Young adults’ psychological and physiological reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election

•Major sociopolitical events can affect individuals’ psychology and physiology.•Negative mood increased before the election and peaked on election night.•Stress responses across election week were largely dependent on individual factors. Elections present unique opportunities to study how sociopolit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychoneuroendocrinology Vol. 92; pp. 162 - 169
Main Authors Hoyt, Lindsay T., Zeiders, Katharine H., Chaku, Natasha, Toomey, Russell B., Nair, Rajni L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Major sociopolitical events can affect individuals’ psychology and physiology.•Negative mood increased before the election and peaked on election night.•Stress responses across election week were largely dependent on individual factors. Elections present unique opportunities to study how sociopolitical events influence individual processes. The current study examined 286 young adults’ mood and diurnal cortisol responses to the 2016 U.S. presidential election in real-time: two days before the election, election night, and two days after the election of Donald Trump, with the goal of understanding whether (and the extent to which) the election influenced young adults’ affective and biological states. Utilizing piecewise trajectory analyses, we observed high, and increasing, negative affect leading up to the election across all participants. Young adults who had negative perceptions of Trump’s ability to fulfill the role of president and/or were part of a non-dominant social group (i.e., women, ethnic/racial minority young adults) reported increased signs of stress before the election and on election night. After the election, we observed a general “recovery” in self-reported mood; however, diurnal cortisol indicators suggested that there was an increase in biological stress among some groups. Overall, findings underscore the role of macro-level factors in individuals’ health and well-being via more proximal attitudes and physiological functioning.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-4530
1873-3360
DOI:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.03.011