Peptide-N-glycosidase F or A treatment and procainamide-labeling for identification and quantification of N-glycans in two types of mammalian glycoproteins using UPLC and LC-MS/MS

•Some reported N-glycan structures are inconsistent depending on the type of glycoprotein or the preparation methods.•N-glycans obtained by different preparation methods were compared with two types of mammalian glycoproteins.•N-glycans identified with PF-ProA or PA-ProA using LC-MS include those th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences Vol. 1214; p. 123538
Main Authors Kim, Ahyeon, Kim, Jeongeun, Park, Chi Soo, Jin, Mijung, Kang, Minju, Moon, Chulmin, Kim, Mirae, Kim, Jieun, Yang, Subin, Jang, Leeseul, Jang, Ji Yeon, Kim, Ha Hyung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Some reported N-glycan structures are inconsistent depending on the type of glycoprotein or the preparation methods.•N-glycans obtained by different preparation methods were compared with two types of mammalian glycoproteins.•N-glycans identified with PF-ProA or PA-ProA using LC-MS include those that cannot be identified by the widely used PF-AB.•Relative and absolute quantification of N-glycans was efficiently determined with PF-ProA or PA-ProA using UPLC and LC-MS. N-glycans in glycoproteins can affect physicochemical properties of proteins; however, some reported N-glycan structures are inconsistent depending on the type of glycoprotein or the preparation methods. To obtain consistent results for qualitative and quantitative analyses of N-glycans, N-glycans obtained by different preparation methods were compared for two types of mammalian glycoproteins. N-glycans are released by peptide-N-glycosidase F (PF) or A (PA) from two model mammalian glycoproteins, bovine fetuin (with three glycosylation sites) and human IgG (with a single glycosylation site), and labeled with a fluorescent tag [2-aminobenzamide (AB) or procainamide (ProA)]. The structure and quantity of each N-glycan were determined using UPLC and LC-MS/MS. The 21 N-glycans in fetuin and another 21 N-glycans in IgG by either PF-ProA or PA-ProA were identified using LC-MS/MS. The N-glycans in fetuin (8–13 N-glycans were previously reported) and in IgG (19 N-glycans were previously reported), which could not be identified by using the widely used PF-AB, were all identified by using PF-ProA or PA-ProA. The quantities (%) of the N-glycans (>0.1 %) relative to the total amount of N-glycans (100 %) obtained by AB- and ProA-labeling using LC-MS/MS had a similar tendency. However, the absolute quantities (pmol) of the N-glycans estimated using UPLC and LC-MS/MS were more efficiently determined with ProA-labeling than with AB-labeling. Thus, PF-ProA or PA-ProA allows for more effective identification and quantification of N-glycans than PF-AB in glycoprotein, particularly bovine fetuin. This study is the first comparative analysis for the identification and relative and absolute quantification of N-glycans in glycoproteins with PF-ProA and PA-ProA using UPLC and LC-MS/MS.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1570-0232
1873-376X
DOI:10.1016/j.jchromb.2022.123538