Posterior Approach With Small Incision Is a Safe Alternative to Anterior Approach for Hamstring Autograft Harvest in Adolescents

• Published in: HSS journal Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 498 - 503
• Main Authors: Aitchison, Alexandra H., Schlichte, Lindsay M., Heath, Madison R., Fabricant, Peter D., Green, Daniel W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.11.2022
• Subjects: Original; reconstruction; medial patellofemoral ligament; gracilis; anterior cruciate ligament; semitendinosus
• ISSN: 1556-3316; 1556-3324
• DOI: 10.1177/15563316221085262

Background: There are potential drawbacks and complications associated with using the anterior approach to harvest the hamstring tendon as an autograft source for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. A posterior harvest technique has been described as an alternative to an anterior approach in skeletally mature patients. The 2 approaches have not been compared in adolescents. Purpose: We sought to compare the incision size and harvested tendon length produced by anterior and posterior hamstring harvest techniques in an adolescent population. Methods: After obtaining consent, we prospectively collected data on a consecutive series of 115 adolescents undergoing ACL or MPFL reconstruction, including the length of the incision and of the harvested hamstring tendon. Demographic information including age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) was collected at the time of surgery. Results: The mean age at the time of surgery was 14.3 ± 1.8 years (range: 9–21 years), and 43% (N = 50) of participants were male. Of the 115 hamstring autografts, 26 were harvested anteriorly and 89 were harvested posteriorly. Neither mean semitendinosus length nor mean gracilis length was significantly different when harvested anteriorly versus posteriorly. The posterior harvest group had a mean incision length that was significantly smaller than that of the anterior harvest group. No iatrogenic nerve injuries or neurovascular complications were observed in either group. Conclusion: A posterior incision for hamstring autograft harvest provided an alternative approach in adolescents, which resulted in a 20% smaller incision than an anterior approach. For procedures such as MPFL reconstruction that do not require concomitant anteromedial work, posterior hamstring harvest may be used to improve cosmesis while producing viable hamstring autograft tissue for surgical reconstruction.