Application of a cloud platform that identifies patient-ventilator asynchrony and enables continuous monitoring of mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit

• Published in: Heliyon Vol. 10; no. 13; p. e33692
• Main Authors: Chen, Xiangyu, Fan, Junping, Zhao, Wenxian, Shi, Ruochun, Guo, Nan, Chang, Zhigang, Song, Maifen, Wang, Xuedong, Chen, Yan, Li, Tong, Li, Guang-gang, Su, Longxiang, Long, Yun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 15.07.2024; Elsevier
• Subjects: Intensive care medicine; Mechanical ventilation; Monitoring platform; Patient-ventilator asynchrony; Respiratory mechanics; Monitoring platform; Intensive care medicine; Respiratory mechanics; Mechanical ventilation; Patient-ventilator asynchrony
• ISSN: 2405-8440; 2405-8440
• DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33692

Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) frequently occurs in mechanically ventilated patients within the ICU and has the potential for harm. Depending solely on the health care team cannot accurately and promptly identify PVA. To address this issue, our team has developed a cloud-based platform for monitoring mechanical ventilation (MV), comprising the PVA-RemoteMonitor system and the 24-h MV analysis report. We conducted a survey to evaluate physicians' satisfaction and acceptance of the platform in 14 ICUs. Data from medical records, clinical information systems, and ventilators were uploaded to the cloud platform and underwent data processing. The data were analyzed to monitor PVA and displayed in the front-end. The 24-h analysis report for MV was generated for clinical reference. Critical care physicians in 14 hospitals' ICUs that involved in the platform participated in a questionnaire survey, among whom 10 physicians were interviewed to investigate physicians’ acceptance and opinions of this system. The PVA-RemoteMonitor system exhibited a high level of specificity in detecting flow insufficiency, premature cycle, delayed cycle, reverse trigger, auto trigger, and overshoot, with sensitivities of 90.31 %, 98.76 %, 99.75 %, 99.97 %, 100 %, and 99.69 %, respectively. The 24-h analysis report supplied essential data about PVA and respiratory mechanics. 86.2 % (75/87) of physicians supported the application of this platform. The PVA-RemoteMonitor system accurately identified PVA, and the MV analysis report provided guidance in controlling PVA. Our platform can effectively assist ICU physicians in the management of ventilated patients.