Sheil, D., & Burslem, D. F. (2013). Defining and defending Connell's intermediate disturbance hypothesis: A response to Fox. Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 28(10), 571-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.006
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationSheil, Douglas, and David F.R.P Burslem. "Defining and Defending Connell's Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis: A Response to Fox." Trends in Ecology & Evolution (Amsterdam) 28, no. 10 (2013): 571-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.006.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationSheil, Douglas, and David F.R.P Burslem. "Defining and Defending Connell's Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis: A Response to Fox." Trends in Ecology & Evolution (Amsterdam), vol. 28, no. 10, 2013, pp. 571-572, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.006.