Response‐guided telaprevir therapy in prior relapsers? The role of bridging data from treatment‐naïve and experienced subjects

The purpose of this report is to illustrate the US Food and Drug Administration's rationale for approving response‐guided therapy (RGT) for telaprevir (TVR) in combination with pegylated interferon‐α and ribavirin (P/R) for the treatment of adults with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C who were pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Vol. 57; no. 3; pp. 897 - 902
Main Authors Liu, Jiang, Jadhav, Pravin R., Amur, Shashi, Fleischer, Russell, Hammerstrom, Thomas, Lewis, Linda, Naeger, Lisa, O'Rear, Jule, Pacanowski, Michael, Robertson, Sarah, Seo, Shirley, Soon, Greg, Birnkrant, Debra
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.03.2013
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this report is to illustrate the US Food and Drug Administration's rationale for approving response‐guided therapy (RGT) for telaprevir (TVR) in combination with pegylated interferon‐α and ribavirin (P/R) for the treatment of adults with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C who were prior relapsers. RGT was prospectively evaluated in two registration trials of treatment‐naïve subjects. In these studies, RGT allowed subjects who achieved undetectable hepatitis C virus RNA from weeks 4 and 12, known as extended rapid virologic response (eRVR), to stop all treatments at 24 weeks. A patient without eRVR received an additional 36 weeks of P/R after 12 weeks of a TVR triple regimen (total of 48 weeks). However, RGT in prior P/R relapsers was not prospectively evaluated. Empirical cross‐trial data indicated high sustained virologic response rates (>90%) in prior relapsers achieving eRVR, irrespective of P/R duration (24 or 48 weeks). Further analyses demonstrated that interferon responsiveness does not change in P/R‐experienced subjects with a second round of P/R. The comparability in interferon responsiveness across treatment courses allowed us to bridge data between treatment‐naïve and P/R‐experienced subjects to support the approval of RGT in prior relapse subjects. (HEPATOLOGY 2013)
Bibliography:The contents of the manuscript represent the authors' personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect any position of the US Food and Drug Administration.
fax: 301‐847‐8720
Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
See Editorial on Page 875
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0270-9139
1527-3350
1527-3350
DOI:10.1002/hep.25764