Effect of Fluoxetine on the Hippocampus of Wistar Albino Rats in Cold Restraint Stress Model

Stress has been known to be a potential modulator of learning and memory. Long term stress can lead to depression. Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor group of drug used in the treatment of depression. The present study was conducted to evaluate the potential of Fluoxetine on cold...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical and diagnostic research Vol. 11; no. 6; pp. AF01 - AF06
Main Author Jayakumar, Saikarthik
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published India JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 01.06.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2249-782X
0973-709X
DOI10.7860/JCDR/2017/26958.9953

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Stress has been known to be a potential modulator of learning and memory. Long term stress can lead to depression. Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor group of drug used in the treatment of depression. The present study was conducted to evaluate the potential of Fluoxetine on cold restraint induced stress in the hippocampus of Wistar rats. A total of 18 male wistar albino rats were divided randomly into three groups (n=6). Group 1 was the control group which were kept in normal laboratory conditions. Group 2 was the negative control group which were given cold restraint stress for period of four weeks. Group 3 was the experimental group, where the animals were pretreated with fluoxetine 10 mg/kg for a period of one week followed by cold restraint stress for 30 minutes and cotreated with fluoxetine 10 mg/kg for a period of four weeks. The whole study was done for a period of five weeks followed by behavioural studies and subsequently sacrificed with removal of brain for various histological, Immunohistochemical (IHC), neurochemical and antioxidant analysis. The values were expressed as Mean±SEM. One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test was used for the comparison of means. A probability of 0.05 and less was taken as statistically significant using Prism Graphpad software version 6.01. The results show there was significant improvement in the Morris water maze test after treatment with fluoxetine in Group 2. Similar results were also noted in the levels of neurotransmitters and antioxidant levels in brain and also in the number of cells counted in IHC and histological studies by H&E when Group 3 was compared with Group 2. The treatment reversed the damage in Group 2 which was comparable with the control group. The results revealed that administration of fluoxetine 10 mg/kg given orally has a potential antistressor effect by improving the neurogenic and neuroprotective effect on the cold restraint stress induced hippocampal damage.
AbstractList Stress has been known to be a potential modulator of learning and memory. Long term stress can lead to depression. Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor group of drug used in the treatment of depression. The present study was conducted to evaluate the potential of Fluoxetine on cold restraint induced stress in the hippocampus of Wistar rats. A total of 18 male wistar albino rats were divided randomly into three groups (n=6). Group 1 was the control group which were kept in normal laboratory conditions. Group 2 was the negative control group which were given cold restraint stress for period of four weeks. Group 3 was the experimental group, where the animals were pretreated with fluoxetine 10 mg/kg for a period of one week followed by cold restraint stress for 30 minutes and cotreated with fluoxetine 10 mg/kg for a period of four weeks. The whole study was done for a period of five weeks followed by behavioural studies and subsequently sacrificed with removal of brain for various histological, Immunohistochemical (IHC), neurochemical and antioxidant analysis. The values were expressed as Mean±SEM. One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test was used for the comparison of means. A probability of 0.05 and less was taken as statistically significant using Prism Graphpad software version 6.01. The results show there was significant improvement in the Morris water maze test after treatment with fluoxetine in Group 2. Similar results were also noted in the levels of neurotransmitters and antioxidant levels in brain and also in the number of cells counted in IHC and histological studies by H&E when Group 3 was compared with Group 2. The treatment reversed the damage in Group 2 which was comparable with the control group. The results revealed that administration of fluoxetine 10 mg/kg given orally has a potential antistressor effect by improving the neurogenic and neuroprotective effect on the cold restraint stress induced hippocampal damage.
Introduction: Stress has been known to be a potential modulator of learning and memory. Long term stress can lead to depression. Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor group of drug used in the treatment of depression. Aim: The present study was conducted to evaluate the potential of Fluoxetine on cold restraint induced stress in the hippocampus of Wistar rats. Materials and Methods: A total of 18 male wistar albino rats were divided randomly into three groups (n=6). Group 1 was the control group which were kept in normal laboratory conditions. Group 2 was the negative control group which were given cold restraint stress for period of four weeks. Group 3 was the experimental group, where the animals were pretreated with fluoxetine 10 mg/kg for a period of one week followed by cold restraint stress for 30 minutes and cotreated with fluoxetine 10 mg/kg for a period of four weeks. The whole study was done for a period of five weeks followed by behavioural studies and subsequently sacrificed with removal of brain for various histological, Immunohistochemical (IHC), neurochemical and antioxidant analysis. The values were expressed as Mean±SEM. One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for the comparison of means. A probability of 0.05 and less was taken as statistically significant using Prism Graphpad software version 6.01. Results: The results show there was significant improvement in the Morris water maze test after treatment with fluoxetine in Group 2. Similar results were also noted in the levels of neurotransmitters and antioxidant levels in brain and also in the number of cells counted in IHC and histological studies by H&E when Group 3 was compared with Group 2. The treatment reversed the damage in Group 2 which was comparable with the control group. Conclusion: The results revealed that administration of fluoxetine 10 mg/kg given orally has a potential antistressor effect by improving the neurogenic and neuroprotective effect on the cold restraint stress induced hippocampal damage.
Stress has been known to be a potential modulator of learning and memory. Long term stress can lead to depression. Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor group of drug used in the treatment of depression.INTRODUCTIONStress has been known to be a potential modulator of learning and memory. Long term stress can lead to depression. Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor group of drug used in the treatment of depression.The present study was conducted to evaluate the potential of Fluoxetine on cold restraint induced stress in the hippocampus of Wistar rats.AIMThe present study was conducted to evaluate the potential of Fluoxetine on cold restraint induced stress in the hippocampus of Wistar rats.A total of 18 male wistar albino rats were divided randomly into three groups (n=6). Group 1 was the control group which were kept in normal laboratory conditions. Group 2 was the negative control group which were given cold restraint stress for period of four weeks. Group 3 was the experimental group, where the animals were pretreated with fluoxetine 10 mg/kg for a period of one week followed by cold restraint stress for 30 minutes and cotreated with fluoxetine 10 mg/kg for a period of four weeks. The whole study was done for a period of five weeks followed by behavioural studies and subsequently sacrificed with removal of brain for various histological, Immunohistochemical (IHC), neurochemical and antioxidant analysis. The values were expressed as Mean±SEM. One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test was used for the comparison of means. A probability of 0.05 and less was taken as statistically significant using Prism Graphpad software version 6.01.MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 18 male wistar albino rats were divided randomly into three groups (n=6). Group 1 was the control group which were kept in normal laboratory conditions. Group 2 was the negative control group which were given cold restraint stress for period of four weeks. Group 3 was the experimental group, where the animals were pretreated with fluoxetine 10 mg/kg for a period of one week followed by cold restraint stress for 30 minutes and cotreated with fluoxetine 10 mg/kg for a period of four weeks. The whole study was done for a period of five weeks followed by behavioural studies and subsequently sacrificed with removal of brain for various histological, Immunohistochemical (IHC), neurochemical and antioxidant analysis. The values were expressed as Mean±SEM. One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test was used for the comparison of means. A probability of 0.05 and less was taken as statistically significant using Prism Graphpad software version 6.01.The results show there was significant improvement in the Morris water maze test after treatment with fluoxetine in Group 2. Similar results were also noted in the levels of neurotransmitters and antioxidant levels in brain and also in the number of cells counted in IHC and histological studies by H&E when Group 3 was compared with Group 2. The treatment reversed the damage in Group 2 which was comparable with the control group.RESULTSThe results show there was significant improvement in the Morris water maze test after treatment with fluoxetine in Group 2. Similar results were also noted in the levels of neurotransmitters and antioxidant levels in brain and also in the number of cells counted in IHC and histological studies by H&E when Group 3 was compared with Group 2. The treatment reversed the damage in Group 2 which was comparable with the control group.The results revealed that administration of fluoxetine 10 mg/kg given orally has a potential antistressor effect by improving the neurogenic and neuroprotective effect on the cold restraint stress induced hippocampal damage.CONCLUSIONThe results revealed that administration of fluoxetine 10 mg/kg given orally has a potential antistressor effect by improving the neurogenic and neuroprotective effect on the cold restraint stress induced hippocampal damage.
Author Jayakumar, Saikarthik
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Saikarthik
  surname: Jayakumar
  fullname: Jayakumar, Saikarthik
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28764145$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kU1v1DAYhC1URLeFf4CQj1zStR1_hVu1tLSoCGmhag9IlmO_AVfZONiO1P57km7LgQMnS9YzY8_METoY4gAIvaXkRGlJ1p83H7drRqhaM9kIfdI0on6BVqRRdaVIc3uAVozxplKa3R6io5zvCJFS1vIVOmRaSU65WKEfZ10HruDY4fN-ivdQwgA4Drj8AnwRxjE6uxunvAA3IReb8GnfhiHirS0ZhwFvYu_xFnJJNgwFfysJcsZfoof-NXrZ2T7Dm6fzGF2fn33fXFRXXz9dbk6vKsdpUypVt1LVjRdScernMFI5281fhdYzaKWnvuZaOFXb2jvBuONetN457R1htKuP0eXe10d7Z8YUdjY9mGiDebyI6aexqQTXg5FEy1bP8ZUWXHdgLW07mJvRVBPpYfZ6v_caU_w9zbHMLmQHfW8HiFM2tGFCUKGYnNF3T-jU7sD_ffi53Rn4sAdcijkn6IwLxZYQh6Ws3lBilinNMqVZpjSPU5plylnM_xE_-_9X9gesy6D3
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2174_0929866530666230419093531
crossref_primary_10_1186_s43088_024_00482_0
crossref_primary_10_2174_1389557521666210415112601
crossref_primary_10_1080_10253890_2019_1660316
crossref_primary_10_15446_rcciquifa_v52n3_111080
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26958.9953
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 0973-709X
EndPage AF06
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_6086b887678548feaa1bfe00681806de
28764145
10_7860_JCDR_2017_26958_9953
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
2WC
5VS
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACUHS
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BCNDV
CITATION
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EOJEC
ESX
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
KQ8
M~E
OBODZ
OK1
P6G
RNS
RPM
TR2
TUS
~8M
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-73b6739d56741d69567caf663ebd2eb6d1d3485c73a3dc524c4d5bdcc8dc021f3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2249-782X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 00:51:59 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 07:07:43 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:42:27 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:23:34 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:00:18 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Neuroprotective
Neurogenesis
Water maze
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c419t-73b6739d56741d69567caf663ebd2eb6d1d3485c73a3dc524c4d5bdcc8dc021f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/6086b887678548feaa1bfe00681806de
PMID 28764145
PQID 1925515726
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6086b887678548feaa1bfe00681806de
proquest_miscellaneous_1925515726
pubmed_primary_28764145
crossref_citationtrail_10_7860_JCDR_2017_26958_9953
crossref_primary_10_7860_JCDR_2017_26958_9953
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace India
PublicationPlace_xml – name: India
PublicationTitle Journal of clinical and diagnostic research
PublicationTitleAlternate J Clin Diagn Res
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
Publisher_xml – name: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
References 1960381 - Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1991 Summer;6(2):117-24
19066539 - J Vis Exp. 2008 Sep 24;(19):null
7472505 - J Neurosci. 1995 Nov;15(11):7539-47
4556490 - Anal Biochem. 1972 Jun;47(2):389-94
27496030 - Bull Exp Biol Med. 2016 Jul;161(3):351-4
10844239 - Anim Reprod Sci. 2000 Jul 2;60-61:743-52
28100752 - J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 18;37(3):726-737
9822768 - J Neurosci. 1998 Dec 1;18(23):10150-6
24300695 - Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jan;38:173-92
7857640 - Neuron. 1995 Feb;14(2):303-15
21385396 - Mol Brain. 2011 Mar 08;4:10
8140464 - Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jan;38(2):373-81
17716101 - Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:607-28
27754387 - Molecules. 2016 Oct 13;21(10 )
4823943 - J Nutr. 1974 May;104(5):580-7
10958110 - Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000 Jul;151(1):7-12
14749091 - Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004 May;29(4):423-47
2690106 - Prog Clin Biol Res. 1989;317:333-51
24281320 - Mamm Genome. 2014 Feb;25(1-2):49-74
26408987 - Neuroscience. 2015 Dec 3;310:561-77
8601816 - J Neurosci. 1996 Apr 1;16(7):2365-72
2452945 - Life Sci. 1988;42(19):1847-53
9046559 - Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:191-214
10180753 - Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 May;13(5 Pt 1):543-61
7825902 - Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994 Nov 30;746:411-4
6490072 - Indian J Biochem Biophys. 1984 Apr;21(2):130-2
15474655 - Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jan 6;156(1):105-14
17716090 - Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:293-319
12122314 - Behav Pharmacol. 2002 May;13(3):237-42
7897207 - J Immunol. 1995 Apr 1;154(7):3194-203
1375306 - Life Sci. 1992;50(22):1683-90
21175261 - J Neurotrauma. 2011 Feb;28(2):259-68
10818138 - J Neurosci. 2000 Jun 1;20(11):4030-6
9755354 - Biol Psychiatry. 1998 Sep 1;44(5):324-35
23780498 - Drug Res (Stuttg). 2013 Oct;63(10 ):532-9
22429479 - Psychiatry Res. 2012 Aug 15;198(3):407-11
11063970 - Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Oct 15;48(8):732-9
10471245 - Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1999 Jul-Aug;7(2):69-84
28012396 - Biomed Pharmacother. 2017 Feb;86:414-425
23557208 - J Neurotrauma. 2013 Sep 1;30(17 ):1521-30
2522809 - Brain Res. 1989 Jan 16;477(1-2):300-7
21624059 - Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011 Nov;109(5):365-71
10617146 - J Neurochem. 2000 Jan;74(1):406-13
11919662 - Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Apr;160(4):353-61
11331918 - Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 May;2(5):343-51
11850470 - J Neurosci. 2002 Feb 15;22(4):1436-42
References_xml – reference: 7897207 - J Immunol. 1995 Apr 1;154(7):3194-203
– reference: 14749091 - Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004 May;29(4):423-47
– reference: 7472505 - J Neurosci. 1995 Nov;15(11):7539-47
– reference: 1960381 - Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1991 Summer;6(2):117-24
– reference: 19066539 - J Vis Exp. 2008 Sep 24;(19):null
– reference: 21624059 - Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011 Nov;109(5):365-71
– reference: 2522809 - Brain Res. 1989 Jan 16;477(1-2):300-7
– reference: 1375306 - Life Sci. 1992;50(22):1683-90
– reference: 15474655 - Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jan 6;156(1):105-14
– reference: 22429479 - Psychiatry Res. 2012 Aug 15;198(3):407-11
– reference: 11331918 - Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 May;2(5):343-51
– reference: 2690106 - Prog Clin Biol Res. 1989;317:333-51
– reference: 10180753 - Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 May;13(5 Pt 1):543-61
– reference: 17716101 - Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:607-28
– reference: 12122314 - Behav Pharmacol. 2002 May;13(3):237-42
– reference: 8601816 - J Neurosci. 1996 Apr 1;16(7):2365-72
– reference: 23557208 - J Neurotrauma. 2013 Sep 1;30(17 ):1521-30
– reference: 23780498 - Drug Res (Stuttg). 2013 Oct;63(10 ):532-9
– reference: 10818138 - J Neurosci. 2000 Jun 1;20(11):4030-6
– reference: 21175261 - J Neurotrauma. 2011 Feb;28(2):259-68
– reference: 4556490 - Anal Biochem. 1972 Jun;47(2):389-94
– reference: 21385396 - Mol Brain. 2011 Mar 08;4:10
– reference: 7825902 - Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994 Nov 30;746:411-4
– reference: 10958110 - Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000 Jul;151(1):7-12
– reference: 11919662 - Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Apr;160(4):353-61
– reference: 10844239 - Anim Reprod Sci. 2000 Jul 2;60-61:743-52
– reference: 27754387 - Molecules. 2016 Oct 13;21(10 ):
– reference: 27496030 - Bull Exp Biol Med. 2016 Jul;161(3):351-4
– reference: 28100752 - J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 18;37(3):726-737
– reference: 2452945 - Life Sci. 1988;42(19):1847-53
– reference: 24281320 - Mamm Genome. 2014 Feb;25(1-2):49-74
– reference: 9046559 - Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:191-214
– reference: 26408987 - Neuroscience. 2015 Dec 3;310:561-77
– reference: 8140464 - Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jan;38(2):373-81
– reference: 9822768 - J Neurosci. 1998 Dec 1;18(23):10150-6
– reference: 9755354 - Biol Psychiatry. 1998 Sep 1;44(5):324-35
– reference: 11063970 - Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Oct 15;48(8):732-9
– reference: 11850470 - J Neurosci. 2002 Feb 15;22(4):1436-42
– reference: 6490072 - Indian J Biochem Biophys. 1984 Apr;21(2):130-2
– reference: 28012396 - Biomed Pharmacother. 2017 Feb;86:414-425
– reference: 24300695 - Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jan;38:173-92
– reference: 10617146 - J Neurochem. 2000 Jan;74(1):406-13
– reference: 10471245 - Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1999 Jul-Aug;7(2):69-84
– reference: 4823943 - J Nutr. 1974 May;104(5):580-7
– reference: 7857640 - Neuron. 1995 Feb;14(2):303-15
– reference: 17716090 - Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:293-319
SSID ssj0066636
Score 2.13329
Snippet Stress has been known to be a potential modulator of learning and memory. Long term stress can lead to depression. Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake...
Introduction: Stress has been known to be a potential modulator of learning and memory. Long term stress can lead to depression. Fluoxetine is a selective...
SourceID doaj
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage AF01
SubjectTerms neurogenesis
neuroprotective
water maze
Title Effect of Fluoxetine on the Hippocampus of Wistar Albino Rats in Cold Restraint Stress Model
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28764145
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1925515726
https://doaj.org/article/6086b887678548feaa1bfe00681806de
Volume 11
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LixQxEA6yB_Eirs9xdYngNU6n8-o-ruOOw8J6GF2cgxDyhIW2e9jpAX--laRn0IPsxUsfmoROf6nk-4qkqhB6L2MQTrQ18cDFhNPKE8MrSyivlamr6Fi-8n_9Ra5u-NVGbP4o9ZXuhJX0wAW4uQTNbWElwKYK4joGY6iNIUU20KaSPqTdFzjv4EyVPRg0eS4OCPzUEuDATQmaU42s5leLT2tw-ama17IVzYe2FewvUsq5-_8tODPxLJ-gx5NixBdlpKfoQeifoofX05n4M_SjJCDGQ8TLbj_8SjHMAQ89BmmHV7fbLbDVz-1-lxp8T2rxDl904A8PeG3GHb7t8WLoPF6HXS4XMeKvOXwEpypp3XN0s7z8tliRqWYCcZy2I1HMSsVaLyRIBQ8_KJUzEeAI1tfBSk89441wihnmnai5415Y71zjHdB9ZC_QST_04RXCLcAaQ1S8ipJ7yi309ilwHiSuMyrOEDuApt2UUDwNtNPgWCSodYJaJ6h1hlonqGeIHHttS0KNe9p_TPNxbJvSYecXYCR6MhJ9n5HM0LvDbGpYPulMxPRh2O80CFzQjELVcoZelmk-fgqcSckpF6__xxDO0KP0Z-WW2Rt0Mt7tw1vQM6M9z6YLz88b-htwau0k
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+Fluoxetine+on+the+Hippocampus+of+Wistar+Albino+Rats+in+Cold+Restraint+Stress+Model&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+clinical+and+diagnostic+research&rft.au=Saikarthik+Jayakumar&rft.au=Gunapriya+Raghunath&rft.au=Saraswathi+Ilango&rft.au=J+Vijayakumar&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.pub=JCDR+Research+and+Publications+Private+Limited&rft.issn=2249-782X&rft.eissn=0973-709X&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=AF01&rft.epage=AF06&rft_id=info:doi/10.7860%2FJCDR%2F2017%2F26958.9953&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_6086b887678548feaa1bfe00681806de
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2249-782X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2249-782X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2249-782X&client=summon