Significance of Exchanging SSURGO and STATSGO Data When Modeling Hydrology in Diverse Physiographic Terranes
The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL‐based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because th...
Saved in:
Published in | Soil Science Society of America journal Vol. 77; no. 3; pp. 877 - 889 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Madison
The Soil Science Society of America, Inc
01.05.2013
American Society of Agronomy |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0361-5995 1435-0661 |
DOI | 10.2136/sssaj2012.0069 |
Cover
Abstract | The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL‐based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data—Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)—for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km2. Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available‐water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil‐water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low‐ and high‐flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil‐water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL-based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data-Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)-for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km^sup 2^. Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available-water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil-water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low- and high-flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil-water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL-based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data—Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)—for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km². Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available-water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil-water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low- and high-flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil-water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive. The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL‐based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data—Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)—for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km2. Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available‐water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil‐water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low‐ and high‐flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil‐water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive. The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL‐based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data—Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)—for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km 2 . Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available‐water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil‐water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low‐ and high‐flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil‐water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive. The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL-based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data-Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)-for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km sigma up 2 greater than or equal to Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available-water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil-water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low- and high-flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil-water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive. [PUBLICATIONABSTRACT] |
Author | Newson, Jeremy K. Taylor, Charles J. Williamson, Tanja N. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Tanja N. surname: Williamson fullname: Williamson, Tanja N. email: tnwillia@usgs.gov organization: US Geological Survey – sequence: 2 givenname: Charles J. surname: Taylor fullname: Taylor, Charles J. organization: Kentucky Geological Survey – sequence: 3 givenname: Jeremy K. surname: Newson fullname: Newson, Jeremy K. organization: US Geological Survey |
BookMark | eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVJoZu0154FvfTirb4sWYcelnyXlIR6Q49GkUdeLY60lbxt_e_j7YYcAiW5aMTwPMMM7yE6CDEAQh8pmTPK5Zecs1kzQtmcEKnfoBkVvCyIlPQAzQiXtCi1Lt-hw5zXhNBSEzJDfe274J23JljA0eHTv3ZlQudDh-v69sf5NTahxfVysayn_4kZDP65goC_xxb6HXUxtin2sRuxD_jE_4aUAd-sxuxjl8xm5S1eQkomQH6P3jrTZ_jwWI_Q7dnp8viiuLo-vzxeXBVWMKIL6jg4LRyR0OqqdaWtaNsqbYSqrIXSCieBEgutapWsSkWkk3d3XAFY5YzmR-jzfu4mxV9byENz77OFvp-WiNvcMF5VShIt2IsolYIxIQgnr0CZ0oryUk7op2foOm5TmG5uqKBaKcVLOlFiT9kUc07gGusHM_gYhmR831DS7IJtnoJtdsFO2vyZtkn-3qTx_8LXvfDH9zC-QDf14hur6907tf75D-WYud0 |
CODEN | SSSJD4 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_gwat_13357 crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_2508 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_140605 crossref_primary_10_2134_age2019_08_0066 crossref_primary_10_1111_1752_1688_12352 crossref_primary_10_1080_01431161_2021_1988186 crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_13315 crossref_primary_10_4236_jgis_2017_93016 crossref_primary_10_1111_1752_1688_12777 crossref_primary_10_3390_app13042245 crossref_primary_10_3390_w9080585 crossref_primary_10_2136_sssaj2014_01_0045 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijgi10090623 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/978-94-009-4678-1_3 10.1002/hyp.3360060208 10.1029/WR023i012p02266 10.1016/0022-1694(90)90207-E 10.1016/0022-1694(88)90090-X 10.1002/hyp.5027 10.1029/WR025i005p00829 10.1016/0022-1694(83)90214-7 10.3354/cr011149 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:6(597) 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 10.1016/0022-1694(84)90159-8 10.1029/RG028i001p00001 10.1007/BF01903418 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.014 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199707)11:9<1115::AID-HYP548>3.0.CO;2-T 10.1007/978-94-009-4678-1_6 10.1029/92WR01561 10.1097/00010694-194111000-00009 10.1002/for.3980100107 10.1029/WR021i012p01841 10.1080/02626667909491834 10.1016/0022-1694(88)90192-8 10.1080/02626668409490960 10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00081-2 10.1016/0304-3800(91)90199-B 10.1029/WR026i001p00043 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © by the Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Copyright American Society of Agronomy May 2013 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © by the Soil Science Society of America, Inc. – notice: Copyright American Society of Agronomy May 2013 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7ST 7T7 7X2 7XB 88I 8AF 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FK 8G5 ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ L6V M0K M2O M2P M7S MBDVC P64 PATMY PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS PYCSY Q9U R05 S0X SOI 7QH 7UA F1W H96 L.G KR7 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.2136/sssaj2012.0069 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Environment Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Science Database (Alumni Edition) STEM Database Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Research Library (Alumni) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Engineering Collection Agricultural Science Database Research Library Science Database Engineering Database Research Library (Corporate) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic University of Michigan SIRS Editorial Environment Abstracts Aqualine Water Resources Abstracts ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Civil Engineering Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Agricultural Science Database University of Michigan Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials SIRS Editorial ProQuest AP Science ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Engineering Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Research Library Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) ProQuest Central (New) Engineering Collection Engineering Database ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Materials Science & Engineering Collection Environmental Science Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Environment Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Aqualine Water Resources Abstracts Civil Engineering Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Agricultural Science Database AGRICOLA CrossRef Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Technology Research Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1435-0661 |
EndPage | 889 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3043058391 10_2136_sssaj2012_0069 SAJ2SSSAJ20120069 |
Genre | miscellaneous Feature |
GeographicLocations | United States--US Kentucky USA, Kentucky |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Kentucky – name: United States--US – name: USA, Kentucky |
GroupedDBID | -DZ -~X .86 .~0 0R~ 123 186 18M 1OB 1OC 2WC 33P 3V. 53G 6KN 7X2 7XC 88I 8AF 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FW 8G5 8R4 8R5 8WZ A6W AAHBH AAHHS AAHQN AAMNL AANLZ AAYCA ABCQX ABCUV ABEFU ABJCF ABJNI ABUWG ACAWQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGOD ACIWK ACPOU ACPRK ACXQS ADFRT ADKYN ADYHW ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AENEX AEQDE AEUYN AEUYR AFFNX AFFPM AFKRA AFRAH AFWVQ AHBTC AIDBO AITYG AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMYDB ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BFHJK BGLVJ BHPHI BKOMP BKSAR BPHCQ C1A CCPQU CS3 DCZOG DDYGU DU5 DWQXO E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD GNUQQ GUQSH H13 HCIFZ H~9 L6V L7B LAS LATKE LEEKS LK5 M0K M2O M2P M2Q M7R M7S MEWTI MV1 MVM NHAZY NHB O9- OHT P2P PATMY PCBAR PK- PQQKQ PRG PROAC PTHSS PYCSY Q2X R05 RAK ROL RPX RXW S0X SAMSI SJN SUPJJ TAE TN5 TR2 TWZ U2A VJK WOQ WXSBR XIH XJT XOL Y6R YYP ZCA ~02 ~KM AAYXX ADXHL AETEA AEYWJ AGHNM AGYGG CITATION HGLYW PHGZM PHGZT 7ST 7T7 7XB 8FD 8FK AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY C1K FR3 MBDVC P64 PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS PUEGO Q9U SOI 7QH 7UA F1W H96 L.G LH4 KR7 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-1f3ef94f06ed98df5c81dd79a478cce5c4f6e10ced7d7685706f6bb37eec7fa93 |
IEDL.DBID | 8FG |
ISSN | 0361-5995 |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 23:52:02 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 13:49:52 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 11:45:11 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 14:27:22 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:41 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:33:27 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:36:03 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4209-1f3ef94f06ed98df5c81dd79a478cce5c4f6e10ced7d7685706f6bb37eec7fa93 |
Notes | All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 1419777351 |
PQPubID | 40901 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2388760942 proquest_miscellaneous_1642244030 proquest_miscellaneous_1627971356 proquest_journals_1419777351 crossref_citationtrail_10_2136_sssaj2012_0069 crossref_primary_10_2136_sssaj2012_0069 wiley_primary_10_2136_sssaj2012_0069_SAJ2SSSAJ20120069 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | May 2013 2013-05-00 20130501 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2013 text: May 2013 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Madison |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Madison |
PublicationTitle | Soil Science Society of America journal |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | The Soil Science Society of America, Inc American Society of Agronomy |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Soil Science Society of America, Inc – name: American Society of Agronomy |
References | 2002; 16 1991; 56 1984; 69 1991; 12 2012 2011 2006b 2006a 1991; 10 2009 2008 1997 1988; 102 1970; 10 2007 1988; 100 1984; 29 1994 1993 1992 2003 2002 1985; 21 1989; 25 1998; 24 11 1992; 6 1987; 23 1979; 24 1990; 115 1997; 11 1990; 26 2000 1990; 28 1992; 28 1986b 1983; 65 1986 1941 1999; 11 1986a 2008; 211 1988 Ritter D.F. (e_1_2_8_25_1) 1986 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_29_1 Helsel D.R. (e_1_2_8_14_1) 2002 e_1_2_8_47_1 e_1_2_8_46_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 e_1_2_8_48_1 Morlock S.E. (e_1_2_8_22_1) 2008 Quinn P.F. (e_1_2_8_24_1) 1997 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 Coon W.F. (e_1_2_8_11_1) 2011 Wolock D.M. (e_1_2_8_42_1) 2003 e_1_2_8_8_1 Taylor C.J. (e_1_2_8_30_1) 2008 Woods A.J. (e_1_2_8_49_1) 2002 e_1_2_8_43_1 e_1_2_8_45_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_44_1 e_1_2_8_40_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 Taylor C. J. (e_1_2_8_31_1) 2012 e_1_2_8_13_1 Wolock D. M. (e_1_2_8_41_1) 1993 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_38_1 Williamson T. N. (e_1_2_8_39_1) 2009 e_1_2_8_16_1 USEPA (e_1_2_8_36_1) 2011 e_1_2_8_37_1 USDA‐NRCS (e_1_2_8_34_1) 2006 McCuen R. (e_1_2_8_21_1); 11 USDA‐NRCS. (e_1_2_8_32_1) 1993 USDA‐NRCS (e_1_2_8_35_1) 2006 Martin G.R. (e_1_2_8_20_1) 2000 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 Beven K.J. (e_1_2_8_4_1) 1986 USDA‐NRCS (e_1_2_8_33_1) 1994 |
References_xml | – year: 2011 – volume: 211 start-page: 57 year: 2008 end-page: 76 article-title: Use of an integrated flow model to estimate ecologically relevant hydrologic characteristics at stream biomonitoring sites publication-title: Ecol. Modell. – start-page: 107 year: 1986b end-page: 131 – volume: 24 start-page: 43 year: 1979 end-page: 69 article-title: A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/Un modèle à base physique de zone d'appel variable de l'hydrologie du bassin versant publication-title: Hydrol. Sci. Bull. – volume: 26 start-page: 43 year: 1990 end-page: 58 article-title: On hydrologic similarity: 3. A dimensionless flood frequency model using a generalized geomorphologic unit hydrograph and partial area runoff generation publication-title: Water Resour. Res. – year: 2009 – volume: 12 start-page: 179 year: 1991 end-page: 204 article-title: Evapotranspiration and runoff from large land areas: Land surface hydrology for atmospheric general circulation models publication-title: Surv. Geophys. – volume: 21 start-page: 1841 year: 1985 end-page: 1850 article-title: Shenandoah watershed study: Calibration of a topography‐based, variable contributing area hydrological model to a small forested catchment publication-title: Water Resour. Res. – volume: 23 start-page: 2266 year: 1987 end-page: 2278 article-title: On hydrologic similarity: 2. A scaled model of storm runoff production publication-title: Water Resour. Res. – volume: 6 start-page: 199 year: 1992 end-page: 214 article-title: Towards identifying sources of subsurface flow: A comparison of components identified by a physically based runoff model and those determined by chemical mixing techniques publication-title: Hydrol. Processes – year: 1941 – volume: 11 start-page: 149 year: 1999 end-page: 159 article-title: Explaining spatial variability in mean annual runoff in the conterminous United States publication-title: Clim. Res. – volume: 100 start-page: 353 year: 1988 end-page: 375 article-title: On hydrological heterogeneity—Catchment morphology and catchment response publication-title: J. Hydrol. – volume: 25 start-page: 829 year: 1989 end-page: 837 article-title: The relationship of catchment topography and soil hydraulic characteristics to lake alkalinity in the northeastern United States publication-title: Water Resour. Res. – volume: 11 start-page: 1115 year: 1997 end-page: 1129 article-title: A MATLAB implementation of TOPMODEL publication-title: Hydrol. Processes – volume: 115 start-page: 243 year: 1990 end-page: 259 article-title: Topographic effects on flow path and surface water chemistry of the Llyn Brianne catchments in Wales publication-title: J. Hydrol. – year: 2003 – year: 2000 – volume: 69 start-page: 119 year: 1984 end-page: 143 article-title: Testing a physically‐based flood forecasting model (TOPMODEL) for three U.K. catchments publication-title: J. Hydrol. – volume: 28 start-page: 2733 year: 1992 end-page: 2741 article-title: Sensitivity of a basin evolution model to the nature of runoff production and to initial conditions publication-title: Water Resour. Res. – year: 2006a – start-page: 187 year: 1986a end-page: 202 – volume: 29 start-page: 425 year: 1984 end-page: 434 article-title: Infiltration into a class of vertically non‐uniform soils publication-title: Hydrol. Sci. J. – year: 1992 – year: 1994 – year: 2012 – volume: 102 start-page: 29 year: 1988 end-page: 47 article-title: Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling publication-title: J. Hydrol. – year: 1986 – volume: 24 start-page: 299 year: 1998 end-page: 314 article-title: Interactions between model predictions, parameters and DTM scales for topmodel publication-title: Comput. Geosci. – volume: 65 start-page: 139 year: 1983 end-page: 158 article-title: Catchment geomorphology and the dynamics of runoff contributing areas publication-title: J. Hydrol. – year: 2002 – year: 2008 – year: 1988 – volume: 11 start-page: 597 end-page: 602 article-title: 2006. Evaluation of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency index publication-title: J. Hydrol. Eng. – start-page: 39 year: 1986 end-page: 56 – volume: 16 start-page: 1871 year: 2002 end-page: 1877 article-title: Estimation of baseflow residence times in watersheds from the runoff hydrograph recession: Method and application in the Neversink watershed, Catskill Mountains, New York publication-title: Hydrol. Processes – year: 2006b – start-page: 31 year: 1997 end-page: 52 – volume: 28 start-page: 1 year: 1990 end-page: 18 article-title: Similarity and scale in catchment storm response publication-title: Rev. Geophys. – volume: 10 start-page: 105 year: 1991 end-page: 116 article-title: Hydrological effects of changes in levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide publication-title: J. Forecast. – year: 1993 – volume: 10 start-page: 282 year: 1970 end-page: 290 article-title: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles publication-title: J. Hydrol. – volume: 56 start-page: 171 year: 1991 end-page: 196 article-title: Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: Basis for distributed simulation publication-title: Ecol. Modell. – year: 2007 article-title: Implications of SSURGO versus STATSGO data for modeling daily streamflow in Kentucky – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-4678-1_3 – volume-title: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 339 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 – volume-title: Scientific Investigations Rep. 2012–5071 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 – start-page: 31 volume-title: Distributed hydrological modeling: Applications of the TOPMODEL concept year: 1997 ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 – volume-title: Statistical Methods in Water Resources. Chapter A3 in Techniques of the Water‐Resources Investigations of the USGS Book 4‐ Hydrologic Analysis and Interpretation year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 – volume-title: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Rep. 2008–1322 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1002/hyp.3360060208 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1029/WR023i012p02266 – volume-title: Simulating the variable‐source‐area concept of streamflow generation with the watershed model TOPMODEL year: 1993 ident: e_1_2_8_41_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_45_1 doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(90)90207-E – ident: e_1_2_8_48_1 doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(88)90090-X – volume-title: Soil survey manual. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service year: 1993 ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_37_1 doi: 10.1002/hyp.5027 – volume-title: Process Geomorphology year: 1986 ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_40_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_44_1 doi: 10.1029/WR025i005p00829 – volume-title: U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Rep. 2011–1202 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(83)90214-7 – ident: e_1_2_8_46_1 doi: 10.3354/cr011149 – volume-title: State soil geographic (STATSGO) data base for Kentucky year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 – volume-title: Draft guidance on identifying waters protected by the clean water act year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 – volume: 11 start-page: 597 ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 article-title: 2006. Evaluation of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency index publication-title: J. Hydrol. Eng. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:6(597) – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(84)90159-8 – ident: e_1_2_8_47_1 doi: 10.1029/RG028i001p00001 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1007/BF01903418 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.014 – volume-title: U.S. Geological Survey Water‐Resources Investigations Rep. 2000–4239 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199707)11:9<1115::AID-HYP548>3.0.CO;2-T – volume-title: The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER)—A water‐budget modeling approach for managing water‐supply resources in Kentucky—Phase I—Data processing, model development, and application to non‐karst areas. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Rep. 34 year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_8_39_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-4678-1_6 – volume-title: Soil survey geographic (SSURGO) database for GA. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1029/92WR01561 – ident: e_1_2_8_38_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1097/00010694-194111000-00009 – volume-title: Infiltration‐excess overland flow estimated by TOPMODEL for the conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Rep. 03–310 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_8_42_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_43_1 doi: 10.1002/for.3980100107 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1029/WR021i012p01841 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1080/02626667909491834 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(88)90192-8 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1080/02626668409490960 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 – start-page: 187 volume-title: Hillslope processes year: 1986 ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00081-2 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1016/0304-3800(91)90199-B – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.1029/WR026i001p00043 – volume-title: Ecoregions of Kentucky (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs). (map scale 1:1,000,000) year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_8_49_1 – volume-title: U.S. general soil map (STATSGO2). Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 |
SSID | ssj0015900 |
Score | 2.13375 |
Snippet | The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL‐based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function... The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL-based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 877 |
SubjectTerms | Alluvial plains aquifers Basins Climate change Drought Field capacity Floods High flow Hydrologic models Hydrology Karstic areas Kentucky landscapes Mathematical models model validation Moisture content Mountain regions mountains multipliers Partitioning Porosity Precipitation Programming languages Sinkholes Soil (material) Soil surveys Soil water soil water storage Stores storms Stream discharge Stream flow Streams Studies surveys Water availability Water quality Water storage |
Title | Significance of Exchanging SSURGO and STATSGO Data When Modeling Hydrology in Diverse Physiographic Terranes |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2136%2Fsssaj2012.0069 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1419777351 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1627971356 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1642244030 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2388760942 |
Volume | 77 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9swDBa29rIdhj2xbF2hAQN2MmpZsmSfhmxNGvTQDXUC9GbIElWkKJwuToHt34-UnbSXdhfDsHmwSYqkxMfH2BefO-m1KxJLLe4qgzIppC5xuVsddNoI62K1xZmeLdTpRX4xHLh1Q1nl1iZGQ-1Xjs7Ij4QSGKoYmYtvN78TQo2i7OoAofGU7Qv0NKTnxfRkl0UgRMw-VykSGqzVD23MhNRHXdfZK3R-NK6Tip3vO6W7SPN-vBodzvQlezFEinzci_YVewLta_Z8fLkepmXAG3ZdLS9bqvUh0fFV4JM_sZEX3RGvqsX5yU9uW8-r-Xhe4f2x3ViO1rflhIBGfeh89tev48E6X7b8ONZoAI9Vof0o66Xjc1ijP4PuLVtMJ_Mfs2SAT0icygjkIEgIpQqpBl8WPuQOY1NvSqtM4RzkTgUNInXgjcdNR25SlE7TSAPgTLClfMf22lUL7xk3qglpkEUQLigv0sa6UoIJKRShyRyMWLLlX-2G2eIEcXFd4x6D-F3v-F0Tv0fs647-pp-q8SDlwVYc9bC6uvpOF0bs8-41rgtKdiBHVrdIozNTEv6gfoxGYQSj0M49TIMhDToM3ARnI6ajOvzni-tqfJpVFV2pMRmffHj8Hz6yZ1nE2KAqygO2t1nfwieMdDbNYVTnQ7b_fXL26_wfEzn9fA |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaq7QE4oPISSwsYCcQpauI4dnKo0MJu2T5YUJOVeguOH9WiKttutoL-qf7GzuSx7aXl1EsUJXNIxuOZz_bMN4R8NJEOjdCxp7DEnTObeHEoEpjuSjjhF4HSdbbFRIynfP84Ol4jV10tDKZVdj6xdtRmrnGPfDvgAUAVGUbBl7NzD7tG4elq10KjMYsDe_kXlmzVzt4QxvcTY7uj7NvYa7sKeJoz5P53oXUJd76wJomNizRANiMTxWWstY00d8IGvrZGGsDikfTho4silNZq6RSSL4HLX-dY0doj619Hk19Hq3ML7MHZnI4GHlJ5NTSRLAjFdlVV6g-EWyQIxfTq22HwBtveRsh1iNvdIE9bbEoHjTE9I2u2fE6eDE4WLT-HfUFO09lJidlFaCx07ujoX106DAGQpun06PtPqkpD02yQpXA_VEtFwd-XFHuuYeU7HV-aRb2VT2clHdZZIZbWeagNefZM08wuIILa6iWZPohqX5FeOS_ta0IlL5zvwtgF2nET-IXSSWil823sCqZtn3id_nLdspljU43THFY1qO98pe8c9d0nn1fyZw2Px52SW91w5O18rvIb6-uTD6vXMBPxeAU0Mr8AGcFkgh0PxX0yHDATB896twyAKAhRsOxmfSJqc_jPF-fpYJ-lKV6xFBqevLn_H96TR-Psx2F-uDc52CSPWd3hA3M4t0hvubiwbwFnLYt3rXFT8vuh59M17j48Jg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9tAEF6hIFXtoepTDVC6lVr1ZMVer3ftQ1WFJmmAKkU4kbi5632gVMiBOKjlr_HrmPEjcIGeuFiWPQd7PI9vvTPzEfLJRDo0QseewhZ3zmzixaFIwN2VcMLPA6WraouJGM_4wUl0skGu214YLKtsY2IVqM1C4z_yXsADgCoyjIKea8oijgajb-cXHjJI4U5rS6dRm8ihvfoLy7fy6_4AvvVnxkbD6fex1zAMeJoz5AFwoXUJd76wJomNizTANyMTxWWstY00d8IGvrZGGsDlkfThBfI8lNZq6RQOYoLwvykhK_IO2dwbTo6O13sYyMdZ75QGHo71qkdGsiAUvbIs1R9IvTgsFEut76bEW5x7Fy1X6W70gjxvcCrt14b1kmzY4hV51j9dNrM67Gtyls5PC6w0QsOhC0eH_6o2YkiGNE1nxz9-UVUYmk770xTOB2qlKMT-giL_GnbB0_GVWVa_9em8oIOqQsTSqia1HqQ913Rql5BNbfmGzB5FtW9Jp1gU9h2hkufOd2HsAu24Cfxc6SS00vk2djnTtku8Vn-ZbiabI8HGWQYrHNR3ttZ3hvruki9r-fN6pse9kjvt58ga3y6zW0vsko_r2-CVuNUCGllcgoxgMkH2Q_GQDAf8xCHK3i8DgArSFSzBWZeIyhz-88RZ2j9gaYpHbIuGK1sPv8MH8gT8KPu5PzncJk9ZRfaB5Zw7pLNaXtr3ALlW-W5j25T8fmx3ugFjkEBS |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Significance+of+Exchanging+SSURGO+and+STATSGO+Data+When+Modeling+Hydrology+in+Diverse+Physiographic+Terranes&rft.jtitle=Soil+Science+Society+of+America+journal&rft.au=Williamson%2C+Tanja+N&rft.au=Taylor%2C+Charles+J&rft.au=Newson%2C+Jeremy+K&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=877&rft.epage=889&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136%2Fsssaj2012.0069&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-5995&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-5995&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-5995&client=summon |