2014 – volume: 15 start-page: 4 year: 2005 end-page: 6 article-title: Balancing restoration and development publication-title: ITTO Trop. For. Update – volume: 45 start-page: 14 year: 2014 article-title: Economic impacts of FLR publication-title: Arborvitae – volume: 55 start-page: 1402 year: 2015 end-page: 1417 article-title: Farmer‐managed natural regeneration enhances rural livelihoods in dryland west Africa publication-title: Environ. Manage. – volume: 48 start-page: 915 year: 2016 end-page: 924 article-title: Incorporating natural regeneration in forest landscape restoration in tropical regions: Synthesis and key research gaps publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 22 start-page: 284 year: 2014 end-page: 287 article-title: Hidden costs of passive restoration publication-title: Restor. Ecol. – volume: 25 start-page: 2021 year: 2016 article-title: Neotropical rainforest restoration: Comparing passive, plantation and nucleation approaches publication-title: Biodivers. Conserv. – volume: 48 start-page: 825 year: 2016 end-page: 833 article-title: The potential for automating assisted natural regeneration of tropical forest ecosystems publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 15 start-page: 620 year: 2007 end-page: 626 article-title: Application of assisted natural regeneration to restore degraded tropical forestlands publication-title: Restor. Ecol. – year: 2015 article-title: A policy‐driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration publication-title: Conserv. Lett. – year: 2004 – volume: 48 start-page: 758 year: 2016 end-page: 769 article-title: Changes in biotic and abiotic drivers of seedling species composition during forest recovery following shifting cultivation on Hainan Island, China publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 113 start-page: 5323 year: 2016a end-page: 5328 article-title: Anthropogenic disturbances jeopardize biodiversity conservation within tropical rainforest reserves publication-title: Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA – volume: 48 start-page: 770 year: 2016 end-page: 779 article-title: Recovery of tree and mammal communities during large‐scale forest regeneration in Kibale National Park, Uganda publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 325 start-page: 1121 year: 2009 end-page: 1124 article-title: Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta‐analysis publication-title: Science – volume: 48 start-page: 868 year: 2016 end-page: 881 article-title: Ecological outcomes and livelihood benefits of community‐managed agroforests and second‐growth forests in Southeast Brazil publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 48 start-page: 745 year: 2016b end-page: 757 article-title: Natural forest regeneration and ecological restoration in human modified tropical landscapes publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 48 start-page: 856 year: 2016 end-page: 867 article-title: Balancing economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: The case of Brazil publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 48 start-page: 882 year: 2016 end-page: 889 article-title: Co‐benefits of biodiversity and carbon sequestration from regenerating secondary forests in the Philippines uplands: Implications for forest landscape restoration publication-title: Biotropica – year: 2015 – volume: 50 start-page: 114 year: 2015 end-page: 129 article-title: Carbon farming via assisted natural regeneration as a cost‐effective mechanism for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes publication-title: Environ. Sci. Policy – volume: 48 start-page: 834 year: 2016 end-page: 843 article-title: Scaling up farmer‐managed natural regeneration in Africa to restore degraded landscapes publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 349 start-page: 827 year: 2015 end-page: 832 article-title: Increasing human dominance of tropical forests publication-title: Science – volume: 5 start-page: 3022 year: 2014 end-page: 3030 article-title: Current challenges and perspectives for governing forest restoration publication-title: Forests – volume: 41 start-page: 142 year: 2009 end-page: 153 article-title: Beyond reserves: A research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human‐modified tropical landscapes publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 48 start-page: 844 year: 2016 end-page: 855 article-title: Natural regeneration as a tool for large‐scale forest restoration in the tropics: Prospects and challenges publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 261 start-page: 1553 year: 2011 end-page: 1557 article-title: The ecology and ecosystem services of native trees: Implications for reforestation and land restoration in Mesoamerica publication-title: For. Ecol. Manage. – volume: 320 start-page: 1458 year: 2008 end-page: 1460 article-title: Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands publication-title: Science – volume: 20 start-page: 1255 year: 2010 end-page: 1269 article-title: Seed rain under tree islands planted to restore degraded lands in a tropical agricultural landscape publication-title: Ecol. Appl. – volume: 5 start-page: 1022 year: 2015 end-page: 1023 article-title: A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2 publication-title: Nat. Clim. Chang. – volume: 32 start-page: 728 year: 2013 end-page: 744 article-title: How to organize a large‐scale ecological restoration program? The framework developed by the Atlantic Forest restoration pact in Brazil publication-title: J. Sustain. For. – year: 2016 – volume: 48 start-page: 900 year: 2016 end-page: 914 article-title: Stakeholders and tropical reforestation: Challenges, tradeoffs, and strategies in dynamic environments publication-title: Biotropica – year: 2010 – volume: 2 start-page: e1501639 year: 2016 article-title: Carbon sequestration potential of second‐growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics publication-title: Sci. Adv. – volume: 48 start-page: 809 year: 2016 end-page: 824 article-title: Roles of non‐native species in large‐scale regeneration of moist tropical forests on anthropogenic grassland publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 22 start-page: 2540 year: 2016 end-page: 2554 article-title: Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: Learning from the past to guide the future publication-title: Glob. Change Biol. – volume: 48 start-page: 798 year: 2016 end-page: 808 article-title: Recovery of floristic diversity and basal area in natural forest regeneration and planted plots in a Costa Rican wet forest publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 107 start-page: 21925 year: 2010 end-page: 21930 – volume: 48 start-page: 890 year: 2016 end-page: 899 article-title: The role of natural regeneration to ecosystem services provision and habitat availability: A case study in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest publication-title: Biotropica Special Issue – volume: 22 start-page: 8 year: 2008 end-page: 15 article-title: Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot publication-title: Conserv. Biol. – year: 2016 article-title: Regulating the quality of seedlings for forest restoration: Lessons from the National Greening Program in the Philippines publication-title: Small‐scale For. – volume: 43 start-page: 13 year: 2016 end-page: 23 article-title: Tropical forest seeds in the household economy: Effects of market participation among three sociocultural groups in the Upper Xingu region of the Brazilian Amazon publication-title: Environ. Conserv. – year: 2013 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003369107 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.003 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12384 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.011 – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12361 – start-page: 53 volume-title: Forest landscape restoration for Asia‐Pacific forests year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_8_41_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.1111/rec.12209 – ident: e_1_2_8_43_1 doi: 10.1111/gcb.13284 – volume: 62 start-page: 47 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 article-title: Mapping opportunities for forest landscape restoration publication-title: Unasylva – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12386 – ident: e_1_2_8_37_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602893113 – ident: e_1_2_8_55_1 doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0469-1 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12391 – ident: e_1_2_8_40_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12389 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.004 – volume-title: A guide to the restoration opportunities assessment methodology (ROAM): Assessing forest landscape restoration opportunities at the national or sub‐national level year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1007/s11842‐016‐9344‐z – volume-title: The SER international primer on ecological restoration year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_8_47_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1080/10549811.2013.817339 – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.4324/9780203071649 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1890/09-0714.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12388 – volume: 45 start-page: 14 year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_8_53_1 article-title: Economic impacts of FLR publication-title: Arborvitae – volume: 48 start-page: 890 year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_8_49_1 article-title: The role of natural regeneration to ecosystem services provision and habitat availability: A case study in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest publication-title: Biotropica Special Issue – volume: 15 start-page: 4 year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 article-title: Balancing restoration and development publication-title: ITTO Trop. For. Update – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12385 – ident: e_1_2_8_44_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12390 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12383 – volume-title: Quanto custa reflorestar 12 milhões de hectares na Amazônia e Mata Atlântica? year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226118109.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501639 – ident: e_1_2_8_48_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00274.x – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12387 – start-page: 71 volume-title: The forest landscape restoration handbook year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1038/nclimate2869 – volume-title: A cost‐benefit framework for analyzing forest landscape restoration decisions year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_8_54_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_45_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1172460 – ident: e_1_2_8_52_1 doi: 10.1017/S0376892915000247 – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00863.x – volume-title: Plano nacional de recuperação da vegetação nativa, Versão Preliminar year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_8_39_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00471.x – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12392 – ident: e_1_2_8_46_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210595110 – ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9932 – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.3390/f5123022 – ident: e_1_2_8_56_1 doi: 10.1111/rec.12098 – ident: e_1_2_8_51_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12380 – volume: 48 start-page: 844 year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 article-title: Natural regeneration as a tool for large‐scale forest restoration in the tropics: Prospects and challenges publication-title: Biotropica – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_38_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12382 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1007/s10531‐016‐1186‐7 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.1111/conl.12220 – ident: e_1_2_8_50_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12411 – ident: e_1_2_8_42_1 doi: 10.1111/btp.12360 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1155365 |
SSID | ssj0009504 |
Score | 2.5083025 |
Snippet | Large-scale and long-term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics.... Large‐scale and long‐term restoration efforts are urgently needed to reverse historical global trends of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics.... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wiley jstor istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 709 |
SubjectTerms | Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate effects Deforestation Economics Ecosystem integrity ecosystem services Environmental restoration farms financial economics Food security forest and landscape restoration forest damage Forest degradation forest restoration forests human development humans INTRODUCTION Land use Landscape landscape management landscapes livelihood mosaic restoration mosaico de restauração natural regeneration people planting regeneración natural espontanea regeneração natural espontânea restauración de mosaícos restauración forestal a escala de paisaje restauração em larga escala restauração florestal e em paisagens florestais servicios ecosistémicos serviços ecossistêmicos soil spontaneous natural regeneration sustainable land use Tree planting trees Tropical environments tropics uso sustentable del paisaje uso sustentável da terra Water resources wide-scale restoration |
Title | Natural regeneration in the context of large-scale forest and landscape restoration in the tropics |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-FDBTPD6K-V/fulltext.pdf https://www.jstor.org/stable/48576570 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fbtp.12409 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1844751777 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1850778274 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2000419811 |
Volume | 48 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fa9RAEB5KpeCL1dZibC2rFPElR5Lb7Db4pG3PUulRpNU-CEs2uyulJXfkcmB98k_wb_QvcWbzgztpQXwLZBJ2d3Yy39598w3AnkZUXmip0QMuDXlqRIhJOAsT6wymu8wkvur9dCyOL_jJZXq5Am-7WphGH6L_wY0iw3-vKcBzPVsIcl1PB5icfPEecbUIEH1KFgR3o0aBmbhdiNJbVSFi8fRPLuWiB7Ss3zta4hLgXIStPu-M1uFrN-KGbnI9mNd6UPz4S8zxP6f0GB61eJS9azbQE1ix5QasNR0qb_HqyKta326CGedeooNV9puXqiaPsquSIYJkRHjHrzybOHZD1PLfP3_N0PmWISTGubG8NMwXFRPdilW-m83SC-pqMr0qZk_hYnR0fnActi0awoKUA8PMRkNr9_HQZjJnRGqGmR7G2slCxkVsEx0JHXGXF07HIuJWpLHmEkGaTB2nFhNbsFpOSvsMmJe9kQnPnbGYMUmKCx80SeY1-EUSwJvOWapo9cupjcaN6s4xuHzKL18Ar3rTaSPacZfRa-_x3iKvronlJlP1ZfxBjQ7fn58dio_qcwBbfkv0hhwHRIyhAHa6PaLayJ8pPDHTBKWUAbzsb2PM0h8xeWknc7JBFI7QTPL7baiEisfZfhzjxP2muX8qCofqL57_u-k2PETsJ5qyyh1Yrau5fYH4qta7PpD-AAaXHz8 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fa9RAEB9Ki-hL679i2qqriPiSI8ltsg34ol7P07aHyFX7Iks2u1tKS-7I5aD1yY_gZ_STOLP5w51YEN8CmYSdnZ3MbzczvwF4oRCV50ootICNfR7rxMcgnPqRsRrDXaojV_V-PE5GJ_zjaXy6Bq_bWpiaH6I7cCPPcN9rcnA6kF7yclXNehidqHpvgzp6U_-CwedoiXI3qDmYKbsLcXrDK0R5PN2jK9Fogyb2qk1MXIGcy8DVRZ7hFnxrx1wnnFz0FpXq5d__oHP8X6XuwmYDSdmbeg3dgzVT3IdbdZPKa7w6cMTW1w9AjzPH0sFKc-bYqsmo7LxgCCIZ5bzjh55NLbuk7PJfP37O0f6GISpG5VhWaObqiinjipWuoc3KC6pyOjvP5w_hZHgweTfymy4Nfk7kgX5qgr4x-7hv06nVSaz7qeqHyopchHloIhUkKuA2y60Kk4AbtJTiAnGaiC2nLhPbsF5MC_MImGO-ERHPrDYYNImNCx_UUepo-JPIg1ettWTeUJhTJ41L2W5lcPqkmz4Pnneis5q3429CL53JO4msvKBENxHLr-P3cjh4O_k0SA7lFw-23ZroBDkOiJKGPNhrF4lsnH8ucdNMCgohPHjW3Ua3pX8xWWGmC5JBII7oTPCbZaiKiofpfhii4m7V3KyKxKG6i51_F30Kt0eT4yN59GF8uAt3EAomdZXlHqxX5cI8RrhVqSfOq34D4fgjWQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fa9RAEB9Ki-KL9V8xtuoqIr7kSHKb3Qaf1OtZrR5FWu1DYclmd6W05I5cDqxPfgQ_o5_Emc0f7sSC-BbIbNjZ2cn8Npn5DcAzjai80FKjBVwa8tSIEINwFibWGQx3mUl81fvHidg_5u9P0pM1eNnVwjT8EP0HN_IM_74mB58Zt-Tkup4NMDhR8d4GF-gshIg-JUuMu1FDwUzJXQjTW1ohSuPph64Eow1a129dXuIK4lzGrT7wjDfhtJtyk29yPljUelB8_4PN8T91ugU3W0DKXjU76Das2fIOXGtaVF7i1Z6ntb68C2aSe44OVtmvnquaTMrOSoYQklHGO77m2dSxC8ot__Xj5xytbxliYtSN5aVhvqqY8q1Y5dvZrDygrqazs2J-D47He0dv9sO2R0NYEHVgmNloaO0untpM5oxIzTDTw1g7Wci4iG2iI6Ej7vLC6VhE3Io01lwiSpOp49RjYgvWy2lp7wPzvDcy4bkzFkMmcXHhQJNknoRfJAG86IylipbAnPpoXKjuIIPLp_zyBfC0F501rB1_E3ruLd5L5NU5pbnJVH2ZvFXj0eujw5E4UJ8D2PJbohfkOCFKGQpgp9sjqnX9ucIjMykopQzgSX8bnZb-xOSlnS5IBmE4YjPJr5ahGioeZ7txjIr7TXO1Kgqn6i8e_LvoY7h-OBqrD-8mB9twA3GgaEosd2C9rhb2IWKtWj_yPvUbepUiEQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural+regeneration+in+the+context+of+large-scale+forest+and+landscape+restoration+in+the+tropics&rft.jtitle=Biotropica&rft.au=Chazdon%2C+Robin+L&rft.au=Uriarte%2C+Mar%C3%ADa&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=0006-3606&rft.eissn=1744-7429&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=709&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fbtp.12409&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=4265725381 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0006-3606&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0006-3606&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0006-3606&client=summon |