Comparison of experimental designs for estimating quantitative genetic parameters in fish

Four popular experimental designs for estimating variance components of additive genetic effects and (secondarily) dominance and maternal effects in fish (full‐sib families, half‐sib families, nested design and factorial design) were compared. The error variances of the estimators were formulated as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAquaculture research Vol. 34; no. 12; pp. 1099 - 1105
Main Author Blanc, J M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.10.2003
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Four popular experimental designs for estimating variance components of additive genetic effects and (secondarily) dominance and maternal effects in fish (full‐sib families, half‐sib families, nested design and factorial design) were compared. The error variances of the estimators were formulated as functions of the true (hypothetical) values of genetic and environmental variances, depending on the experimental design considered, and whether the families were reared separately or mixed. Half‐sib families and rectangular (many sires×few dams) factorial design were most useful for the estimation of heritability. The nested design appeared much less adequate. The minimum experimental capacity for obtaining accurate estimates was 100 lots in separate rearing or 1000 fish in mixed rearing. A larger experimental capacity is required when dominance and maternal effects as well as heritability are to be estimated because these different estimations, requiring contradictory conditions, cannot be simultaneously optimized.
Bibliography:istex:A6505BCF2853D862E55A27690C33CC9685405147
ArticleID:ARE919
ark:/67375/WNG-PRBB3184-2
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1355-557X
1365-2109
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2109.2003.00919.x