Comparison of two commercial multiplex PCR assays for the detection of sexually transmitted infections

Introduction: Multiplex molecular panels are replacing conventional methods for the detection of sexually transmitted infections. In the current study, we evaluated the performance of two commercial multiplex assays, EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays, for detecting six sexually transmit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of infection in developing countries Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 333 - 338
Main Authors Yassin, Ruba, Hanna, Jessica, El Bikai, Rana, Mohtar, Jad, El Chaar, Mira
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Italy Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 28.02.2022
The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1972-2680
2036-6590
1972-2680
DOI10.3855/jidc.15279

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Introduction: Multiplex molecular panels are replacing conventional methods for the detection of sexually transmitted infections. In the current study, we evaluated the performance of two commercial multiplex assays, EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays, for detecting six sexually transmitted infections. Methodology: The diagnostic performance of the EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays was evaluated against a panel of 105 positive DNA samples identified by in-house real-time PCR assays including Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Neisseria gonorrhea. Samples from healthy subjects, negative for any microorganism, were used as negative controls. Results: Of the 105 positive specimens, 103 (98%) were tested positive by Allplex and 102 (97%) by EUROArray. Among the 51 negative samples that were tested by in house assay, 48 (94%) were tested negative by Allplex assay and 43 (84%) by EUROArray assay. The overall sensitivity of EUROArray and Allplex were 97.1% and 98.1% with an accuracy of 92.9% and 96.7%, respectively. The overall assay specificity was 94.1% for Allplex assay and 84.3% for EUROArray assay, The sensitivity of both kits to all targeted microorganisms ranged from 55.6% to 100%, with the lowest sensitivity noted for Trichomonas vaginalis. Conclusions: Diagnostic performance varies depending on the method used to detect the targeted pathogens, the assay manipulation, and the cost. This study showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy characteristics for two kits commonly used to detect STIs, which will guide the choice for an appropriate multiplex PCR platform.
AbstractList Multiplex molecular panels are replacing conventional methods for the detection of sexually transmitted infections. In the current study, we evaluated the performance of two commercial multiplex assays, EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays, for detecting six sexually transmitted infections. The diagnostic performance of the EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays was evaluated against a panel of 105 positive DNA samples identified by in-house real-time PCR assays including Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Neisseria gonorrhea. Samples from healthy subjects, negative for any microorganism, were used as negative controls. Of the 105 positive specimens, 103 (98%) were tested positive by Allplex and 102 (97%) by EUROArray. Among the 51 negative samples that were tested by in house assay, 48 (94%) were tested negative by Allplex assay and 43 (84%) by EUROArray assay. The overall sensitivity of EUROArray and Allplex were 97.1% and 98.1% with an accuracy of 92.9% and 96.7%, respectively. The overall assay specificity was 94.1% for Allplex assay and 84.3% for EUROArray assay, The sensitivity of both kits to all targeted microorganisms ranged from 55.6% to 100%, with the lowest sensitivity noted for Trichomonas vaginalis. Diagnostic performance varies depending on the method used to detect the targeted pathogens, the assay manipulation, and the cost. This study showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy characteristics for two kits commonly used to detect STIs, which will guide the choice for an appropriate multiplex PCR platform.
Introduction: Multiplex molecular panels are replacing conventional methods for the detection of sexually transmitted infections. In the current study, we evaluated the performance of two commercial multiplex assays, EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays, for detecting six sexually transmitted infections. Methodology: The diagnostic performance of the EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays was evaluated against a panel of 105 positive DNA samples identified by in-house real-time PCR assays including Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Neisseria gonorrhea. Samples from healthy subjects, negative for any microorganism, were used as negative controls. Results: Of the 105 positive specimens, 103 (98%) were tested positive by Allplex and 102 (97%) by EUROArray. Among the 51 negative samples that were tested by in house assay, 48 (94%) were tested negative by Allplex assay and 43 (84%) by EUROArray assay. The overall sensitivity of EUROArray and Allplex were 97.1% and 98.1% with an accuracy of 92.9% and 96.7%, respectively. The overall assay specificity was 94.1% for Allplex assay and 84.3% for EUROArray assay, The sensitivity of both kits to all targeted microorganisms ranged from 55.6% to 100%, with the lowest sensitivity noted for Trichomonas vaginalis. Conclusions: Diagnostic performance varies depending on the method used to detect the targeted pathogens, the assay manipulation, and the cost. This study showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy characteristics for two kits commonly used to detect STIs, which will guide the choice for an appropriate multiplex PCR platform.
Introduction: Multiplex molecular panels are replacing conventional methods for the detection of sexually transmitted infections. In the current study, we evaluated the performance of two commercial multiplex assays, EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays, for detecting six sexually transmitted infections. Methodology: The diagnostic performance of the EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays was evaluated against a panel of 105 positive DNA samples identified by in-house real-time PCR assays including Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Neisseria gonorrhea. Samples from healthy subjects, negative for any microorganism, were used as negative controls. Results: Of the 105 positive specimens, 103 (98%) were tested positive by Allplex and 102 (97%) by EUROArray. Among the 51 negative samples that were tested by in house assay, 48 (94%) were tested negative by Allplex assay and 43 (84%) by EUROArray assay. The overall sensitivity of EUROArray and Allplex were 97.1% and 98.1% with an accuracy of 92.9% and 96.7%, respectively. The overall assay specificity was 94.1% for Allplex assay and 84.3% for EUROArray assay, The sensitivity of both kits to all targeted microorganisms ranged from 55.6% to 100%, with the lowest sensitivity noted for Trichomonas vaginalis. Conclusions: Diagnostic performance varies depending on the method used to detect the targeted pathogens, the assay manipulation, and the cost. This study showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy characteristics for two kits commonly used to detect STIs, which will guide the choice for an appropriate multiplex PCR platform.
Multiplex molecular panels are replacing conventional methods for the detection of sexually transmitted infections. In the current study, we evaluated the performance of two commercial multiplex assays, EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays, for detecting six sexually transmitted infections.INTRODUCTIONMultiplex molecular panels are replacing conventional methods for the detection of sexually transmitted infections. In the current study, we evaluated the performance of two commercial multiplex assays, EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays, for detecting six sexually transmitted infections.The diagnostic performance of the EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays was evaluated against a panel of 105 positive DNA samples identified by in-house real-time PCR assays including Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Neisseria gonorrhea. Samples from healthy subjects, negative for any microorganism, were used as negative controls.METHODOLOGYThe diagnostic performance of the EUROArray STI and Allplex STI essential assays was evaluated against a panel of 105 positive DNA samples identified by in-house real-time PCR assays including Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Neisseria gonorrhea. Samples from healthy subjects, negative for any microorganism, were used as negative controls.Of the 105 positive specimens, 103 (98%) were tested positive by Allplex and 102 (97%) by EUROArray. Among the 51 negative samples that were tested by in house assay, 48 (94%) were tested negative by Allplex assay and 43 (84%) by EUROArray assay. The overall sensitivity of EUROArray and Allplex were 97.1% and 98.1% with an accuracy of 92.9% and 96.7%, respectively. The overall assay specificity was 94.1% for Allplex assay and 84.3% for EUROArray assay, The sensitivity of both kits to all targeted microorganisms ranged from 55.6% to 100%, with the lowest sensitivity noted for Trichomonas vaginalis.RESULTSOf the 105 positive specimens, 103 (98%) were tested positive by Allplex and 102 (97%) by EUROArray. Among the 51 negative samples that were tested by in house assay, 48 (94%) were tested negative by Allplex assay and 43 (84%) by EUROArray assay. The overall sensitivity of EUROArray and Allplex were 97.1% and 98.1% with an accuracy of 92.9% and 96.7%, respectively. The overall assay specificity was 94.1% for Allplex assay and 84.3% for EUROArray assay, The sensitivity of both kits to all targeted microorganisms ranged from 55.6% to 100%, with the lowest sensitivity noted for Trichomonas vaginalis.Diagnostic performance varies depending on the method used to detect the targeted pathogens, the assay manipulation, and the cost. This study showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy characteristics for two kits commonly used to detect STIs, which will guide the choice for an appropriate multiplex PCR platform.CONCLUSIONSDiagnostic performance varies depending on the method used to detect the targeted pathogens, the assay manipulation, and the cost. This study showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy characteristics for two kits commonly used to detect STIs, which will guide the choice for an appropriate multiplex PCR platform.
Author El Bikai, Rana
El Chaar, Mira
Hanna, Jessica
Mohtar, Jad
Yassin, Ruba
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ruba
  surname: Yassin
  fullname: Yassin, Ruba
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jessica
  surname: Hanna
  fullname: Hanna, Jessica
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Rana
  surname: El Bikai
  fullname: El Bikai, Rana
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jad
  surname: Mohtar
  fullname: Mohtar, Jad
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mira
  surname: El Chaar
  fullname: El Chaar, Mira
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35298429$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkU2LFDEQhoOsuB968QdIwIsIsybppDs5yuDHwoIieg41SUUzpDtjkmZ3_r09O-sii4dQITz1UqnnnJxMeUJCXnJ22Wml3m2jd5dcicE8IWfcDGIles1O_rmfkvNat4wp0yn-jJx2ShgthTkjYZ3HHZRY80RzoO0mU5fHEYuLkOg4pxZ3CW_p1_U3CrXCvtKQC22_kHps6Fo8Nla8nSGlPW0FpjrG1tDTOIUjUZ-TpwFSxRf39YL8-Pjh-_rz6vrLp6v1--uVk3xoKwSBPde6Y1IHCRCUdqC8cNKj59op3Q9DvxzvpdhwvhGDAgO-90wi20B3Qa6OuT7D1u5KHKHsbYZo7x5y-WmhtOgSWvSB88FwLZiXA9OAQhnGveTOOAlhyXpzzNqV_HvG2uwYq8OUYMI8Vyt6yRljpmcL-voRus1zmZaf2o53_DCz6Rbq1T01b0b0D-P9tbEAb4-AK7nWguEB4cweVNuDanuneoHZI9jFBodtLwpi-l_LH90IrD4
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1099_jmm_0_001797
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_38121_w
crossref_primary_10_1021_acsomega_4c04385
crossref_primary_10_1093_cid_ciad508
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2024_1328589
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright (c) 2022 Ruba Yassin, Jessica Hanna, Rana El Bikai, Jad Mohtar, Mira El Chaar.
2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright (c) 2022 Ruba Yassin, Jessica Hanna, Rana El Bikai, Jad Mohtar, Mira El Chaar.
– notice: 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
8C1
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.3855/jidc.15279
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Public Health Database
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

Publicly Available Content Database
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
EISSN 1972-2680
EndPage 338
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_edf11791820d4708ae25901d41c9c4af
35298429
10_3855_jidc_15279
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
29K
2WC
53G
5GY
8C1
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACUHS
ADBBV
AEGXH
AENEX
AFKRA
AIAGR
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
D-I
DIK
E3Z
EBD
ECGQY
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
KWQ
OK1
OVT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
RNS
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
~8M
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AZQEC
DWQXO
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ea2e61883048f4aaf58ca5d2c4ded18c586776677dd42b11b275a9ad6d04e0ba3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1972-2680
2036-6590
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:28:46 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 22:47:30 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 23:39:18 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:55:30 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:38:49 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:59:56 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords specificity
STI
sensitivity
commercial assays
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright (c) 2022 Ruba Yassin, Jessica Hanna, Rana El Bikai, Jad Mohtar, Mira El Chaar.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c417t-ea2e61883048f4aaf58ca5d2c4ded18c586776677dd42b11b275a9ad6d04e0ba3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/edf11791820d4708ae25901d41c9c4af
PMID 35298429
PQID 3131776693
PQPubID 5199004
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_edf11791820d4708ae25901d41c9c4af
proquest_miscellaneous_2641000960
proquest_journals_3131776693
pubmed_primary_35298429
crossref_primary_10_3855_jidc_15279
crossref_citationtrail_10_3855_jidc_15279
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-02-28
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-02-28
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-02-28
  day: 28
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Italy
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Italy
– name: Sassari
PublicationTitle Journal of infection in developing countries
PublicationTitleAlternate J Infect Dev Ctries
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
Publisher_xml – name: Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
– name: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
SSID ssj0059351
Score 2.288997
Snippet Introduction: Multiplex molecular panels are replacing conventional methods for the detection of sexually transmitted infections. In the current study, we...
Multiplex molecular panels are replacing conventional methods for the detection of sexually transmitted infections. In the current study, we evaluated the...
SourceID doaj
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 333
SubjectTerms Chlamydia trachomatis - genetics
commercial assays
Humans
Infections
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis
specificity
STD
STI
Trichomonas vaginalis - genetics
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3LT98wDI42uEya0N7rYFOm7bJDRdM8mp4m-AmEJg0hNCRuVV6dQNAyWsT477HTtOOw7dBLm1RtEtufE_szIZ8ZC66qNIcZUCYXldG5LYTJjeNcWKVCG5PEvh-qgxPx7VSepg23IYVVzjoxKmrfO9wj3-YMLF2lVM2_Xv3KsWoUnq6mEhqPyTqoYA3O1_ru3uHR8ayLZc1jAUY8bcuVrIuJoJRrKbfPz7zD6j8YxPXAJEXm_n_DzWh29p-RjYQX6c40wc_Jo9C9IE-nzTY65RC9JO1qqSZI-5aOtz2Fn7rEYkrQd44Z_E2PVscUwLK5GyhgVQrYj_owxmCs2HGI_MsXd3REC3Z5NgIcpXO4Vje8Iif7ez9WB3kqoJA7waoxD6YMimnNQUxbYUwrtTPSl0744Jl2EsnsFFzei9IyZstKmtp45QsRCmv4a7LW9V14SyiPrD7G-joIUbraWgmvq50Df4VVXGTkyzyGjUvs4ljk4qIBLwPHu8HxbuJ4Z-TT0vZq4tT4a6tdnIqlBfJgxxv99c8miVUTfIucdshC70VVaBNKTKb1grnaCdNmZGueyCYJ59D8WUoZ-bg8BrHCsxLThf5maAAnssm_y8ibaQEsXwKYtdZgx9_9_-Wb5EmJuRIx_32LrI3XN-E9IJjRfkjL9B7IKfDe
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Comparison of two commercial multiplex PCR assays for the detection of sexually transmitted infections
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35298429
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3131776693
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2641000960
https://doaj.org/article/edf11791820d4708ae25901d41c9c4af
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Nb9UwDLdgXJAQ4pvCeAqCC4dqL03Spkf2tGlCYpomJu0W5avS0NY30U6w_x47aasdQFw49NImVeo48c-p_TPAR86jbxotcAZqW8rG6tKtpS2tF0K6uo5dShL7elwfnckv5-r8TqkvignL9MBZcHsxdMRaRjzjQTZrbWNF6ZJBct96aTvafdHmzc5U3oNVKxTPZKRCK7X3_SJ4qvRDAVt3zE9i6f87tEwm5vAJPJ6wIfucx_QU7sX-GTzKB2ss5ws9h26zVA5k246NP7cMleaKCidh3zk-8Bc72ZwyBMb2dmCISxniPBbimAKvUschcS1f3rKRrNXVxYjQk82hWf3wAs4OD75tjsqpWELpJW_GMtoq1lxrgUuyk9Z2SnurQuVliIFrr4i4rsYrBFk5zl3VKNvaUIe1jGtnxUvY6bd9fA1MJAYf60Ibpax865zC17Xeo2_CGyEL-DTL0PiJSZwKWlwa9ChI3obkbZK8C_iwtL3O_Bl_bLVPU7G0IM7rdAM1wUyaYP6lCQXszhNppoU4GMERIOF3t6KA98tjXEL0X8T2cXszGMSEPPtyBbzKCrCMBPFpq9Fmv_kfI3wLDyvKnkgZ8buwM_64ie8Q04xuBff1hq_gwf7B8cnpKinzb5DQ-Cs
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9QwEB2V7QEkhPgmUMAIOHCIGseO4xwQokurLW1XVdVKvRnHdlBRm5QmVdk_xW9k7CQLB-DWQy6JY0Xjsf0mnnkP4A2lzuS5ZDgCQsc81zIuE65jbRjjpRCuCkVie3MxO-Kfj7PjFfg51sL4tMpxTQwLtW2M_0e-zijudLkQBftw_j32qlH-dHWU0OjdYsctrjBka99vf8LxfZumW5uH01k8qArEhtO8i51OnaBSYhwvK651lUmjM5sabp2l0mSe4U3gZS1PS0rLNM90oa2wCXdJqRn2ewNWOcNQZgKrG5vz_YNx7c8KFgQf_eleLLIi6QlRmcyy9W8n1ni1IZ809scWGJQC_g1vwza3dRfuDPiUfOwd6h6suPo-3O5_7pG-ZukBVNOleiFpKtJdNQSNeObFm_DdMUfxB9mfHhAE53rREsTGBLEmsa4LyV_hxTbwPZ8uSOd3zLOTDuEvGdPD6vYhHF2LaR_BpG5q9wQICyxCurSF4zw1RVlm2F1hDMZHNGc8gnejDZUZ2My9qMapwqjG21t5e6tg7wheL9ue9xwef2214Ydi2cLzbocbzcVXNUxj5WzlOfQ8673leSK1S33xruXUFIbrKoK1cSDVsBi06rfrRvBq-RinsT-b0bVrLluFuJT28WQEj3sHWH4JYuRCIm54-v_OX8LN2eHertrdnu88g1upr9MItfdrMOkuLt1zRE9d-WJwWQJfrnuW_AL6By5M
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+two+commercial+multiplex+PCR+assays+for+the+detection+of+sexually+transmitted+infections&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+infection+in+developing+countries&rft.au=Ruba+Yassin&rft.au=Jessica+Hanna&rft.au=Rana+El+Bikai&rft.au=Jad+Mohtar&rft.date=2022-02-28&rft.pub=The+Journal+of+Infection+in+Developing+Countries&rft.eissn=1972-2680&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft_id=info:doi/10.3855%2Fjidc.15279&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_edf11791820d4708ae25901d41c9c4af
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1972-2680&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1972-2680&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1972-2680&client=summon