Prevalence of Ocular Candidiasis and Candida Endophthalmitis in Patients With Candidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Infectious diseases and ophthalmology professional societies have disagreed regarding ocular screening in patients with candidemia. We aimed to summarize the current evidence on the prevalence of ocular candidiasis (OC) and Candida endophthalmitis (CE) according to the standardiz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical infectious diseases Vol. 76; no. 10; pp. 1738 - 1749
Main Authors Phongkhun, Kasidis, Pothikamjorn, Thananop, Srisurapanont, Karan, Manothummetha, Kasama, Sanguankeo, Anawin, Thongkam, Achitpol, Chuleerarux, Nipat, Leksuwankun, Surachai, Meejun, Tanaporn, Thanakitcharu, Jaedvara, Walker, Morgan, Gopinath, Shilpa, Torvorapanit, Pattama, Langsiri, Nattapong, Worasilchai, Navaporn, Moonla, Chatphatai, Plongla, Rongpong, Kates, Olivia S, Nematollahi, Saman, Permpalung, Nitipong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published US Oxford University Press 24.05.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Infectious diseases and ophthalmology professional societies have disagreed regarding ocular screening in patients with candidemia. We aimed to summarize the current evidence on the prevalence of ocular candidiasis (OC) and Candida endophthalmitis (CE) according to the standardized definitions. Methods A literature search was conducted from the inception date through 16 October 2022 using PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS. Pooled prevalence of ocular complications was derived from generalized linear mixed models (PROSPERO CRD42022326610). Results A total of 70 and 35 studies were included in the meta-analysis for OC and concordant CE (chorioretinitis with vitreous involvement), respectively. This study represented 8599 patients with candidemia who underwent ophthalmologic examination. Pooled prevalences (95% CI) of OC, overall CE, concordant CE, and discordant CE were 10.7% (8.4–13.5%), 3.1% (2.1–4.5%), 1.8% (1.3–2.6%), and 7.4% (4.5–12%) of patients screened, respectively. Studies from Asian countries had significantly higher concordant CE prevalence (95% CI) of patients screened (3.6%; 2.9–4.6%) compared with studies from European countries (1.4%; .4–5%) and American countries (1.4%; .9–2.2%) (P <.01). Presence of total parenteral nutrition and Candida albicans was associated with CE, with pooled odds ratios (95% CI) of 6.92 (3.58–13.36) and 3.02 (1.67–5.46), respectively. Conclusions Prevalence of concordant CE overall and among Asian countries was 2 and 4 times higher than the prevalence previously reported by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) of <0.9%, respectively. There is an urgent need to study optimal screening protocols and to establish joint recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and AAO. This study demonstrates a higher prevalence of concordant Candida endophthalmitis compared with the previous report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (1.8% vs <0.9%), with a higher prevalence among studies from Asian countries of 3.6%.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Potential conflicts of interest. S. N. reported receiving a grant from the Fisher Center Discovery Program (Johns Hopkins University). N. W., P. T., and R. P. reported receiving grants from the Health Systems Research Institute (Thailand) and Rachadapiseksompotch Fund, Chulalongkorn University, outside the submitted work. N. P. reported receiving grants and salary support from the Health Systems Research Institute (Thailand), the Fisher Center Discovery Program (Johns Hopkins University), the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, CareDx, and Merck, outside the submitted work. N. P. has served on the Advisory Board for Shionogi, Inc, and the Data Review Committee for Pulmocide Ltd. All other authors report no potential conflicts.
K. P. and T. P. contributed equally.
All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
DOI:10.1093/cid/ciad064