A Systematic Approach for MRI Brain Tumor Localization and Segmentation Using Deep Learning and Active Contouring

• Published in: Journal of healthcare engineering Vol. 2021; pp. 1 - 13
• Main Authors: Gunasekara, Shanaka Ramesh, Kaldera, H. N. T. K., Dissanayake, Maheshi B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Hindawi 2021
• Subjects: Algorithms; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Deep Learning; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Reproducibility of Results
• DOI: 10.1155/2021/6695108
• ISSN: 2040-2295; 2040-2309

One of the main requirements of tumor extraction is the annotation and segmentation of tumor boundaries correctly. For this purpose, we present a threefold deep learning architecture. First, classifiers are implemented with a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) and second a region-based convolutional neural network (R-CNN) is performed on the classified images to localize the tumor regions of interest. As the third and final stage, the concentrated tumor boundary is contoured for the segmentation process by using the Chan–Vese segmentation algorithm. As the typical edge detection algorithms based on gradients of pixel intensity tend to fail in the medical image segmentation process, an active contour algorithm defined with the level set function is proposed. Specifically, the Chan–Vese algorithm was applied to detect the tumor boundaries for the segmentation process. To evaluate the performance of the overall system, Dice Score, Rand Index (RI), Variation of Information (VOI), Global Consistency Error (GCE), Boundary Displacement Error (BDE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) were calculated by comparing the segmented boundary area which is the final output of the proposed, against the demarcations of the subject specialists which is the gold standard. Overall performance of the proposed architecture for both glioma and meningioma segmentation is with an average Dice Score of 0.92 (also, with RI of 0.9936, VOI of 0.0301, GCE of 0.004, BDE of 2.099, PSNR of 77.076, and MAE of 52.946), pointing to the high reliability of the proposed architecture.