Cost‐effective imaging for resectability of liver lesions in colorectal cancer: an economic decision model

Background This study aimed to determine the cost‐effectiveness of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE‐MRI) compared with multiphase CE computed tomography (CE‐CT) scan to characterize suspected liver lesions in patients with known colorectal carcinoma. Methods A decision analytic model...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inANZ journal of surgery Vol. 88; no. 6; pp. E507 - E511
Main Authors Saing, Sopany, Haywood, Phil, Duncan, Joanna K., Ma, Ning, Cameron, Alun L., Goodall, Stephen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01.06.2018
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background This study aimed to determine the cost‐effectiveness of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE‐MRI) compared with multiphase CE computed tomography (CE‐CT) scan to characterize suspected liver lesions in patients with known colorectal carcinoma. Methods A decision analytic model linking diagnostic accuracy to health outcomes in patients with colorectal carcinoma was constructed. The model assumed that CE‐MRI has superior sensitivity and equivalent specificity to CE‐CT, and patients with a colorectal liver metastasis could be eligible for curative surgery or chemotherapy and palliation. Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis was associated with worse health outcomes (disutility). Cost‐effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost relative to the incremental benefit, the benefit was estimated using quality‐adjusted life years. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the results. Results The clinical evidence supports increased sensitivity of CE‐MRI compared with CE‐CT (0.943 versus 0.768). CE‐MRI was more effective and more costly than CE‐CT. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio was estimated to be $40 548 per quality‐adjusted life year gained. The model is most sensitive to the cost of MRI, cost of palliative treatment and the disutility associated with delayed palliative care. The results were also sensitive to the assumptions made about the clinical algorithm. Conclusion The results provide evidence of the potential cost‐effectiveness associated with CE‐MRI for the diagnosis of liver metastases in patients with identified colorectal carcinoma. CE‐MRI can be recommended as cost‐effective provided it replaces CE‐CT and that improved diagnostic accuracy results in earlier, curative, disease management.
AbstractList This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) compared with multiphase CE computed tomography (CE-CT) scan to characterize suspected liver lesions in patients with known colorectal carcinoma. A decision analytic model linking diagnostic accuracy to health outcomes in patients with colorectal carcinoma was constructed. The model assumed that CE-MRI has superior sensitivity and equivalent specificity to CE-CT, and patients with a colorectal liver metastasis could be eligible for curative surgery or chemotherapy and palliation. Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis was associated with worse health outcomes (disutility). Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost relative to the incremental benefit, the benefit was estimated using quality-adjusted life years. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the results. The clinical evidence supports increased sensitivity of CE-MRI compared with CE-CT (0.943 versus 0.768). CE-MRI was more effective and more costly than CE-CT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated to be $40 548 per quality-adjusted life year gained. The model is most sensitive to the cost of MRI, cost of palliative treatment and the disutility associated with delayed palliative care. The results were also sensitive to the assumptions made about the clinical algorithm. The results provide evidence of the potential cost-effectiveness associated with CE-MRI for the diagnosis of liver metastases in patients with identified colorectal carcinoma. CE-MRI can be recommended as cost-effective provided it replaces CE-CT and that improved diagnostic accuracy results in earlier, curative, disease management.
BackgroundThis study aimed to determine the cost‐effectiveness of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE‐MRI) compared with multiphase CE computed tomography (CE‐CT) scan to characterize suspected liver lesions in patients with known colorectal carcinoma.MethodsA decision analytic model linking diagnostic accuracy to health outcomes in patients with colorectal carcinoma was constructed. The model assumed that CE‐MRI has superior sensitivity and equivalent specificity to CE‐CT, and patients with a colorectal liver metastasis could be eligible for curative surgery or chemotherapy and palliation. Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis was associated with worse health outcomes (disutility). Cost‐effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost relative to the incremental benefit, the benefit was estimated using quality‐adjusted life years. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the results.ResultsThe clinical evidence supports increased sensitivity of CE‐MRI compared with CE‐CT (0.943 versus 0.768). CE‐MRI was more effective and more costly than CE‐CT. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio was estimated to be $40 548 per quality‐adjusted life year gained. The model is most sensitive to the cost of MRI, cost of palliative treatment and the disutility associated with delayed palliative care. The results were also sensitive to the assumptions made about the clinical algorithm.ConclusionThe results provide evidence of the potential cost‐effectiveness associated with CE‐MRI for the diagnosis of liver metastases in patients with identified colorectal carcinoma. CE‐MRI can be recommended as cost‐effective provided it replaces CE‐CT and that improved diagnostic accuracy results in earlier, curative, disease management.
Background This study aimed to determine the cost‐effectiveness of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE‐MRI) compared with multiphase CE computed tomography (CE‐CT) scan to characterize suspected liver lesions in patients with known colorectal carcinoma. Methods A decision analytic model linking diagnostic accuracy to health outcomes in patients with colorectal carcinoma was constructed. The model assumed that CE‐MRI has superior sensitivity and equivalent specificity to CE‐CT, and patients with a colorectal liver metastasis could be eligible for curative surgery or chemotherapy and palliation. Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis was associated with worse health outcomes (disutility). Cost‐effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost relative to the incremental benefit, the benefit was estimated using quality‐adjusted life years. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the results. Results The clinical evidence supports increased sensitivity of CE‐MRI compared with CE‐CT (0.943 versus 0.768). CE‐MRI was more effective and more costly than CE‐CT. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio was estimated to be $40 548 per quality‐adjusted life year gained. The model is most sensitive to the cost of MRI, cost of palliative treatment and the disutility associated with delayed palliative care. The results were also sensitive to the assumptions made about the clinical algorithm. Conclusion The results provide evidence of the potential cost‐effectiveness associated with CE‐MRI for the diagnosis of liver metastases in patients with identified colorectal carcinoma. CE‐MRI can be recommended as cost‐effective provided it replaces CE‐CT and that improved diagnostic accuracy results in earlier, curative, disease management.
Author Ma, Ning
Duncan, Joanna K.
Saing, Sopany
Haywood, Phil
Goodall, Stephen
Cameron, Alun L.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sopany
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5913-9654
  surname: Saing
  fullname: Saing, Sopany
  email: sopany.saing@chere.uts.edu.au
  organization: University of Technology Sydney
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Phil
  surname: Haywood
  fullname: Haywood, Phil
  organization: University of Technology Sydney
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Joanna K.
  surname: Duncan
  fullname: Duncan, Joanna K.
  organization: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ning
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3191-8688
  surname: Ma
  fullname: Ma, Ning
  organization: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Alun L.
  surname: Cameron
  fullname: Cameron, Alun L.
  organization: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Stephen
  surname: Goodall
  fullname: Goodall, Stephen
  organization: University of Technology Sydney
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28982209$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp10ctuGyEUBmBUJWpuXfQFKqRsmoVjbjMM3VlWc5GsZNFmjRjmEBExkIKdyrs-Qp8xTxJcu1lEChsQ-vRzOOcI7cUUAaHPlJzTuqYmlnMqqBIf0CEVopkwquTe7kwF5wfoqJQHQmjbquYjOmCd6hgj6hCFeSrL5z9_wTmwS_8E2I_m3sd77FLGGUq9Nb0PfrnGyeFQRcYBik-xYB-xTSHljQnYmmghf8MmYrApptFbPID1G4vHNEA4QfvOhAKfdvsxurv4_nN-NVncXl7PZ4uJ3XxiYlUPRgzGWGe5Yz1XTHBq-oEzrrgaeC8H0XNJBTSkbQiB1kkCUjW2Yba3_Bh93eY-5vRrBWWpR18shGAipFXR9ZFONrLpeKWnb-hDWuVYq9OMCNUS2klZ1dlW2ZxKyeD0Y659ymtNid6MQNcR6H8jqPbLLnHVjzC8yv89r2C6Bb99gPX7SXp282Mb-QJ8ipOi
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1161738
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v6_i14_716
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_868
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2023_110803
crossref_primary_10_1177_0846537120928349
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_021_08356_0
Cites_doi 10.1259/bjr/55166688
10.1002/jmri.22613
10.1007/s11605-014-2676-0
10.1007/s00268-015-2944-5
10.1148/radiol.11103548
10.1002/bjs.9465
10.1093/bmb/64.1.81
10.1007/s00384-007-0350-7
10.1186/1477-7819-9-154
10.3348/kjr.2013.14.6.894
10.1002/bjs.7365
10.3310/hta17090
10.3748/wjg.v17.i36.4067
10.1007/s11845-012-0805-x
10.1259/bjr/25139667
10.1007/s12029-013-9569-4
10.1007/s10434-001-0573-8
10.1007/s00330-009-1432-4
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000315)88:6<1294::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-M
10.1148/radiol.14140390
10.1007/s10434-999-0691-2
10.1007/s00330-013-2824-z
10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.025
10.1007/s00261-009-9555-2
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
2018 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
Copyright_xml – notice: 2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
– notice: 2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
– notice: 2018 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QO
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1111/ans.14194
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1445-2197
EndPage E511
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_ans_14194
28982209
ANS14194
Genre article
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations Australia
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Australia
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
23M
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
J5H
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
ZGI
ZXP
~IA
~WT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAMNL
AAYXX
ACRPL
CITATION
7QO
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4194-c9bea4daacfc3f2b392431abd323939d3b7d4b3714e506500e6f70e795c52cbc3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1445-1433
IngestDate Wed Dec 04 14:56:21 EST 2024
Thu Oct 10 22:18:28 EDT 2024
Fri Dec 06 03:02:21 EST 2024
Sat Sep 28 08:38:00 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 00:42:02 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords cost-effectiveness
liver metastasis
magnetic resonance imaging
economic evaluation
Language English
License 2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4194-c9bea4daacfc3f2b392431abd323939d3b7d4b3714e506500e6f70e795c52cbc3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-3191-8688
0000-0001-5913-9654
PMID 28982209
PQID 2049601877
PQPubID 25531
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1948757583
proquest_journals_2049601877
crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_14194
pubmed_primary_28982209
wiley_primary_10_1111_ans_14194_ANS14194
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate June 2018
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2018
  text: June 2018
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Melbourne
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Melbourne
– name: Australia
– name: East Melbourne
PublicationTitle ANZ journal of surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate ANZ J Surg
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
– name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References 2015; 39
2010; 35
2013; 23
2000; 88
2011; 84
2012; 181
2011; 98
2011; 34
2011; 17
1999; 6
2014; 45
2011; 9
2013; 14
2013; 17
2002; 64
2015; 274
2001; 8
2008; 23
2015
2014
2014; 18
2009; 19
2014; 50
2011; 260
2012; 4
2014; 101
2012; 85
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
Kanas GP (e_1_2_7_23_1) 2012; 4
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
e_1_2_7_29_1
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (e_1_2_7_2_1) 2014
References_xml – volume: 34
  start-page: 326
  year: 2011
  end-page: 35
  article-title: Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases: comparison of contrast‐enhanced CT, contrast‐enhanced us, superparamagnetic iron oxide‐enhanced MRI, and gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI
  publication-title: J. Magn. Reson. Imaging
– volume: 19
  start-page: 753
  year: 2009
  end-page: 63
  article-title: Health‐economic evaluation of three imaging strategies in patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases: Gd‐EOB‐DTPA‐enhanced MRI vs. extracellular contrast media‐enhanced MRI and 3‐phase MDCT in Germany, Italy and Sweden
  publication-title: Eur. Radiol.
– volume: 84
  start-page: S112
  year: 2011
  end-page: 20
  article-title: Dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI
  publication-title: Br. J. Radiol.
– volume: 64
  start-page: 81
  year: 2002
  end-page: 99
  article-title: New techniques for imaging colorectal cancer: the use of MRI, PET and radioimmunoscintigraphy for primary staging and follow‐up
  publication-title: Br. Med. Bull.
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 243
  article-title: Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast‐enhanced computed tomography and contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost‐effectiveness analysis
  publication-title: Health Technol. Assess.
– volume: 8
  start-page: 573
  year: 2001
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Clinical and cost effectiveness of a new hepatocellular MRI contrast agent, mangafodipir trisodium, in the preoperative assessment of liver resectability
  publication-title: Ann. Surg. Oncol.
– volume: 17
  start-page: 4067
  year: 2011
  end-page: 75
  article-title: Current treatment for colorectal liver metastases
  publication-title: World J. Gastroenterol.
– volume: 6
  start-page: 691
  year: 1999
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Hepatic tumor imaging using iron oxide MRI: comparison with computed tomography, clinical impact, and cost analysis
  publication-title: Ann. Surg. Oncol.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 511
  year: 2010
  end-page: 21
  article-title: Detection of colo‐rectal liver metastases: prospective comparison of contrast enhanced us, multidetector CT, PET/CT, and 1.5 Tesla MR with extracellular and reticulo‐endothelial cell specific contrast agents
  publication-title: Abdom. Imaging
– volume: 23
  start-page: 2187
  year: 2013
  end-page: 96
  article-title: Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison between gadoxetic acid‐enhanced 3.0‐t MRI and contrast‐enhanced MDCT with histopathological correlation
  publication-title: Eur. Radiol.
– volume: 101
  start-page: 613
  year: 2014
  end-page: 21
  article-title: Randomized multicentre trial of gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI versus conventional MRI or CT in the staging of colorectal cancer liver metastases
  publication-title: Br. J. Surg.
– year: 2014
– volume: 274
  start-page: 712
  year: 2015
  end-page: 22
  article-title: Incremental value of liver MR imaging in patients with potentially curable colorectal hepatic metastasis detected at CT: a prospective comparison of diffusion‐weighted imaging, gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MR imaging, and a combination of both MR techniques
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 98
  start-page: 565
  year: 2011
  end-page: 71
  article-title: Long‐term global quality of life in patients treated for colorectal liver metastases
  publication-title: Br. J. Surg.
– volume: 260
  start-page: 446
  year: 2011
  end-page: 53
  article-title: Detection of pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases with gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MR imaging: comparison with contrast‐enhanced multi‐detector row CT
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 14
  start-page: 894
  year: 2013
  end-page: 904
  article-title: MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver‐specific contrast agent gadoxetic acid
  publication-title: Korean J. Radiol.
– volume: 9
  start-page: 154
  year: 2011
  article-title: Treatment of colorectal liver metastases
  publication-title: World J. Surg. Oncol.
– volume: 88
  start-page: 1294
  year: 2000
  end-page: 303
  article-title: Quality of life in survivors of colorectal carcinoma
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 85
  start-page: 539
  year: 2012
  end-page: 47
  article-title: Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI for the detection and characterisation of liver metastases: comparison with multidetector‐row CT
  publication-title: Br. J. Radiol.
– volume: 45
  start-page: 146
  year: 2014
  end-page: 53
  article-title: Assessment of the value of MRI scan in addition to CT in the pre‐operative staging of colorectal liver metastases
  publication-title: J. Gastrointest. Cancer
– volume: 18
  start-page: 2130
  year: 2014
  end-page: 5
  article-title: MRI with gadoxetate disodium for colorectal liver metastasis: is it the new “imaging modality of choice”?
  publication-title: J. Gastrointest. Surg.
– volume: 4
  start-page: 283
  year: 2012
  end-page: 301
  article-title: Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: review and meta‐analysis of prognostic factors
  publication-title: Clin. Epidemiol.
– volume: 50
  start-page: 937
  year: 2014
  end-page: 43
  article-title: Optimal imaging sequence for staging in colorectal liver metastases: analysis of three hypothetical imaging strategies
  publication-title: Eur. J. Cancer
– volume: 23
  start-page: 77
  year: 2008
  end-page: 83
  article-title: Health economic evaluation of ferucarbotran‐enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of liver metastases in colorectal cancer patients
  publication-title: Int. J. Colorectal Dis.
– volume: 181
  start-page: 499
  year: 2012
  end-page: 509
  article-title: Diagnostic performance of MDCT, PET/CT and gadoxetic acid (Primovist(( )))‐enhanced MRI in patients with colorectal liver metastases being considered for hepatic resection: initial experience in a single centre
  publication-title: Ir. J. Med. Sci.
– year: 2015
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1161
  year: 2015
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Role of gadoxetic acid‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of small hepatic lesions in patients with colorectal cancer
  publication-title: World J. Surg.
– volume-title: Cancer in Australia: An Overview 2014
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1259/bjr/55166688
– ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.22613
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2676-0
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2944-5
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.11103548
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.9465
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.1093/bmb/64.1.81
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0350-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-154
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.6.894
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.7365
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.3310/hta17090
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i36.4067
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11845-012-0805-x
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1259/bjr/25139667
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  doi: 10.1007/s12029-013-9569-4
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10434-001-0573-8
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1432-4
– volume: 4
  start-page: 283
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  article-title: Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: review and meta‐analysis of prognostic factors
  publication-title: Clin. Epidemiol.
  contributor:
    fullname: Kanas GP
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000315)88:6<1294::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-M
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140390
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10434-999-0691-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2824-z
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.025
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00261-009-9555-2
SSID ssj0016695
Score 2.2834857
Snippet Background This study aimed to determine the cost‐effectiveness of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE‐MRI) compared with multiphase CE computed...
This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) compared with multiphase CE computed tomography...
BackgroundThis study aimed to determine the cost‐effectiveness of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE‐MRI) compared with multiphase CE computed...
BACKGROUNDThis study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) compared with multiphase CE computed...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage E507
SubjectTerms Aged
Australia
Chemotherapy
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
Computed tomography
Contrast Media
Cost-Benefit Analysis
cost‐effectiveness
Decision analysis
Decision Support Techniques
Diagnosis
Diagnostic systems
Disease control
economic evaluation
Economic models
Female
Humans
Lesions
Liver
Liver cancer
liver metastasis
Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Liver Neoplasms - secondary
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - economics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Mathematical models
Medical imaging
Metastases
Middle Aged
Model accuracy
Models, Economic
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Palliation
Patients
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Risk Assessment
Sensitivity
Sensitivity analysis
Surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - economics
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Title Cost‐effective imaging for resectability of liver lesions in colorectal cancer: an economic decision model
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fans.14194
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28982209
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2049601877
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1948757583
Volume 88
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8QwEB4WT1584Ku6ShQPXrq0mza1elpWRQQ9qAt7EEqSpiCuXXG7Bz35E_yN_hJn0geuIoi3QpsmzWQm36Qz3wDsC8M9jVuZ62cycgME-K4Mg8z1uOxKT-HYfcp3vrwS54PgYhgOW3Bc58KU_BDNgRtphrXXpOBSTb4oOVlyP0AfHO2vzyMK5zu5bqijfCFsxRX0F0IXMQGvWIUoiqdpObsX_QCYs3jVbjhni3BXD7WMM3noTAvV0a_fWBz_-S1LsFABUdYrV84ytEy-AqP-eFJ8vL2XUR5oCNn9oy1jxBDbMspU0kVJ7P3CxhkbUVAHGxk6cZuw-5wRBTaZUHyxpuX0fMRkzkyV_MzSqqAPs_V3VmFwdnrbP3eregyuprG5OkbZBamUOtM86yqEVgg_pEo58ajFKVdRGiiiADQhIT_PiCzyTBSHOuxqpfkazOXj3GwAC7PYCO4pBC860LGQWhAZmXcYC52KUDqwV0smeSppN5LaXcHJSuxkOdCuZZZUmjdJuujyCKo0GDmw29xGnaEfITI34ym2jslNQ0-JO7BeyrrpBR1QxExe7MCBldjv3Se9qxt7sfn3R7dgHhHXYRlr1oa54nlqthHVFGrHLt9PfX30cg
link.rule.ids 314,780,784,1375,27924,27925,46294,46718
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtNAEB6F9gCX0gpKXQpdEAcuruysvY4rLlFKFCDJARIpF2TtrtdSRHCqxDmUE4_QZ-yTdGb9I9KqUsXNkr3e9c7O7DfrmW8APgjDPY1bmetnMnIDBPiuDIPM9bhsS0_h2H3Kdx6NxWAafJ2FsxZ8qnNhSn6I5sCNNMPaa1JwOpD-R8vJlPsBOuFPYBfV3aeArovvDXmUL4StuYIeQ-giKuAVrxDF8TRNt3ejexBzG7HaLaf_HH7Wgy0jTX6dbQp1pv_c4XH836_Zh70Ki7JuuXgOoGXyF7DoLdfFzd_rMtADbSGb_7aVjBjCW0bJSrooub2v2DJjC4rrYAtDh25rNs8ZsWCTFcUXa1pRq3Mmc2aq_GeWVjV9mC3B8xKm_c-T3sCtSjK4msbm6hjFF6RS6kzzrK0QXSECkSrlRKUWp1xFaaCIBdCEBP48I7LIM1Ec6rCtleaHsJMvc3MELMxiI7inEL_oQMdCakF8ZF4nFjoVoXTgfS2a5LJk3khqjwUnK7GT5cBJLbSkUr510kavR1CxwciBd81tVBv6FyJzs9xg65g8NXSWuAOvSmE3vaAPirDJix34aEX2cPdJd_zDXhw__tFTeDqYjIbJ8Mv422t4hgCsU4aencBOsdqYNwhyCvXWruVbyi34kw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB6SLZRc-qB5uN2mauihFwfbsuVVclo2WdJHltImkEPASLIMoVs77HoP7ak_ob-xv6Qz8oOkoRB6M9iyZI1m9I088w3AG2F5YHAr88NCpX6MAN9XSVz4AVeRCjSOPaR859OZODmP318kF2tw2OXCNPwQ_YEbaYaz16Tg13lxQ8nJkocx-uDr8CAWkSTi_KPPPXdUKIQruYIOQ-IjKOAtrRCF8fRNb29GdxDmbcDqdpzpY7jsxtoEmnzdX9V63_z4i8bxPz_mCTxqkSgbN0vnKazZ8hnMJ9Wy_v3zVxPmgZaQXX1zdYwYgltGqUqmbpi9v7OqYHOK6mBzS0duS3ZVMuLAJhuKLza0nhYHTJXMttnPLG8r-jBXgGcTzqfHZ5MTvy3I4Bsam28kCi_OlTKF4UWkEVsh_lA650SkJnOu0zzWxAFoE4J-gRVFGthUJiaJjDZ8CwZlVdodYEkhreCBRvRiYiOFMoLYyIKRFCYXifJgr5NMdt3wbmSdv4KTlbnJ8mDYySxrVW-ZRejzCCo1mHrwur-NSkN_QlRpqxW2luSnoavEPdhuZN33gh4ogqZAevDWSezf3Wfj2Rd38fz-j76Ch5-OptnHd7MPL2AD0deoiTsbwqBerOxLRDi13nUr-Q_xKfdC
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%E2%80%90effective+imaging+for+resectability+of+liver+lesions+in+colorectal+cancer%3A+an+economic+decision+model&rft.jtitle=ANZ+journal+of+surgery&rft.au=Saing%2C+Sopany&rft.au=Haywood%2C+Phil&rft.au=Duncan%2C+Joanna+K&rft.au=Ma%2C+Ning&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=E507&rft.epage=E511&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fans.14194&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1445-1433&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1445-1433&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1445-1433&client=summon