The evidence-based role of catecholaminergic PET tracers in Neuroblastoma. A systematic review and a head-to-head comparison with mIBG scintigraphy

Background Molecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [ 123 I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is the standard imaging method; however, it is characterised by low spatial resolution, time-consuming acquisition procedures and difficult interpre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging Vol. 51; no. 3; pp. 756 - 767
Main Authors Piccardo, Arnoldo, Treglia, Giorgio, Fiz, Francesco, Bar-Sever, Zvi, Bottoni, Gianluca, Biassoni, Lorenzo, Borgwardt, Lise, de Keizer, Bart, Jehanno, Nina, Lopci, Egesta, Kurch, Lars, Massollo, Michela, Nadel, Helen, Roca Bielsa, Isabel, Shulkin, Barry, Vali, Reza, De Palma, Diego, Cecchin, Diego, Santos, Ana Isabel, Zucchetta, Pietro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.02.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Molecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [ 123 I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is the standard imaging method; however, it is characterised by low spatial resolution, time-consuming acquisition procedures and difficult interpretation. Many PET catecholaminergic radiotracers have been proposed as a replacement for [ 123 I]-mIBG, however they have not yet made it into clinical practice. We aimed to review the available literature comparing head-to-head [ 123 I]-mIBG with the most common PET catecholaminergic radiopharmaceuticals. Methods We searched the PubMed database for studies performing a head-to-head comparison between [ 123 I]-mIBG and PET radiopharmaceuticals including meta-hydroxyephedrine ([ 11 C]C-HED), 18 F-18F-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([ 18 F]DOPA) [ 124 I]mIBG and Meta -[18F]fluorobenzylguanidine ([ 18 F]mFBG). Review articles, preclinical studies, small case series (< 5 subjects), case reports, and articles not in English were excluded. From each study, the following characteristics were extracted: bibliographic information, technical parameters, and the sensitivity of the procedure according to a patient-based analysis (PBA) and a lesion-based analysis (LBA). Results Ten studies were selected: two regarding [ 11 C]C-HED, four [ 18 F]DOPA, one [ 124 I]mIBG, and three [ 18 F]mFBG. These studies included 181 patients (range 5–46). For the PBA, the superiority of the PET method was reported in two out of ten studies (both using [ 18 F]DOPA). For LBA, PET detected significantly more lesions than scintigraphy in seven out of ten studies. Conclusions PET/CT using catecholaminergic tracers shows superior diagnostic performance than mIBG scintigraphy. However, it is still unknown if such superiority can influence clinical decision-making. Nonetheless, the PET examination appears promising for clinical practice as it offers faster image acquisition, less need for sedation, and a single-day examination.
AbstractList Molecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [ I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is the standard imaging method; however, it is characterised by low spatial resolution, time-consuming acquisition procedures and difficult interpretation. Many PET catecholaminergic radiotracers have been proposed as a replacement for [ I]-mIBG, however they have not yet made it into clinical practice. We aimed to review the available literature comparing head-to-head [ I]-mIBG with the most common PET catecholaminergic radiopharmaceuticals. We searched the PubMed database for studies performing a head-to-head comparison between [ I]-mIBG and PET radiopharmaceuticals including meta-hydroxyephedrine ([ C]C-HED), F-18F-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([ F]DOPA) [ I]mIBG and Meta-[18F]fluorobenzylguanidine ([ F]mFBG). Review articles, preclinical studies, small case series (< 5 subjects), case reports, and articles not in English were excluded. From each study, the following characteristics were extracted: bibliographic information, technical parameters, and the sensitivity of the procedure according to a patient-based analysis (PBA) and a lesion-based analysis (LBA). Ten studies were selected: two regarding [ C]C-HED, four [ F]DOPA, one [ I]mIBG, and three [ F]mFBG. These studies included 181 patients (range 5-46). For the PBA, the superiority of the PET method was reported in two out of ten studies (both using [ F]DOPA). For LBA, PET detected significantly more lesions than scintigraphy in seven out of ten studies. PET/CT using catecholaminergic tracers shows superior diagnostic performance than mIBG scintigraphy. However, it is still unknown if such superiority can influence clinical decision-making. Nonetheless, the PET examination appears promising for clinical practice as it offers faster image acquisition, less need for sedation, and a single-day examination.
BACKGROUNDMolecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [123I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is the standard imaging method; however, it is characterised by low spatial resolution, time-consuming acquisition procedures and difficult interpretation. Many PET catecholaminergic radiotracers have been proposed as a replacement for [123I]-mIBG, however they have not yet made it into clinical practice. We aimed to review the available literature comparing head-to-head [123I]-mIBG with the most common PET catecholaminergic radiopharmaceuticals.METHODSWe searched the PubMed database for studies performing a head-to-head comparison between [123I]-mIBG and PET radiopharmaceuticals including meta-hydroxyephedrine ([11C]C-HED), 18F-18F-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F]DOPA) [124I]mIBG and Meta-[18F]fluorobenzylguanidine ([18F]mFBG). Review articles, preclinical studies, small case series (< 5 subjects), case reports, and articles not in English were excluded. From each study, the following characteristics were extracted: bibliographic information, technical parameters, and the sensitivity of the procedure according to a patient-based analysis (PBA) and a lesion-based analysis (LBA).RESULTSTen studies were selected: two regarding [11C]C-HED, four [18F]DOPA, one [124I]mIBG, and three [18F]mFBG. These studies included 181 patients (range 5-46). For the PBA, the superiority of the PET method was reported in two out of ten studies (both using [18F]DOPA). For LBA, PET detected significantly more lesions than scintigraphy in seven out of ten studies.CONCLUSIONSPET/CT using catecholaminergic tracers shows superior diagnostic performance than mIBG scintigraphy. However, it is still unknown if such superiority can influence clinical decision-making. Nonetheless, the PET examination appears promising for clinical practice as it offers faster image acquisition, less need for sedation, and a single-day examination.
Abstract Background Molecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [ 123 I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is the standard imaging method; however, it is characterised by low spatial resolution, time-consuming acquisition procedures and difficult interpretation. Many PET catecholaminergic radiotracers have been proposed as a replacement for [ 123 I]-mIBG, however they have not yet made it into clinical practice. We aimed to review the available literature comparing head-to-head [ 123 I]-mIBG with the most common PET catecholaminergic radiopharmaceuticals. Methods We searched the PubMed database for studies performing a head-to-head comparison between [ 123 I]-mIBG and PET radiopharmaceuticals including meta-hydroxyephedrine ([ 11 C]C-HED), 18 F-18F-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([ 18 F]DOPA) [ 124 I]mIBG and Meta -[18F]fluorobenzylguanidine ([ 18 F]mFBG). Review articles, preclinical studies, small case series (< 5 subjects), case reports, and articles not in English were excluded. From each study, the following characteristics were extracted: bibliographic information, technical parameters, and the sensitivity of the procedure according to a patient-based analysis (PBA) and a lesion-based analysis (LBA). Results Ten studies were selected: two regarding [ 11 C]C-HED, four [ 18 F]DOPA, one [ 124 I]mIBG, and three [ 18 F]mFBG. These studies included 181 patients (range 5–46). For the PBA, the superiority of the PET method was reported in two out of ten studies (both using [ 18 F]DOPA). For LBA, PET detected significantly more lesions than scintigraphy in seven out of ten studies. Conclusions PET/CT using catecholaminergic tracers shows superior diagnostic performance than mIBG scintigraphy. However, it is still unknown if such superiority can influence clinical decision-making. Nonetheless, the PET examination appears promising for clinical practice as it offers faster image acquisition, less need for sedation, and a single-day examination.
Background Molecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [ 123 I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is the standard imaging method; however, it is characterised by low spatial resolution, time-consuming acquisition procedures and difficult interpretation. Many PET catecholaminergic radiotracers have been proposed as a replacement for [ 123 I]-mIBG, however they have not yet made it into clinical practice. We aimed to review the available literature comparing head-to-head [ 123 I]-mIBG with the most common PET catecholaminergic radiopharmaceuticals. Methods We searched the PubMed database for studies performing a head-to-head comparison between [ 123 I]-mIBG and PET radiopharmaceuticals including meta-hydroxyephedrine ([ 11 C]C-HED), 18 F-18F-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([ 18 F]DOPA) [ 124 I]mIBG and Meta -[18F]fluorobenzylguanidine ([ 18 F]mFBG). Review articles, preclinical studies, small case series (< 5 subjects), case reports, and articles not in English were excluded. From each study, the following characteristics were extracted: bibliographic information, technical parameters, and the sensitivity of the procedure according to a patient-based analysis (PBA) and a lesion-based analysis (LBA). Results Ten studies were selected: two regarding [ 11 C]C-HED, four [ 18 F]DOPA, one [ 124 I]mIBG, and three [ 18 F]mFBG. These studies included 181 patients (range 5–46). For the PBA, the superiority of the PET method was reported in two out of ten studies (both using [ 18 F]DOPA). For LBA, PET detected significantly more lesions than scintigraphy in seven out of ten studies. Conclusions PET/CT using catecholaminergic tracers shows superior diagnostic performance than mIBG scintigraphy. However, it is still unknown if such superiority can influence clinical decision-making. Nonetheless, the PET examination appears promising for clinical practice as it offers faster image acquisition, less need for sedation, and a single-day examination.
Author Fiz, Francesco
de Keizer, Bart
Piccardo, Arnoldo
Lopci, Egesta
Biassoni, Lorenzo
Nadel, Helen
De Palma, Diego
Roca Bielsa, Isabel
Santos, Ana Isabel
Massollo, Michela
Treglia, Giorgio
Cecchin, Diego
Vali, Reza
Jehanno, Nina
Shulkin, Barry
Bar-Sever, Zvi
Kurch, Lars
Borgwardt, Lise
Bottoni, Gianluca
Zucchetta, Pietro
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Arnoldo
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6779-1471
  surname: Piccardo
  fullname: Piccardo, Arnoldo
  email: arnoldo.piccardo@galliera.it
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. “Ospedali Galliera”
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Giorgio
  surname: Treglia
  fullname: Treglia, Giorgio
  organization: Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università Della Svizzera Italiana
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Francesco
  surname: Fiz
  fullname: Fiz, Francesco
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. “Ospedali Galliera”, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Zvi
  surname: Bar-Sever
  fullname: Bar-Sever, Zvi
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Schneider Children’s Medical Center, Tel Aviv University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Gianluca
  surname: Bottoni
  fullname: Bottoni, Gianluca
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. “Ospedali Galliera”
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Lorenzo
  surname: Biassoni
  fullname: Biassoni, Lorenzo
  organization: Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Lise
  surname: Borgwardt
  fullname: Borgwardt, Lise
  organization: Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Bart
  surname: de Keizer
  fullname: de Keizer, Bart
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Nina
  surname: Jehanno
  fullname: Jehanno, Nina
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie Paris
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Egesta
  surname: Lopci
  fullname: Lopci, Egesta
  organization: Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS-Humanitas Research Hospital
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Lars
  surname: Kurch
  fullname: Kurch, Lars
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Michela
  surname: Massollo
  fullname: Massollo, Michela
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. “Ospedali Galliera”
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Helen
  surname: Nadel
  fullname: Nadel, Helen
  organization: Department of Pediatric Nuclear Medicine, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital of Stanford (CA)
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Isabel
  surname: Roca Bielsa
  fullname: Roca Bielsa, Isabel
  organization: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Barry
  surname: Shulkin
  fullname: Shulkin, Barry
  organization: St Jude Children’s Research Hospital
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Reza
  surname: Vali
  fullname: Vali, Reza
  organization: Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children of Toronto
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Diego
  surname: De Palma
  fullname: De Palma, Diego
  organization: Nuclear Medicine Unit, Ospedale Di Circolo of Varese
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Diego
  surname: Cecchin
  fullname: Cecchin, Diego
  organization: Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University Hospital of Padova
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Ana Isabel
  surname: Santos
  fullname: Santos, Ana Isabel
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Garcia de Orta
– sequence: 20
  givenname: Pietro
  surname: Zucchetta
  fullname: Zucchetta, Pietro
  organization: Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University Hospital of Padova
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37962616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kctu1TAQhi1URC_wAiyQJTZsUnxJ7HhZqlIqVcDisLYmzuTEVWIfbIfqPAcvTMopRWLBxmNpvvlnpO-UHIUYkJDXnJ1zxvT7zJhoTMWErJiqW1WZZ-SEK24qzVpz9PTX7Jic5nzHGG9Fa16QY6mNEoqrE_JzMyLFH77H4LDqIGNPU5yQxoE6KOjGOMHsA6atd_Tr1YaWBA5Tpj7Qz7ik2E2QS5zhnF7QvM8FZygrmtZQvKcQegp0ROirEquHSl2cd5B8joHe-zLS-ebDNc3Oh-K3CXbj_iV5PsCU8dVjPSPfPl5tLj9Vt1-uby4vbitXc1OqQbPeDRqNANXUg-66QTB0vJXAtW6YFHJ9mBiM6lnXgJCuR1VL6LlToECekXeH3F2K3xfMxc4-O5wmCBiXbEXbGmOkbviKvv0HvYtLCut1VhiuRMNrJVZKHCiXYs4JB7tLfoa0t5zZB2X2oMyuyuxvZdasQ28eo5duxv5p5I-jFZAHIK-tsMX0d_d_Yn8BcoukcA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0000000000005226
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2023_1320574
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diii_2024_04_004
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2024_03_003
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_123_267256
Cites_doi 10.1186/1471-2407-11-21
10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.03.026
10.1097/RLU.0000000000001984
10.1097/RLU.0000000000004185
10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4648
10.2967/jnumed.116.186833
10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8925
10.1186/s40658-016-0144-5
10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5732
10.1097/RLU.0b013e31827a0002
10.2967/jnumed.120.243139
10.1002/1096-911x(200008)35:23.0.co;2-7
10.1007/s00259-011-1938-2
10.2967/jnumed.108.060467
10.3390/jpm11040270
10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
10.1007/s13139-022-00762-6
10.1007/s00259-023-06221-4
10.1001/jama.2017.19163
10.2967/jnumed.119.232553
10.1002/14651858.CD009263.pub2
10.1007/s00259-017-3829-7
10.1097/RLU.0000000000002961
10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.10.007
10.2967/jnumed.117.193169
10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182485172
10.1007/s00259-022-06063-6
10.1007/s00259-018-4070-8
10.3413/Nukmed-0743-15-0
10.2967/jnumed.117.195883
10.1007/s00259-023-06160-0
10.2967/jnumed.112.102772
10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.10029
10.1002/mp.12202
10.1038/sj.bjc.660562
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2023
2023. The Author(s).
The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2023
– notice: 2023. The Author(s).
– notice: The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7TK
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s00259-023-06486-9
DatabaseName Springer_OA刊
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef

ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer_OA刊
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1619-7089
EndPage 767
ExternalDocumentID 10_1007_s00259_023_06486_9
37962616
Genre Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
GroupedDBID ---
-5E
-5G
-BR
-Y2
-~C
.86
.GJ
.VR
04C
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
199
1N0
203
29G
29~
2JN
2JY
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3V.
4.4
406
40D
53G
5GY
5QI
5RE
5VS
67Z
6NX
78A
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABYN
AAFGU
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAKSU
AANXM
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYFA
AAYQN
AAYTO
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDBF
ABECU
ABFGW
ABFTV
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKAS
ABKCH
ABLJU
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABPTK
ABQBU
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABUWZ
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACBMV
ACBRV
ACBXY
ACBYP
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACIGE
ACIPQ
ACIWK
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPRK
ACTTH
ACUDM
ACVWB
ACWMK
ADBBV
ADHIR
ADINQ
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADMDM
ADOXG
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEEQQ
AEFIE
AEFTE
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJRE
AEKMD
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AESTI
AEVLU
AEVTX
AEXYK
AFAFS
AFEXP
AFFNX
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFNRJ
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGBP
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGKHE
AGMZJ
AGQMX
AGWIL
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHVUH
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIIXL
AILAN
AIMYW
AITGF
AJBLW
AJDOV
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
AKQUC
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AOCGG
ARAPS
ARMRJ
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
B0M
BA0
BBNVY
BDATZ
BENPR
BGLVJ
BGNMA
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BMSDO
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBB
EBC
EBD
EBLON
EBO
EBS
EBX
EHN
EIHBH
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EN4
EPL
EPT
ESBYG
ESX
EX3
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GXS
HCIFZ
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KPH
LAS
LK8
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
M7P
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NAPCQ
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P19
P62
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
Q~Q
R89
R9I
RNI
RNS
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TH9
TSG
TSK
TT1
TUS
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UNUBA
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WK8
WOW
YLTOR
Z45
Z7R
Z7U
Z7V
Z7W
Z7X
Z7Y
Z7Z
Z81
Z82
Z83
Z85
Z87
Z88
Z8M
Z8O
Z8P
Z8Q
Z8R
Z8S
Z8T
Z8U
Z8V
Z8W
Z8Z
Z91
ZMTXR
~8M
AACDK
AAEOY
AAJBT
AASML
AAYZH
ABAKF
ACAOD
ACDTI
ACZOJ
AEFQL
AEMSY
AFBBN
AGQEE
AGRTI
AIGIU
AJOOF
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
H13
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7TK
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-f70dcf7e92a654f7bbf20ec183a1775032350302f96d0b5a23cde643ad1c6a6a3
IEDL.DBID C6C
ISSN 1619-7070
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 23:49:01 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 22:05:03 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 12 18:09:57 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 23 10:04:42 EDT 2024
Fri Jan 19 03:31:40 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Paediatric PET
I]MIBG, 18F-MFBG, 11C-HED
Guideline
PET-CT
F]F-DOPA
Neuroblastoma
[
Catecholamine
[18F]F-DOPA
[124I]MIBG, 18F-MFBG, 11C-HED
Language English
License 2023. The Author(s).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c419t-f70dcf7e92a654f7bbf20ec183a1775032350302f96d0b5a23cde643ad1c6a6a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0002-6779-1471
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06486-9
PMID 37962616
PQID 2916251462
PQPubID 42802
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2889993751
proquest_journals_2916251462
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_023_06486_9
pubmed_primary_37962616
springer_journals_10_1007_s00259_023_06486_9
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Berlin/Heidelberg
– name: Germany
– name: Heidelberg
PublicationTitle European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
PublicationTitleAbbrev Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Beijst C, de Keizer B, Lam MGEH, Janssens GO, Tytgat GAM, de Jong HWAM. A phantom study: Should124I-mIBG PET/CT replace123I-mIBG SPECT/CT? Med Phys. 2017;44:1624–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12202.
Franzius C, Hermann K, Weckesser M, Kopka K, Juergens KU, Vormoor J, et al. Whole-Body PET/CT with11C-meta-hydroxyephedrine in tumors of the sympathetic nervous system: Feasibility study and comparison with 123I-MIBG SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1635-42
Bleeker G, Tytgat GAM, Adam JA, Caron HN, Kremer LCM, Hooft L, et al. 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosing neuroblastoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 29;2015:CD009263. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009263.pub2.
Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. Quadas-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–36. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
Černý I, Prášek J, Kašpárková H. Superiority of SPECT/CT over planar 123I-mIBG images in neuroblastoma patients with impact on Curie and SIOPEN score values. Nuklearmedizin. 20165;55:151–7. https://doi.org/10.3413/Nukmed-0743-15-0.
Ladenstein R, Lambert B, Pötschger U, Castellani MR, Lewington V, Bar-Sever Z, et al. Validation of the mIBG skeletal SIOPEN scoring method in two independent high-risk neuroblastoma populations: the SIOPEN/HR-NBL1 and COG-A3973 trials. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:292–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3829-7.
Lopci E, Piccardo A, Nanni C, Altrinetti V, Garaventa A, Pession A, et al. 18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma: Comparison of conventional imaging with CT/MR. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:e73–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182485172.
Telli T, Lay Ergün E, Volkan Salanci B, Özgen Kiratli P. The complementary role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroblastoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2020;45:326–9.https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000002961.
Taggart DR, Han MM, Quach A, Groshen S, Ye W, Villablanca JG, et al. Comparison of iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate response after iodine-131 MIBG therapy for relapsed neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5343–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5732.
Pinto NR, Applebaum MA, Volchenboum SL, Matthay KK, London WB, Ambros PF, et al. Advances in risk classification and treatment strategies for neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015 20;33:3008–17. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4648.
Piccardo A, Lopci E, Conte M, Garaventa A, Foppiani L, Altrinetti V, et al. Comparison of 18F-dopa PET/CT and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in stage 3 and 4 neuroblastoma: A pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1938-2.
Borgwardt L, Brok JS, Andersen KF, Madsen J, Gillings N, Fosbøl M, et al. [18F]mFBG long axial field of view PET-CT without general anaesthesia reveals concise extension of neuroblastoma in a 9-month-old boy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50:2563–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06160-0.
YanikGAParisiMTNaranjoANadelHGelfandMJParkJRValidation of Postinduction Curie Scores in High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A Children’s Oncology Group and SIOPEN Group Report on SIOPEN/HR-NBL1J Nucl Med2018595025081:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXitFylurbF10.2967/jnumed.117.195883288873995868501
ContiMErikssonLPhysics of pure and non-pure positron emitters for PET: a review and a discussionEJNMMI Phys20163810.1186/s40658-016-0144-5272713044894854
Piccardo A, Morana G, Puntoni M, Campora S, Sorrentino S, Zucchetta P, et al. Diagnosis, treatment response, and prognosis: The role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in children affected by neuroblastoma in comparison with 123I-mIBG scan: The first prospective study. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:367–74. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.232553.
Aboian MS, Huang SY, Hernandez-Pampaloni M, Hawkins RA, VanBrocklin HF, Huh Y, et al. 124I-MIBG PET/CT to monitor metastatic disease in children with relapsed neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(1):43–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.243139.
Pandit-TaskarNZanzonicoPStatonKDCarrasquilloJAReidy-LagunesDLyashchenkoSBiodistribution and Dosimetry of 18 F-Meta-Fluorobenzylguanidine: A First-in-Human PET/CT Imaging Study of Patients with Neuroendocrine MalignanciesJ Nucl Med2018591471531:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXitFCjsL7F10.2967/jnumed.117.193169287059165750519
Matthay KK, Reynolds CP, Seeger RC, Shimada H, Adkins ES, Haas-Kogan D, et al. Long-term results for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated on a randomized trial of myeloablative therapy followed by 13-cis-retinoic acid: A children’s oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1007–13. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8925.
Boubaker A, Poetschger U, Lambert B, Castellani MR, Bar-Sever Z, Oudoux A, et al. Validation of the MIBG SIOPEN scoring method in two independent high-risk neuroblastoma trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.10029.
Bar-Sever Z, Biassoni L, Shulkin B, Kong G, Hofman MS, Lopci E, et al. Guidelines on nuclear medicine imaging in neuroblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:2009–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4070-8.
Biasotti S, Garaventa A, Villavecchia GP, Cabria M, Nantron M, De Bernardi B. False-negative metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy at diagnosis of neuroblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2000;35:153–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-911x(200008)35:23.0.co;2-7.
Lu MY, Liu YL, Chang HH, Jou ST, Yang YL, Lin KH, et al. Characterization of neuroblastic tumors using 18F-FDOPA PET. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:42–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.102772.
Hemrom A, Arora G, Damle NA, Bal C. Comparative role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT and 131I-MIBG scintigraphy in neuroblastoma and application of curie and SIOPEN scoring systems in 18F-DOPA PET/CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;56:236–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-022-00762-6.
Piccardo A, Lopci E, Conte M, Cabria M, Cistaro A, Garaventa A, et al. Bone and lymph node metastases from neuroblastoma detected by 18F-DOPA-PET/CT and confirmed by posttherapy 131I-MIBG but negative on diagnostic 123I-MIBG scan. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:e80–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e31827a0002.
Pfluger T, Piccardo A. Neuroblastoma: MIBG imaging and new tracers. Semin Nucl Med. 2017;47:143–57. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.10.007.
Simon T, Hero B, Faldum A, Handgretinger R, Schrappe M, Klingebiel T, et al. Long term outcome of high-risk neuroblastoma patients after immunotherapy with antibody ch14.18 or oral metronomic chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-21.
Sharp SE, Shulkin BL, Gelfand MJ, Salisbury S, Furman WL. 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and18F-FDG PET in neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1237–43. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.060467.
Wang P, Li T, Liu Z, Jin M, Su Y, Zhang J, et al. [18F]MFBG PET/CT outperforming [123I]MIBG SPECT/CT in the evaluation of neuroblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50:3097–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06221-4.
Samim A, Tytgat GAM, Bleeker G, Wenker STM, Chatalic KLS, Poot AJ, et al. Nuclear medicine imaging in neuroblastoma: Current status and new developments. J Pers Med. 2021;11:270. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11040270.
SamimABlomTPootAJWindhorstADFioccoMTolboomNCorrection to: [18F]mFBG PET-CT for detection and localisation of neuroblastoma: a prospective pilot studyEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging2023504114611571:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XjtV2ksr3E10.1007/s00259-022-06063-636504277
Mcinnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, Mcgrath TA, Bossuyt PM. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies the PRISMA-DTA statement supplemental content CME Quiz at jamanetwork.com/learning. JAMA. 2018;319:388–96. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163.
Braghirolli AMS, Waissmann W, Da Silva JB, Dos Santos GR. Production of iodine-124 and its applications in nuclear medicine. Appl Radiat Isot. 2014;90:138–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.03.026.
Pandit-Taskar N, Modak S. Norepinephrine transporter as a target for imaging and therapy. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:39S–53S. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.186833.
FizFBiniFGabrieleEBottoniGGarrèMMarinozziFMilanaccioCVerricoAMassolloMBosioVLattuadaMRossiAPARole of dynamic parameters of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in pediatric gliomasClin Nucl Med20224751752410.1097/RLU.000000000000418535353725
Pandit-Taskar N, Zanzonico P, Staton KD, Carrasquillo JA, Reidy-Lagunes D, Lyashchenko S, et al. Biodistribution and dosimetry of 18 F-meta-fluorobenzylguanidine: A first-in-human PET/CT imaging study of patients with neuroendocrine malignancies. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:147-153. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.193169.
Liu B, Servaes S, Zhuang H. SPECT/CT MIBG imaging is crucial in the follow-up of the patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43:232–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000001984.
Shulkin BL, Wieland DM, Baro ME, Ungar DR, Mitchell DS, Dole MG, et al. PET hydroxyephedrine imaging of neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:16–21.
Matthay KK, Shulkin B, Ladenstein R, Michon J, Giammarile F, Lewington V, et al. Criteria for evaluation of disease extent by 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scans in neuroblastoma: A report for the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Task Force. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:1319–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.660562.
N Pandit-Taskar (6486_CR22) 2018; 59
A Samim (6486_CR19) 2023; 50
F Fiz (6486_CR32) 2022; 47
6486_CR29
6486_CR28
6486_CR2
6486_CR21
6486_CR3
6486_CR20
6486_CR4
6486_CR23
6486_CR5
6486_CR6
6486_CR25
6486_CR24
6486_CR8
6486_CR27
GA Yanik (6486_CR7) 2018; 59
6486_CR9
6486_CR26
M Conti (6486_CR33) 2016; 3
6486_CR30
6486_CR1
6486_CR18
6486_CR17
6486_CR10
6486_CR31
6486_CR12
6486_CR34
6486_CR11
6486_CR14
6486_CR36
6486_CR13
6486_CR35
6486_CR16
6486_CR38
6486_CR15
6486_CR37
References_xml – ident: 6486_CR1
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-21
– ident: 6486_CR35
  doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.03.026
– ident: 6486_CR15
– ident: 6486_CR29
  doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001984
– volume: 47
  start-page: 517
  year: 2022
  ident: 6486_CR32
  publication-title: Clin Nucl Med
  doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004185
  contributor:
    fullname: F Fiz
– ident: 6486_CR2
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4648
– ident: 6486_CR28
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186833
– ident: 6486_CR3
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8925
– volume: 3
  start-page: 8
  year: 2016
  ident: 6486_CR33
  publication-title: EJNMMI Phys
  doi: 10.1186/s40658-016-0144-5
  contributor:
    fullname: M Conti
– ident: 6486_CR26
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5732
– ident: 6486_CR36
  doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31827a0002
– ident: 6486_CR14
– ident: 6486_CR18
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.243139
– ident: 6486_CR8
  doi: 10.1002/1096-911x(200008)35:23.0.co;2-7
– ident: 6486_CR16
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1938-2
– ident: 6486_CR25
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.060467
– ident: 6486_CR38
  doi: 10.3390/jpm11040270
– ident: 6486_CR12
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
– ident: 6486_CR17
  doi: 10.1007/s13139-022-00762-6
– ident: 6486_CR21
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06221-4
– ident: 6486_CR11
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163
– ident: 6486_CR13
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.232553
– ident: 6486_CR9
  doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009263.pub2
– ident: 6486_CR5
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3829-7
– ident: 6486_CR27
  doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002961
– ident: 6486_CR24
  doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.10.007
– ident: 6486_CR37
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193169
– ident: 6486_CR23
  doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182485172
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1146
  issue: 4
  year: 2023
  ident: 6486_CR19
  publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06063-6
  contributor:
    fullname: A Samim
– ident: 6486_CR4
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4070-8
– ident: 6486_CR30
  doi: 10.3413/Nukmed-0743-15-0
– volume: 59
  start-page: 502
  year: 2018
  ident: 6486_CR7
  publication-title: J Nucl Med
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.195883
  contributor:
    fullname: GA Yanik
– ident: 6486_CR31
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06160-0
– ident: 6486_CR20
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.102772
– volume: 59
  start-page: 147
  year: 2018
  ident: 6486_CR22
  publication-title: J Nucl Med
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193169
  contributor:
    fullname: N Pandit-Taskar
– ident: 6486_CR6
  doi: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.10029
– ident: 6486_CR34
  doi: 10.1002/mp.12202
– ident: 6486_CR10
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.660562
SSID ssj0018289
Score 2.4958935
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Background Molecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [ 123 I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is the...
Molecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [ I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is the standard...
Abstract Background Molecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [ 123 I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine...
BackgroundMolecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [123I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is the...
BACKGROUNDMolecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [123I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is the...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 756
SubjectTerms 3-Iodobenzylguanidine
Cardiology
Case reports
Child
Clinical medicine
Decision making
Dihydroxyphenylalanine
Fluorine isotopes
Humans
Image acquisition
Imaging
Lesions
Literature reviews
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neuroblastoma
Neuroblastoma - diagnostic imaging
Neuroblastoma - pathology
Nuclear Medicine
Oncology
Orthopedics
Parameter sensitivity
Positron emission
Positron emission tomography
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Radioactive tracers
Radiology
Radiopharmaceuticals
Review Article
Scintigraphy
Spatial discrimination
Spatial resolution
Title The evidence-based role of catecholaminergic PET tracers in Neuroblastoma. A systematic review and a head-to-head comparison with mIBG scintigraphy
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-023-06486-9
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37962616
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2916251462
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2889993751
Volume 51
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1NT9wwEB1RkKpeqtIWmpaiqdQbGCVOYifH3RULRQL1ABK3aOIPaQ-bVBB-CX-44yQb1EIPvSSHWHaU58m88XieAb7HPivIlyRSlVmRFU6KMieOeWJtfGGIdK-zfXmlzm-yi9v8dpTJCbUwf-Xvg9gnE3TBnkWw8yyUKF_BTp6oOMzghVpMGYMQOYTgigMCoXkejwUyL_fxpxN6xiyfZUV7Z7N8B29HloizAdZd2HLNe3h9OebBP8Ajo4tuPBBUBE9kMewTxNZj2OLUR6zrvq5vZfDn6TV2d2SY6eGqwV6Po2bW3LVrOsEZPqk541DJgtRYJOT_tBVdK8IdzXRgIYa1W1z_mJ8h-8-mWw2i1x_hZnl6vTgX4_EKwmRJ2QmvY2u8dqUklWde17WXsTNs45TokN6UKV9i6Utl45oBTI11TGDIJkaRonQPtpu2cZ8AiVxtKSXn2Ly1thTXoTokjCB9qtIIjjbfu_o1qGhUk15yj07F6FQ9OlUZwcEGkmq0qPtKMo9lLpYpGcG36THbQkhwUOPaB25TcPTIfCtPItgfoJyGS3XJsVuiIjjeYPvU-b_f5fP_Nf8CbySznmFb9wFsd3cP7iuzlq4-hJ3Zcj6_Ouyn7W-areTC
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27955,27956,41153,42222,51609
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1NT9wwEB1RkNpeUOkHBGiZStxaV4mTtZMjXUGXlkUcFolbNPGHtIdNEA2_pH-44yQbRGkPvSSHWHaU58m88XieAY5jn-XkCxKpyqzIcidFMSGOeWJtfG6IdKezPb9Us-vs-83kZpDJCbUwf-Tvg9gnE3TBnkWw88yVKJ7BVli2CKcVTNV0zBiEyCEEVxwQCM3zeCiQ-Xsfj53QE2b5JCvaOZuzV7A9sEQ86WHdgQ1Xv4bn8yEP_gZ-MbrohgNBRfBEFsM-QWw8hi1OXcS66ur6lgavThfY3pFhpofLGjs9jopZc9us6Aue4IOaM_aVLEi1RUL-T1vRNiLc0YwHFmJYu8XV-ddvyP6zbpe96PVbuD47XUxnYjheQZgsKVrhdWyN166QpCaZ11XlZewM2zglOqQ3ZcqXWPpC2bhiAFNjHRMYsolRpCh9B5t1U7s9QCJXWUrJOTZvrS3FVagOCSNIn6o0gk_r713e9ioa5aiX3KFTMjplh05ZRHC4hqQcLOpnKZnHMhfLlIzg4_iYbSEkOKh2zT23yTl6ZL41SSLY7aEch0t1wbFboiL4vMb2ofN_v8v-_zU_ghezxfyivDi__HEALyUzoH6L9yFstnf37j0zmLb60E3d3yqz5ic
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3LTt0wEB21VELdoL4J0HYqdde65HXteEkpt9AWxAIkdtHED-kuboIgfAk_zNjJDa1oF90ki1hOlOPJnMmZGQN8TH1ZkdckCllaUVYuF3pGHPOkyvjKEKnYZ_v4RB6elz8uZhe_VfHHbPeVJDnUNIQuTW2_e2n97lT4Fly1FuxvBLvUSgr9GJ6UTG6iXCv3Jx0hxBMh5OIwQShe3WPZzN_n-NM1PeCbD7TS6ILmz2Bj5I64N4D9HB659gWsH4_q-Eu4ZczRjduEiuCfLIbsQew8hsSnGMcuY7XfwuDpwRn2V2SY_-Gixdilo2Eu3XdL-oJ7eN_jGYf6FqTWIiF_va3oOxHOaKZtDDH80cXl0dfvyF617RdDK-xXcD4_ONs_FOOmC8KUme6FV6k1Xjmdk5yVXjWNz1Nn2PIpU0H0zAs-pLnX0qYNw1oY65jWkM2MJEnFa1hru9ZtAhK5xlJBzrHRK2UpbULNSLhD7gtZJPBp9b7ry6G3Rj11UY7o1IxOHdGpdQI7K0jq0c6u65zZLTO0UuYJfJgus4UE2YNa193wmIpjSmZhsyyBNwOU0-0KpTmiy2QCn1fY3k_-72fZ-r_h72H99Nu8_nV08nMbnuZMi4a87x1Y669u3FumNX3zLq7cOz-j7nc
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+evidence-based+role+of+catecholaminergic+PET+tracers+in+Neuroblastoma.+A+systematic+review+and+a+head-to-head+comparison+with+mIBG+scintigraphy&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+nuclear+medicine+and+molecular+imaging&rft.au=Piccardo%2C+Arnoldo&rft.au=Treglia%2C+Giorgio&rft.au=Fiz%2C+Francesco&rft.au=Bar-Sever%2C+Zvi&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=1619-7070&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=756&rft.epage=767&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00259-023-06486-9&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1619-7070&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1619-7070&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1619-7070&client=summon