Eating behaviors as predictors of weight loss in a 6 month weight loss intervention

• Published in: Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Vol. 21; no. 11; pp. 2256 - 2263
• Main Authors: Batra, Payal, Das, Sai Krupa, Salinardi, Taylor, Robinson, Lisa, Saltzman, Edward, Scott, Tammy, Pittas, Anastassios G., Roberts, Susan B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2013
• Subjects: Adult; Behavior; Clinical trials; Diet Records; Dietary fiber; Employees; Feeding Behavior - physiology; Female; Humans; Intervention; Inventory; Male; Meetings; Middle Aged; Obesity; Obesity - diagnosis; Obesity - epidemiology; Obesity - therapy; Overweight - diagnosis; Overweight - epidemiology; Overweight - therapy; Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data; Prognosis; Studies; Treatment Outcome; Weight control; Weight Loss; Weight Reduction Programs
• ISSN: 1930-7381; 1930-739X
• DOI: 10.1002/oby.20404

Objective To examine associations between eating behavior constructs and weight loss (WL) in a 6‐month WL intervention in worksites. Design and Methods A cluster‐randomized controlled trial of a group behavioral WL intervention versus wait‐listed control was conducted at four worksites. Measures included body weight and the eating behavior constructs restraint, disinhibition, hunger, and their sub‐constructs. Rates of intervention meeting attendance and weight self‐monitoring were also quantified. Results WL was greater in intervention participants than controls (ΔI = −8.1±6.8 kg, ΔC = +0.9±3.6 kg, P<0.001). Between‐group analyses showed that the intervention was associated with increased restraint (ΔI = 5.43±4.25, ΔC = 0.29±3.80, P<0.001), decreased disinhibition (ΔI = −2.5±3.63, ΔC = 0.66±1.85, P < 0.001) and decreased hunger (ΔI = −2.79±3.13, ΔC = 0.56±2.63, P < 0.001), and changes in all eating behavior subscales. Greater WL in intervention participants was correlated with higher baseline hunger (r = −0.25, P = 0.03), increased restraint (r = −0.35, P=0.001), decreased disinhibition (r = 0.26, P = 0.02), and decreased hunger (r = 0.36, P = 0.001). However, in a multiple regression model including rates of meeting attendance and self‐monitoring, decreased hunger was the only eating behavior change that predicted weight loss (R2=0.57, P<0.001). Conclusion Decreased hunger was the strongest predictor of WL in this intervention with relatively high mean WL. Further studies are needed to confirm the central role of hunger management in successful WL.