Significance of Exchanging SSURGO and STATSGO Data When Modeling Hydrology in Diverse Physiographic Terranes

The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL‐based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSoil Science Society of America journal Vol. 77; no. 3; pp. 877 - 889
Main Authors Williamson, Tanja N., Taylor, Charles J., Newson, Jeremy K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Madison The Soil Science Society of America, Inc 01.05.2013
American Society of Agronomy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0361-5995
1435-0661
DOI10.2136/sssaj2012.0069

Cover

Abstract The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL‐based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data—Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)—for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km2. Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available‐water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil‐water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low‐ and high‐flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil‐water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive.
AbstractList The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL-based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data-Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)-for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km^sup 2^. Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available-water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil-water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low- and high-flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil-water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL-based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data—Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)—for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km². Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available-water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil-water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low- and high-flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil-water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive.
The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL‐based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data—Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)—for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km2. Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available‐water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil‐water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low‐ and high‐flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil‐water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive.
The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL‐based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data—Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)—for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km 2 . Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available‐water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil‐water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low‐ and high‐flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil‐water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive.
The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL-based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data-Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)-for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km sigma up 2 greater than or equal to Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available-water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil-water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low- and high-flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil-water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive. [PUBLICATIONABSTRACT]
Author Newson, Jeremy K.
Taylor, Charles J.
Williamson, Tanja N.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Tanja N.
  surname: Williamson
  fullname: Williamson, Tanja N.
  email: tnwillia@usgs.gov
  organization: US Geological Survey
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Charles J.
  surname: Taylor
  fullname: Taylor, Charles J.
  organization: Kentucky Geological Survey
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jeremy K.
  surname: Newson
  fullname: Newson, Jeremy K.
  organization: US Geological Survey
BookMark eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVJoZu0154FvfTirb4sWYcelnyXlIR6Q49GkUdeLY60lbxt_e_j7YYcAiW5aMTwPMMM7yE6CDEAQh8pmTPK5Zecs1kzQtmcEKnfoBkVvCyIlPQAzQiXtCi1Lt-hw5zXhNBSEzJDfe274J23JljA0eHTv3ZlQudDh-v69sf5NTahxfVysayn_4kZDP65goC_xxb6HXUxtin2sRuxD_jE_4aUAd-sxuxjl8xm5S1eQkomQH6P3jrTZ_jwWI_Q7dnp8viiuLo-vzxeXBVWMKIL6jg4LRyR0OqqdaWtaNsqbYSqrIXSCieBEgutapWsSkWkk3d3XAFY5YzmR-jzfu4mxV9byENz77OFvp-WiNvcMF5VShIt2IsolYIxIQgnr0CZ0oryUk7op2foOm5TmG5uqKBaKcVLOlFiT9kUc07gGusHM_gYhmR831DS7IJtnoJtdsFO2vyZtkn-3qTx_8LXvfDH9zC-QDf14hur6907tf75D-WYud0
CODEN SSSJD4
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_gwat_13357
crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_2508
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_140605
crossref_primary_10_2134_age2019_08_0066
crossref_primary_10_1111_1752_1688_12352
crossref_primary_10_1080_01431161_2021_1988186
crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_13315
crossref_primary_10_4236_jgis_2017_93016
crossref_primary_10_1111_1752_1688_12777
crossref_primary_10_3390_app13042245
crossref_primary_10_3390_w9080585
crossref_primary_10_2136_sssaj2014_01_0045
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijgi10090623
Cites_doi 10.1007/978-94-009-4678-1_3
10.1002/hyp.3360060208
10.1029/WR023i012p02266
10.1016/0022-1694(90)90207-E
10.1016/0022-1694(88)90090-X
10.1002/hyp.5027
10.1029/WR025i005p00829
10.1016/0022-1694(83)90214-7
10.3354/cr011149
10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:6(597)
10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
10.1016/0022-1694(84)90159-8
10.1029/RG028i001p00001
10.1007/BF01903418
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.014
10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199707)11:9<1115::AID-HYP548>3.0.CO;2-T
10.1007/978-94-009-4678-1_6
10.1029/92WR01561
10.1097/00010694-194111000-00009
10.1002/for.3980100107
10.1029/WR021i012p01841
10.1080/02626667909491834
10.1016/0022-1694(88)90192-8
10.1080/02626668409490960
10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00081-2
10.1016/0304-3800(91)90199-B
10.1029/WR026i001p00043
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © by the Soil Science Society of America, Inc.
Copyright American Society of Agronomy May 2013
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © by the Soil Science Society of America, Inc.
– notice: Copyright American Society of Agronomy May 2013
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7ST
7T7
7X2
7XB
88I
8AF
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FK
8G5
ABJCF
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
ATCPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKSAR
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
L6V
M0K
M2O
M2P
M7S
MBDVC
P64
PATMY
PCBAR
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
PYCSY
Q9U
R05
S0X
SOI
7QH
7UA
F1W
H96
L.G
KR7
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.2136/sssaj2012.0069
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Environment Abstracts
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
STEM Database
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Research Library (Alumni)
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Agricultural Science Database
Research Library
Science Database
Engineering Database
Research Library (Corporate)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Science Database
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
University of Michigan
SIRS Editorial
Environment Abstracts
Aqualine
Water Resources Abstracts
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Civil Engineering Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Agricultural Science Database
University of Michigan
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
SIRS Editorial
ProQuest AP Science
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Central
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Research Library
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
ProQuest Central (New)
Engineering Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
Environment Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Aqualine
Water Resources Abstracts
Civil Engineering Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Agricultural Science Database
AGRICOLA

CrossRef
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Technology Research Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1435-0661
EndPage 889
ExternalDocumentID 3043058391
10_2136_sssaj2012_0069
SAJ2SSSAJ20120069
Genre miscellaneous
Feature
GeographicLocations United States--US
Kentucky
USA, Kentucky
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Kentucky
– name: United States--US
– name: USA, Kentucky
GroupedDBID -DZ
-~X
.86
.~0
0R~
123
186
18M
1OB
1OC
2WC
33P
3V.
53G
6KN
7X2
7XC
88I
8AF
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FW
8G5
8R4
8R5
8WZ
A6W
AAHBH
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAMNL
AANLZ
AAYCA
ABCQX
ABCUV
ABEFU
ABJCF
ABJNI
ABUWG
ACAWQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACXQS
ADFRT
ADKYN
ADYHW
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYN
AEUYR
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFKRA
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AHBTC
AIDBO
AITYG
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMYDB
ATCPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BFHJK
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKOMP
BKSAR
BPHCQ
C1A
CCPQU
CS3
DCZOG
DDYGU
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
GNUQQ
GUQSH
H13
HCIFZ
H~9
L6V
L7B
LAS
LATKE
LEEKS
LK5
M0K
M2O
M2P
M2Q
M7R
M7S
MEWTI
MV1
MVM
NHAZY
NHB
O9-
OHT
P2P
PATMY
PCBAR
PK-
PQQKQ
PRG
PROAC
PTHSS
PYCSY
Q2X
R05
RAK
ROL
RPX
RXW
S0X
SAMSI
SJN
SUPJJ
TAE
TN5
TR2
TWZ
U2A
VJK
WOQ
WXSBR
XIH
XJT
XOL
Y6R
YYP
ZCA
~02
~KM
AAYXX
ADXHL
AETEA
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGYGG
CITATION
HGLYW
PHGZM
PHGZT
7ST
7T7
7XB
8FD
8FK
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
C1K
FR3
MBDVC
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
PUEGO
Q9U
SOI
7QH
7UA
F1W
H96
L.G
LH4
KR7
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-1f3ef94f06ed98df5c81dd79a478cce5c4f6e10ced7d7685706f6bb37eec7fa93
IEDL.DBID 8FG
ISSN 0361-5995
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 23:52:02 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 13:49:52 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 11:45:11 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 14:27:22 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:41 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:33:27 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:36:03 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4209-1f3ef94f06ed98df5c81dd79a478cce5c4f6e10ced7d7685706f6bb37eec7fa93
Notes All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.
Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 1419777351
PQPubID 40901
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2388760942
proquest_miscellaneous_1642244030
proquest_miscellaneous_1627971356
proquest_journals_1419777351
crossref_citationtrail_10_2136_sssaj2012_0069
crossref_primary_10_2136_sssaj2012_0069
wiley_primary_10_2136_sssaj2012_0069_SAJ2SSSAJ20120069
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate May 2013
2013-05-00
20130501
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2013
  text: May 2013
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Madison
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Madison
PublicationTitle Soil Science Society of America journal
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher The Soil Science Society of America, Inc
American Society of Agronomy
Publisher_xml – name: The Soil Science Society of America, Inc
– name: American Society of Agronomy
References 2002; 16
1991; 56
1984; 69
1991; 12
2012
2011
2006b
2006a
1991; 10
2009
2008
1997
1988; 102
1970; 10
2007
1988; 100
1984; 29
1994
1993
1992
2003
2002
1985; 21
1989; 25
1998; 24
11
1992; 6
1987; 23
1979; 24
1990; 115
1997; 11
1990; 26
2000
1990; 28
1992; 28
1986b
1983; 65
1986
1941
1999; 11
1986a
2008; 211
1988
Ritter D.F. (e_1_2_8_25_1) 1986
e_1_2_8_28_1
e_1_2_8_29_1
Helsel D.R. (e_1_2_8_14_1) 2002
e_1_2_8_47_1
e_1_2_8_46_1
e_1_2_8_26_1
e_1_2_8_27_1
e_1_2_8_48_1
Morlock S.E. (e_1_2_8_22_1) 2008
Quinn P.F. (e_1_2_8_24_1) 1997
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
Coon W.F. (e_1_2_8_11_1) 2011
Wolock D.M. (e_1_2_8_42_1) 2003
e_1_2_8_8_1
Taylor C.J. (e_1_2_8_30_1) 2008
Woods A.J. (e_1_2_8_49_1) 2002
e_1_2_8_43_1
e_1_2_8_45_1
e_1_2_8_23_1
e_1_2_8_44_1
e_1_2_8_40_1
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_18_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
Taylor C. J. (e_1_2_8_31_1) 2012
e_1_2_8_13_1
Wolock D. M. (e_1_2_8_41_1) 1993
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_38_1
Williamson T. N. (e_1_2_8_39_1) 2009
e_1_2_8_16_1
USEPA (e_1_2_8_36_1) 2011
e_1_2_8_37_1
USDA‐NRCS (e_1_2_8_34_1) 2006
McCuen R. (e_1_2_8_21_1); 11
USDA‐NRCS. (e_1_2_8_32_1) 1993
USDA‐NRCS (e_1_2_8_35_1) 2006
Martin G.R. (e_1_2_8_20_1) 2000
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
Beven K.J. (e_1_2_8_4_1) 1986
USDA‐NRCS (e_1_2_8_33_1) 1994
References_xml – year: 2011
– volume: 211
  start-page: 57
  year: 2008
  end-page: 76
  article-title: Use of an integrated flow model to estimate ecologically relevant hydrologic characteristics at stream biomonitoring sites
  publication-title: Ecol. Modell.
– start-page: 107
  year: 1986b
  end-page: 131
– volume: 24
  start-page: 43
  year: 1979
  end-page: 69
  article-title: A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/Un modèle à base physique de zone d'appel variable de l'hydrologie du bassin versant
  publication-title: Hydrol. Sci. Bull.
– volume: 26
  start-page: 43
  year: 1990
  end-page: 58
  article-title: On hydrologic similarity: 3. A dimensionless flood frequency model using a generalized geomorphologic unit hydrograph and partial area runoff generation
  publication-title: Water Resour. Res.
– year: 2009
– volume: 12
  start-page: 179
  year: 1991
  end-page: 204
  article-title: Evapotranspiration and runoff from large land areas: Land surface hydrology for atmospheric general circulation models
  publication-title: Surv. Geophys.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1841
  year: 1985
  end-page: 1850
  article-title: Shenandoah watershed study: Calibration of a topography‐based, variable contributing area hydrological model to a small forested catchment
  publication-title: Water Resour. Res.
– volume: 23
  start-page: 2266
  year: 1987
  end-page: 2278
  article-title: On hydrologic similarity: 2. A scaled model of storm runoff production
  publication-title: Water Resour. Res.
– volume: 6
  start-page: 199
  year: 1992
  end-page: 214
  article-title: Towards identifying sources of subsurface flow: A comparison of components identified by a physically based runoff model and those determined by chemical mixing techniques
  publication-title: Hydrol. Processes
– year: 1941
– volume: 11
  start-page: 149
  year: 1999
  end-page: 159
  article-title: Explaining spatial variability in mean annual runoff in the conterminous United States
  publication-title: Clim. Res.
– volume: 100
  start-page: 353
  year: 1988
  end-page: 375
  article-title: On hydrological heterogeneity—Catchment morphology and catchment response
  publication-title: J. Hydrol.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 829
  year: 1989
  end-page: 837
  article-title: The relationship of catchment topography and soil hydraulic characteristics to lake alkalinity in the northeastern United States
  publication-title: Water Resour. Res.
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1115
  year: 1997
  end-page: 1129
  article-title: A MATLAB implementation of TOPMODEL
  publication-title: Hydrol. Processes
– volume: 115
  start-page: 243
  year: 1990
  end-page: 259
  article-title: Topographic effects on flow path and surface water chemistry of the Llyn Brianne catchments in Wales
  publication-title: J. Hydrol.
– year: 2003
– year: 2000
– volume: 69
  start-page: 119
  year: 1984
  end-page: 143
  article-title: Testing a physically‐based flood forecasting model (TOPMODEL) for three U.K. catchments
  publication-title: J. Hydrol.
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2733
  year: 1992
  end-page: 2741
  article-title: Sensitivity of a basin evolution model to the nature of runoff production and to initial conditions
  publication-title: Water Resour. Res.
– year: 2006a
– start-page: 187
  year: 1986a
  end-page: 202
– volume: 29
  start-page: 425
  year: 1984
  end-page: 434
  article-title: Infiltration into a class of vertically non‐uniform soils
  publication-title: Hydrol. Sci. J.
– year: 1992
– year: 1994
– year: 2012
– volume: 102
  start-page: 29
  year: 1988
  end-page: 47
  article-title: Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling
  publication-title: J. Hydrol.
– year: 1986
– volume: 24
  start-page: 299
  year: 1998
  end-page: 314
  article-title: Interactions between model predictions, parameters and DTM scales for topmodel
  publication-title: Comput. Geosci.
– volume: 65
  start-page: 139
  year: 1983
  end-page: 158
  article-title: Catchment geomorphology and the dynamics of runoff contributing areas
  publication-title: J. Hydrol.
– year: 2002
– year: 2008
– year: 1988
– volume: 11
  start-page: 597
  end-page: 602
  article-title: 2006. Evaluation of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency index
  publication-title: J. Hydrol. Eng.
– start-page: 39
  year: 1986
  end-page: 56
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1871
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1877
  article-title: Estimation of baseflow residence times in watersheds from the runoff hydrograph recession: Method and application in the Neversink watershed, Catskill Mountains, New York
  publication-title: Hydrol. Processes
– year: 2006b
– start-page: 31
  year: 1997
  end-page: 52
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1
  year: 1990
  end-page: 18
  article-title: Similarity and scale in catchment storm response
  publication-title: Rev. Geophys.
– volume: 10
  start-page: 105
  year: 1991
  end-page: 116
  article-title: Hydrological effects of changes in levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide
  publication-title: J. Forecast.
– year: 1993
– volume: 10
  start-page: 282
  year: 1970
  end-page: 290
  article-title: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles
  publication-title: J. Hydrol.
– volume: 56
  start-page: 171
  year: 1991
  end-page: 196
  article-title: Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: Basis for distributed simulation
  publication-title: Ecol. Modell.
– year: 2007
  article-title: Implications of SSURGO versus STATSGO data for modeling daily streamflow in Kentucky
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-4678-1_3
– volume-title: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 339
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
– volume-title: Scientific Investigations Rep. 2012–5071
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
– start-page: 31
  volume-title: Distributed hydrological modeling: Applications of the TOPMODEL concept
  year: 1997
  ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
– volume-title: Statistical Methods in Water Resources. Chapter A3 in Techniques of the Water‐Resources Investigations of the USGS Book 4‐ Hydrologic Analysis and Interpretation
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
– volume-title: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Rep. 2008–1322
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
  doi: 10.1002/hyp.3360060208
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
  doi: 10.1029/WR023i012p02266
– volume-title: Simulating the variable‐source‐area concept of streamflow generation with the watershed model TOPMODEL
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_8_41_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_45_1
  doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(90)90207-E
– ident: e_1_2_8_48_1
  doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(88)90090-X
– volume-title: Soil survey manual. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_8_32_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_37_1
  doi: 10.1002/hyp.5027
– volume-title: Process Geomorphology
  year: 1986
  ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_40_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_44_1
  doi: 10.1029/WR025i005p00829
– volume-title: U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Rep. 2011–1202
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(83)90214-7
– ident: e_1_2_8_46_1
  doi: 10.3354/cr011149
– volume-title: State soil geographic (STATSGO) data base for Kentucky
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_8_33_1
– volume-title: Draft guidance on identifying waters protected by the clean water act
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_8_36_1
– volume: 11
  start-page: 597
  ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
  article-title: 2006. Evaluation of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency index
  publication-title: J. Hydrol. Eng.
  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:6(597)
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(84)90159-8
– ident: e_1_2_8_47_1
  doi: 10.1029/RG028i001p00001
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF01903418
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.014
– volume-title: U.S. Geological Survey Water‐Resources Investigations Rep. 2000–4239
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199707)11:9<1115::AID-HYP548>3.0.CO;2-T
– volume-title: The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER)—A water‐budget modeling approach for managing water‐supply resources in Kentucky—Phase I—Data processing, model development, and application to non‐karst areas. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Rep. 34
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_8_39_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-4678-1_6
– volume-title: Soil survey geographic (SSURGO) database for GA. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_8_34_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1029/92WR01561
– ident: e_1_2_8_38_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1097/00010694-194111000-00009
– volume-title: Infiltration‐excess overland flow estimated by TOPMODEL for the conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Rep. 03–310
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_8_42_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_43_1
  doi: 10.1002/for.3980100107
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.1029/WR021i012p01841
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1080/02626667909491834
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(88)90192-8
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1080/02626668409490960
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
– start-page: 187
  volume-title: Hillslope processes
  year: 1986
  ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00081-2
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/0304-3800(91)90199-B
– ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
  doi: 10.1029/WR026i001p00043
– volume-title: Ecoregions of Kentucky (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs). (map scale 1:1,000,000)
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_8_49_1
– volume-title: U.S. general soil map (STATSGO2). Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_8_35_1
SSID ssj0015900
Score 2.13375
Snippet The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL‐based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function...
The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL-based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function...
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 877
SubjectTerms Alluvial plains
aquifers
Basins
Climate change
Drought
Field capacity
Floods
High flow
Hydrologic models
Hydrology
Karstic areas
Kentucky
landscapes
Mathematical models
model validation
Moisture content
Mountain regions
mountains
multipliers
Partitioning
Porosity
Precipitation
Programming languages
Sinkholes
Soil (material)
Soil surveys
Soil water
soil water storage
Stores
storms
Stream discharge
Stream flow
Streams
Studies
surveys
Water availability
Water quality
Water storage
Title Significance of Exchanging SSURGO and STATSGO Data When Modeling Hydrology in Diverse Physiographic Terranes
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2136%2Fsssaj2012.0069
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1419777351
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1627971356
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1642244030
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2388760942
Volume 77
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9swDBa29rIdhj2xbF2hAQN2MmpZsmSfhmxNGvTQDXUC9GbIElWkKJwuToHt34-UnbSXdhfDsHmwSYqkxMfH2BefO-m1KxJLLe4qgzIppC5xuVsddNoI62K1xZmeLdTpRX4xHLh1Q1nl1iZGQ-1Xjs7Ij4QSGKoYmYtvN78TQo2i7OoAofGU7Qv0NKTnxfRkl0UgRMw-VykSGqzVD23MhNRHXdfZK3R-NK6Tip3vO6W7SPN-vBodzvQlezFEinzci_YVewLta_Z8fLkepmXAG3ZdLS9bqvUh0fFV4JM_sZEX3RGvqsX5yU9uW8-r-Xhe4f2x3ViO1rflhIBGfeh89tev48E6X7b8ONZoAI9Vof0o66Xjc1ijP4PuLVtMJ_Mfs2SAT0icygjkIEgIpQqpBl8WPuQOY1NvSqtM4RzkTgUNInXgjcdNR25SlE7TSAPgTLClfMf22lUL7xk3qglpkEUQLigv0sa6UoIJKRShyRyMWLLlX-2G2eIEcXFd4x6D-F3v-F0Tv0fs647-pp-q8SDlwVYc9bC6uvpOF0bs8-41rgtKdiBHVrdIozNTEv6gfoxGYQSj0M49TIMhDToM3ARnI6ajOvzni-tqfJpVFV2pMRmffHj8Hz6yZ1nE2KAqygO2t1nfwieMdDbNYVTnQ7b_fXL26_wfEzn9fA
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaq7QE4oPISSwsYCcQpauI4dnKo0MJu2T5YUJOVeguOH9WiKttutoL-qf7GzuSx7aXl1EsUJXNIxuOZz_bMN4R8NJEOjdCxp7DEnTObeHEoEpjuSjjhF4HSdbbFRIynfP84Ol4jV10tDKZVdj6xdtRmrnGPfDvgAUAVGUbBl7NzD7tG4elq10KjMYsDe_kXlmzVzt4QxvcTY7uj7NvYa7sKeJoz5P53oXUJd76wJomNizRANiMTxWWstY00d8IGvrZGGsDikfTho4silNZq6RSSL4HLX-dY0doj619Hk19Hq3ML7MHZnI4GHlJ5NTSRLAjFdlVV6g-EWyQIxfTq22HwBtveRsh1iNvdIE9bbEoHjTE9I2u2fE6eDE4WLT-HfUFO09lJidlFaCx07ujoX106DAGQpun06PtPqkpD02yQpXA_VEtFwd-XFHuuYeU7HV-aRb2VT2clHdZZIZbWeagNefZM08wuIILa6iWZPohqX5FeOS_ta0IlL5zvwtgF2nET-IXSSWil823sCqZtn3id_nLdspljU43THFY1qO98pe8c9d0nn1fyZw2Px52SW91w5O18rvIb6-uTD6vXMBPxeAU0Mr8AGcFkgh0PxX0yHDATB896twyAKAhRsOxmfSJqc_jPF-fpYJ-lKV6xFBqevLn_H96TR-Psx2F-uDc52CSPWd3hA3M4t0hvubiwbwFnLYt3rXFT8vuh59M17j48Jg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9tAEF6hIFXtoepTDVC6lVr1ZMVer3ftQ1WFJmmAKkU4kbi5632gVMiBOKjlr_HrmPEjcIGeuFiWPQd7PI9vvTPzEfLJRDo0QseewhZ3zmzixaFIwN2VcMLPA6WraouJGM_4wUl0skGu214YLKtsY2IVqM1C4z_yXsADgCoyjIKea8oijgajb-cXHjJI4U5rS6dRm8ihvfoLy7fy6_4AvvVnxkbD6fex1zAMeJoz5AFwoXUJd76wJomNizTANyMTxWWstY00d8IGvrZGGsDlkfThBfI8lNZq6RQOYoLwvykhK_IO2dwbTo6O13sYyMdZ75QGHo71qkdGsiAUvbIs1R9IvTgsFEut76bEW5x7Fy1X6W70gjxvcCrt14b1kmzY4hV51j9dNrM67Gtyls5PC6w0QsOhC0eH_6o2YkiGNE1nxz9-UVUYmk770xTOB2qlKMT-giL_GnbB0_GVWVa_9em8oIOqQsTSqia1HqQ913Rql5BNbfmGzB5FtW9Jp1gU9h2hkufOd2HsAu24Cfxc6SS00vk2djnTtku8Vn-ZbiabI8HGWQYrHNR3ttZ3hvruki9r-fN6pse9kjvt58ga3y6zW0vsko_r2-CVuNUCGllcgoxgMkH2Q_GQDAf8xCHK3i8DgArSFSzBWZeIyhz-88RZ2j9gaYpHbIuGK1sPv8MH8gT8KPu5PzncJk9ZRfaB5Zw7pLNaXtr3ALlW-W5j25T8fmx3ugFjkEBS
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Significance+of+Exchanging+SSURGO+and+STATSGO+Data+When+Modeling+Hydrology+in+Diverse+Physiographic+Terranes&rft.jtitle=Soil+Science+Society+of+America+journal&rft.au=Williamson%2C+Tanja+N&rft.au=Taylor%2C+Charles+J&rft.au=Newson%2C+Jeremy+K&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=877&rft.epage=889&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136%2Fsssaj2012.0069&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-5995&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-5995&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-5995&client=summon