Diagnostic assessment of autism in adults – current considerations in neurodevelopmentally informed professional learning with reference to ADOS-2

Services for the assessment and diagnosis of autism in adults have been widely criticized and there is an identified need for further research in this field. There is a call for diagnostic services to become more accessible, person-centered, neurodiversity affirming, and respectful. There is a need...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychiatry Vol. 14
Main Authors Curnow, Eleanor, Utley, Izy, Rutherford, Marion, Johnston, Lorna, Maciver, Donald
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 05.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Services for the assessment and diagnosis of autism in adults have been widely criticized and there is an identified need for further research in this field. There is a call for diagnostic services to become more accessible, person-centered, neurodiversity affirming, and respectful. There is a need for workforce development which will increase capacity for diagnostic assessment and support for adults. ADOS-2 is a gold-standard diagnostic assessment tool for autism recommended in clinical guidelines. However, diagnostic procedures such as the ADOS-2 are rooted in the medical model and do not always sit comfortably alongside the neurodiversity paradigm or preferences of the autistic community. Training and educational materials need to account for the differences between these approaches and support clinicians to provide services which meet the needs of the adults they serve. The National Autism Implementation Team worked alongside ADOS-2 training providers to support clinicians in Scotland, to provide effective and respectful diagnostic assessment. The team engaged with clinicians who had attended ADOS training to identify areas of uncertainty or concern. Training materials were developed to support ADOS assessors to incorporate key principles including “nothing about us without us”; “difference not deficit”; “environment first”; “diagnosis matters,” “language and mindsets matter”; and “a neurodevelopmental lens,” to support the provision of neurodiversity affirming assessment practice. The National Autism Implementation Team also provided examples of actions which can be undertaken by clinicians to improve the assessment experience for those seeking a diagnosis. Training materials are based on research evidence, clinical experience, and the needs and wishes of autistic people.
Bibliography:Reviewed by: Abdolvahab Samavi, University of Hormozgan, Iran; Stormi Pulver White, Emory University, United States
Edited by: Lawrence Fung, Stanford University, United States
ISSN:1664-0640
1664-0640
DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1258204