Comparison of different methods of controlling pain during debonding of orthodontic brackets

Objective: To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding. Method: This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Pakistan Medical Association Vol. 73; no. 7; pp. 1408 - 1411
Main Authors Iqbal, Kashif, Khalid, Zahra, Khan, Ali Akhtar, Jan, Abdullah
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Pakistan Knowledge Bylanes 01.07.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objective: To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding. Method: This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised patients of either gender aged 13-21 years who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment with 0.022 brackets of Roth prescription and required debonding. The patients was divided into two equal groups. In group A, teeth were stabilised with finger pressure with cotton between the finger and teeth, and then debonding was done using open mouth technique. In group B, teeth were stabilised using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth, and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale VAS. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. Results: Of the 110 patients, each of the 2 groups had 55(50%) subjects. Overall, there were 35(32%) males and 75(68%) females. The mean age of the sample was 16±2.4 years. Mean pain scores among the males was 32.0±7.68 compared to 34.067±12.59 among the females (p>0.05). Subjects in group B had significantly less pain than those in group A (p<0.05). Conclusion: Plastic wafer was found to be more effective in terms of controlling pain during debonding compared to finger pressure. Key Words: Pain measurement, Methods of debonding, Orthodontic pain management, Finger pressure, Plastic wafer.
AbstractList To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding.This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised patients of either gender aged 13-21 years who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment with 0.022 brackets of Roth prescription and required debonding. The patients was divided into two equal groups. In group A, teeth were stabilised with finger pressure with cotton between the finger and teeth, and then debonding was done using open mouth technique. In group B, teeth were stabilised using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth, and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale VAS. Data was analysed using SPSS 23.METHODSThis cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised patients of either gender aged 13-21 years who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment with 0.022 brackets of Roth prescription and required debonding. The patients was divided into two equal groups. In group A, teeth were stabilised with finger pressure with cotton between the finger and teeth, and then debonding was done using open mouth technique. In group B, teeth were stabilised using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth, and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale VAS. Data was analysed using SPSS 23.Of the 110 patients, each of the 2 groups had 55(50%) subjects. Overall, there were 35(32%) males and 75(68%) females. The mean age of the sample was 16±2.4 years. Mean pain scores among the males was 32.0±7.68 compared to 34.067±12.59 among the females (p>0.05). Subjects in group B had significantly less pain than those in group A (p<0.05).RESULTSOf the 110 patients, each of the 2 groups had 55(50%) subjects. Overall, there were 35(32%) males and 75(68%) females. The mean age of the sample was 16±2.4 years. Mean pain scores among the males was 32.0±7.68 compared to 34.067±12.59 among the females (p>0.05). Subjects in group B had significantly less pain than those in group A (p<0.05).Plastic wafer was found to be more effective in terms of controlling pain during debonding compared to finger pressure.ConclusionPlastic wafer was found to be more effective in terms of controlling pain during debonding compared to finger pressure.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding. Method: This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised patients of either gender aged 13-21 years who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment with 0.022 brackets of Roth prescription and required debonding. The patients was divided into two equal groups. In group A, teeth were stabilised with finger pressure with cotton between the finger and teeth, and then debonding was done using open mouth technique. In group B, teeth were stabilised using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth, and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale VAS. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. Results: Of the 110 patients, each of the 2 groups had 55(50%) subjects. Overall, there were 35(32%) males and 75(68%) females. The mean age of the sample was 16±2.4 years. Mean pain scores among the males was 32.0±7.68 compared to 34.067±12.59 among the females (p>0.05). Subjects in group B had significantly less pain than those in group A (p<0.05). Conclusion: Plastic wafer was found to be more effective in terms of controlling pain during debonding compared to finger pressure. Key Words: Pain measurement, Methods of debonding, Orthodontic pain management, Finger pressure, Plastic wafer.
To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding. This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January to June 2020, and comprised patients of either gender aged 13-21 years who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment with 0.022 brackets of Roth prescription and required debonding. The patients was divided into two equal groups. In group A, teeth were stabilised with finger pressure with cotton between the finger and teeth, and then debonding was done using open mouth technique. In group B, teeth were stabilised using a plastic wafer between maxillary and mandibular teeth, and then debonding was done using closed mouth technique. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale VAS. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. Of the 110 patients, each of the 2 groups had 55(50%) subjects. Overall, there were 35(32%) males and 75(68%) females. The mean age of the sample was 16±2.4 years. Mean pain scores among the males was 32.0±7.68 compared to 34.067±12.59 among the females (p>0.05). Subjects in group B had significantly less pain than those in group A (p<0.05). Plastic wafer was found to be more effective in terms of controlling pain during debonding compared to finger pressure.
Audience Professional
Author Iqbal, Kashif
Khan, Ali Akhtar
Jan, Abdullah
Khalid, Zahra
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kashif
  surname: Iqbal
  fullname: Iqbal, Kashif
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Zahra
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8044-5741
  surname: Khalid
  fullname: Khalid, Zahra
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ali Akhtar
  surname: Khan
  fullname: Khan, Ali Akhtar
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Abdullah
  surname: Jan
  fullname: Jan, Abdullah
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469052$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpt0c1KJDEQAOAcXPy_-ADSsLDIwoxJdyfdfRwGXVcUPehNCOmk4mQ3ncwm6cO-vWlHRUVyqFB8lRRVe2jLeQcIHRE8r5uqI6eXt9eLOWsbuoV2Ma7wrOvacgftxfgH45JRjLfRTtXUrMO03EUPSz-sRTDRu8LrQhmtIYBLxQBp5VWcktK7FLy1xj0Wa2FcocYw3RX03qnplpEPk8_SyKIPQv6FFA_QNy1shMOXuI_uz8_ulhezq5tfv5eLq5msS5JmpK8wwQ0lmtWtorTvoJVEaqYlFaTvKDANQGsFTEmtFO2g6SuGFe5YC72q9tHJ5t118P9GiIkPJkqwVjjwY-RlW-OybnLI9PuGPgoL3DjtU2524nzR0CYPjrRVVvMvVD4KBpPHAdrk_IeCH-8KViBsWkVvx2S8ix_h8UurYz-A4utgBhH-89eNZPBzA2TwMQbQb4Rg_rxiPq2YTyvOGH_C0iQxfZr7Nfarkic2dKnn
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_app15020927
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_75725_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2025_100969
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2023 Knowledge Bylanes
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 Knowledge Bylanes
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.47391/JPMA.6875
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EndPage 1411
ExternalDocumentID A757687183
37469052
10_47391_JPMA_6875
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Pakistan
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Pakistan
GroupedDBID ---
0ZK
2WC
53G
5GY
AAYXX
ABCQX
ACGFO
ACMJI
ADCHZ
ADEYR
AEGXH
AENEX
AFJDA
AGFXM
AHHXF
AIAGR
AKNUK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAW
CITATION
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EMOBN
EOJEC
F5P
FRP
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
IAO
IEA
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ITC
L7B
LGEZI
LOTEE
LXO
MK0
MV.
NADUK
NFBOU
NKUNM
NXXTH
OBODZ
OK1
P2P
PV9
RXW
RZL
SV3
TAA
TUS
UNMZH
W2D
~ZZ
.55
ABJIR
ABUBX
AGQRV
AHEHV
AHKOF
BAI
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
NYMDV
USXSC
X7M
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-1b3010751f648d55b9e8c1cf6fc5a1b95e6fee54de6dcfdd59e7b360d0968ebd3
ISSN 0030-9982
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 18:29:25 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 20:54:51 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:24:29 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:15:42 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:22:58 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:04:57 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:54 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Keywords Pain measurement, Methods of debonding, Orthodontic pain management, Finger pressure, Plastic wafer
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c421t-1b3010751f648d55b9e8c1cf6fc5a1b95e6fee54de6dcfdd59e7b360d0968ebd3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-8044-5741
OpenAccessLink https://ojs.jpma.org.pk/index.php/public_html/article/download/6875/2520
PMID 37469052
PQID 2840247284
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2840247284
gale_infotracmisc_A757687183
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A757687183
gale_healthsolutions_A757687183
pubmed_primary_37469052
crossref_primary_10_47391_JPMA_6875
crossref_citationtrail_10_47391_JPMA_6875
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Pakistan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Pakistan
PublicationTitle Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
PublicationTitleAlternate J Pak Med Assoc
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Knowledge Bylanes
Publisher_xml – name: Knowledge Bylanes
SSID ssj0026500
Score 2.317546
Snippet Objective: To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding. Method: This cross sectional study was...
To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding. This cross sectional study was conducted at the...
To compare the efficacy of finger pressure and plastic wafers in terms of pain control during debonding.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of finger pressure and...
SourceID proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 1408
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Care and treatment
Complications and side effects
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Methods
Orthodontic appliances
Orthodontic Brackets
Orthodontics
Pain
Pain - etiology
Pain - prevention & control
Pain Management
Plastics
Title Comparison of different methods of controlling pain during debonding of orthodontic brackets
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37469052
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2840247284
Volume 73
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELdgSIgXxDcdYwSBhFCVkcSJkzxWZWMq67qHVqoQUhR_qRVTNrrshb-eu9h1mqoPg5e0cq6u5fv58jvHd0fIR6Yoj0Kh_TTQqR9neeyXIct9KVPJw1xKKjB2eHzOTmfxaJ7M23DFJrqk5kfiz864kv_RKrSBXjFK9h806zqFBvgO-oUraBiud9LxsC0iONFgvUytk7o_bspC32Dj0BxFb4LOL8pl1f9q4hLRzpiAFhCarFAeJJcClF3Cwjb5nXawVuSplnW2b3m2dYxQ-21KCfS_Y7Um7ez6Anh_A6of5WJVbjSbVAaXy_7g16Iu3ZHhkb3BJfjKdu_ablJE1B1odYaXBj54dh3Da2qYWIClG1YUnL5sl3mPU5qjfR9djAdHLDMlV7o5tM8nxcns7KyYHs-n98mDCJwHrGvxbe4O_kTASW2yTjMkk7S26fuL67lDU7Yf1lsuSENFpk_IY6sNb2AA8ZTcU9Uz8nBsT0k8Jz9bXHgT7TlceBYX2LiBCw9x4RlceA4XKLSBC2-NixdkdnI8HZ76toqGL-IorP2Qgw0HYhhqFmcySXiuMgGrk2mRlCHPE8W0UkksFZNCS5nkKuWUBRKc20xxSV-SveqqUq-JF8SalzLKAs7jmOXgmkaUJfjmWmeUy6BHPq8nrRA2xTxWOrkswNVsJrjACS5wgnvkg5O9NolVdkq9w7kvTFCwW7PFIEU_GXgV7ZFPjQTiBP5LlDasBEaMmc06kgcdSbCjonP7_Vq_Bd7Cw4eVurq9KYDBAZNN4aNHXhnFuyHTFPeXkmj_Dr9-Qx61a-OA7NWrW_UWKG3ND5utoMMGp38Bp6qjug
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+Of+Different+Methods+Of+Controlling+Pain+During+Debonding+Of+Orthodontic+Brackets&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+Pakistan+Medical+Association&rft.au=Iqbal%2C+Kashif&rft.au=Khalid%2C+Zahra&rft.au=Khan%2C+Ali+Akhtar&rft.au=Jan%2C+Abdullah&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.issn=0030-9982&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1408&rft_id=info:doi/10.47391%2FJPMA.6875&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0030-9982&client=summon