Selective Attentional Processing to Fall-Relevant Stimuli Among Older Adults Who Fear Falling

• Published in: Experimental aging research Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 330 - 345
• Main Authors: Brown, Lesley A., White, Patti, Doan, Jonathan B., de Bruin, Natalie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Philadelphia, PA Taylor & Francis Group 01.05.2011; Taylor & Francis; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Accidental Falls - prevention & control; Adult. Elderly; Aged; Aging - psychology; Attention; Biological and medical sciences; Cues; Decision Making; Developmental psychology; Discrimination (Psychology); Falls; Fear; Fear & phobias; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Judgment; Male; Middle Aged; Older people; Pattern Recognition, Visual; Psychological aspects; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Reaction Time; Recognition (Psychology); Risk factors; Semantics; Human; Affect affectivity; Selective attention; Fear; Cognition; Fall; Emotion emotionality; Experimental study; Elderly
• ISSN: 0361-073X; 1096-4657
• DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2011.568833

Fear of falling is known to affect more than half of community-dwelling older adults over 60 years of age. This fear is associated with physical and psychological effects that increase the risk of falling. The authors' theory is that attentional processing biases may exist in this population that serve to perpetuate fear of falling and subsequently increase fall risk. As a starting point in testing this proposition, the authors examined selective attentional processing bias to fall-relevant stimuli among older adults. Thirty older adult participants (M age  = 70.8 ± 5.8), self-categorized to be Fearful of Falling (FF, n = 15) or Non-Fearful of Falling (NF, n = 15) completed a visual dot-probe paradigm to determine detection latencies to fall-threatening and general-threat stimuli. Attentional processing was defined using three index scores: attentional bias, congruency index, and incongruency index. Bias indicates capture of attention, whereas congruency and incongruency imply vigilance and disengagement difficulty, respectively. Both groups showed an attentional bias to fall-threat words but those who were fearful of falling also showed an incongruency effect for fall-threat words. These findings confirm that selective attentional processing profiles for fall-relevant stimuli differ between older adults who exhibit fear of falling and those who do not have this fear. Moreover, in accordance with current interpretations of selective attentional processing, the incongruency effect noted among fall-fearful older adults presents a possibility for a difficulty disengaging from fall-threatening stimuli.