Maximum likelihood positioning algorithm for high-resolution PET scanners
Purpose: In high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator arrays in which one scintillator element (crystal) is smaller than the size of the readout channel. In order to identify the hit crystal by mea...
Saved in:
Published in | Medical physics (Lancaster) Vol. 43; no. 6; pp. 3049 - 3061 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Association of Physicists in Medicine
01.06.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose:
In high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator arrays in which one scintillator element (crystal) is smaller than the size of the readout channel. In order to identify the hit crystal by means of the measured light distribution, a positioning algorithm is required. One commonly applied positioning algorithm uses the center of gravity (COG) of the measured light distribution. The COG algorithm is limited in spatial resolution by noise and intercrystal Compton scatter. The purpose of this work is to develop a positioning algorithm which overcomes this limitation.
Methods:
The authors present a maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm which compares a set of expected light distributions given by probability density functions (PDFs) with the measured light distribution. Instead of modeling the PDFs by using an analytical model, the PDFs of the proposed ML algorithm are generated assuming a single-gamma-interaction model from measured data. The algorithm was evaluated with a hot-rod phantom measurement acquired with the preclinical hyperion II
D PET scanner. In order to assess the performance with respect to sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality, the ML algorithm was compared to a COG algorithm which calculates the COG from a restricted set of channels. The authors studied the energy resolution of the ML and the COG algorithm regarding incomplete light distributions (missing channel information caused by detector dead time). Furthermore, the authors investigated the effects of using a filter based on the likelihood values on sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality.
Results:
A sensitivity gain of up to 19% was demonstrated in comparison to the COG algorithm for the selected operation parameters. Energy resolution and image quality were on a similar level for both algorithms. Additionally, the authors demonstrated that the performance of the ML algorithm is less prone to missing channel information. A likelihood filter visually improved the image quality, i.e., the peak-to-valley increased up to a factor of 3 for 2-mm-diameter phantom rods by rejecting 87% of the coincidences. A relative improvement of the energy resolution of up to 12.8% was also measured rejecting 91% of the coincidences.
Conclusions:
The developed ML algorithm increases the sensitivity by correctly handling missing channel information without influencing energy resolution or image quality. Furthermore, the authors showed that energy resolution and image quality can be improved substantially by rejecting events that do not comply well with the single-gamma-interaction model, such as Compton-scattered events. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose: In high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator arrays in which one scintillator element (crystal) is smaller than the size of the readout channel. In order to identify the hit crystal by means of the measured light distribution, a positioning algorithm is required. One commonly applied positioning algorithm uses the center of gravity (COG) of the measured light distribution. The COG algorithm is limited in spatial resolution by noise and intercrystal Compton scatter. The purpose of this work is to develop a positioning algorithm which overcomes this limitation. Methods: The authors present a maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm which compares a set of expected light distributions given by probability density functions (PDFs) with the measured light distribution. Instead of modeling the PDFs by using an analytical model, the PDFs of the proposed ML algorithm are generated assuming a single-gamma-interaction model from measured data. The algorithm was evaluated with a hot-rod phantom measurement acquired with the preclinical HYPERION II {sup D} PET scanner. In order to assess the performance with respect to sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality, the ML algorithm was compared to a COG algorithm which calculates the COG from a restricted set of channels. The authors studied the energy resolution of the ML and the COG algorithm regarding incomplete light distributions (missing channel information caused by detector dead time). Furthermore, the authors investigated the effects of using a filter based on the likelihood values on sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality. Results: A sensitivity gain of up to 19% was demonstrated in comparison to the COG algorithm for the selected operation parameters. Energy resolution and image quality were on a similar level for both algorithms. Additionally, the authors demonstrated that the performance of the ML algorithm is less prone to missing channel information. A likelihood filter visually improved the image quality, i.e., the peak-to-valley increased up to a factor of 3 for 2-mm-diameter phantom rods by rejecting 87% of the coincidences. A relative improvement of the energy resolution of up to 12.8% was also measured rejecting 91% of the coincidences. Conclusions: The developed ML algorithm increases the sensitivity by correctly handling missing channel information without influencing energy resolution or image quality. Furthermore, the authors showed that energy resolution and image quality can be improved substantially by rejecting events that do not comply well with the single-gamma-interaction model, such as Compton-scattered events. PURPOSEIn high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator arrays in which one scintillator element (crystal) is smaller than the size of the readout channel. In order to identify the hit crystal by means of the measured light distribution, a positioning algorithm is required. One commonly applied positioning algorithm uses the center of gravity (COG) of the measured light distribution. The COG algorithm is limited in spatial resolution by noise and intercrystal Compton scatter. The purpose of this work is to develop a positioning algorithm which overcomes this limitation.METHODSThe authors present a maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm which compares a set of expected light distributions given by probability density functions (PDFs) with the measured light distribution. Instead of modeling the PDFs by using an analytical model, the PDFs of the proposed ML algorithm are generated assuming a single-gamma-interaction model from measured data. The algorithm was evaluated with a hot-rod phantom measurement acquired with the preclinical hyperion II (D) PET scanner. In order to assess the performance with respect to sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality, the ML algorithm was compared to a COG algorithm which calculates the COG from a restricted set of channels. The authors studied the energy resolution of the ML and the COG algorithm regarding incomplete light distributions (missing channel information caused by detector dead time). Furthermore, the authors investigated the effects of using a filter based on the likelihood values on sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality.RESULTSA sensitivity gain of up to 19% was demonstrated in comparison to the COG algorithm for the selected operation parameters. Energy resolution and image quality were on a similar level for both algorithms. Additionally, the authors demonstrated that the performance of the ML algorithm is less prone to missing channel information. A likelihood filter visually improved the image quality, i.e., the peak-to-valley increased up to a factor of 3 for 2-mm-diameter phantom rods by rejecting 87% of the coincidences. A relative improvement of the energy resolution of up to 12.8% was also measured rejecting 91% of the coincidences.CONCLUSIONSThe developed ML algorithm increases the sensitivity by correctly handling missing channel information without influencing energy resolution or image quality. Furthermore, the authors showed that energy resolution and image quality can be improved substantially by rejecting events that do not comply well with the single-gamma-interaction model, such as Compton-scattered events. Purpose: In high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator arrays in which one scintillator element (crystal) is smaller than the size of the readout channel. In order to identify the hit crystal by means of the measured light distribution, a positioning algorithm is required. One commonly applied positioning algorithm uses the center of gravity (COG) of the measured light distribution. The COG algorithm is limited in spatial resolution by noise and intercrystal Compton scatter. The purpose of this work is to develop a positioning algorithm which overcomes this limitation. Methods: The authors present a maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm which compares a set of expected light distributions given by probability density functions (PDFs) with the measured light distribution. Instead of modeling the PDFs by using an analytical model, the PDFs of the proposed ML algorithm are generated assuming a single-gamma-interaction model from measured data. The algorithm was evaluated with a hot-rod phantom measurement acquired with the preclinical hyperion II D PET scanner. In order to assess the performance with respect to sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality, the ML algorithm was compared to a COG algorithm which calculates the COG from a restricted set of channels. The authors studied the energy resolution of the ML and the COG algorithm regarding incomplete light distributions (missing channel information caused by detector dead time). Furthermore, the authors investigated the effects of using a filter based on the likelihood values on sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality. Results: A sensitivity gain of up to 19% was demonstrated in comparison to the COG algorithm for the selected operation parameters. Energy resolution and image quality were on a similar level for both algorithms. Additionally, the authors demonstrated that the performance of the ML algorithm is less prone to missing channel information. A likelihood filter visually improved the image quality, i.e., the peak-to-valley increased up to a factor of 3 for 2-mm-diameter phantom rods by rejecting 87% of the coincidences. A relative improvement of the energy resolution of up to 12.8% was also measured rejecting 91% of the coincidences. Conclusions: The developed ML algorithm increases the sensitivity by correctly handling missing channel information without influencing energy resolution or image quality. Furthermore, the authors showed that energy resolution and image quality can be improved substantially by rejecting events that do not comply well with the single-gamma-interaction model, such as Compton-scattered events. In high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator arrays in which one scintillator element (crystal) is smaller than the size of the readout channel. In order to identify the hit crystal by means of the measured light distribution, a positioning algorithm is required. One commonly applied positioning algorithm uses the center of gravity (COG) of the measured light distribution. The COG algorithm is limited in spatial resolution by noise and intercrystal Compton scatter. The purpose of this work is to develop a positioning algorithm which overcomes this limitation. The authors present a maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm which compares a set of expected light distributions given by probability density functions (PDFs) with the measured light distribution. Instead of modeling the PDFs by using an analytical model, the PDFs of the proposed ML algorithm are generated assuming a single-gamma-interaction model from measured data. The algorithm was evaluated with a hot-rod phantom measurement acquired with the preclinical hyperion II (D) PET scanner. In order to assess the performance with respect to sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality, the ML algorithm was compared to a COG algorithm which calculates the COG from a restricted set of channels. The authors studied the energy resolution of the ML and the COG algorithm regarding incomplete light distributions (missing channel information caused by detector dead time). Furthermore, the authors investigated the effects of using a filter based on the likelihood values on sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality. A sensitivity gain of up to 19% was demonstrated in comparison to the COG algorithm for the selected operation parameters. Energy resolution and image quality were on a similar level for both algorithms. Additionally, the authors demonstrated that the performance of the ML algorithm is less prone to missing channel information. A likelihood filter visually improved the image quality, i.e., the peak-to-valley increased up to a factor of 3 for 2-mm-diameter phantom rods by rejecting 87% of the coincidences. A relative improvement of the energy resolution of up to 12.8% was also measured rejecting 91% of the coincidences. The developed ML algorithm increases the sensitivity by correctly handling missing channel information without influencing energy resolution or image quality. Furthermore, the authors showed that energy resolution and image quality can be improved substantially by rejecting events that do not comply well with the single-gamma-interaction model, such as Compton-scattered events. Purpose: In high‐resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator arrays in which one scintillator element (crystal) is smaller than the size of the readout channel. In order to identify the hit crystal by means of the measured light distribution, a positioning algorithm is required. One commonly applied positioning algorithm uses the center of gravity (COG) of the measured light distribution. The COG algorithm is limited in spatial resolution by noise and intercrystal Compton scatter. The purpose of this work is to develop a positioning algorithm which overcomes this limitation. Methods: The authors present a maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm which compares a set of expected light distributions given by probability density functions (PDFs) with the measured light distribution. Instead of modeling the PDFs by using an analytical model, the PDFs of the proposed ML algorithm are generated assuming a single‐gamma‐interaction model from measured data. The algorithm was evaluated with a hot‐rod phantom measurement acquired with the preclinical hyperion II D PET scanner. In order to assess the performance with respect to sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality, the ML algorithm was compared to a COG algorithm which calculates the COG from a restricted set of channels. The authors studied the energy resolution of the ML and the COG algorithm regarding incomplete light distributions (missing channel information caused by detector dead time). Furthermore, the authors investigated the effects of using a filter based on the likelihood values on sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality. Results: A sensitivity gain of up to 19% was demonstrated in comparison to the COG algorithm for the selected operation parameters. Energy resolution and image quality were on a similar level for both algorithms. Additionally, the authors demonstrated that the performance of the ML algorithm is less prone to missing channel information. A likelihood filter visually improved the image quality, i.e., the peak‐to‐valley increased up to a factor of 3 for 2‐mm‐diameter phantom rods by rejecting 87% of the coincidences. A relative improvement of the energy resolution of up to 12.8% was also measured rejecting 91% of the coincidences. Conclusions: The developed ML algorithm increases the sensitivity by correctly handling missing channel information without influencing energy resolution or image quality. Furthermore, the authors showed that energy resolution and image quality can be improved substantially by rejecting events that do not comply well with the single‐gamma‐interaction model, such as Compton‐scattered events. |
Author | Schulz, Volkmar Gross-Weege, Nicolas Hallen, Patrick Schug, David |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Nicolas surname: Gross-Weege fullname: Gross-Weege, Nicolas email: nicolas.gross-weege@pmi.rwth-aachen.de, schulz@pmi.rwth-aachen.de organization: Department for Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, NRW 52074, Germany – sequence: 2 givenname: David surname: Schug fullname: Schug, David organization: Department for Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, NRW 52074, Germany – sequence: 3 givenname: Patrick surname: Hallen fullname: Hallen, Patrick organization: Department for Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, NRW 52074, Germany – sequence: 4 givenname: Volkmar surname: Schulz fullname: Schulz, Volkmar email: nicolas.gross-weege@pmi.rwth-aachen.de, schulz@pmi.rwth-aachen.de organization: Department for Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen NRW 52074, Germany and Philips Research Europe, Aachen NRW 52074, Germany |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27277052$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22685109$$D View this record in Osti.gov |
BookMark | eNp90U1LxDAQBuAgiq4fB_-AFLyoUE2mH2mPsqy6sKIHPYc0TbbRtFmTVt1_b5euIqKe5vLMy8vMLtpsbCMROiT4nBCSXZDzOE8wJfkGGkFMozAGnG-iEcZ5HEKMkx206_0TxjiNEryNdoACpTiBEZre8nddd3Vg9LM0urK2DBbW61bbRjfzgJu5dbqt6kBZF1R6XoVOemu6FQjuJw-BF7xppPP7aEtx4-XBeu6hx6vJw_gmnN1dT8eXs1DEQPJQFEAVFIVKFYesjIo0SxPOeVpQwCQVZSZBRCRTQEtaYk5iUDyiJeScyILk0R46HnKtbzXzQrdSVML2HUTLANIsIXilTga1cPalk75ltfZCGsMbaTvPCM2TjCZ9ek-P1rQralmyhdM1d0v2eaQenA5AOOu9k-qLEMxWD2CErR_Q24sfti_IV8dqHdfm141w2HjTRi7_jma392t_Nnj_mfxvnT_xq3Xfwhelij4A_jiv2g |
CODEN | MPHYA6 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s13534_024_00427_7 crossref_primary_10_1109_TRPMS_2018_2884320 crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_aae6c2 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40658_020_0279_2 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_aa56e1 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNS_2017_2664921 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ad19f1 crossref_primary_10_1109_TRPMS_2018_2837738 crossref_primary_10_1109_TRPMS_2023_3272015 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40658_021_00370_x crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ac0b82 crossref_primary_10_1049_joe_2018_9021 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ab6b44 crossref_primary_10_1109_TRPMS_2019_2960129 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_16928 crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_ac11c0 |
Cites_doi | 10.1088/0031‐9155/49/19/007 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2009.10.109 10.1109/tmi.2015.2427993 10.1088/0031‐9155/60/18/7359 10.1109/tns.2015.2420578 10.1109/TNS.2004.829781 10.1088/0031‐9155/53/7/003 10.1109/23.682430 10.1109/TNS.2011.2165968 10.1088/1748‐0221/9/06/P06016 10.1109/TNS.2013.2252193 10.1109/NSSMIC.1993.373521 10.1109/TNS.2006.873710 10.1109/NSSMIC.2009.5402143 10.1109/NSSMIC.2011.6153679 10.1109/TBME.2015.2456640 10.1109/23.856555 10.1109/TMI.2010.2095464 10.1109/TNS.2009.2015308 10.1063/1.1715998 10.1214/ss/1030037906 10.1109/TNS.1976.4328354 10.1109/TNS.2014.2379620 10.1088/2057‐1976/2/1/015010 10.1088/0031‐9155/61/7/2851 10.1109/TMI.2012.2213827 10.1109/NSSMIC.2001.1008696 10.1088/0031‐9155/61/4/1650 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
Copyright_xml | – notice: American Association of Physicists in Medicine – notice: 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 OTOTI |
DOI | 10.1118/1.4950719 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic OSTI.GOV |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Physics |
EISSN | 2473-4209 |
EndPage | 3061 |
ExternalDocumentID | 22685109 27277052 10_1118_1_4950719 MP0719 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) grantid: 241711 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004963 – fundername: Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) funderid: 241711 |
GroupedDBID | --- --Z -DZ .GJ 0R~ 1OB 1OC 29M 2WC 33P 36B 3O- 4.4 476 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS AAHHS AANLZ AAQQT AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCUV ABEFU ABFTF ABJNI ABLJU ABQWH ABTAH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBEA ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACPOU ACSMX ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADKYN ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AENEX AEQDE AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AHBTC AIACR AIAGR AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMYDB ASPBG BFHJK C45 CS3 DCZOG DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS EJD EMB EMOBN F5P G8K HDBZQ HGLYW I-F KBYEO LATKE LEEKS LOXES LUTES LYRES MEWTI O9- OVD P2P P2W PALCI PHY RJQFR RNS ROL SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TN5 TWZ USG WOHZO WXSBR XJT ZGI ZVN ZXP ZY4 ZZTAW AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AAYCA ABDPE AFWVQ AITYG ALVPJ AAYXX ADMLS AEYWJ AGHNM AGYGG CITATION AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY NPM 7X8 AAJUZ AAPBV ABCVL ABPTK ADDAD AEUQT OTOTI |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4219-cb27f2bbf6fa28d3b6865aaa6b72016cd8e2c318f27d7d0a142fa37d29a1eb193 |
ISSN | 0094-2405 |
IngestDate | Fri May 19 01:40:11 EDT 2023 Fri Jul 11 09:47:06 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:01:41 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:54:07 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:49 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:26:26 EST 2025 Sun Jul 14 13:20:53 EDT 2019 Fri Jun 21 00:17:37 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | scintillation cameras maximum likelihood estimation PET data processing |
Language | English |
License | 0094-2405/2016/43(6)/3049/13/$30.00 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4219-cb27f2bbf6fa28d3b6865aaa6b72016cd8e2c318f27d7d0a142fa37d29a1eb193 |
Notes | nicolas.gross‐weege@pmi.rwth‐aachen.de Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail schulz@pmi.rwth‐aachen.de and ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 27277052 |
PQID | 1795875142 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4950719 wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4950719_MP0719 proquest_miscellaneous_1795875142 pubmed_primary_27277052 osti_scitechconnect_22685109 scitation_primary_10_1118_1_4950719 crossref_citationtrail_10_1118_1_4950719 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | June 2016 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2016 text: June 2016 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Med Phys |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
References | Düppenbecker, Weissler, Gebhardt, Schug, Wehner, Marsden, Schulz (c20) 2016; 2 Lecomte, Pepin, Rouleau, Saoudi, Andreaco, Casey, Nutt, Dautet, Webb (c26) 1998; 45 Pani (c2) 2009; 197 Lerche, Salomon, Goldschmidt, Lodomez, Weissler, Solf (c10) 2016; 61 Van Der Laan, Maas, Schaart, Bruyndonckx, Léonard, Van Eijk (c16) 2006; 53 Jha, Barrett, Frey, Clarkson, Caucci, Kupinski (c18) 2015; 60 Weissler (c19) 2015; 34 Schug, Lerche, Weissler, Gebhardt, Goldschmidt, Wehner, Dueppenbecker, Salomon, Hallen, Kiessling, Schulz (c30) 2016; 61 Barrett, Hunter, Miller, Moore, Chen, Furenlid (c7) 2009; 56 Goldschmidt, Schug, Lerche, Salomon, Gebhardt, Weissler, Wehner, Dueppenbecker, Kiessling, Schulz (c24) 2016; 63 Ling, Burnett, Lewellen, Miyaoka (c11) 2008; 53 Li, Hunter, Lewellen, Miyaoka (c17) 2012; 59 Anger (c1) 1958; 29 Salomon, Goedicke, Schweizer, Aach, Schulz (c28) 2011; 30 Tabacchini, Westerwoudt, Borghi, Seifert, Schaart (c22) 2014; 9 Jan (c27) 2004; 49 Salomon, Goldschmidt, Botnar, Kiessling, Schulz (c29) 2012; 31 Gray, Macovski (c6) 1976; 23 Pepin, Bérard, Perrot, Pépin, Houde, Lecomte, Melcher, Dautet (c25) 2004; 51 Joung, Miyaoka, Kohlmyer, Lewellen (c8) 2000; 47 Goldschmidt, Lerche, Solf, Salomon, Kiessling, Schulz (c23) 2013; 60 Bora, Barrett, Jha, Clarkson (c15) 2015; 62 Schug, Wehner, Goldschmidt, Lerche, Dueppenbecker, Hallen, Weissler, Gebhardt, Kiessling, Schulz (c3) 2015; 62 Aldrich (c5) 1997; 12 2015; 34 2006; 53 1976; 23 2000; 47 2011 2004; 49 2009 2011; 30 2005 1993 2009; 197 2008; 53 2012; 59 1998; 45 2012; 31 2009; 56 2004; 51 2016; 2 2015; 60 1958; 29 2015; 62 1997; 12 2013; 60 2016; 63 2001; 3 2016; 61 2014; 9 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_29_1 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 e_1_2_8_30_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 47 start-page: 1104 year: 2000 ident: c8 article-title: Implementation of ML based positioning algorithms for scintillation cameras publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 29 start-page: 27 year: 1958 ident: c1 article-title: Scintillation camera publication-title: Rev. Sci. Instrum. – volume: 12 start-page: 162 year: 1997 ident: c5 article-title: R. A. Fisher and the making of maximum likelihood 1912-1922 publication-title: Stat. Sci. – volume: 61 start-page: 2851 year: 2016 ident: c30 article-title: Initial PET performance evaluation of a preclinical insert for PET/MRI with digital SIPM technology publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 59 start-page: 3 year: 2012 ident: c17 article-title: Use of Cramer–Rao lower bound for performance evaluation of different monolithic crystal PET detector designs publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 60 start-page: 1550 year: 2013 ident: c23 article-title: Towards software-based real-time singles and coincidence processing of digital PET detector raw data publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 61 start-page: 1650 year: 2016 ident: c10 article-title: Maximum likelihood positioning and energy correction for scintillation detectors publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 53 start-page: 1843 year: 2008 ident: c11 article-title: Parametric positioning of a continuous crystal PET detector with depth of interaction decoding publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 60 start-page: 7359 year: 2015 ident: c18 article-title: Singular value decomposition for photon-processing nuclear imaging systems and applications for reconstruction and computing null functions publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 2 start-page: 015010 year: 2016 ident: c20 article-title: Development of an MRI-compatible digital SiPM detector stack for simultaneous PET/MRI publication-title: Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express – volume: 34 start-page: 2258 year: 2015 ident: c19 article-title: A digital preclinical PET/MRI insert and initial results publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 23 start-page: 849 year: 1976 ident: c6 article-title: Maximum a posteriori estimation of position in scintillation cameras publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 31 start-page: 2234 year: 2012 ident: c29 article-title: A self-normalization reconstruction technique for PET scans using the positron emission data publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 45 start-page: 478 year: 1998 ident: c26 article-title: Investigation of GSO, LSO and YSO scintillators using reverse avalanche photodiodes publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 49 start-page: 4543 year: 2004 ident: c27 article-title: : A simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 51 start-page: 789 year: 2004 ident: c25 article-title: Properties of LYSO and recent LSO scintillators for phoswich PET detectors publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 62 start-page: 42 year: 2015 ident: c15 article-title: Impact of the Fano factor on position and energy estimation in scintillation detectors publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 56 start-page: 725 year: 2009 ident: c7 article-title: Maximum-likelihood methods for processing signals from gamma-ray detectors publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 62 start-page: 669 year: 2015 ident: c3 article-title: Data processing for a high resolution preclinical PET detector based on philips DPC digital SiPMs publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 53 start-page: 1063 year: 2006 ident: c16 article-title: Using Cramér-Rao theory combined with Monte Carlo simulations for the optimization of monolithic scintillator PET detectors publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 9 start-page: P06016 year: 2014 ident: c22 article-title: Probabilities of triggering and validation in a digital silicon photomultiplier publication-title: J. Instrum. – volume: 63 start-page: 316 year: 2016 ident: c24 article-title: Software-based real-time acquisition and processing of PET detector raw data publication-title: IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. – volume: 30 start-page: 804 year: 2011 ident: c28 article-title: Simultaneous reconstruction of activity and attenuation for PET/MR publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 197 start-page: 383 year: 2009 ident: c2 article-title: Revisited position arithmetics for LaBr : Ce continuous crystals publication-title: Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. – volume: 62 start-page: 42 issue: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 56 article-title: Impact of the Fano factor on position and energy estimation in scintillation detectors publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 31 start-page: 2234 issue: 12 year: 2012 end-page: 2240 article-title: A self‐normalization reconstruction technique for PET scans using the positron emission data publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 61 start-page: 1650 issue: 4 year: 2016 article-title: Maximum likelihood positioning and energy correction for scintillation detectors publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – start-page: 1959 year: 2009 end-page: 1965 – volume: 47 start-page: 1104 issue: 3 year: 2000 end-page: 1111 article-title: Implementation of ML based positioning algorithms for scintillation cameras publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – year: 2005 article-title: List‐mode spect reconstruction using empirical likelihood – volume: 23 start-page: 849 issue: 1 year: 1976 end-page: 852 article-title: Maximum a posteriori estimation of position in scintillation cameras publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 60 start-page: 7359 issue: 18 year: 2015 end-page: 7385 article-title: Singular value decomposition for photon‐processing nuclear imaging systems and applications for reconstruction and computing null functions publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 45 start-page: 478 issue: 3 year: 1998 end-page: 482 article-title: Investigation of GSO, LSO and YSO scintillators using reverse avalanche photodiodes publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 60 start-page: 1550 issue: 3 year: 2013 end-page: 1559 article-title: Towards software‐based real‐time singles and coincidence processing of digital PET detector raw data publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 197 start-page: 383 issue: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 386 article-title: Revisited position arithmetics for LaBr : Ce continuous crystals publication-title: Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. – volume: 9 start-page: P06016 issue: 06 year: 2014 article-title: Probabilities of triggering and validation in a digital silicon photomultiplier publication-title: J. Instrum. – volume: 29 start-page: 27 issue: 1 year: 1958 end-page: 33 article-title: Scintillation camera publication-title: Rev. Sci. Instrum. – volume: 2 start-page: 015010 issue: 1 year: 2016 article-title: Development of an MRI‐compatible digital SiPM detector stack for simultaneous PET/MRI publication-title: Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express – volume: 63 start-page: 316 year: 2016 end-page: 327 article-title: Software‐based real‐time acquisition and processing of PET detector raw data publication-title: IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. – volume: 56 start-page: 725 issue: 3 year: 2009 end-page: 735 article-title: Maximum‐likelihood methods for processing signals from gamma‐ray detectors publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 12 start-page: 162 issue: 3 year: 1997 end-page: 176 article-title: R. A. Fisher and the making of maximum likelihood 1912‐1922 publication-title: Stat. Sci. – volume: 61 start-page: 2851 issue: 7 year: 2016 end-page: 2878 article-title: Initial PET performance evaluation of a preclinical insert for PET/MRI with digital SIPM technology publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 53 start-page: 1843 issue: 7 year: 2008 end-page: 1863 article-title: Parametric positioning of a continuous crystal PET detector with depth of interaction decoding publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 59 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2012 end-page: 12 article-title: Use of Cramer–Rao lower bound for performance evaluation of different monolithic crystal PET detector designs publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – start-page: 3610 year: 2011 end-page: 3613 – volume: 53 start-page: 1063 issue: 3 year: 2006 end-page: 1070 article-title: Using Cramér‐Rao theory combined with Monte Carlo simulations for the optimization of monolithic scintillator PET detectors publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 34 start-page: 2258 year: 2015 end-page: 2270 article-title: A digital preclinical PET/MRI insert and initial results publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 3 start-page: 1821 year: 2001 end-page: 1825 – volume: 30 start-page: 804 issue: 3 year: 2011 end-page: 813 article-title: Simultaneous reconstruction of activity and attenuation for PET/MR publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 51 start-page: 789 issue: 3 year: 2004 end-page: 795 article-title: Properties of LYSO and recent LSO scintillators for phoswich PET detectors publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 62 start-page: 669 year: 2015 end-page: 678 article-title: Data processing for a high resolution preclinical PET detector based on philips DPC digital SiPMs publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 49 start-page: 4543 issue: 19 year: 2004 end-page: 4561 article-title: : A simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – start-page: 1414 year: 1993 end-page: 1416 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/49/19/007 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2009.10.109 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1109/tmi.2015.2427993 – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/60/18/7359 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.1109/tns.2015.2420578 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1109/TNS.2004.829781 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/53/7/003 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.1109/23.682430 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1109/TNS.2011.2165968 – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.1088/1748‐0221/9/06/P06016 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1109/TNS.2013.2252193 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.1993.373521 – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1109/TNS.2006.873710 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2009.5402143 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2011.6153679 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2456640 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1109/23.856555 – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2095464 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1109/TNS.2009.2015308 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1063/1.1715998 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1214/ss/1030037906 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1109/TNS.1976.4328354 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1109/TNS.2014.2379620 – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.1088/2057‐1976/2/1/015010 – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/61/7/2851 – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2213827 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2001.1008696 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.1088/0031‐9155/61/4/1650 |
SSID | ssj0006350 |
Score | 2.293719 |
Snippet | Purpose:
In high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator... Purpose: In high‐resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator... In high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator arrays in... PURPOSEIn high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator... Purpose: In high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator... |
SourceID | osti proquest pubmed crossref wiley scitation |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 3049 |
SubjectTerms | 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ALGORITHMS Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers Compton effect data processing Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications DISTRIBUTION ENERGY RESOLUTION General statistical methods Image data processing or generation, in general Image reconstruction image resolution maximum likelihood estimation Measuring half‐life of a radioactive substance medical image processing Medical image quality PET phantoms Photodiodes Photons Position sensitive detectors POSITIONING POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY positron emission tomography Positron emission tomography (PET) PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTIONS Probability theory RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY READOUT SYSTEMS Scintigraphy scintillation scintillation cameras Scintillation detectors SENSITIVITY SIMULATION SPATIAL RESOLUTION VISIBLE RADIATION |
Title | Maximum likelihood positioning algorithm for high-resolution PET scanners |
URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4950719 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1118%2F1.4950719 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27277052 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1795875142 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22685109 |
Volume | 43 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZQJy57QDAuCwwULkJIVUbiXP04wWAggiqtg71FvmWtliZT1yLEr-c4dpxu6ibgpa1Sy038fT3nO_Y5NkKvSRkLEkjuRSKlXlRy5jHOYk8EzOdZJLIgUfXO-bfk4Cj6chwfd2e1m-qSBdvlv9fWlfwPqnANcFVVsv-ArO0ULsBnwBdeAWF4_SuMc_prOlvOhtX0VFbTdoPiLgmrrT2sThqI_SezNpdQbUzsQXBt7mg42h8Pz2Fga5MD30nUbulGz3m0k7KqUJrqIzzsvMEn5V69H1Lqs9lbRlEr0A_5ZHlyKWdemTl1cIsWrgu7H79pXrVT2d-b6nRG56uTEUHSJ011BpZEasFGL1TL9hqO0tCLsE9Wja7em8mQK7nClqv6hGAXQjjQQaR3WDaNEKQjCEZVvrmBIUoAM7ex9yH_emhdMagpXYNk7spsLQU9v7P9XhAkgwYM67pgYxPdBkmisyMuxjGtEBnfQ3dNBOHuaTrcRzdkvYVu5SZHYgvdHGngHqDPhh9uzw93hR-u5YcL_HAv8cMFfrgdPx6io4_74_cHnjk6w-MR-CCPM5yWmLEyKSnORMiSLIkppQlLFWxcZBJzMOclTkUqfBpEuKRhKjChAXhvEj5Cg7qp5TZyQRMK7IdlllERUcwJeAiRSEIkDgmjoYPeduNXdCOkjjepCh1fZkVQmKF20Evb9ExvprKu0Y4CoVDDLfmEq3wvvig6rB30ogOnAEuolrdoLZvleQGuJYboGx7FQY81avZXMMj01I_hm1cWxutuYU2rn828b1GcidJBb1oaXN1PkY_U25Prn-gputP_lXbQYDFfymegdBfsueHzH_IlpvM |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maximum+likelihood+positioning+algorithm+for+high-resolution+PET+scanners&rft.jtitle=Medical+physics+%28Lancaster%29&rft.au=Gross-Weege%2C+Nicolas&rft.au=Schug%2C+David&rft.au=Hallen%2C+Patrick&rft.au=Schulz%2C+Volkmar&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118%2F1.4950719&rft.externalDocID=22685109 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon |