Relationship Between Nucleos(t)ide analogue antiviral response time and prognosis in Chronic Hepatitis B: conclusions depend on baseline viral load and HBeAg status
Current guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral lo...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in pharmacology Vol. 16; p. 1572827 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
24.04.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Current guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral load and HBeAg status.
This retrospective cohort study included 1,037 patients, who were classified based on their baseline viral load (high viral load, HVL, ≥ 7log
IU mL
: 522 individuals; or non-HVL, < 7log
IU mL
: 515 individuals) and HBeAg status (positive: 668 individuals; or negative: 369 individuals). Based on the virological response time, patients were grouped separately using 48 weeks and 96 weeks as the boundaries. The prognoses across these groups were evaluated and compared.
Patients in the within-48-week group, 48-96-week group, and after-96-week group exhibited no significant difference in the incidence of liver disease progression (5.08% vs 4.38% vs 9.61%,
= 0.33). For HVL or HBeAg-positive patients, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression between the within-48-week group and the 48-96-week group. In contrast, for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients, the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression was significantly higher in the after-48-week group than in the within-48-week group. Only the after-96-week group showed a significant increase in maintained virological response rate (
= 0.04).
Antiviral treatment should be adjusted at 48 weeks for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients. For HVL and HBeAg-positive patients, we suggest changing the antiviral treatment plan to 96 weeks. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Current guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral load and HBeAg status.
This retrospective cohort study included 1,037 patients, who were classified based on their baseline viral load (high viral load, HVL, ≥ 7log
IU mL
: 522 individuals; or non-HVL, < 7log
IU mL
: 515 individuals) and HBeAg status (positive: 668 individuals; or negative: 369 individuals). Based on the virological response time, patients were grouped separately using 48 weeks and 96 weeks as the boundaries. The prognoses across these groups were evaluated and compared.
Patients in the within-48-week group, 48-96-week group, and after-96-week group exhibited no significant difference in the incidence of liver disease progression (5.08% vs 4.38% vs 9.61%,
= 0.33). For HVL or HBeAg-positive patients, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression between the within-48-week group and the 48-96-week group. In contrast, for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients, the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression was significantly higher in the after-48-week group than in the within-48-week group. Only the after-96-week group showed a significant increase in maintained virological response rate (
= 0.04).
Antiviral treatment should be adjusted at 48 weeks for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients. For HVL and HBeAg-positive patients, we suggest changing the antiviral treatment plan to 96 weeks. Current guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral load and HBeAg status.IntroductionCurrent guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral load and HBeAg status.This retrospective cohort study included 1,037 patients, who were classified based on their baseline viral load (high viral load, HVL, ≥ 7log10 IU mL-1: 522 individuals; or non-HVL, < 7log10 IU mL-1: 515 individuals) and HBeAg status (positive: 668 individuals; or negative: 369 individuals). Based on the virological response time, patients were grouped separately using 48 weeks and 96 weeks as the boundaries. The prognoses across these groups were evaluated and compared.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 1,037 patients, who were classified based on their baseline viral load (high viral load, HVL, ≥ 7log10 IU mL-1: 522 individuals; or non-HVL, < 7log10 IU mL-1: 515 individuals) and HBeAg status (positive: 668 individuals; or negative: 369 individuals). Based on the virological response time, patients were grouped separately using 48 weeks and 96 weeks as the boundaries. The prognoses across these groups were evaluated and compared.Patients in the within-48-week group, 48-96-week group, and after-96-week group exhibited no significant difference in the incidence of liver disease progression (5.08% vs 4.38% vs 9.61%, p = 0.33). For HVL or HBeAg-positive patients, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression between the within-48-week group and the 48-96-week group. In contrast, for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients, the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression was significantly higher in the after-48-week group than in the within-48-week group. Only the after-96-week group showed a significant increase in maintained virological response rate (p = 0.04).ResultsPatients in the within-48-week group, 48-96-week group, and after-96-week group exhibited no significant difference in the incidence of liver disease progression (5.08% vs 4.38% vs 9.61%, p = 0.33). For HVL or HBeAg-positive patients, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression between the within-48-week group and the 48-96-week group. In contrast, for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients, the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression was significantly higher in the after-48-week group than in the within-48-week group. Only the after-96-week group showed a significant increase in maintained virological response rate (p = 0.04).Antiviral treatment should be adjusted at 48 weeks for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients. For HVL and HBeAg-positive patients, we suggest changing the antiviral treatment plan to 96 weeks.ConclusionAntiviral treatment should be adjusted at 48 weeks for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients. For HVL and HBeAg-positive patients, we suggest changing the antiviral treatment plan to 96 weeks. IntroductionCurrent guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant prognostic differences exist among patients achieving virological response at various time points and whether these differences vary by viral load and HBeAg status.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 1,037 patients, who were classified based on their baseline viral load (high viral load, HVL, ≥ 7log10 IU mL−1: 522 individuals; or non-HVL, < 7log10 IU mL−1: 515 individuals) and HBeAg status (positive: 668 individuals; or negative: 369 individuals). Based on the virological response time, patients were grouped separately using 48 weeks and 96 weeks as the boundaries. The prognoses across these groups were evaluated and compared.ResultsPatients in the within-48-week group, 48–96-week group, and after-96-week group exhibited no significant difference in the incidence of liver disease progression (5.08% vs 4.38% vs 9.61%, p = 0.33). For HVL or HBeAg-positive patients, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression between the within-48-week group and the 48–96-week group. In contrast, for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients, the cumulative incidence of liver disease progression was significantly higher in the after-48-week group than in the within-48-week group. Only the after-96-week group showed a significant increase in maintained virological response rate (p = 0.04).ConclusionAntiviral treatment should be adjusted at 48 weeks for non-HVL or HBeAg-negative patients. For HVL and HBeAg-positive patients, we suggest changing the antiviral treatment plan to 96 weeks. |
Author | Li, Xiangyong Cao, Hong Huang, Jingtao You, Lijie Chong, Yutian |
AuthorAffiliation | Department of Infectious Diseases , Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University , Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Infectious Diseases , Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University , Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jingtao surname: Huang fullname: Huang, Jingtao – sequence: 2 givenname: Xiangyong surname: Li fullname: Li, Xiangyong – sequence: 3 givenname: Lijie surname: You fullname: You, Lijie – sequence: 4 givenname: Yutian surname: Chong fullname: Chong, Yutian – sequence: 5 givenname: Hong surname: Cao fullname: Cao, Hong |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40343009$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpVkk1v1DAQhiNUREvpH-CAfGwPu_gjTmwuqLsCtlIFEoKz5diTXVdZO9hOEf-nP7TeD6rWF4_G7zyj8bxvqxMfPFTVe4LnjAn5sR83Os4ppnxOeEsFbV9VZ6Rp2EwKQk-exafVRUp3uBwmJWvqN9VpjVnNMJZn1cNPGHR2waeNG9EC8l8Aj75PZoCQLvOVs4C010NYT7sgu3sX9YAipLHUAMpuu8tbNMaw9iG5hJxHy00M3hm0grHAc0kuPiETvBmmtOuFLIxQioJHnU4wOA_oAB6CtnveagHXa5SyzlN6V73u9ZDg4nifV7-_fvm1XM1uf3y7WV7fzkxNaZ4xQWknobNccNJQy6kgjBIuNDGkMT3uiAbdmq5tZCOI5A1lvSGt6Akwyzg7r24OXBv0nRqj2-r4TwXt1D4R4lrpmF35GyUEFaAbzA2VdY-5ZH3d2La3AmrDdF1Ynw-sceq2YA34XOZ7AX354t1GrcO9IhRzUbdNIVweCTH8mSBltXXJwDBoD2FKipXlM9m2VBbph-fNnrr833MR0IPAxJBShP5JQrDa-Unt_aR2flJHP7FHhZHA9A |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/jvh.12838 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021 10.1128/JVI.00833-10 10.3390/v13020180 10.1111/liv.12343 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01468-4 10.1177/1756284818786108 10.1111/jcpt.12023 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000345 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.005 10.1002/hep.29800 10.1111/jvh.12313 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2019.01.006 10.1016/j.clinre.2017.06.008 10.14218/JCTH.2023.00320 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7380.2019.04.013 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000752 10.1055/s-2006-939751 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00046 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.063 10.1111/apt.16611 10.1056/NEJMoa0802878 10.1111/liv.12694 10.1007/s12072-021-10239-x 10.1016/j.clinre.2014.09.009 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao. Copyright © 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao. 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao. – notice: Copyright © 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao. 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2025.1572827 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Huang et al |
EISSN | 1663-9812 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_8828ea605c294f0593f46d7fd8e4c3a4 PMC12058476 40343009 10_3389_fphar_2025_1572827 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 9T4 AAFWJ AAKDD AAYXX ACGFO ACGFS ACXDI ADBBV ADRAZ AENEX AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV CITATION DIK EMOBN GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE KQ8 M~E O5R O5S OK1 P2P PGMZT RNS RPM IPNFZ M48 NPM RIG 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3822b9ebd585162d528132158a1c16cf0b1aea7cb76968195623fc178f1e3d353 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1663-9812 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:06 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:27:21 EDT 2025 Sat May 10 20:00:44 EDT 2025 Mon May 12 02:38:40 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:06:29 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | chronic hepatitis B antiviral agent viral load liver disease cumulative incidence HBV |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2025 Huang, Li, You, Chong and Cao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c422t-3822b9ebd585162d528132158a1c16cf0b1aea7cb76968195623fc178f1e3d353 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Reviewed by: Ping Zhou, University of California, Los Angeles, United States Edited by: Imran Khan, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Pakistan Lu Junfeng, Capital Medical University, China These authors share first authorship |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/8828ea605c294f0593f46d7fd8e4c3a4 |
PMID | 40343009 |
PQID | 3202397729 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8828ea605c294f0593f46d7fd8e4c3a4 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12058476 proquest_miscellaneous_3202397729 pubmed_primary_40343009 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2025_1572827 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-04-24 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-04-24 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2025 text: 2025-04-24 day: 24 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Switzerland |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Switzerland |
PublicationTitle | Frontiers in pharmacology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Front Pharmacol |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | Frontiers Media S.A |
Publisher_xml | – name: Frontiers Media S.A |
References | Li (B13) 2019; 11 Liu (B14) 2014; 34 Yan (B24) 2015; 39 (B16) 2019; 27 Hou (B8) 2015; 22 Zhou (B27) 2010; 46 (B21) 2024 Mason (B19) 2010; 84 Choi (B3) 2024; 80 Kayaaslan (B11) 2018; 42 Jang (B9) 2018; 16 Hadziyannis (B7) 2006; 26 Jeng (B10) 2023; 401 Ha (B6) 2016; 50 Nam (B20) 2018; 25 Byrne (B1) 2018; 11 Marcellin (B18) 2008; 359 Tu (B23) 2021; 13 (B4) 2017; 67 Liu (B15) 2021; 54 Lau (B12) 2021; 15 Fung (B5) 2015; 35 Lu (B17) 2013; 38 Zhang (B26) 2021; 9 Ceylan (B2) 2013; 17 Terrault (B22) 2018; 67 You (B25) 2023; 11 |
References_xml | – volume: 25 start-page: 552 year: 2018 ident: B20 article-title: Delayed viral suppression during antiviral therapy is associated with increased hepatocellular carcinoma rates in HBeAg-positive high viral load chronic hepatitis B publication-title: J. Viral Hepat. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12838 – volume: 67 start-page: 370 year: 2017 ident: B4 article-title: EASL 2017 clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection publication-title: J. Hepatol. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021 – volume: 17 start-page: 2467 year: 2013 ident: B2 article-title: Comparison of tenofovir and entecavir in patients with chronic HBV infection publication-title: Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. – volume: 84 start-page: 8308 year: 2010 ident: B19 article-title: Clonal expansion of normal-appearing human hepatocytes during chronic hepatitis B virus infection publication-title: J. Virol. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00833-10 – year: 2024 ident: B21 article-title: Implementing the global health sector strategies on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections. (2022–2030): report on Progress and Gaps 2024 publication-title: Glob. HIV, Hepat. STIs Programmes (HHS) – volume: 13 start-page: 180 year: 2021 ident: B23 article-title: Hepatitis B virus DNA integration: in vitro models for investigating viral pathogenesis and persistence publication-title: Viruses doi: 10.3390/v13020180 – volume: 34 start-page: 1025 year: 2014 ident: B14 article-title: HBV clinical isolates expressing adefovir resistance mutations show similar tenofovir susceptibilities across genotypes B, C and D publication-title: Liver Int. doi: 10.1111/liv.12343 – volume: 401 start-page: 1039 year: 2023 ident: B10 article-title: Hepatitis B publication-title: Lancet. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01468-4 – volume: 11 start-page: 1756284818786108 year: 2018 ident: B1 article-title: Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: rationale and clinical trial evidence publication-title: Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. doi: 10.1177/1756284818786108 – volume: 38 start-page: 136 year: 2013 ident: B17 article-title: Pharmacokinetics and food interaction of a novel prodrug of tenofovir, tenofovir dipivoxil fumarate, in healthy volunteers publication-title: J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12023 – volume: 50 start-page: 169 year: 2016 ident: B6 article-title: Treatment outcomes with first-line therapies with entecavir and tenofovir in treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B patients in a routine clinical practice publication-title: J. Clin. Gastroenterol. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000345 – volume: 46 start-page: 1056 year: 2010 ident: B27 article-title: Hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma may hold common disease process for carcinogenesis publication-title: Eur. J. Cancer. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.005 – volume: 67 start-page: 1560 year: 2018 ident: B22 article-title: Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance publication-title: Hepatology doi: 10.1002/hep.29800 – volume: 22 start-page: 85 year: 2015 ident: B8 article-title: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs adefovir dipivoxil in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B after 48 weeks: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: J. Viral Hepat. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12313 – volume: 27 start-page: 18 year: 2019 ident: B16 article-title: Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure publication-title: Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2019.01.006 – volume: 42 start-page: 40 year: 2018 ident: B11 article-title: A long-term multicenter study: entecavir versus tenofovir in treatment of nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B patients publication-title: Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2017.06.008 – volume: 11 start-page: 1425 year: 2023 ident: B25 article-title: Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Version 2022 publication-title: J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2023.00320 – volume: 11 start-page: 81 year: 2019 ident: B13 article-title: Influencing factors of partial virological response to entecavir monotherapy of patients with chronic hepatitis B publication-title: Chin. J. Liver Dis. Electron. Version doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7380.2019.04.013 – volume: 80 start-page: 428 year: 2024 ident: B3 article-title: Chronic hepatitis B baseline viral load and on-treatment liver cancer risk: a multinational cohort study of HBeAg-positive patients publication-title: Hepatology doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000752 – volume: 26 start-page: 130 year: 2006 ident: B7 article-title: Hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B: Natural history and treatment publication-title: Semin. Liver Dis. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-939751 – volume: 9 start-page: 850 year: 2021 ident: B26 article-title: Chronic hepatitis B infection with low level viremia correlates with the progression of the liver disease publication-title: J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00046 – volume: 16 start-page: 1954 year: 2018 ident: B9 article-title: Effects of virologic response to treatment on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection and decompensated cirrhosis publication-title: Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.063 – volume: 54 start-page: 1134 year: 2021 ident: B15 article-title: Randomised clinical trial: 48 weeks of treatment with tenofovir amibufenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for patients with chronic hepatitis B publication-title: Pharmacol. Ther. doi: 10.1111/apt.16611 – volume: 359 start-page: 2442 year: 2008 ident: B18 article-title: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802878 – volume: 35 start-page: 422 year: 2015 ident: B5 article-title: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Asian or Pacific Islander chronic hepatitis B patients with high viral load (≥9 log10 copies/ml) publication-title: Liver Int. doi: 10.1111/liv.12694 – volume: 15 start-page: 1031 year: 2021 ident: B12 article-title: APASL clinical practice guideline on hepatitis B reactivation related to the use of immunosuppressive therapy publication-title: Hepatol. Int. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10239-x – volume: 39 start-page: 366 year: 2015 ident: B24 article-title: Efficacy of entecavir treatment for up to 96 weeks in nucleoside-naive HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with high viral load publication-title: Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2014.09.009 |
SSID | ssj0000399364 |
Score | 2.3773189 |
Snippet | Current guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether significant... IntroductionCurrent guidelines for changing antiviral therapy regimens do not consider different baseline statuses. This study aimed to investigate whether... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 1572827 |
SubjectTerms | antiviral agent chronic hepatitis B cumulative incidence HBV liver disease Pharmacology viral load |
Title | Relationship Between Nucleos(t)ide analogue antiviral response time and prognosis in Chronic Hepatitis B: conclusions depend on baseline viral load and HBeAg status |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40343009 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3202397729 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12058476 https://doaj.org/article/8828ea605c294f0593f46d7fd8e4c3a4 |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlp15K3922KVMooaVxYz1sy71lS8NSaMghgdyMZMldQ7CX2HvI_-kPzYzkbHZLoZfejGzkQTPSzGhmvmHsg1VeWmGofbtKE2W1S0pZqkQbb0ouTGpCVuXP03xxoX5cZpdbrb4oJyzCA8eFO0ILUHuDRnctStVQA7pG5a5onPaqliYggaLO23KmwhlMejdXsUoGvbDyqFktDeF_iuwLzwp0NIodTRQA-_9mZf6ZLLmlfU4es0eT2QjHkdwn7IHvnrKDs4g7fXMI5_dlVMMhHMDZPSL1zTP2e5PytmxXMI-pWXBKUMb98HH81DoPpovXOPhADSWQBriO-bMeqAE9jjugbK6uH9oB2g4mXF1YeMrKHnFw_hXQva6v1nQFN0BssAt9B6QryZ6FOPFVb1yYbzH3x7-AiprWw3N2cfL9_NsimdozJLUSYkwk2ha29NZRZDEXLhMaXVueacNrntdNajkyvKhtQQA8VJcoZFPzQjfcSycz-YLtdX3nXzHAY0Q1tinJeVIkHlwX1mjCRyylq-2Mfb5jVbWKKBwVei_E2CowtiLGVhNjZ2xO3Nx8SQjaYQDlqprkqvqXXM3Y-ztZqHDHURjFdL5fD1XoOF-SVzJjL6NsbH6lUqkkmq0zpnekZoeW3Tdduwyo3lykFLLOX_8P6t-wh7QiFPYS6i3bG6_Xfh-tp9G-CxvlFm0gGt8 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship+Between+Nucleos%28t%29ide+analogue+antiviral+response+time+and+prognosis+in+Chronic+Hepatitis+B%3A+conclusions+depend+on+baseline+viral+load+and+HBeAg+status&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+pharmacology&rft.au=Huang%2C+Jingtao&rft.au=Li%2C+Xiangyong&rft.au=You%2C+Lijie&rft.au=Chong%2C+Yutian&rft.date=2025-04-24&rft.pub=Frontiers+Media+S.A&rft.eissn=1663-9812&rft.volume=16&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffphar.2025.1572827&rft.externalDocID=PMC12058476 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1663-9812&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1663-9812&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1663-9812&client=summon |