Response‐guided telaprevir therapy in prior relapsers? The role of bridging data from treatment‐naïve and experienced subjects
The purpose of this report is to illustrate the US Food and Drug Administration's rationale for approving response‐guided therapy (RGT) for telaprevir (TVR) in combination with pegylated interferon‐α and ribavirin (P/R) for the treatment of adults with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C who were pr...
Saved in:
Published in | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Vol. 57; no. 3; pp. 897 - 902 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.03.2013
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The purpose of this report is to illustrate the US Food and Drug Administration's rationale for approving response‐guided therapy (RGT) for telaprevir (TVR) in combination with pegylated interferon‐α and ribavirin (P/R) for the treatment of adults with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C who were prior relapsers. RGT was prospectively evaluated in two registration trials of treatment‐naïve subjects. In these studies, RGT allowed subjects who achieved undetectable hepatitis C virus RNA from weeks 4 and 12, known as extended rapid virologic response (eRVR), to stop all treatments at 24 weeks. A patient without eRVR received an additional 36 weeks of P/R after 12 weeks of a TVR triple regimen (total of 48 weeks). However, RGT in prior P/R relapsers was not prospectively evaluated. Empirical cross‐trial data indicated high sustained virologic response rates (>90%) in prior relapsers achieving eRVR, irrespective of P/R duration (24 or 48 weeks). Further analyses demonstrated that interferon responsiveness does not change in P/R‐experienced subjects with a second round of P/R. The comparability in interferon responsiveness across treatment courses allowed us to bridge data between treatment‐naïve and P/R‐experienced subjects to support the approval of RGT in prior relapse subjects. (HEPATOLOGY 2013) |
---|---|
Bibliography: | The contents of the manuscript represent the authors' personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect any position of the US Food and Drug Administration. fax: 301‐847‐8720 Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report. See Editorial on Page 875 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0270-9139 1527-3350 1527-3350 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hep.25764 |