Comparison of different methods of controlling pain during debonding of orthodontic brackets
Objective: To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding. Method: This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association Vol. 73; no. 7; pp. 1408 - 1411 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Pakistan
Knowledge Bylanes
01.07.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objective: To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding.
Method: This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised patients of either gender aged 13-21 years who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment with 0.022 brackets of Roth prescription and required debonding. The patients was divided into two equal groups. In group A, teeth were stabilised with finger pressure with cotton between the finger and teeth, and then debonding was done using open mouth technique. In group B, teeth were stabilised using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth, and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale VAS. Data was analysed using SPSS 23.
Results: Of the 110 patients, each of the 2 groups had 55(50%) subjects. Overall, there were 35(32%) males and 75(68%) females. The mean age of the sample was 16±2.4 years. Mean pain scores among the males was 32.0±7.68 compared to 34.067±12.59 among the females (p>0.05). Subjects in group B had significantly less pain than those in group A (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Plastic wafer was found to be more effective in terms of controlling pain during debonding compared to finger pressure.
Key Words: Pain measurement, Methods of debonding, Orthodontic pain management, Finger pressure, Plastic wafer. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding.This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised patients of either gender aged 13-21 years who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment with 0.022 brackets of Roth prescription and required debonding. The patients was divided into two equal groups. In group A, teeth were stabilised with finger pressure with cotton between the finger and teeth, and then debonding was done using open mouth technique. In group B, teeth were stabilised using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth, and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale VAS. Data was analysed using SPSS 23.METHODSThis cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised patients of either gender aged 13-21 years who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment with 0.022 brackets of Roth prescription and required debonding. The patients was divided into two equal groups. In group A, teeth were stabilised with finger pressure with cotton between the finger and teeth, and then debonding was done using open mouth technique. In group B, teeth were stabilised using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth, and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale VAS. Data was analysed using SPSS 23.Of the 110 patients, each of the 2 groups had 55(50%) subjects. Overall, there were 35(32%) males and 75(68%) females. The mean age of the sample was 16±2.4 years. Mean pain scores among the males was 32.0±7.68 compared to 34.067±12.59 among the females (p>0.05). Subjects in group B had significantly less pain than those in group A (p<0.05).RESULTSOf the 110 patients, each of the 2 groups had 55(50%) subjects. Overall, there were 35(32%) males and 75(68%) females. The mean age of the sample was 16±2.4 years. Mean pain scores among the males was 32.0±7.68 compared to 34.067±12.59 among the females (p>0.05). Subjects in group B had significantly less pain than those in group A (p<0.05).Plastic wafer was found to be more effective in terms of controlling pain during debonding compared to finger pressure.ConclusionPlastic wafer was found to be more effective in terms of controlling pain during debonding compared to finger pressure. Objective: To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding. Method: This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised patients of either gender aged 13-21 years who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment with 0.022 brackets of Roth prescription and required debonding. The patients was divided into two equal groups. In group A, teeth were stabilised with finger pressure with cotton between the finger and teeth, and then debonding was done using open mouth technique. In group B, teeth were stabilised using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth, and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale VAS. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. Results: Of the 110 patients, each of the 2 groups had 55(50%) subjects. Overall, there were 35(32%) males and 75(68%) females. The mean age of the sample was 16±2.4 years. Mean pain scores among the males was 32.0±7.68 compared to 34.067±12.59 among the females (p>0.05). Subjects in group B had significantly less pain than those in group A (p<0.05). Conclusion: Plastic wafer was found to be more effective in terms of controlling pain during debonding compared to finger pressure. Key Words: Pain measurement, Methods of debonding, Orthodontic pain management, Finger pressure, Plastic wafer. To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding. This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised patients of either gender aged 13-21 years who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment with 0.022 brackets of Roth prescription and required debonding. The patients was divided into two equal groups. In group A, teeth were stabilised with finger pressure with cotton between the finger and teeth, and then debonding was done using open mouth technique. In group B, teeth were stabilised using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth, and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale VAS. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. Of the 110 patients, each of the 2 groups had 55(50%) subjects. Overall, there were 35(32%) males and 75(68%) females. The mean age of the sample was 16±2.4 years. Mean pain scores among the males was 32.0±7.68 compared to 34.067±12.59 among the females (p>0.05). Subjects in group B had significantly less pain than those in group A (p<0.05). Plastic wafer was found to be more effective in terms of controlling pain during debonding compared to finger pressure. |
Audience | Professional |
Author | Iqbal, Kashif Khan, Ali Akhtar Jan, Abdullah Khalid, Zahra |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kashif surname: Iqbal fullname: Iqbal, Kashif – sequence: 2 givenname: Zahra orcidid: 0000-0002-8044-5741 surname: Khalid fullname: Khalid, Zahra – sequence: 3 givenname: Ali Akhtar surname: Khan fullname: Khan, Ali Akhtar – sequence: 4 givenname: Abdullah surname: Jan fullname: Jan, Abdullah |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469052$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpt0c1KJDEQAOAcXPy_-ADSsLDIwoxJdyfdfRwGXVcUPehNCOmk4mQ3ncwm6cO-vWlHRUVyqFB8lRRVe2jLeQcIHRE8r5uqI6eXt9eLOWsbuoV2Ma7wrOvacgftxfgH45JRjLfRTtXUrMO03EUPSz-sRTDRu8LrQhmtIYBLxQBp5VWcktK7FLy1xj0Wa2FcocYw3RX03qnplpEPk8_SyKIPQv6FFA_QNy1shMOXuI_uz8_ulhezq5tfv5eLq5msS5JmpK8wwQ0lmtWtorTvoJVEaqYlFaTvKDANQGsFTEmtFO2g6SuGFe5YC72q9tHJ5t118P9GiIkPJkqwVjjwY-RlW-OybnLI9PuGPgoL3DjtU2524nzR0CYPjrRVVvMvVD4KBpPHAdrk_IeCH-8KViBsWkVvx2S8ix_h8UurYz-A4utgBhH-89eNZPBzA2TwMQbQb4Rg_rxiPq2YTyvOGH_C0iQxfZr7Nfarkic2dKnn |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_app15020927 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_75725_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2025_100969 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2023 Knowledge Bylanes |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 Knowledge Bylanes |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.47391/JPMA.6875 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EndPage | 1411 |
ExternalDocumentID | A757687183 37469052 10_47391_JPMA_6875 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Pakistan |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Pakistan |
GroupedDBID | --- 0ZK 2WC 53G 5GY AAYXX ABCQX ACGFO ACMJI ADCHZ ADEYR AEGXH AENEX AFJDA AGFXM AHHXF AIAGR AKNUK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAW CITATION DIK E3Z EBD EMOBN EOJEC F5P FRP GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 IAO IEA IHR IHW INH INR ITC L7B LGEZI LOTEE LXO MK0 MV. NADUK NFBOU NKUNM NXXTH OBODZ OK1 P2P PV9 RXW RZL SV3 TAA TUS UNMZH W2D ~ZZ .55 ABJIR ABUBX AGQRV AHEHV AHKOF BAI CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM NYMDV USXSC X7M 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-1b3010751f648d55b9e8c1cf6fc5a1b95e6fee54de6dcfdd59e7b360d0968ebd3 |
ISSN | 0030-9982 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 18:29:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 20:54:51 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:24:29 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:15:42 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:22:58 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:04:57 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:54 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Keywords | Pain measurement, Methods of debonding, Orthodontic pain management, Finger pressure, Plastic wafer |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c421t-1b3010751f648d55b9e8c1cf6fc5a1b95e6fee54de6dcfdd59e7b360d0968ebd3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-8044-5741 |
OpenAccessLink | https://ojs.jpma.org.pk/index.php/public_html/article/download/6875/2520 |
PMID | 37469052 |
PQID | 2840247284 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 4 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2840247284 gale_infotracmisc_A757687183 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A757687183 gale_healthsolutions_A757687183 pubmed_primary_37469052 crossref_primary_10_47391_JPMA_6875 crossref_citationtrail_10_47391_JPMA_6875 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-07-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2023 text: 2023-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Pakistan |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Pakistan |
PublicationTitle | Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Pak Med Assoc |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Knowledge Bylanes |
Publisher_xml | – name: Knowledge Bylanes |
SSID | ssj0026500 |
Score | 2.317546 |
Snippet | Objective: To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding.
Method: This cross sectional study was... To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding. This cross sectional study was conducted at the... To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of finger pressure and... |
SourceID | proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 1408 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Care and treatment Complications and side effects Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Male Methods Orthodontic appliances Orthodontic Brackets Orthodontics Pain Pain - etiology Pain - prevention & control Pain Management Plastics |
Title | Comparison of different methods of controlling pain during debonding of orthodontic brackets |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469052 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2840247284 |
Volume | 73 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELdgSIgXxDcdYwSBhFCVkcSJkzxWZWMq67qHVqoQUhR_qRVTNrrshb-eu9h1mqoPg5e0cq6u5fv58jvHd0fIR6Yoj0Kh_TTQqR9neeyXIct9KVPJw1xKKjB2eHzOTmfxaJ7M23DFJrqk5kfiz864kv_RKrSBXjFK9h806zqFBvgO-oUraBiud9LxsC0iONFgvUytk7o_bspC32Dj0BxFb4LOL8pl1f9q4hLRzpiAFhCarFAeJJcClF3Cwjb5nXawVuSplnW2b3m2dYxQ-21KCfS_Y7Um7ez6Anh_A6of5WJVbjSbVAaXy_7g16Iu3ZHhkb3BJfjKdu_ablJE1B1odYaXBj54dh3Da2qYWIClG1YUnL5sl3mPU5qjfR9djAdHLDMlV7o5tM8nxcns7KyYHs-n98mDCJwHrGvxbe4O_kTASW2yTjMkk7S26fuL67lDU7Yf1lsuSENFpk_IY6sNb2AA8ZTcU9Uz8nBsT0k8Jz9bXHgT7TlceBYX2LiBCw9x4RlceA4XKLSBC2-NixdkdnI8HZ76toqGL-IorP2Qgw0HYhhqFmcySXiuMgGrk2mRlCHPE8W0UkksFZNCS5nkKuWUBRKc20xxSV-SveqqUq-JF8SalzLKAs7jmOXgmkaUJfjmWmeUy6BHPq8nrRA2xTxWOrkswNVsJrjACS5wgnvkg5O9NolVdkq9w7kvTFCwW7PFIEU_GXgV7ZFPjQTiBP5LlDasBEaMmc06kgcdSbCjonP7_Vq_Bd7Cw4eVurq9KYDBAZNN4aNHXhnFuyHTFPeXkmj_Dr9-Qx61a-OA7NWrW_UWKG3ND5utoMMGp38Bp6qjug |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+Of+Different+Methods+Of+Controlling+Pain+During+Debonding+Of+Orthodontic+Brackets&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+Pakistan+Medical+Association&rft.au=Iqbal%2C+Kashif&rft.au=Khalid%2C+Zahra&rft.au=Khan%2C+Ali+Akhtar&rft.au=Jan%2C+Abdullah&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.issn=0030-9982&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1408&rft_id=info:doi/10.47391%2FJPMA.6875&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon |