Stretch-Minimizing Volumetric Parameterization

Not many methods for parameterization guarantee bijectivity or local injectivity, which is essential for foldover- free mappings. Stretch-minimizing parameterization which is widely used for surface parameterization, provides foldover-free mappings and is capable of trading off between angle and are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of computer science and technology Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 553 - 564
Main Author 金耀 钱归平 赵杰伊 常建 童若锋 张建军
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.05.2015
Springer Nature B.V
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China%College of New Media, Zhejiang University of Media and Communications, Hangzhou 310018, China%National Centre for Computer Animation, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, BH12 5BB, U.K
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1000-9000
1860-4749
DOI10.1007/s11390-015-1545-y

Cover

More Information
Summary:Not many methods for parameterization guarantee bijectivity or local injectivity, which is essential for foldover- free mappings. Stretch-minimizing parameterization which is widely used for surface parameterization, provides foldover-free mappings and is capable of trading off between angle and area distortions. We extend its usage to volumetric parameterization in this paper by deriving a 3D version of stretch-distortion energy and incorporating fixed boundary conditions. Our energy definition includes a naturM barrier term which effectively prevents elements from collapsing and folding over. It saves the effort in other methods of formulating additional energy or constrains to ensure the local injectivity. We propose to minimize the overall energy integrated over the whole mesh with a relaxation-enhanced solver and optimize the energy globally. This is different from the conventional approach of surface parameterization where mesh nodes are optimized individually. Compared with other volumetric parameterizations, method, being foldover-free and offering a good trade-off between our approach bears the advantages of stretch-minimizing angle and volume distortions.
Bibliography:Yao Jin, Gui-Ping Qian, Jie-Yi Zhao, Jian Chang,Ruo-Feng Tong, Jianjun Zhang (1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China 2College of New Media, Zhejian9 University of Media and Communications, Hangzhou 310018, China 3National Centre for Computer Animation, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, BH12 5BB, U.K)
11-2296/TP
Not many methods for parameterization guarantee bijectivity or local injectivity, which is essential for foldover- free mappings. Stretch-minimizing parameterization which is widely used for surface parameterization, provides foldover-free mappings and is capable of trading off between angle and area distortions. We extend its usage to volumetric parameterization in this paper by deriving a 3D version of stretch-distortion energy and incorporating fixed boundary conditions. Our energy definition includes a naturM barrier term which effectively prevents elements from collapsing and folding over. It saves the effort in other methods of formulating additional energy or constrains to ensure the local injectivity. We propose to minimize the overall energy integrated over the whole mesh with a relaxation-enhanced solver and optimize the energy globally. This is different from the conventional approach of surface parameterization where mesh nodes are optimized individually. Compared with other volumetric parameterizations, method, being foldover-free and offering a good trade-off between our approach bears the advantages of stretch-minimizing angle and volume distortions.
stretch-minimizing, volumetric parameterization, foldover-free
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1000-9000
1860-4749
DOI:10.1007/s11390-015-1545-y