Appropriate in vivo follow-up assays to an in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test positive investigational drug candidate (active pharmaceutical ingredient), drug-related metabolite, or drug-related impurity

Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommenda...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis Vol. 868-869; p. 503386
Main Authors Robison, Timothy W., Heflich, Robert H., Manjanatha, Mugimane G., Elespuru, Rosalie, Atrakchi, Aisar, Mei, Nan, Ding, Wei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.08.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommendations on the use of the in vivo comet and transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assays to screen for in vivo mutagenicity. Although it is not directly stated in either of these publications, we are concerned that the reports could potentially be used to support assertions that it is equally acceptable to follow up a positive bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) finding for an investigational drug with either the in vivo TGR mutation assay or an in vivo comet assay. For regulatory genotoxicity assessment, the in vivo follow-up for an in vitro bacterial mutation-positive drug, drug-related metabolite, or impurity should be based upon evaluating a similar endpoint (i.e., mutagenicity) as the intent is to determine if the findings of in vitro gene mutation correlate with findings of in vivo gene mutation (i.e., biologically relevant to the in vitro results). Thus, the most scientifically appropriate in vivo assays would be the TGR mutation assay or, in some circumstances, the in vivo Pig-a assay. An in vivo rodent comet assay or combination of the in vivo micronucleus and in vivo rodent comet assays would generally not be an appropriate follow-up test.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1383-5718
1879-3592
1879-3592
DOI:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386