Autoantibody profiles delineate distinct subsets of scleromyositis

Abstract Objective Scleromyositis remains incompletely characterized owing in part to its heterogeneity. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of autoantibody profiles to define subsets of scleromyositis. Methods Subjects with scleromyositis from a prospective cohort were divided into th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRheumatology (Oxford, England) Vol. 61; no. 3; pp. 1148 - 1157
Main Authors Leclair, Valérie, D’Aoust, Julie, Gyger, Geneviève, Landon-Cardinal, Océane, Meyer, Alain, O'Ferrall, Erin, Karamchandani, Jason, Massie, Rami, Ellezam, Benjamin, Satoh, Minoru, Troyanov, Yves, Fritzler, Marvin J, Hudson, Marie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 02.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective Scleromyositis remains incompletely characterized owing in part to its heterogeneity. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of autoantibody profiles to define subsets of scleromyositis. Methods Subjects with scleromyositis from a prospective cohort were divided into three groups based on autoantibody profiles: subjects with SSc-specific autoantibodies (anti-centromere, -topoisomerase 1, -RNA polymerase III, -Th/To, -fibrillarin), subjects with SSc-overlap autoantibodies (anti-PM/Scl, -U1RNP, -Ku) and subjects without SSc-related autoantibodies. Clinical features, laboratory tests and histopathological findings were retrieved and compared between groups. Results Of 42 scleromyositis subjects (79% female, mean age at diagnosis 55 years, mean disease duration 3.5 years), 8 (19%) subjects had SSc-specific autoantibodies, 14 (33%) SSc-overlap autoantibodies and 20 (48%) had no SSc-related autoantibodies. One-third had no skin involvement, a finding more frequent in the SSc-overlap subjects and those without SSc-related autoantibodies. Proximal and distal weakness was common and head drop/bent spine was found in 50% of the SSc-specific and 35% of the subjects without SSc-related autoantibodies. Of note, the group without SSc-related autoantibodies had the only cases of severe cardiac systolic dysfunction (n = 1) and scleroderma renal crisis (n = 1), as well as three out of the four cancers and three out of the four deaths. Conclusion In this carefully phenotyped series of scleromyositis subjects, absence of SSc-related autoantibodies was common and associated with distinct features and poor prognosis. Future studies are needed to validate these results and possibly identify novel autoantibodies or other biomarkers associated with scleromyositis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1462-0324
1462-0332
1462-0332
DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keab492