The Quantified Relationship

The growth of self-tracking and personal surveillance has given rise to the Quantified Self movement. Members of this movement seek to enhance their personal well-being, productivity, and self-actualization through the tracking and gamification of personal data. The technologies that make this possi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of bioethics Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 3 - 19
Main Authors Danaher, John, Nyholm, Sven, Earp, Brian D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Taylor & Francis 01.02.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The growth of self-tracking and personal surveillance has given rise to the Quantified Self movement. Members of this movement seek to enhance their personal well-being, productivity, and self-actualization through the tracking and gamification of personal data. The technologies that make this possible can also track and gamify aspects of our interpersonal, romantic relationships. Several authors have begun to challenge the ethical and normative implications of this development. In this article, we build upon this work to provide a detailed ethical analysis of the Quantified Relationship (QR). We identify eight core objections to the QR and subject them to critical scrutiny. We argue that although critics raise legitimate concerns, there are ways in which tracking technologies can be used to support and facilitate good relationships. We thus adopt a stance of cautious openness toward this technology and advocate the development of a research agenda for the positive use of QR technologies.
AbstractList The growth of self-tracking and personal surveillance has given rise to the Quantified Self movement. Members of this movement seek to enhance their personal well-being, productivity, and self-actualization through the tracking and gamification of personal data. The technologies that make this possible can also track and gamify aspects of our interpersonal, romantic relationships. Several authors have begun to challenge the ethical and normative implications of this development. In this article, we build upon this work to provide a detailed ethical analysis of the Quantified Relationship (QR). We identify eight core objections to the QR and subject them to critical scrutiny. We argue that although critics raise legitimate concerns, there are ways in which tracking technologies can be used to support and facilitate good relationships. We thus adopt a stance of cautious openness toward this technology and advocate the development of a research agenda for the positive use of QR technologies.The growth of self-tracking and personal surveillance has given rise to the Quantified Self movement. Members of this movement seek to enhance their personal well-being, productivity, and self-actualization through the tracking and gamification of personal data. The technologies that make this possible can also track and gamify aspects of our interpersonal, romantic relationships. Several authors have begun to challenge the ethical and normative implications of this development. In this article, we build upon this work to provide a detailed ethical analysis of the Quantified Relationship (QR). We identify eight core objections to the QR and subject them to critical scrutiny. We argue that although critics raise legitimate concerns, there are ways in which tracking technologies can be used to support and facilitate good relationships. We thus adopt a stance of cautious openness toward this technology and advocate the development of a research agenda for the positive use of QR technologies.
The growth of self-tracking and personal surveillance has given rise to the Quantified Self movement. Members of this movement seek to enhance their personal well-being, productivity, and self-actualization through the tracking and gamification of personal data. The technologies that make this possible can also track and gamify aspects of our interpersonal, romantic relationships. Several authors have begun to challenge the ethical and normative implications of this development. In this article, we build upon this work to provide a detailed ethical analysis of the Quantified Relationship (QR). We identify eight core objections to the QR and subject them to critical scrutiny. We argue that although critics raise legitimate concerns, there are ways in which tracking technologies can be used to support and facilitate good relationships. We thus adopt a stance of cautious openness toward this technology and advocate the development of a research agenda for the positive use of QR technologies.
Author Earp, Brian D.
Nyholm, Sven
Danaher, John
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: John
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5879-3160
  surname: Danaher
  fullname: Danaher, John
  organization: National University of Ireland Galway
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sven
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3836-5932
  surname: Nyholm
  fullname: Nyholm, Sven
  organization: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Brian D.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9691-2888
  surname: Earp
  fullname: Earp, Brian D.
  email: brian.earp@gmail.com
  organization: Yale University and University of Oxford
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29393796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkE1LAzEQhoNU7If-AlE8etk6k2yyXbwoxS8oiFLPIWYTGtnd1GQX6b9317YXD3qaYXjemXnfMRnUvjaEnCFMEWZwhZwKjgKnFDCbYgr5jLIDMkLORAKQ8UHfU5H00JCMY_wAgBSQHZEhzVnOslyMyOlyZS5eWlU3zjpTXLyaUjXO13Hl1sfk0KoympNdnZC3-7vl_DFZPD88zW8XiU6RNYlQXGfaCF1opVJhjdFUmxnT3FBhYVYg5SwDgRqstqAz240ZWKRQZMgNm5DL7d518J-tiY2sXNSmLFVtfBsl5t27ObBUdOj5Dm3fK1PIdXCVChu5N9QB11tABx9jMFZq1_w4aoJypUSQfXxyH5_s45O7-Do1_6XeH_hPd7PVudr6UKkvH8pCNmpT-mCDqrWLkv294hsOp4RB
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_socsci8090262
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13347_024_00695_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11023_024_09661_5
crossref_primary_10_1177_1741659018820562
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00146_024_01993_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11948_022_00380_7
crossref_primary_10_1093_cybsec_tyaa006
crossref_primary_10_1177_13634607221137323
crossref_primary_10_1080_21507740_2019_1665137
crossref_primary_10_1080_15265161_2017_1409828
crossref_primary_10_1080_15265161_2019_1619859
crossref_primary_10_1080_10508422_2022_2082969
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2018_00962
crossref_primary_10_1080_09505431_2018_1458828
crossref_primary_10_1111_jftr_12509
crossref_primary_10_1177_1461444820934032
crossref_primary_10_3390_socsci12010003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s41105_022_00390_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13347_022_00548_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13347_022_00508_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2020_106639
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techsoc_2018_01_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11948_024_00518_9
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.01.001
10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.011
10.1017/S0963180114000644
10.1002/9781118290620.ch5
10.1080/15265161.2013.839771
10.1007/s13347-012-0081-8
10.1080/21507740.2013.863242
10.7551/mitpress/9780262036689.001.0001
10.4324/9781315561523
10.1080/13691058.2014.920528
10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
10.1215/00318108-112-2-135
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732600.001.0001
10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
10.1086/680907
10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283642e10
10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.x
10.3389/fnsys.2014.00012
10.1017/S0963180114000206
10.2196/mhealth.5227
10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.02.001
10.1080/21507740.2012.694391
10.1136/medethics-2014-102390
10.4324/9781315877723
10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.472
10.2196/jmir.6171
10.1080/15265161.2013.839752
10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.843
10.1007/s10676-016-9396-y
10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7667
10.7551/mitpress/10277.001.0001
10.1177/0265407585024002
10.1177/0146167293196003
10.1007/s12152-016-9254-y
10.1002/9781118510384.ch14
10.1111/japp.12085
10.1177/1461444815604328
10.5206/fpq/2016.1.2
10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.034
10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0042
10.7551/mitpress/10421.001.0001
10.1111/japp.12141
10.1136/medethics-2014-102596
10.1017/S0963180116000542
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2017.1409823
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Biology
Philosophy
EISSN 1536-0075
EndPage 19
ExternalDocumentID 29393796
10_1080_15265161_2017_1409823
1409823
Genre Article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.4L
.7I
.CB
.QK
04C
0BK
0R~
23M
36B
4.4
44B
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
6PF
AAAVZ
AAGZJ
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
AATTQ
AAVNP
AAWTL
ABBKH
ABDBF
ABEIZ
ABJNI
ABLCE
ABLIJ
ABPEM
ABTAI
ABUPF
ABXYU
ACENM
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIEZ
ACJZB
ACKLR
ACTOA
ACUHS
ACVOX
ADBBV
ADCVX
ADOJX
ADUOI
ADXPE
AECIN
AEGXH
AEKEX
AENEX
AEOZL
AEPSL
AFAZI
AFKVX
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGMYJ
AGRBW
AGYJP
AIJEM
AIRBT
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
ALYBC
ARJSQ
AVBZW
AWYRJ
BLEHA
BMOTO
BMSDO
BOHLJ
CCCUG
CE4
CQ1
CS3
DGEBU
DGFLZ
DKSSO
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
ECF
ECT
ECV
EHL
EIHBH
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ENC
EPL
EST
ESX
E~B
E~C
F5P
G-F
GCT
GTTXZ
H13
HF~
HISYW
HZ~
IPNFZ
J.O
KSSTO
KYCEM
M4Z
MUP
MUS
N9A
NA5
O9-
P2P
RC9
RHO
RIG
RNANH
RVRKI
S-F
SJN
STATR
SV3
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TFL
TFW
TNTFI
TQQ
TTHFI
TUROJ
TUS
UT5
UT9
VAE
WQ9
XYO
YCJ
ZGOLN
~01
~S~
706
709
AAGDL
AAMZP
AAYXX
ABECW
ABFIM
ABGNL
ABWVI
ACDWB
ACHIS
ACWGZ
ACYXD
ADPSH
ADVEQ
ADWTG
ADYSH
AEHYH
AEIQB
AERNI
AEXKJ
AFLJA
AFRVT
AGXXK
AIHXW
AMBIC
AMPGV
ANBFE
APIUT
CAG
CITATION
COF
COGVJ
FOMLG
HCSNT
HVGLF
LJTGL
LXN
LXY
LXZ
MUA
ROL
U5U
VQG
WHG
ADCGW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PAQYV
TASJS
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-6a5c7ce6cdcaa46feec2ce83c5e26f08d12537061c0fcf0c7f26f30f120d715e3
ISSN 1526-5161
1536-0075
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 23:14:41 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:03:05 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:31:56 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:42 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:09:04 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords love
quantified self
privacy
data ethics
quantified relationship
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c413t-6a5c7ce6cdcaa46feec2ce83c5e26f08d12537061c0fcf0c7f26f30f120d715e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-3836-5932
0000-0001-5879-3160
0000-0001-9691-2888
0000-0001-5879-316
OpenAccessLink https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/bb114ec8-5137-471b-b898-7a112b5b01b7
PMID 29393796
PQID 1993990346
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 17
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1993990346
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_15265161_2017_1409823
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_15265161_2017_1409823
crossref_primary_10_1080_15265161_2017_1409823
pubmed_primary_29393796
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of bioethics
PublicationTitleAlternate Am J Bioeth
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis
References cit0033
Mumford L. (cit0039) 2010
cit0034
Wootton B. (cit0057) 1959
cit0037
cit0038
cit0035
cit0036
cit0023
cit0100
cit0020
cit0021
Levy K. (cit0025) 2014; 51
Danaher J. (cit0004) 2017
Maturo A. (cit0032) 2016; 8
cit0028
cit0022a
cit0026
cit0024
cit0011
cit0012
cit0056
cit0053
cit0010
Nyholm S. (cit0045) 2017
cit0051
Lupton D. (cit0029) 2016
cit0052
Gordon B. (cit0018) 2014
Kelly K. (cit0022) 2016
Madva A. (cit0030) 2016; 3
Soule B. (cit0050) 2013
cit0017
cit0015
Abrams K. (cit0001) 1998; 40
Earp B. D. (cit0007) 2016
cit0016
cit0013
cit0014
cit0058
cit0004a
Duhigg C. (cit0006) 2012
cit0044
Popken B. (cit0047) 2014
cit0043
cit0040
cit0041
Wolf G. (cit0055) 2010
Neff G. (cit0042) 2016
Greengard S. (cit0019) 2015
cit0008
cit0040a
cit0009
cit0020b
cit0020a
Maturo A. (cit0031) 2015; 7
cit0048
cit0005
cit0049
cit0002
cit0046
cit0003
cit0004b
29393792 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):22-24
29393783 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):29-30
29393795 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):31-33
29393785 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):27-28
29393782 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):33-35
29393803 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):35-37
29393791 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):1-2
29393793 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):37-38
29393786 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):20-22
29393787 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):39-40
29393788 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):24-26
References_xml – ident: cit0020a
  doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.01.001
– ident: cit0041
  doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.011
– ident: cit0044
  doi: 10.1017/S0963180114000644
– ident: cit0049
  doi: 10.1002/9781118290620.ch5
– volume: 40
  start-page: 805
  year: 1998
  ident: cit0001
  publication-title: William and Mary Law Review
– ident: cit0020
  doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839771
– ident: cit0008
  doi: 10.1007/s13347-012-0081-8
– ident: cit0010
  doi: 10.1080/21507740.2013.863242
– volume-title: Robot sex: Social and ethical implications
  year: 2017
  ident: cit0004
  doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262036689.001.0001
– volume-title: Technics and civilization
  year: 2010
  ident: cit0039
– ident: cit0037
  doi: 10.4324/9781315561523
– volume: 51
  start-page: 679
  year: 2014
  ident: cit0025
  publication-title: Idaho Law Review
– ident: cit0028
  doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.920528
– ident: cit0034
  doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
– year: 2010
  ident: cit0055
  publication-title: New York Times Magazine, May 2. Available at:
– ident: cit0024
  doi: 10.1215/00318108-112-2-135
– ident: cit0046
  doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732600.001.0001
– ident: cit0035
  doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
– volume: 8
  start-page: 248
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: cit0032
  publication-title: Italian Journal of Sociology of Education
– ident: cit0002
  doi: 10.1086/680907
– ident: cit0058
  doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283642e10
– ident: cit0100
  doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.x
– volume-title: The power of habit
  year: 2012
  ident: cit0006
– ident: cit0009
  doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00012
– ident: cit0011
  doi: 10.1017/S0963180114000206
– ident: cit0052
  doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5227
– ident: cit0013
  doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.02.001
– ident: cit0020b
  doi: 10.1080/21507740.2012.694391
– volume: 7
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: cit0031
  publication-title: EA Journal
– ident: cit0048
  doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102390
– ident: cit0051
– volume-title: The quantified self
  year: 2016
  ident: cit0029
– ident: cit0040a
  doi: 10.4324/9781315877723
– ident: cit0022a
– ident: cit0016
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.472
– ident: cit0017
  doi: 10.2196/jmir.6171
– ident: cit0014
  doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839752
– ident: cit0053
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.843
– ident: cit0026
  doi: 10.1007/s10676-016-9396-y
– volume: 3
  start-page: 701
  issue: 27
  year: 2016
  ident: cit0030
  publication-title: Ergo
– volume-title: Social science and social pathology
  year: 1959
  ident: cit0057
– year: 2013
  ident: cit0050
  publication-title: Messy Matters Blog
– ident: cit0056
  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7667
– volume-title: The Internet of things
  year: 2015
  ident: cit0019
  doi: 10.7551/mitpress/10277.001.0001
– ident: cit0004a
  doi: 10.1177/0265407585024002
– year: 2014
  ident: cit0018
  publication-title: The Telegraph
– ident: cit0003
  doi: 10.1177/0146167293196003
– volume-title: Robot sex: Social and ethical implications
  year: 2017
  ident: cit0045
– ident: cit0021
  doi: 10.1007/s12152-016-9254-y
– ident: cit0023
  doi: 10.1002/9781118510384.ch14
– ident: cit0043
  doi: 10.1111/japp.12085
– ident: cit0036
  doi: 10.1177/1461444815604328
– ident: cit0005
  doi: 10.5206/fpq/2016.1.2
– year: 2016
  ident: cit0007
  publication-title: Quillette Magazine
– ident: cit0038
  doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.034
– ident: cit0015
  doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0042
– ident: cit0004b
– volume-title: Self-tracking
  year: 2016
  ident: cit0042
  doi: 10.7551/mitpress/10421.001.0001
– ident: cit0040
  doi: 10.1111/japp.12141
– year: 2014
  ident: cit0047
  publication-title: NBC News
– volume-title: The inevitable: Understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape your future
  year: 2016
  ident: cit0022
– ident: cit0033
  doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102596
– ident: cit0012
  doi: 10.1017/S0963180116000542
– reference: 29393782 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):33-35
– reference: 29393788 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):24-26
– reference: 29393786 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):20-22
– reference: 29393787 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):39-40
– reference: 29393803 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):35-37
– reference: 29393795 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):31-33
– reference: 29393783 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):29-30
– reference: 29393792 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):22-24
– reference: 29393793 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):37-38
– reference: 29393785 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):27-28
– reference: 29393791 - Am J Bioeth. 2018 Feb;18(2):1-2
SSID ssj0004013
Score 2.3469849
Snippet The growth of self-tracking and personal surveillance has given rise to the Quantified Self movement. Members of this movement seek to enhance their personal...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 3
SubjectTerms data ethics
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
love
Medical Informatics - ethics
Object Attachment
Personal Autonomy
Personal Satisfaction
privacy
quantified relationship
quantified self
Self-Management - ethics
Title The Quantified Relationship
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15265161.2017.1409823
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29393796
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1993990346
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fa9swED62lI2-jC37lXUbGexVni3JkvPYri1l0LKxFPpmZFmCQUlK5wzSv74nS7IdmtH9eDFGRpbRdz5_sr67A_iouJVpxXIitJ0RbnJJKsoNqThVVtY5s-2O7umZODnnXy7yi75wYhtd0lSJvtkaV_IvqGIb4uqiZP8C2e6m2IDniC8eEWE8_jHG31aq1fuYuhe2BWFyl1027soM0kRUP5ZmQ-qO8KuA31Cee7aOv02__-qjxo7U9ZW3DOcfDpPhv4OsiHLjgPb8ThmPoSekguSZz5SemOgdBXEkY7v77Fax3heywUfVu8U77trrG91QbiQntJOJy8BVUNZ_nzrVYLjyEHYorgnoCHb2Dw4Pjvsw2LStht09eQzYKtJPW4fYoCIbiWp_v9xoacf8KTwJ64Xpvgf_GTwwizE88hVE12N4fBq0EWPY_RqrUqyfwx6axrQ3jenQNF7A-fHR_PMJCXUwiEaK0RChci21EbrWSnFhjdFUm4Lp3FCB71KNJJVJJGY6tdqmWlpsZqnNaFrLLDfsJYwWy4V5DVOk27owM5UWpuA1rlZZxpXNDDLBykqqJ8DjlJQ6JIl3tUouyyzkko0zWbqZLMNMTiDpul35LCn3dZgN57tsWku03ghLdk_fDxGcEn2h2-BSC7Nc_SydGBXZFeNiAq88at3jIK1FJj4Tb_5j5D3Y7d-itzBqrlfmHXLSpnofbPEWNHZ_Jg
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Quantified+Relationship&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+bioethics&rft.au=Danaher%2C+John&rft.au=Nyholm%2C+Sven&rft.au=Earp%2C+Brian+D.&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis&rft.issn=1526-5161&rft.eissn=1536-0075&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=19&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F15265161.2017.1409823&rft.externalDocID=1409823
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1526-5161&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1526-5161&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1526-5161&client=summon