A Comparison of Elbow Range of Motion Measurements: Smartphone-Based Digital Photography Versus Goniometric Measurements
Purpose The purpose of this study was to validate elbow flexion and extension measured from smartphone photography obtained by participants and compared them with photographs obtained by surgeons and goniometric measurements. Methods We enrolled 32 participants with a total of 64 elbows, aged 25 to...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 510 - 515.e1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.04.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose The purpose of this study was to validate elbow flexion and extension measured from smartphone photography obtained by participants and compared them with photographs obtained by surgeons and goniometric measurements. Methods We enrolled 32 participants with a total of 64 elbows, aged 25 to 68 years. Participants obtained smartphone photographs of full elbow flexion and extension. Then surgeons obtained the same photographs and goniometric measurement of elbow range of motion (ROM). We measured ROM from the photographs using Adobe Photoshop and calculated average ROM. Comparisons of manual goniometer versus digital measurements, participant versus surgeon photograph measurements, and interobserver measurements were statistically analyzed. Results Average ROM measured by manual goniometer and digital photographs was 0° to 129° (range, 0° to 140°) and 0° to 129° (range, 0° to 145°), respectively. The goniometer versus digital measurements interclass correlation was 0.828 (L) and 0.740 (R). Pearson coefficient was 0.845 (L) and 0.757 (R). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that 30 of 32 digital measurements (L) and 31 of 32 measurements (R) were within the 95% confidence interval. Participant-obtained photographs compared with researcher’s photographs interclass correlation was 0.955 (L) and 0.941 (R), with a Pearson coefficient of 0.962 (L) and 0.957 (R), respectively. Reviewing interobserver reliability, concordance coefficients were 0.793 (L) and 0.767 (R) and Pearson coefficients were 0.811 (L) and 0.780 (R). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that 28 of 32 digital measurements (L) and 26 of 32 measurements (R) were within the 95% confidence interval. Conclusions Measuring elbow ROM using smartphone digital photography is valid and reliable. Participants were able to obtain accurate photographs and the measurements based on these photographs show no statistical difference from those taken by surgeons or goniometric measurement. Clinical relevance This study validates using smartphone photography for measuring elbow ROM by laymen in a remote setting. Type of study/level of evidence Diagnostic II. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The purpose of this study was to validate elbow flexion and extension measured from smartphone photography obtained by participants and compared them with photographs obtained by surgeons and goniometric measurements.
We enrolled 32 participants with a total of 64 elbows, aged 25 to 68 years. Participants obtained smartphone photographs of full elbow flexion and extension. Then surgeons obtained the same photographs and goniometric measurement of elbow range of motion (ROM). We measured ROM from the photographs using Adobe Photoshop and calculated average ROM. Comparisons of manual goniometer versus digital measurements, participant versus surgeon photograph measurements, and interobserver measurements were statistically analyzed.
Average ROM measured by manual goniometer and digital photographs was 0° to 129° (range, 0° to 140°) and 0° to 129° (range, 0° to 145°), respectively. The goniometer versus digital measurements interclass correlation was 0.828 (L) and 0.740 (R). Pearson coefficient was 0.845 (L) and 0.757 (R). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that 30 of 32 digital measurements (L) and 31 of 32 measurements (R) were within the 95% confidence interval. Participant-obtained photographs compared with researcher's photographs interclass correlation was 0.955 (L) and 0.941 (R), with a Pearson coefficient of 0.962 (L) and 0.957 (R), respectively. Reviewing interobserver reliability, concordance coefficients were 0.793 (L) and 0.767 (R) and Pearson coefficients were 0.811 (L) and 0.780 (R). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that 28 of 32 digital measurements (L) and 26 of 32 measurements (R) were within the 95% confidence interval.
Measuring elbow ROM using smartphone digital photography is valid and reliable. Participants were able to obtain accurate photographs and the measurements based on these photographs show no statistical difference from those taken by surgeons or goniometric measurement.
This study validates using smartphone photography for measuring elbow ROM by laymen in a remote setting.
Diagnostic II. Purpose The purpose of this study was to validate elbow flexion and extension measured from smartphone photography obtained by participants and compared them with photographs obtained by surgeons and goniometric measurements. Methods We enrolled 32 participants with a total of 64 elbows, aged 25 to 68 years. Participants obtained smartphone photographs of full elbow flexion and extension. Then surgeons obtained the same photographs and goniometric measurement of elbow range of motion (ROM). We measured ROM from the photographs using Adobe Photoshop and calculated average ROM. Comparisons of manual goniometer versus digital measurements, participant versus surgeon photograph measurements, and interobserver measurements were statistically analyzed. Results Average ROM measured by manual goniometer and digital photographs was 0° to 129° (range, 0° to 140°) and 0° to 129° (range, 0° to 145°), respectively. The goniometer versus digital measurements interclass correlation was 0.828 (L) and 0.740 (R). Pearson coefficient was 0.845 (L) and 0.757 (R). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that 30 of 32 digital measurements (L) and 31 of 32 measurements (R) were within the 95% confidence interval. Participant-obtained photographs compared with researcher’s photographs interclass correlation was 0.955 (L) and 0.941 (R), with a Pearson coefficient of 0.962 (L) and 0.957 (R), respectively. Reviewing interobserver reliability, concordance coefficients were 0.793 (L) and 0.767 (R) and Pearson coefficients were 0.811 (L) and 0.780 (R). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that 28 of 32 digital measurements (L) and 26 of 32 measurements (R) were within the 95% confidence interval. Conclusions Measuring elbow ROM using smartphone digital photography is valid and reliable. Participants were able to obtain accurate photographs and the measurements based on these photographs show no statistical difference from those taken by surgeons or goniometric measurement. Clinical relevance This study validates using smartphone photography for measuring elbow ROM by laymen in a remote setting. Type of study/level of evidence Diagnostic II. PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to validate elbow flexion and extension measured from smartphone photography obtained by participants and compared them with photographs obtained by surgeons and goniometric measurements.METHODSWe enrolled 32 participants with a total of 64 elbows, aged 25 to 68 years. Participants obtained smartphone photographs of full elbow flexion and extension. Then surgeons obtained the same photographs and goniometric measurement of elbow range of motion (ROM). We measured ROM from the photographs using Adobe Photoshop and calculated average ROM. Comparisons of manual goniometer versus digital measurements, participant versus surgeon photograph measurements, and interobserver measurements were statistically analyzed.RESULTSAverage ROM measured by manual goniometer and digital photographs was 0° to 129° (range, 0° to 140°) and 0° to 129° (range, 0° to 145°), respectively. The goniometer versus digital measurements interclass correlation was 0.828 (L) and 0.740 (R). Pearson coefficient was 0.845 (L) and 0.757 (R). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that 30 of 32 digital measurements (L) and 31 of 32 measurements (R) were within the 95% confidence interval. Participant-obtained photographs compared with researcher's photographs interclass correlation was 0.955 (L) and 0.941 (R), with a Pearson coefficient of 0.962 (L) and 0.957 (R), respectively. Reviewing interobserver reliability, concordance coefficients were 0.793 (L) and 0.767 (R) and Pearson coefficients were 0.811 (L) and 0.780 (R). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that 28 of 32 digital measurements (L) and 26 of 32 measurements (R) were within the 95% confidence interval.CONCLUSIONSMeasuring elbow ROM using smartphone digital photography is valid and reliable. Participants were able to obtain accurate photographs and the measurements based on these photographs show no statistical difference from those taken by surgeons or goniometric measurement.CLINICAL RELEVANCEThis study validates using smartphone photography for measuring elbow ROM by laymen in a remote setting.TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCEDiagnostic II. |
Author | Meislin, Megan A., MD Shin, Alexander Y., MD Wagner, Eric R., MD |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Meislin, Megan A., MD – sequence: 2 fullname: Wagner, Eric R., MD – sequence: 3 fullname: Shin, Alexander Y., MD |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880499$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kUFv1DAQhS1URLeFP8AB5cglYRzHcYwQUllKQWoFosDVcpzZXS-JHewE2H-Poy1IcOBkW37vaeZ7Z-TEeYeEPKZQUKD1s32x30VdlOleAC0A6ntkRTmjec3r6oSsgNUs51CyU3IW4x4gKRl_QE7LummgknJFfl5kaz-MOtjoXeY32WXf-h_ZR-22uDxv_GTTxw3qOAcc0E3xeXY76DCNuzRN_kpH7LLXdmsn3Wcfdn7y26DH3SH7giHOMbvyzvoBp2DNXykPyf2N7iM-ujvPyec3l5_Wb_Pr91fv1hfXuakonXIpgTcCoARe0RJg07bQgmk6JmVDUTDNK0CBDeei65q2kaZlLetEyzvNsWLn5Okxdwz-24xxUoONBvteO_RzVFRI0QjJhEjS8ig1wccYcKPGYNOqB0VBLcTVXi3E1UJcAVWJeDI9ucuf2wG7P5bfiJPgxVGAacvvFoOKxqIz2NmAZlKdt__Pf_mP3fTWWaP7r3jAuPdzcImfoiqWCtTt0vlSOa1T28Ak-wUEzali |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2023_01_011 crossref_primary_10_1302_1863_2548_14_200123 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0293178 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsurg_2017_09_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artd_2021_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jos_2017_11_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2021_03_021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhsa_2021_03_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhsa_2019_05_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2021_07_020 crossref_primary_10_15561_20755279_2021_0304 crossref_primary_10_2196_50582 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xrrt_2020_11_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43205_020_00062_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mehy_2020_109741 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_022_05826_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jseint_2022_12_009 crossref_primary_10_1177_1758573219869206 crossref_primary_10_1177_1558944718820955 crossref_primary_10_4103_abr_abr_47_21 crossref_primary_10_7547_16_128 crossref_primary_10_3233_PPR_190142 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2024_085856 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhsa_2023_04_006 crossref_primary_10_1177_1558944717702471 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhsa_2021_06_011 crossref_primary_10_3928_01477447_20180103_02 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhsa_2019_09_007 crossref_primary_10_1177_1758573218774326 crossref_primary_10_1177_1753193417729140 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2023_111062 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12178_021_09723_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2020_08_016 crossref_primary_10_1080_2000656X_2020_1755296 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhsg_2020_05_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhsg_2023_05_006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00590_017_2058_x crossref_primary_10_1097_SAP_0000000000002519 crossref_primary_10_2147_JPR_S336168 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hansur_2020_02_004 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_1042167 crossref_primary_10_1515_abm_2020_0006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jht_2023_05_010 crossref_primary_10_1177_1753193421991062 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhsa_2019_05_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_BPB_0000000000001090 crossref_primary_10_1177_00368504231152740 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpeds_2023_113739 crossref_primary_10_1177_17531934221132690 crossref_primary_10_3390_s22134684 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2017_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jseint_2023_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1142_S2424835523500157 |
Cites_doi | 10.1093/rheumatology/keh367 10.2307/2529310 10.1007/s11999-011-1986-8 10.1093/ptj/67.12.1867 10.1097/00007611-197702000-00013 10.2106/00004623-198567020-00008 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91748-9 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.002 10.2106/00004623-198668050-00005 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)30983-4 10.1016/j.jse.2011.06.018 10.2106/00004623-198062080-00003 10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90003-9 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1143 10.1093/ptj/67.5.668 10.1097/00005131-199209000-00003 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.06.002 10.1093/ptj/58.11.1355 10.2106/00004623-197456020-00004 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | American Society for Surgery of the Hand 2016 American Society for Surgery of the Hand Copyright © 2016 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: American Society for Surgery of the Hand – notice: 2016 American Society for Surgery of the Hand – notice: Copyright © 2016 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1531-6564 |
EndPage | 515.e1 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_jhsa_2016_01_006 26880499 S0363502316001039 1_s2_0_S0363502316001039 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .1- .55 .FO 0R~ 123 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1~5 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5VS 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AALRI AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAXUO ABLJU ABMAC ADBBV ADMUD ADPAM AEVXI AFJKZ AFRHN AFTJW AHHHB AHMBA AITUG AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BELOY CAG COF CS3 EBS EFJIC EJD F5P FDB FGOYB G-2 G-Q GBLVA HEK HMK HMO HZ~ IHE J1W J5H K-O L7B M28 M41 NQ- O9- OF0 OR. PQQKQ R2- RIG ROL RPZ RWL SAE SDG SEL SES SEW SJN SSZ TAE UV1 WUQ X7M XH2 YCJ Z5R ZGI AAIAV AGZHU AHPSJ ALXNB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX ACRPL ADNMO CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9905870020541200fbb0b0c8d39981e73a540e7e8557dd8b89cb3b3d7b5da5e43 |
ISSN | 0363-5023 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 00:53:09 EDT 2024 Fri Dec 06 04:33:28 EST 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:57:32 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:23:26 EST 2024 Tue Oct 15 22:53:01 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | elbow range of motion Digital photography smartphone |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2016 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c411t-9905870020541200fbb0b0c8d39981e73a540e7e8557dd8b89cb3b3d7b5da5e43 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 26880499 |
PQID | 1797879377 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1797879377 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhsa_2016_01_006 pubmed_primary_26880499 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jhsa_2016_01_006 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0363502316001039 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2016 text: 2016-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Hand Surg Am |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Morrey, An, Chao (bib15) 1993 Boone, Azen, Lin, Spence, Baron, Lee (bib6) 1978; 58 Landis, Koch (bib11) 1977; 33 Neviaser, Wickstrom (bib21) 1977; 70 Verhaegen, Ganseman, Arnout, Vandenneucker, Bellemans (bib8) 2010; 76 Riddle, Rothstein, Lamb (bib1) 1987; 67 Bergmo, Kummervold, Gammon, Dahl (bib13) 2005; 74 van de Pol, van Trijffel, Lucas (bib2) 2010; 56 Gajdosik, Bohannon (bib5) 1987; 67 Armstrong, MacDermid, Chinchalkar, Stevens, King (bib7) 1998; 7 Blonna, Zarkadas, Fitzsimmons, O’Driscoll (bib9) 2012; 21 Jadad, Delamothe (bib10) 2004; 328 Inglis, Pellicci (bib17) 1980; 62 Flynn, Matthews, Benoit (bib20) 1974; 56 Carter, Pansy, Wolff (bib4) 2009; 34 Khalfayan, Culp, Alexander (bib19) 1992; 6 Chapleau, Lagace, Canet, Hagemeister, Rouleau (bib23) 2014; 102 Sathyamoorthy, Kemp, Rawal, Rayner, Frostick (bib14) 2004; 43 Jupiter, Neff, Holzach, Allgower (bib22) 1985; 67 Ewald (bib18) 1975; 6 Chapleau, Canet, Petit, Laflamme, Rouleau (bib3) 2011; 469 Broberg, Morrey (bib16) 1986; 68 Bland, Altman (bib12) 1995; 346 Verhaegen (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib8) 2010; 76 Ewald (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib18) 1975; 6 van de Pol (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib2) 2010; 56 Chapleau (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib3) 2011; 469 Morrey (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib15) 1993 Inglis (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib17) 1980; 62 Gajdosik (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib5) 1987; 67 Sathyamoorthy (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib14) 2004; 43 Boone (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib6) 1978; 58 Riddle (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib1) 1987; 67 Jadad (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib10) 2004; 328 Flynn (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib20) 1974; 56 Jupiter (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib22) 1985; 67 Armstrong (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib7) 1998; 7 Neviaser (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib21) 1977; 70 Khalfayan (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib19) 1992; 6 Chapleau (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib23) 2014; 102 Carter (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib4) 2009; 34 Landis (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib11) 1977; 33 Bergmo (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib13) 2005; 74 Broberg (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib16) 1986; 68 Blonna (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib9) 2012; 21 Bland (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib12) 1995; 346 |
References_xml | – volume: 34 start-page: 1422 year: 2009 end-page: 1428 ident: bib4 article-title: Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study publication-title: J Hand Surg Am contributor: fullname: Wolff – volume: 70 start-page: 172 year: 1977 end-page: 173 ident: bib21 article-title: Dislocation of the elbow: a retrospective study of 115 patients publication-title: South Med J contributor: fullname: Wickstrom – volume: 56 start-page: 7 year: 2010 end-page: 17 ident: bib2 article-title: Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological range of motion of upper extremity joints is better if instruments are used: a systematic review publication-title: J Physiother contributor: fullname: Lucas – volume: 76 start-page: 794 year: 2010 end-page: 798 ident: bib8 article-title: Are clinical photographs appropriate to determine the maximal range of motion of the knee? publication-title: Acta Orthop Belgica contributor: fullname: Bellemans – volume: 21 start-page: 29 year: 2012 end-page: 35 ident: bib9 article-title: Validation of a photography-based goniometry method for measuring joint range of motion publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg contributor: fullname: O’Driscoll – volume: 67 start-page: 226 year: 1985 end-page: 239 ident: bib22 article-title: Intercondylar fractures of the humerus: an operative approach publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am contributor: fullname: Allgower – volume: 469 start-page: 3134 year: 2011 end-page: 3140 ident: bib3 article-title: Validity of goniometric elbow measurements: comparative study with a radiographic method publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res contributor: fullname: Rouleau – volume: 56 start-page: 263 year: 1974 end-page: 272 ident: bib20 article-title: Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: sixteen years’ experience with long-term follow-up publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am contributor: fullname: Benoit – volume: 74 start-page: 705 year: 2005 end-page: 710 ident: bib13 article-title: Electronic patient-provider communication: will it offset office visits and telephone consultations in primary care? publication-title: Int J Med Inform contributor: fullname: Dahl – volume: 43 start-page: 1434 year: 2004 end-page: 1440 ident: bib14 article-title: Development and validation of an elbow score publication-title: Rheumatology contributor: fullname: Frostick – start-page: 86 year: 1993 end-page: 89 ident: bib15 article-title: Functional evaluation of the elbow publication-title: The Elbow and Its Disorders contributor: fullname: Chao – volume: 102 start-page: 5125 year: 2014 end-page: 5128 ident: bib23 article-title: Does malpositioning of the arm influence radiographic range of motion measurement? publication-title: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc contributor: fullname: Rouleau – volume: 6 start-page: 685 year: 1975 end-page: 696 ident: bib18 article-title: Total elbow replacement publication-title: Orthop Clin North Am contributor: fullname: Ewald – volume: 68 start-page: 669 year: 1986 end-page: 674 ident: bib16 article-title: Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture publication-title: Bone Joint Surg Am contributor: fullname: Morrey – volume: 62 start-page: 1252 year: 1980 end-page: 1258 ident: bib17 article-title: Total elbow replacement publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am contributor: fullname: Pellicci – volume: 328 start-page: 1143 year: 2004 end-page: 1144 ident: bib10 article-title: What next for electronic communication and health care? publication-title: BMJ contributor: fullname: Delamothe – volume: 67 start-page: 1867 year: 1987 end-page: 1872 ident: bib5 article-title: Clinical measurement of range of motion: review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity publication-title: Phys Ther contributor: fullname: Bohannon – volume: 346 start-page: 1085 year: 1995 end-page: 1087 ident: bib12 article-title: Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading publication-title: Lancet contributor: fullname: Altman – volume: 58 start-page: 1355 year: 1978 end-page: 1360 ident: bib6 article-title: Reliability of goniometric measurements publication-title: Phys Ther contributor: fullname: Lee – volume: 33 start-page: 159 year: 1977 end-page: 174 ident: bib11 article-title: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data publication-title: Biometrics contributor: fullname: Koch – volume: 67 start-page: 668 year: 1987 end-page: 673 ident: bib1 article-title: Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: shoulder measurements publication-title: Phys Ther contributor: fullname: Lamb – volume: 6 start-page: 283 year: 1992 end-page: 289 ident: bib19 article-title: Mason type II radial head fractures: operative versus nonoperative treatment publication-title: J Orthop Trauma contributor: fullname: Alexander – volume: 7 start-page: 573 year: 1998 end-page: 580 ident: bib7 article-title: Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg contributor: fullname: King – volume: 43 start-page: 1434 issue: 11 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib14 article-title: Development and validation of an elbow score publication-title: Rheumatology doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh367 contributor: fullname: Sathyamoorthy – volume: 33 start-page: 159 issue: 1 year: 1977 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib11 article-title: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data publication-title: Biometrics doi: 10.2307/2529310 contributor: fullname: Landis – volume: 469 start-page: 3134 issue: 11 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib3 article-title: Validity of goniometric elbow measurements: comparative study with a radiographic method publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1986-8 contributor: fullname: Chapleau – volume: 67 start-page: 1867 issue: 12 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib5 article-title: Clinical measurement of range of motion: review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.12.1867 contributor: fullname: Gajdosik – volume: 70 start-page: 172 issue: 2 year: 1977 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib21 article-title: Dislocation of the elbow: a retrospective study of 115 patients publication-title: South Med J doi: 10.1097/00007611-197702000-00013 contributor: fullname: Neviaser – volume: 67 start-page: 226 issue: 2 year: 1985 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib22 article-title: Intercondylar fractures of the humerus: an operative approach publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/00004623-198567020-00008 contributor: fullname: Jupiter – volume: 76 start-page: 794 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib8 article-title: Are clinical photographs appropriate to determine the maximal range of motion of the knee? publication-title: Acta Orthop Belgica contributor: fullname: Verhaegen – volume: 346 start-page: 1085 issue: 8982 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib12 article-title: Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91748-9 contributor: fullname: Bland – volume: 74 start-page: 705 issue: 9 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib13 article-title: Electronic patient-provider communication: will it offset office visits and telephone consultations in primary care? publication-title: Int J Med Inform doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.002 contributor: fullname: Bergmo – volume: 102 start-page: 5125 issue: 8 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib23 article-title: Does malpositioning of the arm influence radiographic range of motion measurement? publication-title: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc contributor: fullname: Chapleau – volume: 68 start-page: 669 issue: 5 year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib16 article-title: Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture publication-title: Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/00004623-198668050-00005 contributor: fullname: Broberg – volume: 6 start-page: 685 issue: 3 year: 1975 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib18 article-title: Total elbow replacement publication-title: Orthop Clin North Am doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)30983-4 contributor: fullname: Ewald – start-page: 86 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib15 article-title: Functional evaluation of the elbow contributor: fullname: Morrey – volume: 21 start-page: 29 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib9 article-title: Validation of a photography-based goniometry method for measuring joint range of motion publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.06.018 contributor: fullname: Blonna – volume: 62 start-page: 1252 issue: 8 year: 1980 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib17 article-title: Total elbow replacement publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/00004623-198062080-00003 contributor: fullname: Inglis – volume: 7 start-page: 573 issue: 6 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib7 article-title: Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90003-9 contributor: fullname: Armstrong – volume: 328 start-page: 1143 issue: 7449 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib10 article-title: What next for electronic communication and health care? publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1143 contributor: fullname: Jadad – volume: 67 start-page: 668 issue: 5 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib1 article-title: Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: shoulder measurements publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.5.668 contributor: fullname: Riddle – volume: 6 start-page: 283 issue: 3 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib19 article-title: Mason type II radial head fractures: operative versus nonoperative treatment publication-title: J Orthop Trauma doi: 10.1097/00005131-199209000-00003 contributor: fullname: Khalfayan – volume: 34 start-page: 1422 issue: 8 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib4 article-title: Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study publication-title: J Hand Surg Am doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.06.002 contributor: fullname: Carter – volume: 56 start-page: 7 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib2 article-title: Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological range of motion of upper extremity joints is better if instruments are used: a systematic review publication-title: J Physiother contributor: fullname: van de Pol – volume: 58 start-page: 1355 issue: 11 year: 1978 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib6 article-title: Reliability of goniometric measurements publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.1093/ptj/58.11.1355 contributor: fullname: Boone – volume: 56 start-page: 263 issue: 2 year: 1974 ident: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006_bib20 article-title: Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: sixteen years’ experience with long-term follow-up publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/00004623-197456020-00004 contributor: fullname: Flynn |
SSID | ssj0001635 |
Score | 2.424402 |
Snippet | Purpose The purpose of this study was to validate elbow flexion and extension measured from smartphone photography obtained by participants and compared them... The purpose of this study was to validate elbow flexion and extension measured from smartphone photography obtained by participants and compared them with... PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to validate elbow flexion and extension measured from smartphone photography obtained by participants and compared them... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 510 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Arthrometry, Articular Digital photography Elbow Joint - physiology elbow range of motion Female Humans Male Middle Aged Observer Variation Orthopedics Photography Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Reproducibility of Results Smartphone |
Title | A Comparison of Elbow Range of Motion Measurements: Smartphone-Based Digital Photography Versus Goniometric Measurements |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0363502316001039 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880499 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1797879377 |
Volume | 41 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZK98ILGuJWbjISb1Equ4lz4S2byiYgCNENxpMVJ85KxZqJpALxL_jHHF-Spt2KYC9R6zgnjs9nn2P7XBB6SRgpVQYHV9Asc_0i9F0RR8LNQVh7mSSZ9JQ3cvo-OD7135yxs8Hgd89qadWIcf7rWr-Sm3AVyoCvykv2PzjbEYUC-A38hStwGK7_xOPEDOc2jaAz_SaqH85H5S-gTVt0hh4nXW8Davu32QWQUibp0j0AGVaoQyaVOsT5MK8aG8HaUftoq9o5giFfXaisW_kGnb5Ou_Yu03qt2Yo33tZKf-3OhGQx7u07pPJrbZPFp_Icbid6nko7C-TP2XnrjKOt_bduz-Y2-kHroeN86dewGxk06Nm_tA5cnsuIcT--MrObTYbFeDGvVbgoGuhoq-SaMNrTw7fUrSdj4s4USUWRBjqfRbxZ2SyCeD3hhF-pegvtqdiK_hDtHR28-5R04h0UWNYegKsHrCeWMRrcbt0ubWfXakZrNSf76I5lG04Mtu6igVzeQz8TvMYVrkqscYU1rtRfgyvcx8MrvI0qbFGFe6jCBlW4h6oNKvfR6evpyeGxazN0wFimtHFBlWEw4cOSg_kURmYpBBEkjwpQeyMqQy-DBYEMZcRYWBSRiOJceMIrQsGKjEnfe4CGS2jYI4TjMPNDoY8FS6CdZzmFIpGXBESg8Ccj5LQ9yS9NIBbeWiguuOp3rvqdE8qh30cobDubty7GIBRlbUdvzXfxfYRY96RVQo1yyQGJf33ji5anHGZodeyWLWW1gjeFMUhFWAaEI_TQMLv7gkkA8tOP48c3bu8TdHs9mJ6iYfN9JZ-BntyI5xa5fwDLfbhq |
link.rule.ids | 314,780,784,27924,27925 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Comparison+of+Elbow+Range+of+Motion+Measurements%3A+Smartphone-Based+Digital+Photography+Versus+Goniometric+Measurements&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+hand+surgery+%28American+ed.%29&rft.au=Meislin%2C+Megan+A.%2C+MD&rft.au=Wagner%2C+Eric+R.%2C+MD&rft.au=Shin%2C+Alexander+Y.%2C+MD&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.issn=0363-5023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jhsa.2016.01.006&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S0363502316001039&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S0363502316001039 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0363-5023&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0363-5023&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0363-5023&client=summon |