A risk-based approach to cumulative effects assessment for large marine ecosystems to support transboundary marine spatial planning: A case study of the yellow sea

• Published in: Journal of environmental management Vol. 342; p. 118165
• Main Authors: Ma, Chen, Stelzenmüller, Vanessa, Rehren, Jennifer, Yu, Jing, Zhang, Zhiwei, Zheng, Hao, Lin, Lu, Yang, Hee-Cheol, Jin, Yinhuan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 15.09.2023
• Subjects: China and South Korea; DPSI model; Network analysis; Risk identification; Spatially explicit risk analysis; Transboundary cooperation; Transboundary cooperation; China and South Korea; Risk identification; Network analysis; Spatially explicit risk analysis; DPSI model
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118165

Cumulative effects assessment (CEA) should be conducted at ecologically meaningful scales such as large marine ecosystems to halt further ocean degradation caused by anthropogenic pressures and facilitate ecosystem-based management such as transboundary marine spatial planning (MSP). However, few studies exist at large marine ecosystems scale, especially in the West Pacific seas, where countries have different MSP processes yet transboundary cooperation is paramount. Thus, a step-wise CEA would be informative to help bordering countries set a common goal. Building on the risk-based CEA framework, we decomposed CEA into risk identification and spatially-explicit risk analysis and applied it to the Yellow Sea Large Marine Ecosystem (YSLME), aiming to understand the most influential cause-effect pathways and risk distribution pattern. The results showed that (1) seven human activities including port, mariculture, fishing, industry and urban development, shipping, energy, and coastal defence, and three pressures including physical loss of seabed, input of hazardous substances, nitrogen, and phosphorus enrichment were the leading causes of environmental problems in the YSLME; (2) benthic organisms, fishes, algae, tidal flats, seabirds, and marine mammals were the most vulnerable ecosystem components on which cumulative effects acted; (3) areas with relatively high risk mainly concentrated on nearshore zones, especially Shandong, Liaoning, and northern Jiangsu, while coastal bays of South Korea also witnessed high risk; (4) certain risks could be observed in the transboundary area, of which the causes were the pervasive fishing, shipping, and sinking of pollutants in this area due to the cyclonic circulation and fine-grained sediments. In future transboundary cooperation on MSP, risk criteria and evaluation of existing management measures should be incorporated to determine whether the identified risk has exceeded the acceptable level and identify the next step of cooperation. Our study presents an example of CEA at large marine ecosystems scale and provides a reference to other large marine ecosystems in the West Pacific and elsewhere. •Seven human activities and three pressures were the main causes of environmental problems.•Cumulative effects largely affected six most vulnerable ecosystem components.•Relatively higher cumulative effects are concentrated on nearshore areas.•A certain amount of cumulative effects could also be observed in the transboundary area.•Implications for transboundary cooperation on marine spatial planning were proposed.