Including business strategy in model-driven methods: an experiment
Software-centric organisations design a loosely coupled organisation structure around strategic objectives, replicating this design to their business processes and information systems. Nowadays, dealing with business strategy in a model-driven development context is a challenge since key concepts su...
Saved in:
| Published in | Requirements engineering Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 411 - 440 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
Springer London
01.09.2023
Springer Nature B.V |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Software-centric organisations design a loosely coupled organisation structure around strategic objectives, replicating this design to their business processes and information systems. Nowadays, dealing with business strategy in a model-driven development context is a challenge since key concepts such as the organisation’s structure and strategic ends and means have been mostly addressed at the enterprise architecture level for the strategic alignment of the whole organisation, and have not been included into MDD methods as a requirements source. To overcome this issue, researchers have designed the LiteStrat, a business strategy modelling method compliant with MDD for developing information systems. This article presents an empirical comparison of LiteStrat and with i*, one of the most used models for strategic alignment in an MDD context. The article contributes with a literature review on the experimental comparison of modelling languages, the design of a study for measuring and comparing the semantic quality of modelling languages, and empirical evidence of the LiteStrat and i* differences. The evaluation consists of a 2 × 2 factorial experiment recruiting 28 undergraduate subjects. Significant differences favouring LiteStrat were found for models’ accuracy and completeness, while no differences in modeller’s efficiency and satisfaction were detected. These results yield evidence of the suitability of LiteStrat for business strategy modelling in a model-driven context. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Software-centric organisations design a loosely coupled organisation structure around strategic objectives, replicating this design to their business processes and information systems. Nowadays, dealing with business strategy in a model-driven development context is a challenge since key concepts such as the organisation’s structure and strategic ends and means have been mostly addressed at the enterprise architecture level for the strategic alignment of the whole organisation, and have not been included into MDD methods as a requirements source. To overcome this issue, researchers have designed the LiteStrat, a business strategy modelling method compliant with MDD for developing information systems. This article presents an empirical comparison of LiteStrat and with i*, one of the most used models for strategic alignment in an MDD context. The article contributes with a literature review on the experimental comparison of modelling languages, the design of a study for measuring and comparing the semantic quality of modelling languages, and empirical evidence of the LiteStrat and i* differences. The evaluation consists of a 2 × 2 factorial experiment recruiting 28 undergraduate subjects. Significant differences favouring LiteStrat were found for models’ accuracy and completeness, while no differences in modeller’s efficiency and satisfaction were detected. These results yield evidence of the suitability of LiteStrat for business strategy modelling in a model-driven context. Software-centric organisations design a loosely coupled organisation structure around strategic objectives, replicating this design to their business processes and information systems. Nowadays, dealing with business strategy in a model-driven development context is a challenge since key concepts such as the organisation's structure and strategic ends and means have been mostly addressed at the enterprise architecture level for the strategic alignment of the whole organisation, and have not been included into MDD methods as a requirements source. To overcome this issue, researchers have designed the LiteStrat, a business strategy modelling method compliant with MDD for developing information systems. This article presents an empirical comparison of LiteStrat and with i*, one of the most used models for strategic alignment in an MDD context. The article contributes with a literature review on the experimental comparison of modelling languages, the design of a study for measuring and comparing the semantic quality of modelling languages, and empirical evidence of the LiteStrat and i* differences. The evaluation consists of a 2 × 2 factorial experiment recruiting 28 undergraduate subjects. Significant differences favouring LiteStrat were found for models' accuracy and completeness, while no differences in modeller's efficiency and satisfaction were detected. These results yield evidence of the suitability of LiteStrat for business strategy modelling in a model-driven context.Software-centric organisations design a loosely coupled organisation structure around strategic objectives, replicating this design to their business processes and information systems. Nowadays, dealing with business strategy in a model-driven development context is a challenge since key concepts such as the organisation's structure and strategic ends and means have been mostly addressed at the enterprise architecture level for the strategic alignment of the whole organisation, and have not been included into MDD methods as a requirements source. To overcome this issue, researchers have designed the LiteStrat, a business strategy modelling method compliant with MDD for developing information systems. This article presents an empirical comparison of LiteStrat and with i*, one of the most used models for strategic alignment in an MDD context. The article contributes with a literature review on the experimental comparison of modelling languages, the design of a study for measuring and comparing the semantic quality of modelling languages, and empirical evidence of the LiteStrat and i* differences. The evaluation consists of a 2 × 2 factorial experiment recruiting 28 undergraduate subjects. Significant differences favouring LiteStrat were found for models' accuracy and completeness, while no differences in modeller's efficiency and satisfaction were detected. These results yield evidence of the suitability of LiteStrat for business strategy modelling in a model-driven context. |
| Author | Pastor, Oscar Noel, Rene Panach, Jose Ignacio |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rene orcidid: 0000-0002-3652-4645 surname: Noel fullname: Noel, Rene email: rnoel@vrain.upv.es, rene.noel@uv.cl organization: Valencian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Universitat Politècnica de València, Escuela de Ingeniería Informática, Universidad de Valparaíso – sequence: 2 givenname: Jose Ignacio orcidid: 0000-0002-7043-6227 surname: Panach fullname: Panach, Jose Ignacio organization: Escola Tècnica Superior d’Enginyeria, Universitat de València – sequence: 3 givenname: Oscar orcidid: 0000-0002-1320-8471 surname: Pastor fullname: Pastor, Oscar organization: Valencian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Universitat Politècnica de València |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359152$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kUlLBDEQhYMoOi5_wIM0ePESrSy9lDcdXAYELwreQqa7Zoz0pMekW_Tfm3EUwYOXCkW-V7yqt8s2feeJsUMBpwKgPIupFAUHqTiABuBqg42EVpKDgKdNNgLUJVcFyB22G-MLgNQl4jbbUaXKUeRyxC4nvm6Hxvl5Nh2i8xRjFvtge5p_ZM5ni66hljfBvVFqqH_umnieWZ_R-5KCW5Dv99nWzLaRDr7fPfZ4ffUwvuV39zeT8cUdr7XAnhdFrtEmD42UqkRda4sCobKzCivQMjkrC2kFSip1MdO20ulTY14hTGu0ao-drOcuQ_c6UOzNwsWa2tZ66oZoZKVAihwrTOjxH_SlG4JP7lZUcoJK60QdfVPDdEGNWaZ9bPgwP9dJQLUG6tDFGGhmatfb3nU-Xci1RoBZBWHWQZgUhPkKwqgklX-kP9P_Fam1KCbYzyn82v5H9QmGO5c8 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00766_024_00422_5 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1155/2019/6918105 10.1016/S0169-023X(97)88935-5 10.1109/52.268955 10.1016/j.infsof.2019.08.003 10.18417/EMISA.17.2 10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.023 10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8 10.1109/SBCARS.2016.15 10.1142/S0218194007003148 10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2 10.1145/2601248.2601268 10.1007/978-3-642-41467-1 10.1145/122672.122692 10.1007/s00450-016-0337-0 10.1007/978-0-387-35611-2_14 10.1109/EDOC.2013.12 10.47839/ijc.18.3.1524 10.1007/11767138_34 10.1007/978-3-540-73031-6_2 10.1016/j.is.2013.05.006 10.2307/249008 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.08.009 10.1007/s13369-017-2425-2 10.1007/s10257-008-0079-z 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.04.003 10.1145/3239235.3267433 10.1016/j.infsof.2019.08.001 10.1007/s00766-021-00348-2 10.1002/smr.2254 10.1109/MITP.2011.109 10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_13 10.1016/j.is.2015.03.007 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.09.002 10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.03.002 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007 10.1007/978-3-540-30464-7_10 10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_7 10.1007/s10664-017-9523-3 10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_6 10.1109/32.879812 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2017-0122 10.1016/j.infsof.2005.08.009 10.1016/0950-5849(95)01059-9 10.5281/zenodo.7622995 10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_42 10.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_34 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2023 The Author(s) 2023. The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2023 – notice: The Author(s) 2023. – notice: The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7SC 7XB 88I 8AL 8AO 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ JQ2 K7- L6V L7M L~C L~D M0N M2P M7S P5Z P62 PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS Q9U 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00766-023-00400-3 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Computer and Information Systems Abstracts ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Science Database (Alumni Edition) Computing Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central Student SciTech Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer Science Database ProQuest Engineering Collection Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Computing Database Science Database Engineering Database ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Computer Science Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Engineering Collection ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Engineering Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Computing Engineering Database ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest Computing (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic (New) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed Computer Science Database MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Computer Science |
| EISSN | 1432-010X |
| EndPage | 440 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 37359152 10_1007_s00766_023_00400_3 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Conselleria de Innovación, Universidades, Ciencia y Sociedad Digital, Generalitat Valenciana grantid: GENI (CIAICO/2022/229) funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100016386 – fundername: Agencia Estatal de Investigación grantid: PID2021-123824OB-I00; PDC2021-121243-I00 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100011033 – fundername: Universidad Politècnica de València – fundername: Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo grantid: 2020-72210494 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100020884 – fundername: Agència Valenciana de la Innovació grantid: INNEST/2021/57 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100016028 |
| GroupedDBID | -4Z -59 -5G -BR -CS -D8 -EM -Y2 -~C .4S .86 .DC .VR 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 1N0 1SB 2.D 203 28- 29P 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 3EH 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 5QI 5VS 67Z 6NX 88I 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FW 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AAOBN AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDBF ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHFT ABHLI ABHQN ABJCF ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACHSB ACHXU ACIHN ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACREN ACSNA ACUHS ACZOJ ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADMLS ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADYOE ADZKW AEAQA AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFYQB AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARAPS ARCSS ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AYJHY AZFZN AZQEC B-. B0M BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGLVJ BGNMA BPHCQ BSONS C6C CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 DWQXO EAD EAP EBLON EBS EDO EIOEI EJD EMK EPL ESBYG ESX FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GXS H13 HCIFZ HF~ HG5 HG6 HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I-F I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ K6V K7- KDC KOV KOW KZ1 L6V LAS LLZTM LMP M0N M2P M4Y M7S MA- N2Q NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM P19 P2P P62 P9O PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PT4 PT5 PTHSS Q2X QOK QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI RNS ROL RPX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S3B SAP SCJ SCLPG SCO SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE SZN T13 T16 TSG TSK TSV TUC TUS U2A UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WK8 YLTOR Z45 Z7R Z7S Z7X Z7Z Z83 Z88 Z8M Z8N Z8R Z8T Z8W Z92 ZMTXR ~8M ~EX AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACMFV ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT NPM 7SC 7XB 8AL 8FD 8FK ABRTQ JQ2 L7M L~C L~D PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-66549a002d223794c4a91908af898042799762a192e746f4a8408a495890bc9a3 |
| IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
| ISSN | 0947-3602 1432-010X |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 13:42:27 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 13:53:04 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:23:18 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:58 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:26:01 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:42:06 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | Model-driven architecture Organisational modelling Goal modelling Organisational structure modelling Business strategy modelling |
| Language | English |
| License | The Author(s) 2023. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c419t-66549a002d223794c4a91908af898042799762a192e746f4a8408a495890bc9a3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3652-4645 0000-0002-1320-8471 0000-0002-7043-6227 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00766-023-00400-3 |
| PMID | 37359152 |
| PQID | 2836659344 |
| PQPubID | 43844 |
| PageCount | 30 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2830215989 proquest_journals_2836659344 pubmed_primary_37359152 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00766_023_00400_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00766_023_00400_3 springer_journals_10_1007_s00766_023_00400_3 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2023-09-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-09-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2023 text: 2023-09-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Requirements engineering |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | Requirements Eng |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Requir Eng |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| Publisher | Springer London Springer Nature B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Springer London – name: Springer Nature B.V |
| References | HabbaMFredjMBenabdellah ChaouniSAlignment between business requirement, business process, and software system: a systematic literature reviewJ Eng2019201911910.1155/2019/6918105 RichardKLeffingwellDSAFe 5.0 distilled: achieving business agility with the scaled agile framework2020BostonAddison-Wesley PetersenKVakkalankaSKuzniarzLGuidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: an updateInf Softw Technol20156411810.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007 Giannoulis C, Zdravkovic J (2011) Modeling strategy maps and balanced scorecards using iStar 6 ScannielloGErraUDistributed modeling of use case diagrams with a method based on think-pair-square: results from two controlled experimentsJ Vis Lang Comput20142549451710.1016/j.jvlc.2014.03.002 KabeliJShovalPComprehension and quality of analysis specifications—a comparison of FOOM and OPM methodologiesInf Softw Technol20054727129010.1016/j.infsof.2004.08.0091015.68668 Sousa HP. Implementing GPI, a language for organizational alignment 6 Model Driven Architecture (MDA) Object management group. https://www.omg.org/mda/. Accessed 21 May 2020 Wohlin C (2014) Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering—EASE ’14. ACM Press, London, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268 WieringaRJDesign science methodology for information systems and software engineering2014BerlinSpringer10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8 BrinkkemperSMethod engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and toolsInf Softw Technol19963827528010.1016/0950-5849(95)01059-9 WohlinCRunesonPHöstMOhlssonMCRegnellBWesslénAExperimentation in software engineering2012BerlinSpringer10.1007/978-3-642-29044-21069.68547 Abrahão S, Insfran E, de Guevara FG-L, Fernández-Diego M, Cano-Genoves C, de Oliveira RP (2018) Comparing the effectiveness of goal-oriented languages: results from a controlled experiment. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement. ACM, Oulu Finland, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239235.3267433 ThabetRBorkDBoufaiedALamineEKorbaaOPingaudHRisk-aware business process management using multi-view modeling: method and toolRequir Eng202110.1007/s00766-021-00348-2 IonitaDWieringaRBulleeJ-WVasenevAJohannessonPLeeMLLiddleSWOpdahlALPastor LópezÓTangible modelling to elicit domain knowledge: an experiment and focus groupConceptual modeling2015ChamSpringer55856510.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_42 Mohagheghi P, Dehlen V, Neple T (2008) Towards a tool-supported quality model for model-driven engineering Nagel B, Gerth C, Engels G, Post J (2013) Ensuring consistency among business goals and business process models. In: 2013 17th IEEE international enterprise distributed object computing conference. IEEE, pp 17–26 SamaviRYuETopaloglouTStrategic reasoning about business models: a conceptual modeling approachInf Syst E Bus Manag2009717119810.1007/s10257-008-0079-z The Object Management Group (2015) Business motivation model specification, version 1.3 Horkoff J (2019) Goal-oriented requirements engineering: an extended systematic mapping study 28 De CastroVMarcosEVaraJMApplying CIM-to-PIM model transformations for the service-oriented development of information systemsInf Softw Technol2011538710510.1016/j.infsof.2010.09.002 YuESKSocial modeling for requirements engineering2011CambridgeMIT Press Krogstie J (2002) A semiotic approach to quality in requirements specifications. In: Organizational semiotics. Springer, pp 231–249 ConwayMEHow do committees inventDatamation1968142831 LapalmeJThree schools of thought on enterprise architectureIT Prof201214374310.1109/MITP.2011.109 FalessiDJuristoNWohlinCTurhanBMünchJJedlitschkaAOivoMEmpirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experimentsEmpir Softw Eng20182345248910.1007/s10664-017-9523-3 LiZZhouXGuALiQA complete approach for CIM modelling and model formalisingInf Softw Technol201565395510.1016/j.infsof.2015.04.003 KitsiosFKamariotouMBusiness strategy modelling based on enterprise architecture: a state of the art reviewBPMJ20192560662410.1108/BPMJ-05-2017-0122 DavisFPerceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologyMIS Q19891331934010.2307/249008 Forsgren N, Humble J, Kim G (2018) Accelerate: the science behind DevOps: building and scaling high performing technology organizations. IT Revolution, Portland, Oregon AmyotDAkhigbeOBaslymanMGhanavatiSGhasemiMHassineJLessardLMussbacherGShenKYuECombining goal modelling with business process modellingEnter Model Inf Syst Archit EMISAJ2022213810.18417/EMISA.17.2 Llinares JD, López ÓP. Aplying modelling techniques for the development of a strategic plan in a large corporation 7 Insfran E, Abrahao S. Specifying value in GRL for guiding BPMN activities prioritization 12 RuizMCostalDEspañaSFranchXPastorÓGoBIS: An integrated framework to analyse the goal and business process perspectives in information systemsInf Syst20155333034510.1016/j.is.2015.03.007 Henderson-SellersBRalytéJÅgerfalkPJRossiMSituational method engineering2014BerlinSpringer10.1007/978-3-642-41467-1 Moody DL. The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods 18 Dalpiaz F, Franch X, Horkoff J (2016) iStar 2.0 language guide. arXiv:1605.07767 [cs] Noel R, Panach I, Pastor O (2021) Experimental Comparison of LiteStrat vs iStar [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7622995 LewisJRPsychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: the ASQACM Sigchi Bull199123788110.1145/122672.122692 AbrahãoSInsfranEGonzález-Ladrón-de-GuevaraFFernández-DiegoMCano-GenovesCPereira de OliveiraRAssessing the effectiveness of goal-oriented modeling languages: a family of experimentsInf Softw Technol201911610617110.1016/j.infsof.2019.08.003 SousaHPYuEDobbieGJarkeMPuraoSModeling organizational alignmentConceptual modeling2014ChamSpringer40741410.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_34 Marosin D, Van Zee M, Ghanavati S (2016) Formalizing and modeling enterprise architecture (EA) principles with goal-oriented requirements language (GRL). In: International conference on advanced information systems engineering. Springer, pp 205–220 PelegMDoriDThe model multiplicity problem: experimenting with real-time specification methodsIIEEE Trans Softw Eng20002674275910.1109/32.879812 IbriweshIHoS-BChaiITanC-HA controlled experiment on comparison of data perspectives for software requirements documentationArab J Sci Eng2017423175318910.1007/s13369-017-2425-2 Atlassian (2021) The Spotify model. https://www.atlassian.com/agile/agile-at-scale/spotify ArchiMate® 3.1 specification. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/. Accessed 29 June 2020 LindlandOISindreGSolvbergAUnderstanding quality in conceptual modelingIEEE Softw199411424910.1109/52.268955 Kharmoum N, Ziti S, Rhazali Y, Omary F (2019) An automatic transformation method from the E3value model to UML2 sequence diagrams: an MDA approach 15 LarmanCLarge-scale scrum: more with LeSS2017BostonAddison-Wesley FranchXGrauGMayolEQuerCAyalaCCaresCNavarreteFHayaMBotellaPSystematic construction of i* strategic dependency models for socio-technical systemsInt J Softw Eng Knowl Eng2007177910610.1142/S0218194007003148 de Jesus Souza ML, Santos AR, Machado IDC, Santana de Almeida E, Gomes GSS (2016) Evaluating variability modeling techniques for dynamic software product lines: a controlled experiment. In: 2016 X Brazilian symposium on software components, architectures and reuse (SBCARS). IEEE, Maringa, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/SBCARS.2016.15 ZimmermannOMicroservices tenets: agile approach to service development and deploymentComput Sci Res Dev20173230131010.1007/s00450-016-0337-0 FrakesWBBaeza-YatesRInformation retrieval: data structures & algorithms1992New YorkPrentice-Hall TrkmanMMendlingJTrkmanPKrisperMImpact of the conceptual model’s representation format on identifying and understanding user storiesInf Softw Technol201911610616910.1016/j.infsof.2019.08.001 DybåTKampenesVBSjøbergDIKA systematic review of statistical power in software engineering experimentsInf Softw Technol200610.1016/j.infsof.2005.08.009 EstradaHRebollarAMPastorOMylopoulosJDuboisEPohlKAn empirical evaluation of the i* framework in a model-based software generation environmentAdvanced information systems engineering2006BerlinSpringer51352710.1007/11767138_34 GonçalvesECastroJAraújoJHeineckTA systematic literature review of iStar extensionsJ Syst Softw201813713310.1016/j.jss.2017.11.023 MatulevičiusRHeymansPSawyerPPaechBHeymansPComparing goal modelling languages: an experimentRequirements Engineering: foundation for software qualit2007BerlinSpringer183210.1007/978-3-540-73031-6_2 Yu ES (2009) Social modeling and i. In: Conceptual modeling: foundations and applications: essays in honor of John Mylopoulos, pp. 99–121 RosemannMGreenPIndulskaMAtzeniPChuWLuHZhouSLingT-WA reference methodology for conducting ontological analysesConceptual modeling—ER 20042004HeidelbergSpringer11012110.1007/978-3-540-30464-7_10 Evans E (2003) Domain-driven design: tackling complexity in the heart of software 359 (2003) Noel R, Panach I, Ruiz M, Pastor O (2021) The LiteStrat method: towards strategic model-driven development. In: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on information systems development Ambler SW, Lines M (2019) An executive’s guide to disciplined agile: winning the race to business agility. Disciplined Agile Inc, United States? GuizzardiRReisANJohannessonPLeeMLLiddleSWOpdahlALPastor LópezÓA method to align goals and business processesConceptual modeling2015ChamSpringer799310.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_6 Noel R, Ruiz M, Panach I, Pastor O (2021) Beyond conventional model-driven development: from strategy to code. In: 14th international i* workshop (iStar 2021), pp 49–55 ShovalPShiranSEntity-relationship and object-oriented data model TRD Saputri (400_CR42) 2020 H Estrada (400_CR27) 2006 400_CR29 400_CR28 M Ruiz (400_CR6) 2015; 53 X Franch (400_CR26) 2007; 17 G Scanniello (400_CR37) 2014; 25 R Matulevičius (400_CR46) 2007 400_CR34 400_CR32 400_CR36 M Rosemann (400_CR62) 2004 T Dybå (400_CR61) 2006 C Larman (400_CR11) 2017 R Guizzardi (400_CR20) 2015 M Peleg (400_CR39) 2000; 26 J Lapalme (400_CR18) 2012; 14 M Trkman (400_CR41) 2019; 116 400_CR17 ME Conway (400_CR9) 1968; 14 400_CR23 400_CR66 400_CR21 400_CR65 400_CR24 F Kitsios (400_CR25) 2019; 25 Z Li (400_CR3) 2015; 65 RJ Wieringa (400_CR68) 2014 J Kabeli (400_CR38) 2005; 47 G Gröner (400_CR7) 2014; 43 WB Frakes (400_CR33) 1992 O Zimmermann (400_CR15) 2017; 32 (400_CR22) 2011 R Thabet (400_CR43) 2021 JR Lewis (400_CR48) 1991; 23 D Falessi (400_CR67) 2018; 23 400_CR56 400_CR55 400_CR10 400_CR16 R Samavi (400_CR51) 2009; 7 400_CR59 400_CR14 OI Lindland (400_CR58) 1994; 11 400_CR13 400_CR57 400_CR52 D Ionita (400_CR44) 2015 F Davis (400_CR49) 1989; 13 400_CR50 E Gonçalves (400_CR53) 2018; 137 V De Castro (400_CR4) 2011; 53 S Abrahão (400_CR35) 2019; 116 400_CR8 K Petersen (400_CR31) 2015; 64 B Henderson-Sellers (400_CR63) 2014 400_CR2 400_CR5 P Shoval (400_CR40) 1997; 21 K Richard (400_CR12) 2020 400_CR1 I Ibriwesh (400_CR47) 2017; 42 M Habba (400_CR30) 2019; 2019 400_CR45 C Wohlin (400_CR60) 2012 S Brinkkemper (400_CR64) 1996; 38 D Amyot (400_CR19) 2022; 2 HP Sousa (400_CR54) 2014 |
| References_xml | – reference: Noel R, Panach I, Ruiz M, Pastor O (2021) The LiteStrat method: towards strategic model-driven development. In: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on information systems development – reference: Forsgren N, Humble J, Kim G (2018) Accelerate: the science behind DevOps: building and scaling high performing technology organizations. IT Revolution, Portland, Oregon – reference: LiZZhouXGuALiQA complete approach for CIM modelling and model formalisingInf Softw Technol201565395510.1016/j.infsof.2015.04.003 – reference: YuESKSocial modeling for requirements engineering2011CambridgeMIT Press – reference: ConwayMEHow do committees inventDatamation1968142831 – reference: AmyotDAkhigbeOBaslymanMGhanavatiSGhasemiMHassineJLessardLMussbacherGShenKYuECombining goal modelling with business process modellingEnter Model Inf Syst Archit EMISAJ2022213810.18417/EMISA.17.2 – reference: Atlassian (2021) The Spotify model. https://www.atlassian.com/agile/agile-at-scale/spotify – reference: ScannielloGErraUDistributed modeling of use case diagrams with a method based on think-pair-square: results from two controlled experimentsJ Vis Lang Comput20142549451710.1016/j.jvlc.2014.03.002 – reference: Insfran E, Abrahao S. Specifying value in GRL for guiding BPMN activities prioritization 12 – reference: EstradaHRebollarAMPastorOMylopoulosJDuboisEPohlKAn empirical evaluation of the i* framework in a model-based software generation environmentAdvanced information systems engineering2006BerlinSpringer51352710.1007/11767138_34 – reference: DavisFPerceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologyMIS Q19891331934010.2307/249008 – reference: De CastroVMarcosEVaraJMApplying CIM-to-PIM model transformations for the service-oriented development of information systemsInf Softw Technol2011538710510.1016/j.infsof.2010.09.002 – reference: PelegMDoriDThe model multiplicity problem: experimenting with real-time specification methodsIIEEE Trans Softw Eng20002674275910.1109/32.879812 – reference: SaputriTRDLeeSAddressing sustainability in the requirements engineering process: from elicitation to functional decompositionJ Softw Evol Proc202010.1002/smr.2254 – reference: Noel R, Ruiz M, Panach I, Pastor O (2021) Beyond conventional model-driven development: from strategy to code. In: 14th international i* workshop (iStar 2021), pp 49–55 – reference: Noel R, Panach I, Pastor O (2021) Experimental Comparison of LiteStrat vs iStar [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7622995 – reference: Henderson-SellersBRalytéJÅgerfalkPJRossiMSituational method engineering2014BerlinSpringer10.1007/978-3-642-41467-1 – reference: Wohlin C (2014) Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering—EASE ’14. ACM Press, London, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268 – reference: Moody DL. The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods 18 – reference: IonitaDWieringaRBulleeJ-WVasenevAJohannessonPLeeMLLiddleSWOpdahlALPastor LópezÓTangible modelling to elicit domain knowledge: an experiment and focus groupConceptual modeling2015ChamSpringer55856510.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_42 – reference: LindlandOISindreGSolvbergAUnderstanding quality in conceptual modelingIEEE Softw199411424910.1109/52.268955 – reference: Horkoff J (2019) Goal-oriented requirements engineering: an extended systematic mapping study 28 – reference: ShovalPShiranSEntity-relationship and object-oriented data modeling—an experimental comparison of design qualityData Knowl Eng19972129731510.1016/S0169-023X(97)88935-50900.68168 – reference: BrinkkemperSMethod engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and toolsInf Softw Technol19963827528010.1016/0950-5849(95)01059-9 – reference: RuizMCostalDEspañaSFranchXPastorÓGoBIS: An integrated framework to analyse the goal and business process perspectives in information systemsInf Syst20155333034510.1016/j.is.2015.03.007 – reference: Sousa HP. Implementing GPI, a language for organizational alignment 6 – reference: KabeliJShovalPComprehension and quality of analysis specifications—a comparison of FOOM and OPM methodologiesInf Softw Technol20054727129010.1016/j.infsof.2004.08.0091015.68668 – reference: WieringaRJDesign science methodology for information systems and software engineering2014BerlinSpringer10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8 – reference: Kharmoum N, Ziti S, Rhazali Y, Omary F (2019) An automatic transformation method from the E3value model to UML2 sequence diagrams: an MDA approach 15 – reference: FranchXGrauGMayolEQuerCAyalaCCaresCNavarreteFHayaMBotellaPSystematic construction of i* strategic dependency models for socio-technical systemsInt J Softw Eng Knowl Eng2007177910610.1142/S0218194007003148 – reference: Ambler SW, Lines M (2019) An executive’s guide to disciplined agile: winning the race to business agility. Disciplined Agile Inc, United States? – reference: LapalmeJThree schools of thought on enterprise architectureIT Prof201214374310.1109/MITP.2011.109 – reference: Abrahão S, Insfran E, de Guevara FG-L, Fernández-Diego M, Cano-Genoves C, de Oliveira RP (2018) Comparing the effectiveness of goal-oriented languages: results from a controlled experiment. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement. ACM, Oulu Finland, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239235.3267433 – reference: WohlinCRunesonPHöstMOhlssonMCRegnellBWesslénAExperimentation in software engineering2012BerlinSpringer10.1007/978-3-642-29044-21069.68547 – reference: Marosin D, Van Zee M, Ghanavati S (2016) Formalizing and modeling enterprise architecture (EA) principles with goal-oriented requirements language (GRL). In: International conference on advanced information systems engineering. Springer, pp 205–220 – reference: GuizzardiRReisANJohannessonPLeeMLLiddleSWOpdahlALPastor LópezÓA method to align goals and business processesConceptual modeling2015ChamSpringer799310.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_6 – reference: ThabetRBorkDBoufaiedALamineEKorbaaOPingaudHRisk-aware business process management using multi-view modeling: method and toolRequir Eng202110.1007/s00766-021-00348-2 – reference: FrakesWBBaeza-YatesRInformation retrieval: data structures & algorithms1992New YorkPrentice-Hall – reference: RichardKLeffingwellDSAFe 5.0 distilled: achieving business agility with the scaled agile framework2020BostonAddison-Wesley – reference: Yu ES (2009) Social modeling and i. In: Conceptual modeling: foundations and applications: essays in honor of John Mylopoulos, pp. 99–121 – reference: PetersenKVakkalankaSKuzniarzLGuidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: an updateInf Softw Technol20156411810.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007 – reference: Nagel B, Gerth C, Engels G, Post J (2013) Ensuring consistency among business goals and business process models. In: 2013 17th IEEE international enterprise distributed object computing conference. IEEE, pp 17–26 – reference: MatulevičiusRHeymansPSawyerPPaechBHeymansPComparing goal modelling languages: an experimentRequirements Engineering: foundation for software qualit2007BerlinSpringer183210.1007/978-3-540-73031-6_2 – reference: RosemannMGreenPIndulskaMAtzeniPChuWLuHZhouSLingT-WA reference methodology for conducting ontological analysesConceptual modeling—ER 20042004HeidelbergSpringer11012110.1007/978-3-540-30464-7_10 – reference: KitsiosFKamariotouMBusiness strategy modelling based on enterprise architecture: a state of the art reviewBPMJ20192560662410.1108/BPMJ-05-2017-0122 – reference: IbriweshIHoS-BChaiITanC-HA controlled experiment on comparison of data perspectives for software requirements documentationArab J Sci Eng2017423175318910.1007/s13369-017-2425-2 – reference: LewisJRPsychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: the ASQACM Sigchi Bull199123788110.1145/122672.122692 – reference: GrönerGAsadiMMohabbatiBGaševićDBoškovićMSilva ParreirasFValidation of user intentions in process orchestration and choreographyInf Syst201443839910.1016/j.is.2013.05.006 – reference: The Object Management Group (2015) Business motivation model specification, version 1.3 – reference: SousaHPYuEDobbieGJarkeMPuraoSModeling organizational alignmentConceptual modeling2014ChamSpringer40741410.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_34 – reference: Mohagheghi P, Dehlen V, Neple T (2008) Towards a tool-supported quality model for model-driven engineering – reference: DybåTKampenesVBSjøbergDIKA systematic review of statistical power in software engineering experimentsInf Softw Technol200610.1016/j.infsof.2005.08.009 – reference: GonçalvesECastroJAraújoJHeineckTA systematic literature review of iStar extensionsJ Syst Softw201813713310.1016/j.jss.2017.11.023 – reference: LarmanCLarge-scale scrum: more with LeSS2017BostonAddison-Wesley – reference: Evans E (2003) Domain-driven design: tackling complexity in the heart of software 359 (2003) – reference: Model Driven Architecture (MDA) Object management group. https://www.omg.org/mda/. Accessed 21 May 2020 – reference: TrkmanMMendlingJTrkmanPKrisperMImpact of the conceptual model’s representation format on identifying and understanding user storiesInf Softw Technol201911610616910.1016/j.infsof.2019.08.001 – reference: Krogstie J (2002) A semiotic approach to quality in requirements specifications. In: Organizational semiotics. Springer, pp 231–249 – reference: Giannoulis C, Zdravkovic J (2011) Modeling strategy maps and balanced scorecards using iStar 6 – reference: ArchiMate® 3.1 specification. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/. Accessed 29 June 2020 – reference: HabbaMFredjMBenabdellah ChaouniSAlignment between business requirement, business process, and software system: a systematic literature reviewJ Eng2019201911910.1155/2019/6918105 – reference: SamaviRYuETopaloglouTStrategic reasoning about business models: a conceptual modeling approachInf Syst E Bus Manag2009717119810.1007/s10257-008-0079-z – reference: FalessiDJuristoNWohlinCTurhanBMünchJJedlitschkaAOivoMEmpirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experimentsEmpir Softw Eng20182345248910.1007/s10664-017-9523-3 – reference: ZimmermannOMicroservices tenets: agile approach to service development and deploymentComput Sci Res Dev20173230131010.1007/s00450-016-0337-0 – reference: AbrahãoSInsfranEGonzález-Ladrón-de-GuevaraFFernández-DiegoMCano-GenovesCPereira de OliveiraRAssessing the effectiveness of goal-oriented modeling languages: a family of experimentsInf Softw Technol201911610617110.1016/j.infsof.2019.08.003 – reference: Llinares JD, López ÓP. Aplying modelling techniques for the development of a strategic plan in a large corporation 7 – reference: Dalpiaz F, Franch X, Horkoff J (2016) iStar 2.0 language guide. arXiv:1605.07767 [cs] – reference: de Jesus Souza ML, Santos AR, Machado IDC, Santana de Almeida E, Gomes GSS (2016) Evaluating variability modeling techniques for dynamic software product lines: a controlled experiment. In: 2016 X Brazilian symposium on software components, architectures and reuse (SBCARS). IEEE, Maringa, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/SBCARS.2016.15 – ident: 400_CR50 – volume: 2019 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: 400_CR30 publication-title: J Eng doi: 10.1155/2019/6918105 – volume: 21 start-page: 297 year: 1997 ident: 400_CR40 publication-title: Data Knowl Eng doi: 10.1016/S0169-023X(97)88935-5 – volume: 11 start-page: 42 year: 1994 ident: 400_CR58 publication-title: IEEE Softw doi: 10.1109/52.268955 – volume-title: SAFe 5.0 distilled: achieving business agility with the scaled agile framework year: 2020 ident: 400_CR12 – volume-title: Large-scale scrum: more with LeSS year: 2017 ident: 400_CR11 – volume: 116 start-page: 106171 year: 2019 ident: 400_CR35 publication-title: Inf Softw Technol doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2019.08.003 – volume: 2 start-page: 1 year: 2022 ident: 400_CR19 publication-title: Enter Model Inf Syst Archit EMISAJ doi: 10.18417/EMISA.17.2 – ident: 400_CR29 – volume: 14 start-page: 28 year: 1968 ident: 400_CR9 publication-title: Datamation – volume: 137 start-page: 1 year: 2018 ident: 400_CR53 publication-title: J Syst Softw doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.023 – volume-title: Design science methodology for information systems and software engineering year: 2014 ident: 400_CR68 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8 – ident: 400_CR36 doi: 10.1109/SBCARS.2016.15 – volume: 17 start-page: 79 year: 2007 ident: 400_CR26 publication-title: Int J Softw Eng Knowl Eng doi: 10.1142/S0218194007003148 – ident: 400_CR8 – ident: 400_CR16 – volume-title: Experimentation in software engineering year: 2012 ident: 400_CR60 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2 – ident: 400_CR32 doi: 10.1145/2601248.2601268 – volume-title: Situational method engineering year: 2014 ident: 400_CR63 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-41467-1 – volume: 23 start-page: 78 year: 1991 ident: 400_CR48 publication-title: ACM Sigchi Bull doi: 10.1145/122672.122692 – volume: 32 start-page: 301 year: 2017 ident: 400_CR15 publication-title: Comput Sci Res Dev doi: 10.1007/s00450-016-0337-0 – ident: 400_CR45 doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-35611-2_14 – ident: 400_CR21 doi: 10.1109/EDOC.2013.12 – ident: 400_CR2 doi: 10.47839/ijc.18.3.1524 – start-page: 513 volume-title: Advanced information systems engineering year: 2006 ident: 400_CR27 doi: 10.1007/11767138_34 – start-page: 18 volume-title: Requirements Engineering: foundation for software qualit year: 2007 ident: 400_CR46 doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-73031-6_2 – volume: 43 start-page: 83 year: 2014 ident: 400_CR7 publication-title: Inf Syst doi: 10.1016/j.is.2013.05.006 – volume: 13 start-page: 319 year: 1989 ident: 400_CR49 publication-title: MIS Q doi: 10.2307/249008 – ident: 400_CR1 – volume: 47 start-page: 271 year: 2005 ident: 400_CR38 publication-title: Inf Softw Technol doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.08.009 – volume: 42 start-page: 3175 year: 2017 ident: 400_CR47 publication-title: Arab J Sci Eng doi: 10.1007/s13369-017-2425-2 – ident: 400_CR5 – volume: 7 start-page: 171 year: 2009 ident: 400_CR51 publication-title: Inf Syst E Bus Manag doi: 10.1007/s10257-008-0079-z – volume: 65 start-page: 39 year: 2015 ident: 400_CR3 publication-title: Inf Softw Technol doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.04.003 – ident: 400_CR56 – ident: 400_CR34 doi: 10.1145/3239235.3267433 – volume: 116 start-page: 106169 year: 2019 ident: 400_CR41 publication-title: Inf Softw Technol doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2019.08.001 – year: 2021 ident: 400_CR43 publication-title: Requir Eng doi: 10.1007/s00766-021-00348-2 – ident: 400_CR17 – year: 2020 ident: 400_CR42 publication-title: J Softw Evol Proc doi: 10.1002/smr.2254 – volume: 14 start-page: 37 year: 2012 ident: 400_CR18 publication-title: IT Prof doi: 10.1109/MITP.2011.109 – ident: 400_CR52 – ident: 400_CR13 – ident: 400_CR65 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_13 – volume: 53 start-page: 330 year: 2015 ident: 400_CR6 publication-title: Inf Syst doi: 10.1016/j.is.2015.03.007 – volume-title: Social modeling for requirements engineering year: 2011 ident: 400_CR22 – volume: 53 start-page: 87 year: 2011 ident: 400_CR4 publication-title: Inf Softw Technol doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.09.002 – volume: 25 start-page: 494 year: 2014 ident: 400_CR37 publication-title: J Vis Lang Comput doi: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.03.002 – volume: 64 start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: 400_CR31 publication-title: Inf Softw Technol doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007 – start-page: 110 volume-title: Conceptual modeling—ER 2004 year: 2004 ident: 400_CR62 doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-30464-7_10 – ident: 400_CR24 – ident: 400_CR23 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_7 – volume: 23 start-page: 452 year: 2018 ident: 400_CR67 publication-title: Empir Softw Eng doi: 10.1007/s10664-017-9523-3 – ident: 400_CR55 – start-page: 79 volume-title: Conceptual modeling year: 2015 ident: 400_CR20 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_6 – ident: 400_CR14 – ident: 400_CR59 – ident: 400_CR10 – volume: 26 start-page: 742 year: 2000 ident: 400_CR39 publication-title: IIEEE Trans Softw Eng doi: 10.1109/32.879812 – volume: 25 start-page: 606 year: 2019 ident: 400_CR25 publication-title: BPMJ doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2017-0122 – year: 2006 ident: 400_CR61 publication-title: Inf Softw Technol doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2005.08.009 – volume: 38 start-page: 275 year: 1996 ident: 400_CR64 publication-title: Inf Softw Technol doi: 10.1016/0950-5849(95)01059-9 – ident: 400_CR66 – ident: 400_CR57 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7622995 – ident: 400_CR28 – start-page: 558 volume-title: Conceptual modeling year: 2015 ident: 400_CR44 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_42 – start-page: 407 volume-title: Conceptual modeling year: 2014 ident: 400_CR54 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_34 – volume-title: Information retrieval: data structures & algorithms year: 1992 ident: 400_CR33 |
| SSID | ssj0024799 |
| Score | 2.355407 |
| Snippet | Software-centric organisations design a loosely coupled organisation structure around strategic objectives, replicating this design to their business processes... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 411 |
| SubjectTerms | Computer Science Context Factorial experiments Information systems Languages Literature reviews Model accuracy Modelling Original Article Software Engineering Strategy |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) dbid: U2A link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LSwMxEB60Xrz4fmytEsGbBtpNspt4q2Ipgp4s9LbMvkAoW-m2B_-9k-yjSKngebPZ7CST-cJMvg_gTglLq0YOGMboc5nrhKOUkos0IPisYj9Fexv57T0YT-TrVE3rS2FlU-3epCTdTt1edrNJI1swK7hbeVzswp6yZ3daxRN_uGbYC03FsCfJfQJbv9Pd3sfvcLSBMTfyoy7sjI7goMaLbFhN8DHsZMUJHDZaDKx2zVN4IkefrWwgYrWuZMnKinn2m30WzCne8HRhNzdWyUaXjwwLtqb4P4PJ6OXjecxrfQSeyIFZciscbJD-OKUYT36VSDQU3zXm2miroWEIa_hIGC4LZZBLpMOcRjoRadOPE4PiHDrFvMgugZlE6EznJsdBKiWFfcR-EFM3KlNxnhsPBo2ZoqQmD7caFrOopT12po3ItJEzbSQ8uG_f-aqoM_5s3WusH9VuVEaEfegnjZDSg9v2MTmAzWpgkc1Xro3FLUbTIC-qWWs_J0KhDCEUDx6aaVx3vn0s3f81v4J93y0pW3nWg85yscquCaos4xu3Mn8AZZLapw priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Including business strategy in model-driven methods: an experiment |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00766-023-00400-3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359152 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2836659344 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2830215989 |
| Volume | 28 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1JT8JAFH4RuHhxX0AkY-JNJ0JnWma8GCAs0UiMkQRPzXRLTEhBCgf_vW_aaYkhcumhnU6nb97yzfY-gFub6bRqaIBtT1mUR8KninNOWeAgfLY9K1D6NPLr2BlN-PPUnpoJt8Rsq8x9Yuqog7mv58gfMAw6ji0Z50-Lb6pZo_TqqqHQKEEFXbDAwVel2x-_vW-y7bVllm2Poyk5ei9PrTg8pxeh9AZcRlNNpuxvaNrCm1trpWkIGhzBgcGOpJN19jHshfEJHOa8DMSY6Sl00ehnax2UiOGYTEiSZaH9IV8xSdlvaLDUjo5kFNLJI1Ex2aT7P4PJoP_RG1HDlUB93pIrqkmEpcI_DjDeo435XEmM9UJFQgrNpyERd1gK8VzY5k7EFQ7shMLRkZBNz5eKnUM5nsfhJRDpMxGKSEaqFXCOEECppuNhNXZoe1Ekq9DKxeT6JpG45rOYuUUK5FS0LorWTUXrsircFe8ssjQaO0vXc-m7xqQSd6MAVbgpHqMx6BUOFYfzdVpGYxgpsJEXWa8Vn2NtZktEK1W4z7txU_n_bantbssV7FupCuldZ3Uor5br8BphysprQEkMhg2odIafL_2G0Uy823N6eJ1YnV_7UuOO |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3JTsMwEB2xHODCvpTVSHACCxo7qY2EEFtp2U4gcQvOJiGhtDStED_FNzLjLBWq4MY5jmONZ3nOjOcB7LqC2qqhATYC43CZqJAbKSUXkYfw2Q2cyNBt5PsHr_Ukb57d5zH4Ku_CUFll6ROto446If0jP8Qw6HmuFlKedt85sUZRdrWk0MjV4jb-_MAjW3bSvsT93XOc5tXjRYsXrAI8lHXd50S3qw06gggjI2pjKI3GqKhMorQi5gmNEdoxiHzihvQSafAIpAyeI5Q-CkJtBM47DpNSCE0WpZrXw95-DZ339pNouB5VDq1VV_Uo5UXlvoJbu-HiZyAcQbcjmVkb8JpzMFMgVXaWq9Y8jMXpAsyWLBCscAqLcI4u5m1AIZAVjJYZy_Ket5_sNWWWa4dHPXKrLCeszo6ZSdmQXGAJnv5FhsswkXbSeBWYDoWKVaITU4-kRMBhzJEX4DRu7AZJomtQL8Xkh0XbcmLPePOrhstWtD6K1rei9UUN9qt3unnTjj9Hb5TS9wsDzvyhutVgp3qMpkf5FJPGnYEdQ4hJK1zkSr5r1edEQ7gasVENDsptHE7--1rW_l7LNky1Hu_v_Lv2w-06TDtWnajebQMm-r1BvIkAqR9sWa1k8PLfZvANW3UXKQ |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ZS8QwEB50BfHF-9j1iqBPGna3SdtEEPFaPBcRBd9qeoEgXd3uIv41f50zvRYRffO5aRomc3zpTOYD2LYFtVVDA3R9Y3EZq4AbKSUXoYPw2fat0NBt5Juuc_4gLx_txzH4LO_CUFll6RMzRx32AvpH3sQw6Di2FlI246Is4va0c_j6xolBijKtJZ1GriJX0cc7Ht_Sg4tT3Osdy-qc3Z-c84JhgAeyrQecqHe1QacQYpREzQyk0RghlYmVVsRCoTFaWwZRUORKJ5YGj0PK4JlC6ZYfaCNw3nGYcPFU1KrBxPFZ9_Zu1OnP1XmnP4lm7FAdUaO6uEcJMCr-FTyzIi6-h8UfWPdHnjYLf51ZmC5wKzvKFW0OxqJkHmZKTghWuIgFOEaH8zKkgMgKfsuUpXkH3A_2nLCMeYeHfXKyLKevTveZSdiIamARHv5FiktQS3pJtAJMB0JFKtaxaYdSIvwwpuX4OI0d2X4c6zq0SzF5QdHEnLg0Xryq_XImWg9F62Wi9UQddqt3XvMWHn-OXiul7xXmnHoj5avDVvUYDZGyKyaJesNsDOEnrXCRy_muVZ8TrrA1IqU67JXbOJr897U0_l7LJkyiCXjXF92rVZiyMm2i4rc1qA36w2gd0dLA3yjUksHTf1vCF5S8HLs |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Including+business+strategy+in+model-driven+methods%3A+an+experiment&rft.jtitle=Requirements+engineering&rft.au=Noel%2C+Rene&rft.au=Panach%2C+Jose+Ignacio&rft.au=Pastor%2C+Oscar&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=0947-3602&rft.eissn=1432-010X&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00766-023-00400-3&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0947-3602&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0947-3602&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0947-3602&client=summon |