Determining the Oncologic Safety of Autologous Fat Grafting as a Reconstructive Modality: An Institutional Review of Breast Cancer Recurrence Rates and Surgical Outcomes

The increasing use of autologous fat grafting in breast cancer patients has raised concerns regarding its oncologic safety. This study evaluated patient outcomes and tumor recurrence following mastectomy reconstruction and autologous fat grafting. Retrospective chart review identified patients who u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) Vol. 140; no. 3; p. 382e
Main Authors Cohen, Oriana, Lam, Gretl, Karp, Nolan, Choi, Mihye
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.09.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The increasing use of autologous fat grafting in breast cancer patients has raised concerns regarding its oncologic safety. This study evaluated patient outcomes and tumor recurrence following mastectomy reconstruction and autologous fat grafting. Retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction from 2010 to 2015. Eight hundred twenty-nine breasts met inclusion criteria: 248 (30.0 percent) underwent autologous fat grafting, whereas 581 (70.0 percent) breasts did not. Patient demographics, cancer characteristics, oncologic treatment, surgical treatment, surgical complications, local recurrence, and distant metastases were analyzed. Autologous fat grafting patients and control patients were of similar body mass index, smoking status, and BRCA status. Patients who underwent fat grafting were significantly younger than control patients and were less likely to have diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia. The two groups represented similar distributions of BRCA status, Oncotype scores, and hormone receptor status. Patients underwent one to four grafting procedures: one procedure in 83.1 percent, two procedures in 13.7 percent, three in 2.8 percent, and four in 0.4 percent. Mean follow-up time from initial surgery was 45.6 months in the fat grafting group and 38.8 months in controls. The overall complication rate following fat grafting was 9.4 percent. Among breasts undergoing surgery for therapeutic indications, there were similar rates of local recurrence (fat grafting group, 2.5 percent; controls, 1.9 percent; p = 0.747). Interestingly, mean time to recurrence was significantly longer in the fat grafting group (52.3 months versus 22.8 months from initial surgery; p = 0.016). Autologous fat grafting is a powerful tool in breast reconstruction. This large, single-institution study provides valuable evidence-based support for its oncologic safety. Therapeutic, III.
AbstractList The increasing use of autologous fat grafting in breast cancer patients has raised concerns regarding its oncologic safety. This study evaluated patient outcomes and tumor recurrence following mastectomy reconstruction and autologous fat grafting. Retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction from 2010 to 2015. Eight hundred twenty-nine breasts met inclusion criteria: 248 (30.0 percent) underwent autologous fat grafting, whereas 581 (70.0 percent) breasts did not. Patient demographics, cancer characteristics, oncologic treatment, surgical treatment, surgical complications, local recurrence, and distant metastases were analyzed. Autologous fat grafting patients and control patients were of similar body mass index, smoking status, and BRCA status. Patients who underwent fat grafting were significantly younger than control patients and were less likely to have diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia. The two groups represented similar distributions of BRCA status, Oncotype scores, and hormone receptor status. Patients underwent one to four grafting procedures: one procedure in 83.1 percent, two procedures in 13.7 percent, three in 2.8 percent, and four in 0.4 percent. Mean follow-up time from initial surgery was 45.6 months in the fat grafting group and 38.8 months in controls. The overall complication rate following fat grafting was 9.4 percent. Among breasts undergoing surgery for therapeutic indications, there were similar rates of local recurrence (fat grafting group, 2.5 percent; controls, 1.9 percent; p = 0.747). Interestingly, mean time to recurrence was significantly longer in the fat grafting group (52.3 months versus 22.8 months from initial surgery; p = 0.016). Autologous fat grafting is a powerful tool in breast reconstruction. This large, single-institution study provides valuable evidence-based support for its oncologic safety. Therapeutic, III.
Author Lam, Gretl
Cohen, Oriana
Karp, Nolan
Choi, Mihye
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Oriana
  surname: Cohen
  fullname: Cohen, Oriana
  organization: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Gretl
  surname: Lam
  fullname: Lam, Gretl
  organization: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Nolan
  surname: Karp
  fullname: Karp, Nolan
  organization: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Mihye
  surname: Choi
  fullname: Choi, Mihye
  organization: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkNtKAzEQhoMo9qBvIJIX2JpksyfvarW1UCm0el3S7GyNbJOSQ6WP5FuaRQXnZn7--edjmAE610YDQjeUjCipiruDdSPyr9KsyM9Qn2asSjjjrIcGzn0QQos0zy5Rj5UlpzkhffT1CB7sXmmld9i_A15qaVqzUxKvRQP-hE2Dx8F3ngkOT4XHMysa3-WFwwKvQBrtvA3SqyPgF1OLVvnTPR5rPI8D5YNXRos2Jo8KPjvggwXhPJ4ILcF2hGAtRI1XwkOE6hqvg41HxK1l8NLswV2hi0a0Dq5_-xC9TZ9eJ8_JYjmbT8aLRHJaZkkR_0GAkJJRUtcZIYIWWXQkl6nMOciiruqUioaXaV6zKsptWnDOREahAsGG6PaHewjbPdSbg1V7YU-bv5-xb7tScd0
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000002392
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12015_022_10328_w
crossref_primary_10_1093_asj_sjab235
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00266_017_1006_9
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000004579
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000002276
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yacs_2018_02_016
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00266_022_03217_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gofs_2023_07_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000009613
crossref_primary_10_1093_asj_sjz075
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms20225626
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clbc_2021_01_020
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_022_09485_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_023_02313_1
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_022_12389_0
crossref_primary_10_1093_asj_sjaa156
crossref_primary_10_1093_asj_sjab126
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000007580
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2018_05_021
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2021_12_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2024_107998
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000002863
crossref_primary_10_1093_asj_sjaa419
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000005617
crossref_primary_10_2147_CMAR_S353370
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000002285
crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm12081284
crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000003772
crossref_primary_10_1093_stcltm_szac002
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms20133296
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000004736
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000004735
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000006974
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_022_02207_8
crossref_primary_10_1093_asj_sjy073
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000004915
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000007327
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13046_020_01666_z
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_25829
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2022_08_026
crossref_primary_10_1159_000501000
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000008037
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000008279
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamasurg_2018_3744
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000006372
crossref_primary_10_1093_asj_sjy312
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1097/prs.0000000000003576
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1529-4242
ExternalDocumentID 28841600
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.-D
.3C
.55
.GJ
.XZ
.Z2
01R
0R~
123
1CY
1J1
354
3EH
3O-
40H
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5RE
5VS
71W
77Y
7O~
AAAAV
AAAXR
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAMOA
AAMTA
AAQKA
AAQQT
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AASXQ
AAUEB
AAXQO
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ACBNA
ACCJW
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACILI
ACNWC
ACOAL
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADFPA
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
AE3
AE6
AEETU
AENEX
AFDTB
AFFNX
AFSOK
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHRYX
AHVBC
AIJEX
AINUH
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
AKULP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AWKKM
BOYCO
BQLVK
BS7
BYPQX
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
DU5
DUNZO
E.X
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EJD
ERAAH
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
F5P
FCALG
FL-
FW0
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
IPNFZ
J5H
JF7
JF9
JG8
JK3
JK8
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
L7B
N4W
N9A
NPM
N~7
N~B
N~M
O9-
OAG
OAH
OBH
OCUKA
ODA
OHH
OHT
OJAPA
OL1
OLB
OLG
OLH
OLU
OLV
OLW
OLY
OLZ
OPUJH
ORVUJ
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OVOZU
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P-K
P2P
R58
RIG
RLZ
RXW
S4R
S4S
T8P
TAF
TEORI
TSPGW
TWZ
V2I
VVN
W3M
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
X7M
XXN
XYM
YOC
ZFV
ZGI
ZXP
ZY1
ZZMQN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4185-70970e008210dd500a17570ec4c3c64ec7d9d31af4836d2931ab37442a51e9ea2
IngestDate Sat Sep 28 08:27:33 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4185-70970e008210dd500a17570ec4c3c64ec7d9d31af4836d2931ab37442a51e9ea2
PMID 28841600
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_28841600
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-Sep
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-Sep
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
PublicationTitleAlternate Plast Reconstr Surg
PublicationYear 2017
References 30036342 - Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Oct;142(4):579e-580e
30036340 - Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Oct;142(4):580e-581e
References_xml
SSID ssj0017365
Score 2.4797814
Snippet The increasing use of autologous fat grafting in breast cancer patients has raised concerns regarding its oncologic safety. This study evaluated patient...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 382e
SubjectTerms Adipose Tissue - transplantation
Adult
Aged
Autografts
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty - adverse effects
Mammaplasty - methods
Mastectomy - methods
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Transplantation, Autologous
Title Determining the Oncologic Safety of Autologous Fat Grafting as a Reconstructive Modality: An Institutional Review of Breast Cancer Recurrence Rates and Surgical Outcomes
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841600
Volume 140
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1Lj9MwEICtLkiIy4o3y0tz4FYF8nDihFsp7K6A3aJlV9rbyokdLRKkVZoe4B_xr_gpjD12mq6KePQQVbZkpZ6v4_F4ZszYcyVUrkLrcc90wDluUPIyVYGSOopEGcY1N7nDR8fZ4Rl_d56ej0Y_B1FLq658UX3fmlfyP1LFNpSryZL9B8n2g2IDfkf54hMljM-_kvEbF8viU55mTUW6bPxJ1ppiLSYre0OtiXTdl934oJW1jXSWy7E0RuPcl5A1txDNlTXLe28hBRKQt_CkT3J5bQLZu_HUANOaMWyNJ1QQJ8ZwpWDQVUsqdbbq8Je7QEVnBH9Ei93XiW0332BJWdq2fBT-aQd-ij6PZIYT2_SLyQcC-qDVXR8r8l62CzqT-rJmf3o5_0x5Apff9NDXgeunD-bCpcrp57gIeMw3FTgVfHKkJgN1nOSx3rpOUP3hRbuk-pXuk6R0F80AncVXy06cm-NZW1P1D71Xqnf7rh22I3KjgY-NN8mdcokkS306ZyFebnsdU6zaDXFl42MNoNNbbNftXGBCGN5mI93cYTeOXGzGXfZjQCMgjdDTCEQjzGtY0whII3gaQS5BwiaN4Gl8BZMGNlgEYtEMSCwCsQhrFsGyCIgYeBbBs3iPne2_PZ0eBu4ikKAytZUCgbMTamOtRqFSaRhKNHqxpeJVUmVcV0IVKolkzfMkU2jARrJMBCoemUa60DK-z64180Y_ZFCkUnKZREpnuFeJwrIqy1AVldQi1iKs99gDmuSLBVV7ufDT_-i3PY_ZzTWsT9j1GtWLfoq2alc-swL_BUeMl_E
link.rule.ids 786
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining+the+Oncologic+Safety+of+Autologous+Fat+Grafting+as+a+Reconstructive+Modality%3A+An+Institutional+Review+of+Breast+Cancer+Recurrence+Rates+and+Surgical+Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Plastic+and+reconstructive+surgery+%281963%29&rft.au=Cohen%2C+Oriana&rft.au=Lam%2C+Gretl&rft.au=Karp%2C+Nolan&rft.au=Choi%2C+Mihye&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft.volume=140&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=382e&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2Fprs.0000000000003576&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28841600&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28841600&rft.externalDocID=28841600