Conserved and muscle-group-specific gene expression patterns shape postnatal development of the novel extraocular muscle phenotype

1 Department of Neurology, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 2 Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 3 Department of Visual Sciences Research Center, Ohio 44106 4 Department of Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysiological genomics Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 184 - 195
Main Authors Cheng, Georgiana, Merriam, Anita P, Gong, Bendi, Leahy, Patrick, Khanna, Sangeeta, Porter, John D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Am Physiological Soc 08.07.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:1 Department of Neurology, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 2 Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 3 Department of Visual Sciences Research Center, Ohio 44106 4 Department of Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 Current models in skeletal muscle biology do not fully account for the breadth, causes, and consequences of phenotypic variation among skeletal muscle groups. The muscle allotype concept arose to explain frank differences between limb, masticatory, and extraocular (EOM) muscles, but there is little understanding of the developmental regulation of the skeletal muscle phenotypic range. Here, we used morphological and DNA microarray analyses to generate a comprehensive temporal profile for rat EOM development. Based upon coordinate regulation of morphologic/gene expression traits with key events in visual, vestibular, and oculomotor system development, we propose a model that the EOM phenotype is a consequence of extrinsic factors that are unique to its local environment and sensory-motor control system, acting upon a novel myoblast lineage. We identified a broad spectrum of differences between the postnatal transcriptional patterns of EOM and limb muscle allotypes, including numerous transcripts not traditionally associated with muscle fiber/group differences. Several transcription factors were differentially regulated and may be responsible for signaling muscle allotype specificity. Significant differences in cellular energetic mechanisms defined the EOM and limb allotypes. The allotypes were divergent in many other functional transcript classes that remain to be further explored. Taken together, we suggest that the EOM allotype is the consequence of tissue-specific mechanisms that direct expression of a limited number of EOM-specific transcripts and broader, incremental differences in transcripts that are conserved by the two allotypes. This represents an important first step in dissecting allotype-specific regulatory mechanisms that may, in turn, explain differential muscle group sensitivity to a variety of metabolic and neuromuscular diseases. skeletal muscle; hindlimb; microarray; allotype
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1094-8341
1531-2267
DOI:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00222.2003