The Impact of Individuals’ Social Environments on Contact Tracing App Use: Survey Study
The German Corona-Warn-App (CWA) is a contact tracing app to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. As of today, it has been downloaded approximately 45 million times. This study aims to investigate the influence of (non)users' social environments on the usage of the CWA during 2 periods with relat...
Saved in:
Published in | JMIR human factors Vol. 10; p. e45825 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Canada
JMIR Publications
31.05.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The German Corona-Warn-App (CWA) is a contact tracing app to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. As of today, it has been downloaded approximately 45 million times.
This study aims to investigate the influence of (non)users' social environments on the usage of the CWA during 2 periods with relatively lower death rates and higher death rates caused by SARS-CoV-2.
We conducted a longitudinal survey study in Germany with 833 participants in 2 waves to investigate how participants perceive their peer groups' opinion about making use of the German CWA to mitigate the risk of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, we asked whether this perceived opinion, in turn, influences the participants with respect to their own decision to use the CWA. We analyzed these questions with generalized estimating equations. Further, 2 related sample tests were performed to test for differences between users of the CWA and nonusers and between the 2 points in time (wave 1 with the highest death rates observable during the pandemic in Germany versus wave 2 with significantly lower death rates).
Participants perceived that peer groups have a positive opinion toward using the CWA, with more positive opinions by the media, family doctors, politicians, and virologists/Robert Koch Institute and a lower, only slightly negative opinion originating from social media. Users of the CWA perceived their peer groups' opinions about using the app as more positive than nonusers do. Furthermore, the perceived positive opinion of the media (P=.001) and politicians (P<.001) was significantly lower in wave 2 compared with that in wave 1. The perceived opinion of friends and family (P<.001) as well as their perceived influence (P=.02) among nonusers toward using the CWA was significantly higher in the latter period compared with that in wave 1. The influence of virologists (in Germany primarily communicated via the Robert Koch Institute) had the highest positive effect on using the CWA (B=0.363, P<.001). We only found 1 decreasing effect of the influence of politicians (B=-0.098, P=.04).
Opinions of peer groups play an important role when it comes to the adoption of the CWA. Our results show that the influence of virologists/Robert Koch Institute and family/friends exerts the strongest effect on participants' decisions to use the CWA while politicians had a slightly negative influence. Our results also indicate that it is crucial to accompany the introduction of such a contact tracing app with explanations and a media campaign to support its adoption that is backed up by political decision makers and subject matter experts. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The German Corona-Warn-App (CWA) is a contact tracing app to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. As of today, it has been downloaded approximately 45 million times.BACKGROUNDThe German Corona-Warn-App (CWA) is a contact tracing app to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. As of today, it has been downloaded approximately 45 million times.This study aims to investigate the influence of (non)users' social environments on the usage of the CWA during 2 periods with relatively lower death rates and higher death rates caused by SARS-CoV-2.OBJECTIVEThis study aims to investigate the influence of (non)users' social environments on the usage of the CWA during 2 periods with relatively lower death rates and higher death rates caused by SARS-CoV-2.We conducted a longitudinal survey study in Germany with 833 participants in 2 waves to investigate how participants perceive their peer groups' opinion about making use of the German CWA to mitigate the risk of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, we asked whether this perceived opinion, in turn, influences the participants with respect to their own decision to use the CWA. We analyzed these questions with generalized estimating equations. Further, 2 related sample tests were performed to test for differences between users of the CWA and nonusers and between the 2 points in time (wave 1 with the highest death rates observable during the pandemic in Germany versus wave 2 with significantly lower death rates).METHODSWe conducted a longitudinal survey study in Germany with 833 participants in 2 waves to investigate how participants perceive their peer groups' opinion about making use of the German CWA to mitigate the risk of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, we asked whether this perceived opinion, in turn, influences the participants with respect to their own decision to use the CWA. We analyzed these questions with generalized estimating equations. Further, 2 related sample tests were performed to test for differences between users of the CWA and nonusers and between the 2 points in time (wave 1 with the highest death rates observable during the pandemic in Germany versus wave 2 with significantly lower death rates).Participants perceived that peer groups have a positive opinion toward using the CWA, with more positive opinions by the media, family doctors, politicians, and virologists/Robert Koch Institute and a lower, only slightly negative opinion originating from social media. Users of the CWA perceived their peer groups' opinions about using the app as more positive than nonusers do. Furthermore, the perceived positive opinion of the media (P=.001) and politicians (P<.001) was significantly lower in wave 2 compared with that in wave 1. The perceived opinion of friends and family (P<.001) as well as their perceived influence (P=.02) among nonusers toward using the CWA was significantly higher in the latter period compared with that in wave 1. The influence of virologists (in Germany primarily communicated via the Robert Koch Institute) had the highest positive effect on using the CWA (B=0.363, P<.001). We only found 1 decreasing effect of the influence of politicians (B=-0.098, P=.04).RESULTSParticipants perceived that peer groups have a positive opinion toward using the CWA, with more positive opinions by the media, family doctors, politicians, and virologists/Robert Koch Institute and a lower, only slightly negative opinion originating from social media. Users of the CWA perceived their peer groups' opinions about using the app as more positive than nonusers do. Furthermore, the perceived positive opinion of the media (P=.001) and politicians (P<.001) was significantly lower in wave 2 compared with that in wave 1. The perceived opinion of friends and family (P<.001) as well as their perceived influence (P=.02) among nonusers toward using the CWA was significantly higher in the latter period compared with that in wave 1. The influence of virologists (in Germany primarily communicated via the Robert Koch Institute) had the highest positive effect on using the CWA (B=0.363, P<.001). We only found 1 decreasing effect of the influence of politicians (B=-0.098, P=.04).Opinions of peer groups play an important role when it comes to the adoption of the CWA. Our results show that the influence of virologists/Robert Koch Institute and family/friends exerts the strongest effect on participants' decisions to use the CWA while politicians had a slightly negative influence. Our results also indicate that it is crucial to accompany the introduction of such a contact tracing app with explanations and a media campaign to support its adoption that is backed up by political decision makers and subject matter experts.CONCLUSIONSOpinions of peer groups play an important role when it comes to the adoption of the CWA. Our results show that the influence of virologists/Robert Koch Institute and family/friends exerts the strongest effect on participants' decisions to use the CWA while politicians had a slightly negative influence. Our results also indicate that it is crucial to accompany the introduction of such a contact tracing app with explanations and a media campaign to support its adoption that is backed up by political decision makers and subject matter experts. BackgroundThe German Corona-Warn-App (CWA) is a contact tracing app to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. As of today, it has been downloaded approximately 45 million times. ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate the influence of (non)users’ social environments on the usage of the CWA during 2 periods with relatively lower death rates and higher death rates caused by SARS-CoV-2. MethodsWe conducted a longitudinal survey study in Germany with 833 participants in 2 waves to investigate how participants perceive their peer groups’ opinion about making use of the German CWA to mitigate the risk of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, we asked whether this perceived opinion, in turn, influences the participants with respect to their own decision to use the CWA. We analyzed these questions with generalized estimating equations. Further, 2 related sample tests were performed to test for differences between users of the CWA and nonusers and between the 2 points in time (wave 1 with the highest death rates observable during the pandemic in Germany versus wave 2 with significantly lower death rates). ResultsParticipants perceived that peer groups have a positive opinion toward using the CWA, with more positive opinions by the media, family doctors, politicians, and virologists/Robert Koch Institute and a lower, only slightly negative opinion originating from social media. Users of the CWA perceived their peer groups’ opinions about using the app as more positive than nonusers do. Furthermore, the perceived positive opinion of the media (P=.001) and politicians (P<.001) was significantly lower in wave 2 compared with that in wave 1. The perceived opinion of friends and family (P<.001) as well as their perceived influence (P=.02) among nonusers toward using the CWA was significantly higher in the latter period compared with that in wave 1. The influence of virologists (in Germany primarily communicated via the Robert Koch Institute) had the highest positive effect on using the CWA (B=0.363, P<.001). We only found 1 decreasing effect of the influence of politicians (B=–0.098, P=.04). ConclusionsOpinions of peer groups play an important role when it comes to the adoption of the CWA. Our results show that the influence of virologists/Robert Koch Institute and family/friends exerts the strongest effect on participants’ decisions to use the CWA while politicians had a slightly negative influence. Our results also indicate that it is crucial to accompany the introduction of such a contact tracing app with explanations and a media campaign to support its adoption that is backed up by political decision makers and subject matter experts. The German Corona-Warn-App (CWA) is a contact tracing app to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. As of today, it has been downloaded approximately 45 million times. This study aims to investigate the influence of (non)users' social environments on the usage of the CWA during 2 periods with relatively lower death rates and higher death rates caused by SARS-CoV-2. We conducted a longitudinal survey study in Germany with 833 participants in 2 waves to investigate how participants perceive their peer groups' opinion about making use of the German CWA to mitigate the risk of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, we asked whether this perceived opinion, in turn, influences the participants with respect to their own decision to use the CWA. We analyzed these questions with generalized estimating equations. Further, 2 related sample tests were performed to test for differences between users of the CWA and nonusers and between the 2 points in time (wave 1 with the highest death rates observable during the pandemic in Germany versus wave 2 with significantly lower death rates). Participants perceived that peer groups have a positive opinion toward using the CWA, with more positive opinions by the media, family doctors, politicians, and virologists/Robert Koch Institute and a lower, only slightly negative opinion originating from social media. Users of the CWA perceived their peer groups' opinions about using the app as more positive than nonusers do. Furthermore, the perceived positive opinion of the media (P=.001) and politicians (P<.001) was significantly lower in wave 2 compared with that in wave 1. The perceived opinion of friends and family (P<.001) as well as their perceived influence (P=.02) among nonusers toward using the CWA was significantly higher in the latter period compared with that in wave 1. The influence of virologists (in Germany primarily communicated via the Robert Koch Institute) had the highest positive effect on using the CWA (B=0.363, P<.001). We only found 1 decreasing effect of the influence of politicians (B=-0.098, P=.04). Opinions of peer groups play an important role when it comes to the adoption of the CWA. Our results show that the influence of virologists/Robert Koch Institute and family/friends exerts the strongest effect on participants' decisions to use the CWA while politicians had a slightly negative influence. Our results also indicate that it is crucial to accompany the introduction of such a contact tracing app with explanations and a media campaign to support its adoption that is backed up by political decision makers and subject matter experts. Background:The German Corona-Warn-App (CWA) is a contact tracing app to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. As of today, it has been downloaded approximately 45 million times.Objective:This study aims to investigate the influence of (non)users’ social environments on the usage of the CWA during 2 periods with relatively lower death rates and higher death rates caused by SARS-CoV-2.Methods:We conducted a longitudinal survey study in Germany with 833 participants in 2 waves to investigate how participants perceive their peer groups’ opinion about making use of the German CWA to mitigate the risk of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, we asked whether this perceived opinion, in turn, influences the participants with respect to their own decision to use the CWA. We analyzed these questions with generalized estimating equations. Further, 2 related sample tests were performed to test for differences between users of the CWA and nonusers and between the 2 points in time (wave 1 with the highest death rates observable during the pandemic in Germany versus wave 2 with significantly lower death rates).Results:Participants perceived that peer groups have a positive opinion toward using the CWA, with more positive opinions by the media, family doctors, politicians, and virologists/Robert Koch Institute and a lower, only slightly negative opinion originating from social media. Users of the CWA perceived their peer groups’ opinions about using the app as more positive than nonusers do. Furthermore, the perceived positive opinion of the media (P=.001) and politicians (P<.001) was significantly lower in wave 2 compared with that in wave 1. The perceived opinion of friends and family (P<.001) as well as their perceived influence (P=.02) among nonusers toward using the CWA was significantly higher in the latter period compared with that in wave 1. The influence of virologists (in Germany primarily communicated via the Robert Koch Institute) had the highest positive effect on using the CWA (B=0.363, P<.001). We only found 1 decreasing effect of the influence of politicians (B=–0.098, P=.04).Conclusions:Opinions of peer groups play an important role when it comes to the adoption of the CWA. Our results show that the influence of virologists/Robert Koch Institute and family/friends exerts the strongest effect on participants’ decisions to use the CWA while politicians had a slightly negative influence. Our results also indicate that it is crucial to accompany the introduction of such a contact tracing app with explanations and a media campaign to support its adoption that is backed up by political decision makers and subject matter experts. |
Author | Pape, Sebastian Sadeghi, Atiyeh Harborth, David |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Chair of Mobile Business & Multilateral Security Faculty of Economics and Business Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Chair of Mobile Business & Multilateral Security Faculty of Economics and Business Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Atiyeh orcidid: 0000-0002-2012-5252 surname: Sadeghi fullname: Sadeghi, Atiyeh – sequence: 2 givenname: Sebastian orcidid: 0000-0002-0893-7856 surname: Pape fullname: Pape, Sebastian – sequence: 3 givenname: David orcidid: 0000-0001-9554-7567 surname: Harborth fullname: Harborth, David |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256683$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdkstqGzEUhkVJaS71KxRBKWTjVvcZdVOCSVpDoAs7i66E5kjjyMxIU82Mwbu-Rl-vT9JxnIakKwmdTx__kc45OokpeoRmlHxkVKtPQpZMvkJnjGk210LLk2f7UzTr-y0hhCohhRJv0CkvmFSq5Gfox_re42XbWRhwqvEyurALbrRN_-fXb7xKEGyDr-Mu5BRbH4cep4gXKQ6HC-tsIcQNvuo6fNf7z3g15p3f49Uwuv1b9LqeNH72uF6gu5vr9eLb_Pb71-Xi6nYOgrFhbhWtC68kUcoJV7oKaim1hVJZzpQHbpWuiHZaAOMKCHjhZOWIBCvh0MMFWh69Ltmt6XJobd6bZIN5OEh5Y2weAjTeaBDgXVE6sFrUBCzwWjtuK6WLUmg6ub4cXd1Ytd7B1HC2zQvpy0oM92aTdoYSxoVgZDJcPhpy-jn6fjBt6ME3jY0-jb1hJaNckILyCX3_H7pNY47TWxmmaaGI1PwQ6d3zSE9Z_n3hBHw4ApBT32dfPyGUmMN0mIfp4H8B8GarZQ |
Cites_doi | 10.3390/ijerph18031332 10.2196/19458 10.2196/mhealth.3335 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102178 10.1007/s10729-019-09490-4 10.2147/jmdh.s353594 10.1007/978-3-030-78120-0_17 10.2196/25893 10.2196/13817 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106806 10.1177/0049124120914924 10.2139/ssrn.3609516 10.1002/ejsp.621 10.1080/25741292.2020.1850404 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.026 10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.001251 10.1089/cyber.2020.0483 10.1080/0960085x.2020.1803155 10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002 10.1007/978-3-030-92075-3_23 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.12.002 10.17011/ht/urn.201811224834 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102181 10.2139/ssrn.3693783 10.1007/s10597-020-00689-2 10.1080/0960085x.2020.1784046 10.2196/25525 10.1007/s10729-019-09468-2 10.1017/xps.2020.30 10.1371/journal.pone.0245740 10.1097/cin.0000000000000442 10.2196/39570 10.1177/0049124119882480 10.1016/j.jsis.2008.01.001 10.1093/jssam/smy002 10.2196/23362 10.1111/jnu.12298 10.1093/ijpor/1.1.3 10.1108/imds-12-2020-0697 10.1186/s13584-020-00429-7 10.2307/30036540 10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100651 10.2196/20572 10.1007/978-3-031-06975-8_1 10.2196/21613 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100307 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa239 10.1007/s11628-020-00424-7 10.1093/jamia/ocaa240 10.2196/28416 10.1080/15213269.2016.1211539 10.2196/19359 10.48550/arXiv.cs/0109068 10.2196/28146 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008 10.1080/14754835.2020.1816163 10.1136/medethics-2020-106314 10.1080/10463280440000008 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t 10.3390/healthcare11040583 10.2196/26399 10.2196/19857 10.1097/fch.0000000000000177 10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3 10.1109/tem.2020.3019033 10.1007/s11845-020-02389-y |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Atiyeh Sadeghi, Sebastian Pape, David Harborth. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 31.05.2023. 2023. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Atiyeh Sadeghi, Sebastian Pape, David Harborth. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 31.05.2023. 2023 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Atiyeh Sadeghi, Sebastian Pape, David Harborth. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 31.05.2023. – notice: 2023. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Atiyeh Sadeghi, Sebastian Pape, David Harborth. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 31.05.2023. 2023 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88G 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ K9. M0S M2M PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PSYQQ Q9U 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.2196/45825 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Psychology Database (Alumni) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Publicly Available Content ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Open Access Full Text |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Open Access Full Text url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Public Health |
EISSN | 2292-9495 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_9c4ced78dca94f0cac3f9d3ab6978491 PMC10234420 37256683 10_2196_45825 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Germany |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Germany |
GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAYXX ABUWG ADBBV AFKRA AFPKN ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS ARCSS AZQEC BAWUL BCNDV BENPR CCPQU CITATION DIK DWQXO FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE KQ8 M2M M48 M~E OK1 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PSYQQ RPM UKHRP NPM 3V. 7XB 8FK K9. PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI Q9U 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a61f7e65066d4d8dbcf559ac86a326ec3a69b09d94c236c0ce4d5bd05ca5c6683 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2292-9495 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 00:45:27 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:36:59 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 16:53:01 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 14:39:02 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:08:35 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:17:50 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | COVID-19 corona warning app social influence Corona-Warn-App contact tracing app usage |
Language | English |
License | Atiyeh Sadeghi, Sebastian Pape, David Harborth. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 31.05.2023. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c422t-a61f7e65066d4d8dbcf559ac86a326ec3a69b09d94c236c0ce4d5bd05ca5c6683 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-9554-7567 0000-0002-2012-5252 0000-0002-0893-7856 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.2196/45825 |
PMID | 37256683 |
PQID | 2917605931 |
PQPubID | 4997115 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9c4ced78dca94f0cac3f9d3ab6978491 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10234420 proquest_miscellaneous_2821340713 proquest_journals_2917605931 pubmed_primary_37256683 crossref_primary_10_2196_45825 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20230531 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-05-31 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 5 year: 2023 text: 20230531 day: 31 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Canada |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Canada – name: Toronto – name: Toronto, Canada |
PublicationTitle | JMIR human factors |
PublicationTitleAlternate | JMIR Hum Factors |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | JMIR Publications |
Publisher_xml | – name: JMIR Publications |
References | ref13 ref57 ref12 ref56 ref15 ref59 ref14 ref58 ref53 ref52 ref11 ref55 ref10 ref54 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 (ref1) 2020 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref74 ref33 ref32 ref2 ref39 ref38 Abrams, D (ref62) 2006 ref71 ref70 ref73 ref72 ref24 ref68 ref23 ref67 ref26 ref25 ref69 ref20 ref64 ref63 ref22 ref66 ref21 ref65 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref60 ref61 |
References_xml | – ident: ref17 doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031332 – ident: ref72 doi: 10.2196/19458 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3335 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102178 – start-page: 1 year: 2020 ident: ref1 publication-title: GitHub – ident: ref50 doi: 10.1007/s10729-019-09490-4 – ident: ref73 doi: 10.2147/jmdh.s353594 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78120-0_17 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.2196/25893 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.2196/13817 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106806 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1177/0049124120914924 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3609516 – ident: ref64 doi: 10.1002/ejsp.621 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.1080/25741292.2020.1850404 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.026 – ident: ref61 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.001251 – ident: ref57 doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0483 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1080/0960085x.2020.1803155 – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-92075-3_23 – ident: ref69 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.12.002 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.17011/ht/urn.201811224834 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102181 – ident: ref6 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3693783 – ident: ref44 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00689-2 – ident: ref51 doi: 10.1080/0960085x.2020.1784046 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.2196/25525 – ident: ref59 doi: 10.1007/s10729-019-09468-2 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1017/xps.2020.30 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245740 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1097/cin.0000000000000442 – ident: ref74 doi: 10.2196/39570 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.1177/0049124119882480 – ident: ref66 doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2008.01.001 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1093/jssam/smy002 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.2196/23362 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1111/jnu.12298 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1093/ijpor/1.1.3 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1108/imds-12-2020-0697 – ident: ref58 doi: 10.1186/s13584-020-00429-7 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.2307/30036540 – ident: ref68 – ident: ref70 doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100651 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.2196/20572 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-06975-8_1 – ident: ref22 – ident: ref55 doi: 10.2196/21613 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100307 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa239 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.1007/s11628-020-00424-7 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa240 – start-page: 147 year: 2006 ident: ref62 publication-title: Contemporary Sociology – ident: ref46 doi: 10.2196/28416 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1080/15213269.2016.1211539 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.2196/19359 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.cs/0109068 – ident: ref67 – ident: ref52 doi: 10.2196/28146 – ident: ref60 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1080/14754835.2020.1816163 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106314 – ident: ref63 doi: 10.1080/10463280440000008 – ident: ref65 doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t – ident: ref71 doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040583 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.2196/26399 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.2196/19857 – ident: ref49 doi: 10.1097/fch.0000000000000177 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3 – ident: ref56 doi: 10.1109/tem.2020.3019033 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02389-y |
SSID | ssj0001645464 |
Score | 2.221551 |
Snippet | The German Corona-Warn-App (CWA) is a contact tracing app to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. As of today, it has been downloaded approximately 45 million... Background:The German Corona-Warn-App (CWA) is a contact tracing app to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. As of today, it has been downloaded approximately 45... BackgroundThe German Corona-Warn-App (CWA) is a contact tracing app to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. As of today, it has been downloaded approximately 45... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | e45825 |
SubjectTerms | Contact tracing Infectious diseases Influence Knowledge Original Paper Pandemics Privacy Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Smartphones Social interaction Technology Acceptance Model Telemedicine |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Full Text dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEB7Egwgivq0vIngtts1jG28qinrwogt6KmmSopeu7EPw5t_w7_lLnEnWZVcEL147DSQzCfNNMvMNwFGDoLvO8SAh-lYpImKe1lQILBopCZ9i3ByyfG_VVVfcPMiHqVZflBMW6YGj4o61Fda7Tums0aLJrLG80Y6bWmH8I0LdeoE-byqYCrcrRFSlxAIsUa4z7rJjeh-SM84ncPT_Bix_5kdOOZzLFVgeI0V2Gme4CnO-XYOleM3GYvXQOjyimdl1qHRkvYZdT8qrBp_vHyzW3rKLqWI21msZMVLRAPRTFj0XQyTKugN_wu5G_Vf_xii38G0DupcX9-dX6bhbQmpFUQxTo_Km4xFwKeWEK11tUd3a2FIZhGjecqN0nWmnhS24spn1wsnaZdIaaZUq-SbMt73WbwMrpJFFRxuTay-UFSarBc8a5WTuS67yBA6-1Vi9RFKMCoMJ0nMV9JzAGSl3IiQO6_ABLVuNLVv9ZdkE9r5NU40P1qAqMLxU1IYQxYcTMR4Jeucwre-N8J-SaOoo_E5gK1pyMhPeQYyHi02gnLHxzFRnJe3zU6DdJpILIYps5z8WtwuL1Lg-5iHswfywP_L7CG-G9UHYyV-pSfqm priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT9xADLYolVAlhGgLbcpDU6nXiCTzSKYXBAgEHHppV9qeooln0nJJ6D4qcevf6N_rL6mdZBcWIa6ZRJnY48xnj_0Z4FNNoLtKyZAIfZuYELGMKy4EVrXWjE_Jb-6yfL-Yy5G6HuvxEHCbDmmVi39i96P2LXKM_Cgjv8Jw_7n0-PZXzF2j-HR1aKHxAl4ydRmndOXj_D7GwnRVRm3AJmc801o74lMivbIFdUz9T8HLx1mSD7adi23YGvCiOOkV_BrWQvMGNvtgm-hriN7Cd1K2uOrqHUVbi6tlkdX035-_oq_AFecPStpE2wjmpeIHaLdC2r8E4VExmobP4ut88jvcCc4wvNuB0cX5t7PLeOiZEKPKslnsTFrngWCXMV75wldIQrcOC-MIqAWUztgqsd4qzKTBBIPyuvKJRqfRmELuwnrTNuE9iEw7neXWudQGZVC5pFIyqY3XaSikSSM4XIixvO2pMUpyKVjOZSfnCE5ZuMtBZrLuLrSTH-VgGKVFhcHnhUdnVZ2gQ1lbL11lyL9Vlt6yv1BNOZjXtLxfDBF8XA6TYfBph2tCO6d7CiarYyc8gne9JpczkTkhPfrYCIoVHa9MdXWkufnZkW8z1YVSWfLh-XntwStuTN_nGezD-mwyDwcEX2bVYbdG_wPEA_DN priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | The Impact of Individuals’ Social Environments on Contact Tracing App Use: Survey Study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256683 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2917605931 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2821340713 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10234420 https://doaj.org/article/9c4ced78dca94f0cac3f9d3ab6978491 |
Volume | 10 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9RAFD7YFkqhFO9urWEEX6NJ5pKMIGJlSytYRF2oT2EyM6mCJLoXcd_8G_69_pKeM8kuG-mTrzkzZDgXzndmzgXgWY2gu0rRkBB9qxgRMY8rKgQWtZSETzFuDlm-5-p0It5dyI1swp6BsxtDO5onNZl-f_775_I1GvwrSmNGBXpBTz9yC3bQGeVkm-97hB-uWahjlRK7sD9YvQe7PEdvrwo-cEihb_9NYPPfnMkNJ3RyGw569MjedOK-A7d8cxf2u6s31lUU3YMvKHp2FqofWVuzs3XJ1ezqz1_W1eOy8UaBG2sbRl2qaAP6LovejCE6ZZOZf8k-Laa__JJRvuHyPkxOxp_fnsb9BIXYiiybx0alde4RhCnlhCtcZVEE2thCGYRt3nKjdJVop4XNuLKJ9cLJyiXSGmmJOQ9gu2kb_whYJo3Mcm1Mqr1QVpikEjyplZOpL7hKRxCt2Fj-6BpllBhgEMvLwPIRHBNz10Tqax0-tNPLsjeTUlthvcsLZ40WdWKN5bV23FQKo12h8S9HK9GUK10pMww5FY0mRPLTNRnNhN4-TOPbBa4pqHUdheQjeNhJcn2SlSaMoBjIeHDUIaX59jW04qbGF0JkyeH_b30MezTCvstIOILt-XThnyDQmVcRbOUXeQQ7x-PzDx-jcF0QBfW-BuR1Aig |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Zb9QwEB6VrQRIFeImUIqR4DFqEh8bIyFEYatdWlYIulL7FBzbAV6Ssgdo3_gb_Al-FL-EmRzbLkK89TWOE2eOzDf2HABPCgTdeYyKhOhbhYiIeZhTIrAopCR8in5zHeU7VsOJeHMsjzfgV5cLQ2GV3T-x_lG7ytIe-W6CfoWi_nPxi9OvIXWNotPVroVGIxYHfvkdXbbZ89Fr5O_TJNkfHL0ahm1XgdCKJJmHRsVF3yMwUcoJl7rc4rK0sakyCGW85UbpPNJOC5twZSPrhZO5i6Q10iqVcnzuJdgUHF2ZHmzuDcbv3p_t6lCBLCUuwxbFWKN079K5lFwzenVvgH8B2r_jMs8Zuv3rcK1FqOxlI1I3YMOXN2Gr2d5jTdbSLThB8WKjOsOSVQUbrdK6Zr9__GRNzi8bnEuiY1XJqBIWTUD7aNFiMkTAbDLzz9iHxfSbXzKKaVzehsmF0PMO9Mqq9PeAJdLIpK-NibUXygoT5YJHhXIy9ilXcQA7HRmz06YYR4ZODNE5q-kcwB4RdzVItbPrC9X0U9aqYqatsN71U2eNFkVkjeWFdtzkCj1qofEt2x1rslahZ9mZ-AXweDWMqkjnK6b01QLvSak8Hrn9AdxtOLlaCe8jtsSPDSBd4_HaUtdHyi-f63LfVFxDiCS6__91PYIrw6O3h9nhaHzwAK4mOKuJctiG3ny68A8RPM3znVZiGXy8aCX5A5_AMAk |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VIlVIFeJNoBQjwTHaxK_ESAgB7apLUYUEKy2n4NgOcEnKPkB742_wV_g5_BJmks22ixC3XuM4mYxnMt_Y8wB4XCHoLlNUJETfOkZELOKSEoFlpRThU_Sb2yjfE300lq8narIFv_pcGAqr7P-J7Y_aN472yAcc_QpN_efSQbUKi3h7MHx--jWmDlJ00tq30-hE5Dgsv6P7Nns2OsC1fsL58PD9q6N41WEgdpLzeWx1WmUBQYrWXvrclw5JNNbl2iKsCU5YbcrEeCMdF9olLkivSp8oZ5XTOhf43EtwORMqJR3LJtnZ_g6VytJyB3Yp2hrlfEAnVGrD_LVdAv4Fbf-O0Dxn8obX4OoKq7IXnXBdh61Q34DdbqOPdflLN-EDChobtbmWrKnYaJ3gNfv94yfrsn_Z4bl0OtbUjGpi0QS0lA5tJ0MszMaz8JS9W0y_hSWj6MblLRhfCDdvw3bd1OEuMK6s4pmxNjVBaidtUkqRVNqrNORCpxHs92wsTruyHAW6M8TnouVzBC-JuetBqqLdXmimn4qVUhbGSRd8lntnjawSZ52ojBe21OhbS4Nv2euXplip9qw4E8QIHq2HUSnppMXWoVngPTkVyqMNgAjudCu5pkRkiDLxYyPIN9Z4g9TNkfrL57bwN5XZkJIn9_5P10PYQdUo3oxOju_DFY6TunCHPdieTxfhAaKoebnfiiuDjxetH38APeUy2Q |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Impact+of+Individuals%E2%80%99+Social+Environments+on+Contact+Tracing+App+Use%3A+Survey+Study&rft.jtitle=JMIR+human+factors&rft.au=Sadeghi%2C+Atiyeh&rft.au=Pape%2C+Sebastian&rft.au=Harborth%2C+David&rft.date=2023-05-31&rft.pub=JMIR+Publications&rft.eissn=2292-9495&rft.volume=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196%2F45825&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F37256683&rft.externalDocID=PMC10234420 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2292-9495&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2292-9495&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2292-9495&client=summon |