Preference for and Sensitivity to Flavanol Mean Degree of Polymerization in Model Wines Is Correlated with Body Composition (P06-100-19)

It is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich foods. Previous research has indicated that preference for bitterness and astringency is related to health status (i.e., obesity) and sensitivity to bit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent developments in nutrition Vol. 3; no. Supplement_1; p. nzz031.P06-100-19
Main Authors Griffin, Laura, Diako, Charles, Miller, Lindsey, Neilson, Andrew, Ross, Carolyn, Stewart, Amanda
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2019
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2475-2991
2475-2991
DOI10.1093/cdn/nzz031.P06-100-19

Cover

Abstract It is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich foods. Previous research has indicated that preference for bitterness and astringency is related to health status (i.e., obesity) and sensitivity to bitter compounds such as 6-n-propyl-thiouracil (PROP). The objective of this study was to examine trends in liking, bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity of wine-like products with distinct flavanols of different DP in a consumer sensory panel when consumers were differentiated by phenotype. Recruited panelists (n = 102) were segmented into different phenotypes based on body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index, PROP sensitivity, and stated preference for bitter foods. Differences in overall product liking, perceived bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity were observed between the three wine samples formulated to contain varying flavanol mDP. Considering the panelists altogether without segmentation, overall liking and bitterness liking decreased with increasing flavanol mDP, with concurrent increased perception of bitterness and astringency intensity. When looking at specific phenotypes, subjects of higher BMI and BF% showed significantly reduced ability to detect differences in bitterness and astringency intensity. Interestingly and unexpectedly, PROP sensitivity and self-reported bitterness preference did not significantly correlate with liking and intensity trends based on flavanol mDP. Overall, these data suggest that BF% and BMI are greater predictors of liking and sensitivity to flavanol-rich foods compared bitterness sensitivity and self-reported bitterness liking. Reduced perception of bitterness and astringency associated with weight gain may impact selection and preference for these foods. Funding for this work was provided in part by the Virginia Tech Translational Obesity Research Graduate Interdisciplinary Research Program and the Virginia Tech Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Hatch Program, USDA-NIFA.
AbstractList ObjectivesIt is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich foods. Previous research has indicated that preference for bitterness and astringency is related to health status (i.e., obesity) and sensitivity to bitter compounds such as 6-n-propyl-thiouracil (PROP). The objective of this study was to examine trends in liking, bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity of wine-like products with distinct flavanols of different DP in a consumer sensory panel when consumers were differentiated by phenotype.MethodsRecruited panelists (n = 102) were segmented into different phenotypes based on body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index, PROP sensitivity, and stated preference for bitter foods. Differences in overall product liking, perceived bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity were observed between the three wine samples formulated to contain varying flavanol mDP.ResultsConsidering the panelists altogether without segmentation, overall liking and bitterness liking decreased with increasing flavanol mDP, with concurrent increased perception of bitterness and astringency intensity. When looking at specific phenotypes, subjects of higher BMI and BF% showed significantly reduced ability to detect differences in bitterness and astringency intensity. Interestingly and unexpectedly, PROP sensitivity and self-reported bitterness preference did not significantly correlate with liking and intensity trends based on flavanol mDP.ConclusionsOverall, these data suggest that BF% and BMI are greater predictors of liking and sensitivity to flavanol-rich foods compared bitterness sensitivity and self-reported bitterness liking. Reduced perception of bitterness and astringency associated with weight gain may impact selection and preference for these foods.Funding SourcesFunding for this work was provided in part by the Virginia Tech Translational Obesity Research Graduate Interdisciplinary Research Program and the Virginia Tech Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Hatch Program, USDA-NIFA.
Objectives It is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich foods. Previous research has indicated that preference for bitterness and astringency is related to health status (i.e., obesity) and sensitivity to bitter compounds such as 6-n-propyl-thiouracil (PROP). The objective of this study was to examine trends in liking, bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity of wine-like products with distinct flavanols of different DP in a consumer sensory panel when consumers were differentiated by phenotype. Methods Recruited panelists (n = 102) were segmented into different phenotypes based on body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index, PROP sensitivity, and stated preference for bitter foods. Differences in overall product liking, perceived bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity were observed between the three wine samples formulated to contain varying flavanol mDP. Results Considering the panelists altogether without segmentation, overall liking and bitterness liking decreased with increasing flavanol mDP, with concurrent increased perception of bitterness and astringency intensity. When looking at specific phenotypes, subjects of higher BMI and BF% showed significantly reduced ability to detect differences in bitterness and astringency intensity. Interestingly and unexpectedly, PROP sensitivity and self-reported bitterness preference did not significantly correlate with liking and intensity trends based on flavanol mDP. Conclusions Overall, these data suggest that BF% and BMI are greater predictors of liking and sensitivity to flavanol-rich foods compared bitterness sensitivity and self-reported bitterness liking. Reduced perception of bitterness and astringency associated with weight gain may impact selection and preference for these foods. Funding Sources Funding for this work was provided in part by the Virginia Tech Translational Obesity Research Graduate Interdisciplinary Research Program and the Virginia Tech Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Hatch Program, USDA-NIFA.
It is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich foods. Previous research has indicated that preference for bitterness and astringency is related to health status (i.e., obesity) and sensitivity to bitter compounds such as 6-n-propyl-thiouracil (PROP). The objective of this study was to examine trends in liking, bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity of wine-like products with distinct flavanols of different DP in a consumer sensory panel when consumers were differentiated by phenotype. Recruited panelists (n = 102) were segmented into different phenotypes based on body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index, PROP sensitivity, and stated preference for bitter foods. Differences in overall product liking, perceived bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity were observed between the three wine samples formulated to contain varying flavanol mDP. Considering the panelists altogether without segmentation, overall liking and bitterness liking decreased with increasing flavanol mDP, with concurrent increased perception of bitterness and astringency intensity. When looking at specific phenotypes, subjects of higher BMI and BF% showed significantly reduced ability to detect differences in bitterness and astringency intensity. Interestingly and unexpectedly, PROP sensitivity and self-reported bitterness preference did not significantly correlate with liking and intensity trends based on flavanol mDP. Overall, these data suggest that BF% and BMI are greater predictors of liking and sensitivity to flavanol-rich foods compared bitterness sensitivity and self-reported bitterness liking. Reduced perception of bitterness and astringency associated with weight gain may impact selection and preference for these foods. Funding for this work was provided in part by the Virginia Tech Translational Obesity Research Graduate Interdisciplinary Research Program and the Virginia Tech Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Hatch Program, USDA-NIFA.
It is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich foods. Previous research has indicated that preference for bitterness and astringency is related to health status (i.e., obesity) and sensitivity to bitter compounds such as 6-n-propyl-thiouracil (PROP). The objective of this study was to examine trends in liking, bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity of wine-like products with distinct flavanols of different DP in a consumer sensory panel when consumers were differentiated by phenotype. Recruited panelists (n = 102) were segmented into different phenotypes based on body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index, PROP sensitivity, and stated preference for bitter foods. Differences in overall product liking, perceived bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity were observed between the three wine samples formulated to contain varying flavanol mDP. Considering the panelists altogether without segmentation, overall liking and bitterness liking decreased with increasing flavanol mDP, with concurrent increased perception of bitterness and astringency intensity. When looking at specific phenotypes, subjects of higher BMI and BF% showed significantly reduced ability to detect differences in bitterness and astringency intensity. Interestingly and unexpectedly, PROP sensitivity and self-reported bitterness preference did not significantly correlate with liking and intensity trends based on flavanol mDP. Overall, these data suggest that BF% and BMI are greater predictors of liking and sensitivity to flavanol-rich foods compared bitterness sensitivity and self-reported bitterness liking. Reduced perception of bitterness and astringency associated with weight gain may impact selection and preference for these foods. Funding for this work was provided in part by the Virginia Tech Translational Obesity Research Graduate Interdisciplinary Research Program and the Virginia Tech Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Hatch Program, USDA-NIFA.
ObjectivesIt is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich foods. Previous research has indicated that preference for bitterness and astringency is related to health status (i.e., obesity) and sensitivity to bitter compounds such as 6-n-propyl-thiouracil (PROP). The objective of this study was to examine trends in liking, bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity of wine-like products with distinct flavanols of different DP in a consumer sensory panel when consumers were differentiated by phenotype.MethodsRecruited panelists (n = 102) were segmented into different phenotypes based on body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index, PROP sensitivity, and stated preference for bitter foods. Differences in overall product liking, perceived bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity were observed between the three wine samples formulated to contain varying flavanol mDP.ResultsConsidering the panelists altogether without segmentation, overall liking and bitterness liking decreased with increasing flavanol mDP, with concurrent increased perception of bitterness and astringency intensity. When looking at specific phenotypes, subjects of higher BMI and BF% showed significantly reduced ability to detect differences in bitterness and astringency intensity. Interestingly and unexpectedly, PROP sensitivity and self-reported bitterness preference did not significantly correlate with liking and intensity trends based on flavanol mDP.ConclusionsOverall, these data suggest that BF% and BMI are greater predictors of liking and sensitivity to flavanol-rich foods compared bitterness sensitivity and self-reported bitterness liking. Reduced perception of bitterness and astringency associated with weight gain may impact selection and preference for these foods.Funding SourcesFunding for this work was provided in part by the Virginia Tech Translational Obesity Research Graduate Interdisciplinary Research Program and the Virginia Tech Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Hatch Program, USDA-NIFA.
It is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich foods. Previous research has indicated that preference for bitterness and astringency is related to health status (i.e., obesity) and sensitivity to bitter compounds such as 6- -propyl-thiouracil (PROP). The objective of this study was to examine trends in liking, bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity of wine-like products with distinct flavanols of different DP in a consumer sensory panel when consumers were differentiated by phenotype. Recruited panelists (n = 102) were segmented into different phenotypes based on body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index, PROP sensitivity, and stated preference for bitter foods. Differences in overall product liking, perceived bitterness intensity, and astringency intensity were observed between the three wine samples formulated to contain varying flavanol mDP. Considering the panelists altogether without segmentation, overall liking and bitterness liking decreased with increasing flavanol mDP, with concurrent increased perception of bitterness and astringency intensity. When looking at specific phenotypes, subjects of higher BMI and BF% showed significantly reduced ability to detect differences in bitterness and astringency intensity. Interestingly and unexpectedly, PROP sensitivity and self-reported bitterness preference did not significantly correlate with liking and intensity trends based on flavanol mDP. Overall, these data suggest that BF% and BMI are greater predictors of liking and sensitivity to flavanol-rich foods compared bitterness sensitivity and self-reported bitterness liking. Reduced perception of bitterness and astringency associated with weight gain may impact selection and preference for these foods. Funding for this work was provided in part by the Virginia Tech Translational Obesity Research Graduate Interdisciplinary Research Program and the Virginia Tech Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Hatch Program, USDA-NIFA.
ArticleNumber nzz031.P06-100-19
Author Neilson, Andrew
Stewart, Amanda
Diako, Charles
Miller, Lindsey
Ross, Carolyn
Griffin, Laura
AuthorAffiliation 3 Virginia Tech
2 Washington State University
1 North Carolina State University
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Washington State University
– name: 1 North Carolina State University
– name: 3 Virginia Tech
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Laura
  surname: Griffin
  fullname: Griffin, Laura
  organization: North Carolina State University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Charles
  surname: Diako
  fullname: Diako, Charles
  organization: Washington State University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Lindsey
  surname: Miller
  fullname: Miller, Lindsey
  organization: Washington State University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Andrew
  surname: Neilson
  fullname: Neilson, Andrew
  organization: North Carolina State University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Carolyn
  surname: Ross
  fullname: Ross, Carolyn
  organization: Washington State University
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Amanda
  surname: Stewart
  fullname: Stewart, Amanda
  organization: Virginia Tech
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31224642$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNUsFuEzEUXKEiWko_AWSJSzlsa-_au-sDIAgUKrUiEiCOltd-bl0cO9iboOQL-GwcbSill3B61vPMePzmPS72fPBQFE8JPiGY16dK-1O_XuOanExxUxKMS8IfFAcVbVlZcU727pz3i6OUbjDGhHPeYP6o2K9JVdGGVgfFr2kEAxG8AmRCRNJr9Bl8soNd2mGFhoDOnFxKHxy6BOnRO7iKACgYNA1uNYNo13KwwSPr0WXQ4NA36yGh84QmIUZwcgCNftrhGr0NepWbs3nYyGfK8V_zL54UD410CY629bD4evb-y-RjefHpw_nkzUWpKGl4WfPeSN1piikxRLU1M8CIJB10xuheEdrznhDWkpoxok2uEhOpOmZ6rNuuPixejbrzRT8DrcAPUToxj3Ym40oEacW_N95ei6uwFA1raVexLHC8FYjhxwLSIGY2KXBOegiLJKq6ZoThrsG7oRVlOYWq2dh6fg96ExbR50mIOv-bdi1vaEY9u2v-1vWfPDOAjQAVQ0o52lsIwWKzOiKvjhhXR-Tp517u88zDIy8s5jso28Ay5fVIgZzW0kIUSdnNHmkbQQ1CB7vz0Zf3FJSz3irpvsPqP_i_AaBx8K0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 American Society for Nutrition.
Copyright © American Society for Nutrition 2019. 2019
Copyright © American Society for Nutrition 2019.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 American Society for Nutrition.
– notice: Copyright © American Society for Nutrition 2019. 2019
– notice: Copyright © American Society for Nutrition 2019.
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7RV
7X7
7XB
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
KB0
M0S
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
DOI 10.1093/cdn/nzz031.P06-100-19
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
Publicly Available Content Database
AGRICOLA

MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
DocumentTitleAlternate Nutrition 2019 Abstracts
EISSN 2475-2991
ExternalDocumentID PMC6574825
31224642
10_1093_cdn_nzz031_P06_100_19
10.1093/cdn/nzz031.P06-100-19
S2475299123144982
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States--US
Virginia
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
– name: Virginia
GroupedDBID .1-
.FO
0R~
7RV
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAHBH
AALRI
AAPXW
AAVAP
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABPTD
ABUWG
ABXVV
ACGFS
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADVLN
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFPUW
AFRHN
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMNDL
AMRAJ
AOIJS
APXCP
BAYMD
BCNDV
BENPR
CCPQU
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
FDB
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
ITC
KSI
M~E
NAPCQ
O9-
OK1
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PPXIY
PUEGO
RPM
UKHRP
Z5R
0SF
6I.
AAFTH
ABDBF
AFULF
BTTYL
ROX
TOX
AAYXX
CITATION
ABEJV
ABGNP
NPM
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4169-39bfad8d4041f1c735fe51a18e8ffdbc14b9b115713551df713a01ac85fb0d783
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 2475-2991
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 17:51:23 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 23:55:39 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 20:53:51 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 22:02:46 EDT 2025
Mon Mar 03 18:06:47 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:04:27 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 08:34:46 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 20 16:35:13 EDT 2024
Tue Aug 26 16:34:19 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue Supplement_1
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4169-39bfad8d4041f1c735fe51a18e8ffdbc14b9b115713551df713a01ac85fb0d783
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/3169487964?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%&accountid=15518
PMID 31224642
PQID 3169487964
PQPubID 7121353
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6574825
proquest_miscellaneous_2335150860
proquest_miscellaneous_2245642268
proquest_journals_3169487964
pubmed_primary_31224642
crossref_primary_10_1093_cdn_nzz031_P06_100_19
oup_primary_10_1093_cdn_nzz031_P06-100-19
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1093_cdn_nzz031_P06_100_19
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1093_cdn_nzz031_P06_100_19
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-Jun
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-Jun
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Current developments in nutrition
PublicationTitleAlternate Curr Dev Nutr
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Oxford University Press
SSID ssj0001999609
Score 2.0694697
Snippet It is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich foods....
ObjectivesIt is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich...
Objectives It is known that the degree of polymerization (DP) of flavanol compounds influences the perceived bitter and astringent sensations of flavanol-rich...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
oup
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage nzz031.P06-100-19
SubjectTerms astringency
bitter-tasting compounds
bitterness
body fat
Body mass index
Dietary Bioactive Components
flavanols
Food
health status
obesity
Perceptions
phenotype
Polymerization
sensory evaluation
Trends
weight gain
wines
Title Preference for and Sensitivity to Flavanol Mean Degree of Polymerization in Model Wines Is Correlated with Body Composition (P06-100-19)
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S2475299123144982
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzz031.P06-100-19
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31224642
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3169487964
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2245642268
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2335150860
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6574825
Volume 3
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1LbxMxELb6uHBBQHkESjRICNHDtut412sfEGpLo4LUKAIqcrO8a6-oFLyFpIf0F_CzmdlH0iDUcsrBO5G1Mzv-PI9vGHtd5onSaeEj7r2KklzKyKKaI-EGRaolLnqKd5yN5Ol58mmSTjbYqOuFobLKzifWjtpVBcXIDwSXGsE1ir-__BnR1CjKrnYjNGw7WsG9qynGNtk2umSFdr99dDIaf15FXQjfx7pr5dHioHDhIFxfo23vj2kkTRxHxLrz70NqrQfuBhT9u6LyxhE1fMDut9gSDhtjeMg2fHjEdg4D3qt_LOAN1NWedRh9h_0eLweMAOJWsMHBFypmb6ZJwLyC4dQizK6mcOZtgA8eb-YeqhLG1XRBeZ6mgRMuAtBAtSl8owp6-DiDY5r4MUUQ64DCvHBUuQWQ42kLxODt6h3sPWbnw5Ovx6dRO5UhKhC86UjovLROuSROeMmLTKSlT7nlyquydHnBk1znROHDEcpwV-KvjbktVFrmscuUeMK2QhX8MwZ8IK2gpvY8jZNCSl2KjO5Ihc2JE0b32H6nBnPZkG-YJmkuDOrNNHozuGeiXjYkIDtlma6zFH2hwePhLkG1FGyhRwMp_kd0D63ijv2177THdjvbMa2vmJmVZffYq-UyfuWUurHBV1czM6D8NDU9q1ueESIldn8Z99jTxhyXuxKUQMU_6LFszVCXDxDL-PpKuPhes43LNEvUIH1--9ZfsHsIJXVTRLfLtua_rvxLhGvzvM82s0nWb7_Efh30-ANqtj_7
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF6V9AAXBJRHoMAgAaIHN16vvfEeKtRXlNImiqAVvS1r7xoqBbs0qVD6C_hV_DZmYjtpEGq59OTDeqyVZ3b2253Hx9jrLAljFaXO487FXphI6RlUsydskEZK4qCj-45eX3aPwg_H0fES-13XwlBaZe0Tp47aFindkbcElwrBNYq_P_3hEWsURVdrCg1TUSvYjWmLsaqwY99NfuIRbrSxt4P6fhMEnd3D7a5XsQx4KYIR5QmVZMbGNvRDnvG0LaLMRdzw2MVZZpOUh4lKqCUNx62Z2wyfxucmjaMs8W07FvjdW2w5pArXBlve2u0PPs5veeg84au6dEiJVmrzVn5xgWtpfUAUOL7vUZeff2-KCzV3l6Dv3xmcl7bEzj12t8KysFka33225PIHbGUzx3P89wm8hWl26fTafoX9GswITQBxMpjcwidKni_ZK2BcQGdoENYXQ-g5k8OO-3rmHBQZDIrhhOJKZcEonORABG5D-EwZ-7A3gm1iGBkiaLZA18qwVdgJkKOrEtLg3fwfrD1kRzein0eskRe5e8KAB9IIKqJPIj9MpVSZaNOZLDUJ9aBRTbZeq0Gfls0-dBmkFxr1pku9aZwztXrWJCBrZem6khV9r8bt6DrBeCZYQZ0SwvyP6BpaxTXzq_5pk63WtqMr3zTS85XUZK9mw-hVKFRkclecj3RA8XAqso6veEeIiNgEpN9kj0tznM1KUMAWP9Bk7QVDnb1AXc0XR_KTb9Pu5jJqh3EQPb166i_Z7e5h70Af7PX3n7E7CGNVmcC3yhrjs3P3HKHiOHlRrUdgX27aBfwBdOF6_A
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preference+for+and+Sensitivity+to+Flavanol+Mean+Degree+of+Polymerization+in+Model+Wines+Is+Correlated+with+Body+Composition+%28P06-100-19%29&rft.jtitle=Current+developments+in+nutrition&rft.au=Griffin%2C+Laura&rft.au=Diako%2C+Charles&rft.au=Miller%2C+Lindsey&rft.au=Neilson%2C+Andrew&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=2475-2991&rft.eissn=2475-2991&rft.volume=3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fcdn%2Fnzz031.P06-100-19&rft.externalDocID=S2475299123144982
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2475-2991&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2475-2991&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2475-2991&client=summon