International Delphi Study to Optimize the Oral Health Section in interRAI

Introduction: The oral health (OH) of care-dependent older people is generally poor. Since caregivers are mainly responsible for older people’s daily care, they can be considered important intermediaries to improve their OH by performing regular OH assessments. The interRAI instruments are introduce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of dental research Vol. 102; no. 8; pp. 901 - 908
Main Authors Schoebrechts, E., de Almeida Mello, J., Vandenbulcke, P., Palmers, E., Declercq, A., Declerck, D., Duyck, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.07.2023
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction: The oral health (OH) of care-dependent older people is generally poor. Since caregivers are mainly responsible for older people’s daily care, they can be considered important intermediaries to improve their OH by performing regular OH assessments. The interRAI instruments are introduced in 37 countries to assess care needs and facilitate care planning across different health care settings. The oral health section (OHS) within the interRAI instrument used in long-term care facilities was optimized for the Belgian context to identify residents who need assistance with daily oral care and/or need to be referred to a dentist. This Delphi study evaluated whether the OHS is also relevant and useful in other countries and modified the OHS accordingly until an international consensus was reached. Participants were experts in OH for older people. During 2 rounds of online questionnaires, experts rated the content, assessment process, triggering of Clinical Assessment Protocols, and accompanying guidelines and instruction videos of the optimized OHS. Based on the experts’ comments and suggestions collected during the first round, the OHS was adjusted and presented to the experts in the second round for re-evaluation. The first and second questionnaires were completed by 48 and 42 oral health experts from 29 and 27 countries where the interRAI instruments are introduced, respectively. Five experts from 5 countries where interRAI is not introduced also participated in both rounds. After the second round, a consensus of over 86% was reached on all criteria. International consensus on the OHS was reached, considering national and cultural differences that may affect OH. The next step in this research is to evaluate the assessment process to identify potential barriers and facilitators to achieving reliable OH assessments internationally. Furthermore, the effect of the OHS at the level of the resident and of the caregivers will be evaluated.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-0345
1544-0591
DOI:10.1177/00220345231156162