Considerations for conducting a scoping review in pharmacy education

Interrogating the literature is among the first steps a researcher undertakes when actuating a research project or also when any scholar might seek to know what has been done in an area, best practices for conducting a certain activity, or simply to seek answers for a question ranging from one'...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Vol. 14; p. 100448
Main Authors Lucas, Cherie, Desselle, Shane P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2024
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Interrogating the literature is among the first steps a researcher undertakes when actuating a research project or also when any scholar might seek to know what has been done in an area, best practices for conducting a certain activity, or simply to seek answers for a question ranging from one's own personal curiosity to those that might affect departmental or institutional guidance. Decisions on the type of review process to undertake is one that is not taken lightly. This methods commentary outlines the reasons for conducting a scoping review versus a systematic review for topics related to pharmacy education. Considerations for conducting the scoping review are outlined including considerations for writing a protocol prior to conducting a scoping review, to potential platforms to use for transparency of sharing data, processes related to guidelines for data extraction and types of search strategies utilized.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2667-2766
2667-2766
DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100448