Relationship Between Nucleos(t)ide analogue antiviral response time and prognosis in Chronic Hepatitis B: conclusions depend on baseline viral load and HBeAg status

Current guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral lo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in pharmacology Vol. 16; p. 1572827
Main Authors Huang, Jingtao, Li, Xiangyong, You, Lijie, Chong, Yutian, Cao, Hong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 24.04.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Current guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral load and HBeAg status. This retrospective cohort study included 1,037 patients, who were classified based on their baseline viral load (high viral load, HVL, ≥ 7log IU mL : 522 individuals; or non-HVL, < 7log IU mL : 515 individuals) and HBeAg status (positive: 668 individuals; or negative: 369 individuals). Based on the virological response time, patients were grouped separately using 48 weeks and 96 weeks as the boundaries. The prognoses across these groups were evaluated and compared. Patients in the within-48-week group, 48-96-week group, and after-96-week group exhibited no significant difference in the incidence of liver disease progression (5.08% vs 4.38% vs 9.61%, = 0.33). For HVL or HBeAg-positive patients, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression between the within-48-week group and the 48-96-week group. In contrast, for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients, the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression was significantly higher in the after-48-week group than in the within-48-week group. Only the after-96-week group showed a significant increase in maintained virological response rate ( = 0.04). Antiviral treatment should be adjusted at 48 weeks for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients. For HVL and HBeAg-positive patients, we suggest changing the antiviral treatment plan to 96 weeks.
AbstractList Current guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral load and HBeAg status. This retrospective cohort study included 1,037 patients, who were classified based on their baseline viral load (high viral load, HVL, ≥ 7log IU mL : 522 individuals; or non-HVL, < 7log IU mL : 515 individuals) and HBeAg status (positive: 668 individuals; or negative: 369 individuals). Based on the virological response time, patients were grouped separately using 48 weeks and 96 weeks as the boundaries. The prognoses across these groups were evaluated and compared. Patients in the within-48-week group, 48-96-week group, and after-96-week group exhibited no significant difference in the incidence of liver disease progression (5.08% vs 4.38% vs 9.61%, = 0.33). For HVL or HBeAg-positive patients, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression between the within-48-week group and the 48-96-week group. In contrast, for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients, the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression was significantly higher in the after-48-week group than in the within-48-week group. Only the after-96-week group showed a significant increase in maintained virological response rate ( = 0.04). Antiviral treatment should be adjusted at 48 weeks for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients. For HVL and HBeAg-positive patients, we suggest changing the antiviral treatment plan to 96 weeks.
Current guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral load and HBeAg status.IntroductionCurrent guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral load and HBeAg status.This retrospective cohort study included 1,037 patients, who were classified based on their baseline viral load (high viral load, HVL, ≥ 7log10 IU mL-1: 522 individuals; or non-HVL, < 7log10 IU mL-1: 515 individuals) and HBeAg status (positive: 668 individuals; or negative: 369 individuals). Based on the virological response time, patients were grouped separately using 48 weeks and 96 weeks as the boundaries. The prognoses across these groups were evaluated and compared.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 1,037 patients, who were classified based on their baseline viral load (high viral load, HVL, ≥ 7log10 IU mL-1: 522 individuals; or non-HVL, < 7log10 IU mL-1: 515 individuals) and HBeAg status (positive: 668 individuals; or negative: 369 individuals). Based on the virological response time, patients were grouped separately using 48 weeks and 96 weeks as the boundaries. The prognoses across these groups were evaluated and compared.Patients in the within-48-week group, 48-96-week group, and after-96-week group exhibited no significant difference in the incidence of liver disease progression (5.08% vs 4.38% vs 9.61%, p = 0.33). For HVL or HBeAg-positive patients, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression between the within-48-week group and the 48-96-week group. In contrast, for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients, the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression was significantly higher in the after-48-week group than in the within-48-week group. Only the after-96-week group showed a significant increase in maintained virological response rate (p = 0.04).ResultsPatients in the within-48-week group, 48-96-week group, and after-96-week group exhibited no significant difference in the incidence of liver disease progression (5.08% vs 4.38% vs 9.61%, p = 0.33). For HVL or HBeAg-positive patients, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression between the within-48-week group and the 48-96-week group. In contrast, for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients, the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression was significantly higher in the after-48-week group than in the within-48-week group. Only the after-96-week group showed a significant increase in maintained virological response rate (p = 0.04).Antiviral treatment should be adjusted at 48 weeks for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients. For HVL and HBeAg-positive patients, we suggest changing the antiviral treatment plan to 96 weeks.ConclusionAntiviral treatment should be adjusted at 48 weeks for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients. For HVL and HBeAg-positive patients, we suggest changing the antiviral treatment plan to 96 weeks.
IntroductionCurrent guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral load and HBeAg status.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 1,037 patients, who were classified based on their baseline viral load (high viral load, HVL, ≥ 7log10 IU mL−1: 522 individuals; or non-HVL, < 7log10 IU mL−1: 515 individuals) and HBeAg status (positive: 668 individuals; or negative: 369 individuals). Based on the virological response time, patients were grouped separately using 48 weeks and 96 weeks as the boundaries. The prognoses across these groups were evaluated and compared.ResultsPatients in the within-48-week group, 48–96-week group, and after-96-week group exhibited no significant difference in the incidence of liver disease progression (5.08% vs 4.38% vs 9.61%, p = 0.33). For HVL or HBeAg-positive patients, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression between the within-48-week group and the 48–96-week group. In contrast, for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients, the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression was significantly higher in the after-48-week group than in the within-48-week group. Only the after-96-week group showed a significant increase in maintained virological response rate (p = 0.04).ConclusionAntiviral treatment should be adjusted at 48 weeks for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients. For HVL and HBeAg-positive patients, we suggest changing the antiviral treatment plan to 96 weeks.
Author Li, Xiangyong
Cao, Hong
Huang, Jingtao
You, Lijie
Chong, Yutian
AuthorAffiliation Department of Infectious Diseases , Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University , Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Infectious Diseases , Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University , Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jingtao
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Jingtao
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xiangyong
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Xiangyong
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Lijie
  surname: You
  fullname: You, Lijie
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Yutian
  surname: Chong
  fullname: Chong, Yutian
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Hong
  surname: Cao
  fullname: Cao, Hong
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40343009$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVkk1v1DAQhiNUREvpH-CAfGwPu_gjTmwuqLsCtlIFEoKz5diTXVdZO9hOEf-nP7TeD6rWF4_G7zyj8bxvqxMfPFTVe4LnjAn5sR83Os4ppnxOeEsFbV9VZ6Rp2EwKQk-exafVRUp3uBwmJWvqN9VpjVnNMJZn1cNPGHR2waeNG9EC8l8Aj75PZoCQLvOVs4C010NYT7sgu3sX9YAipLHUAMpuu8tbNMaw9iG5hJxHy00M3hm0grHAc0kuPiETvBmmtOuFLIxQioJHnU4wOA_oAB6CtnveagHXa5SyzlN6V73u9ZDg4nifV7-_fvm1XM1uf3y7WV7fzkxNaZ4xQWknobNccNJQy6kgjBIuNDGkMT3uiAbdmq5tZCOI5A1lvSGt6Akwyzg7r24OXBv0nRqj2-r4TwXt1D4R4lrpmF35GyUEFaAbzA2VdY-5ZH3d2La3AmrDdF1Ynw-sceq2YA34XOZ7AX354t1GrcO9IhRzUbdNIVweCTH8mSBltXXJwDBoD2FKipXlM9m2VBbph-fNnrr833MR0IPAxJBShP5JQrDa-Unt_aR2flJHP7FHhZHA9A
Cites_doi 10.1111/jvh.12838
10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021
10.1128/JVI.00833-10
10.3390/v13020180
10.1111/liv.12343
10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01468-4
10.1177/1756284818786108
10.1111/jcpt.12023
10.1097/MCG.0000000000000345
10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.005
10.1002/hep.29800
10.1111/jvh.12313
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2019.01.006
10.1016/j.clinre.2017.06.008
10.14218/JCTH.2023.00320
10.3969/j.issn.1674-7380.2019.04.013
10.1097/HEP.0000000000000752
10.1055/s-2006-939751
10.14218/JCTH.2021.00046
10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.063
10.1111/apt.16611
10.1056/NEJMoa0802878
10.1111/liv.12694
10.1007/s12072-021-10239-x
10.1016/j.clinre.2014.09.009
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao.
Copyright © 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao. 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao.
– notice: Copyright © 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao. 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2025.1572827
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
DocumentTitleAlternate Huang et al
EISSN 1663-9812
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_8828ea605c294f0593f46d7fd8e4c3a4
PMC12058476
40343009
10_3389_fphar_2025_1572827
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 53G
5VS
9T4
AAFWJ
AAKDD
AAYXX
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACXDI
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
CITATION
DIK
EMOBN
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
KQ8
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
P2P
PGMZT
RNS
RPM
IPNFZ
M48
NPM
RIG
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3822b9ebd585162d528132158a1c16cf0b1aea7cb76968195623fc178f1e3d353
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1663-9812
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:06 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:27:21 EDT 2025
Sat May 10 20:00:44 EDT 2025
Mon May 12 02:38:40 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 05:06:29 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords chronic hepatitis B
antiviral agent
viral load
liver disease
cumulative incidence
HBV
Language English
License Copyright © 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c422t-3822b9ebd585162d528132158a1c16cf0b1aea7cb76968195623fc178f1e3d353
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Ping Zhou, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
Edited by: Imran Khan, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Pakistan
Lu Junfeng, Capital Medical University, China
These authors share first authorship
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/8828ea605c294f0593f46d7fd8e4c3a4
PMID 40343009
PQID 3202397729
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8828ea605c294f0593f46d7fd8e4c3a4
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12058476
proquest_miscellaneous_3202397729
pubmed_primary_40343009
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2025_1572827
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-04-24
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-04-24
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-04-24
  day: 24
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Switzerland
PublicationTitle Frontiers in pharmacology
PublicationTitleAlternate Front Pharmacol
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Frontiers Media S.A
Publisher_xml – name: Frontiers Media S.A
References Li (B13) 2019; 11
Liu (B14) 2014; 34
Yan (B24) 2015; 39
(B16) 2019; 27
Hou (B8) 2015; 22
Zhou (B27) 2010; 46
(B21) 2024
Mason (B19) 2010; 84
Choi (B3) 2024; 80
Kayaaslan (B11) 2018; 42
Jang (B9) 2018; 16
Hadziyannis (B7) 2006; 26
Jeng (B10) 2023; 401
Ha (B6) 2016; 50
Nam (B20) 2018; 25
Byrne (B1) 2018; 11
Marcellin (B18) 2008; 359
Tu (B23) 2021; 13
(B4) 2017; 67
Liu (B15) 2021; 54
Lau (B12) 2021; 15
Fung (B5) 2015; 35
Lu (B17) 2013; 38
Zhang (B26) 2021; 9
Ceylan (B2) 2013; 17
Terrault (B22) 2018; 67
You (B25) 2023; 11
References_xml – volume: 25
  start-page: 552
  year: 2018
  ident: B20
  article-title: Delayed viral suppression during antiviral therapy is associated with increased hepatocellular carcinoma rates in HBeAg-positive high viral load chronic hepatitis B
  publication-title: J. Viral Hepat.
  doi: 10.1111/jvh.12838
– volume: 67
  start-page: 370
  year: 2017
  ident: B4
  article-title: EASL 2017 clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection
  publication-title: J. Hepatol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021
– volume: 17
  start-page: 2467
  year: 2013
  ident: B2
  article-title: Comparison of tenofovir and entecavir in patients with chronic HBV infection
  publication-title: Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci.
– volume: 84
  start-page: 8308
  year: 2010
  ident: B19
  article-title: Clonal expansion of normal-appearing human hepatocytes during chronic hepatitis B virus infection
  publication-title: J. Virol.
  doi: 10.1128/JVI.00833-10
– year: 2024
  ident: B21
  article-title: Implementing the global health sector strategies on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections. (2022–2030): report on Progress and Gaps 2024
  publication-title: Glob. HIV, Hepat. STIs Programmes (HHS)
– volume: 13
  start-page: 180
  year: 2021
  ident: B23
  article-title: Hepatitis B virus DNA integration: in vitro models for investigating viral pathogenesis and persistence
  publication-title: Viruses
  doi: 10.3390/v13020180
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1025
  year: 2014
  ident: B14
  article-title: HBV clinical isolates expressing adefovir resistance mutations show similar tenofovir susceptibilities across genotypes B, C and D
  publication-title: Liver Int.
  doi: 10.1111/liv.12343
– volume: 401
  start-page: 1039
  year: 2023
  ident: B10
  article-title: Hepatitis B
  publication-title: Lancet.
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01468-4
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1756284818786108
  year: 2018
  ident: B1
  article-title: Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: rationale and clinical trial evidence
  publication-title: Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol.
  doi: 10.1177/1756284818786108
– volume: 38
  start-page: 136
  year: 2013
  ident: B17
  article-title: Pharmacokinetics and food interaction of a novel prodrug of tenofovir, tenofovir dipivoxil fumarate, in healthy volunteers
  publication-title: J. Clin. Pharm. Ther.
  doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12023
– volume: 50
  start-page: 169
  year: 2016
  ident: B6
  article-title: Treatment outcomes with first-line therapies with entecavir and tenofovir in treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B patients in a routine clinical practice
  publication-title: J. Clin. Gastroenterol.
  doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000345
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1056
  year: 2010
  ident: B27
  article-title: Hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma may hold common disease process for carcinogenesis
  publication-title: Eur. J. Cancer.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.005
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1560
  year: 2018
  ident: B22
  article-title: Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance
  publication-title: Hepatology
  doi: 10.1002/hep.29800
– volume: 22
  start-page: 85
  year: 2015
  ident: B8
  article-title: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs adefovir dipivoxil in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B after 48 weeks: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: J. Viral Hepat.
  doi: 10.1111/jvh.12313
– volume: 27
  start-page: 18
  year: 2019
  ident: B16
  article-title: Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure
  publication-title: Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi
  doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2019.01.006
– volume: 42
  start-page: 40
  year: 2018
  ident: B11
  article-title: A long-term multicenter study: entecavir versus tenofovir in treatment of nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B patients
  publication-title: Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2017.06.008
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1425
  year: 2023
  ident: B25
  article-title: Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Version 2022
  publication-title: J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol.
  doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2023.00320
– volume: 11
  start-page: 81
  year: 2019
  ident: B13
  article-title: Influencing factors of partial virological response to entecavir monotherapy of patients with chronic hepatitis B
  publication-title: Chin. J. Liver Dis. Electron. Version
  doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7380.2019.04.013
– volume: 80
  start-page: 428
  year: 2024
  ident: B3
  article-title: Chronic hepatitis B baseline viral load and on-treatment liver cancer risk: a multinational cohort study of HBeAg-positive patients
  publication-title: Hepatology
  doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000752
– volume: 26
  start-page: 130
  year: 2006
  ident: B7
  article-title: Hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B: Natural history and treatment
  publication-title: Semin. Liver Dis.
  doi: 10.1055/s-2006-939751
– volume: 9
  start-page: 850
  year: 2021
  ident: B26
  article-title: Chronic hepatitis B infection with low level viremia correlates with the progression of the liver disease
  publication-title: J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol.
  doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00046
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1954
  year: 2018
  ident: B9
  article-title: Effects of virologic response to treatment on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection and decompensated cirrhosis
  publication-title: Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.063
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1134
  year: 2021
  ident: B15
  article-title: Randomised clinical trial: 48 weeks of treatment with tenofovir amibufenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for patients with chronic hepatitis B
  publication-title: Pharmacol. Ther.
  doi: 10.1111/apt.16611
– volume: 359
  start-page: 2442
  year: 2008
  ident: B18
  article-title: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B
  publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med.
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802878
– volume: 35
  start-page: 422
  year: 2015
  ident: B5
  article-title: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Asian or Pacific Islander chronic hepatitis B patients with high viral load (≥9 log10 copies/ml)
  publication-title: Liver Int.
  doi: 10.1111/liv.12694
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1031
  year: 2021
  ident: B12
  article-title: APASL clinical practice guideline on hepatitis B reactivation related to the use of immunosuppressive therapy
  publication-title: Hepatol. Int.
  doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10239-x
– volume: 39
  start-page: 366
  year: 2015
  ident: B24
  article-title: Efficacy of entecavir treatment for up to 96 weeks in nucleoside-naive HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with high viral load
  publication-title: Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2014.09.009
SSID ssj0000399364
Score 2.3773189
Snippet Current guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant...
IntroductionCurrent guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1572827
SubjectTerms antiviral agent
chronic hepatitis B
cumulative incidence
HBV
liver disease
Pharmacology
viral load
Title Relationship Between Nucleos(t)ide analogue antiviral response time and prognosis in Chronic Hepatitis B: conclusions depend on baseline viral load and HBeAg status
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40343009
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3202397729
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12058476
https://doaj.org/article/8828ea605c294f0593f46d7fd8e4c3a4
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlp15K3922KVMooaVxYz1sy71lS8NSaMghgdyMZMldQ7CX2HvI_-kPzYzkbHZLoZfejGzkQTPSzGhmvmHsg1VeWmGofbtKE2W1S0pZqkQbb0ouTGpCVuXP03xxoX5cZpdbrb4oJyzCA8eFO0ILUHuDRnctStVQA7pG5a5onPaqliYggaLO23KmwhlMejdXsUoGvbDyqFktDeF_iuwLzwp0NIodTRQA-_9mZf6ZLLmlfU4es0eT2QjHkdwn7IHvnrKDs4g7fXMI5_dlVMMhHMDZPSL1zTP2e5PytmxXMI-pWXBKUMb98HH81DoPpovXOPhADSWQBriO-bMeqAE9jjugbK6uH9oB2g4mXF1YeMrKHnFw_hXQva6v1nQFN0BssAt9B6QryZ6FOPFVb1yYbzH3x7-AiprWw3N2cfL9_NsimdozJLUSYkwk2ha29NZRZDEXLhMaXVueacNrntdNajkyvKhtQQA8VJcoZFPzQjfcSycz-YLtdX3nXzHAY0Q1tinJeVIkHlwX1mjCRyylq-2Mfb5jVbWKKBwVei_E2CowtiLGVhNjZ2xO3Nx8SQjaYQDlqprkqvqXXM3Y-ztZqHDHURjFdL5fD1XoOF-SVzJjL6NsbH6lUqkkmq0zpnekZoeW3Tdduwyo3lykFLLOX_8P6t-wh7QiFPYS6i3bG6_Xfh-tp9G-CxvlFm0gGt8
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship+Between+Nucleos%28t%29ide+analogue+antiviral+response+time+and+prognosis+in+Chronic+Hepatitis+B%3A+conclusions+depend+on+baseline+viral+load+and+HBeAg+status&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+pharmacology&rft.au=Huang%2C+Jingtao&rft.au=Li%2C+Xiangyong&rft.au=You%2C+Lijie&rft.au=Chong%2C+Yutian&rft.date=2025-04-24&rft.pub=Frontiers+Media+S.A&rft.eissn=1663-9812&rft.volume=16&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffphar.2025.1572827&rft.externalDocID=PMC12058476
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1663-9812&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1663-9812&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1663-9812&client=summon