The effectiveness of a "critical pathway" in the management of laryngectomy patients

Background This is a retrospective review of medical and financial records to test the hypothesis that the use of a critical pathway specifically designed for the management of laryngectomy patients will result in improved patient care, decreased length of hospitalization, and optimal allocation of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHead & neck Vol. 22; no. 7; pp. 694 - 699
Main Authors Levin, Roger J., Ferraro, Richard E., Kodosky, Sharon R., Fedok, Fred G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.10.2000
John Wiley & Sons
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background This is a retrospective review of medical and financial records to test the hypothesis that the use of a critical pathway specifically designed for the management of laryngectomy patients will result in improved patient care, decreased length of hospitalization, and optimal allocation of resources. Methods Thirty patients undergoing laryngectomy before the implementation of the laryngectomy critical pathway were compared with 30 patients after implementation of the pathway. Clinical outcomes, length of hospitalization, and cost analyses were performed. Results Adjusting for two outliers, the average length of stay for pathway patients was 7.3 days vs 12 days for prepathway patients. A total estimated cost‐savings of $204,000 was ultimately achieved. Conclusions Our laryngectomy critical pathway has resulted in improved patient care and optimized allocation of medical resources. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 22: 694–699, 2000.
Bibliography:istex:BD3FC1D215FA110B0CE707DA99B39F12D767CB38
ArticleID:HED9
ark:/67375/WNG-PC92BFX4-4
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1043-3074
1097-0347
DOI:10.1002/1097-0347(200010)22:7<694::AID-HED9>3.0.CO;2-0