Appropriate in vivo follow-up assays to an in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test positive investigational drug candidate (active pharmaceutical ingredient), drug-related metabolite, or drug-related impurity

Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommenda...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis Vol. 868-869; p. 503386
Main Authors Robison, Timothy W., Heflich, Robert H., Manjanatha, Mugimane G., Elespuru, Rosalie, Atrakchi, Aisar, Mei, Nan, Ding, Wei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.08.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommendations on the use of the in vivo comet and transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assays to screen for in vivo mutagenicity. Although it is not directly stated in either of these publications, we are concerned that the reports could potentially be used to support assertions that it is equally acceptable to follow up a positive bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) finding for an investigational drug with either the in vivo TGR mutation assay or an in vivo comet assay. For regulatory genotoxicity assessment, the in vivo follow-up for an in vitro bacterial mutation-positive drug, drug-related metabolite, or impurity should be based upon evaluating a similar endpoint (i.e., mutagenicity) as the intent is to determine if the findings of in vitro gene mutation correlate with findings of in vivo gene mutation (i.e., biologically relevant to the in vitro results). Thus, the most scientifically appropriate in vivo assays would be the TGR mutation assay or, in some circumstances, the in vivo Pig-a assay. An in vivo rodent comet assay or combination of the in vivo micronucleus and in vivo rodent comet assays would generally not be an appropriate follow-up test.
AbstractList Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommendations on the use of the in vivo comet and transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assays to screen for in vivo mutagenicity. Although it is not directly stated in either of these publications, we are concerned that the reports could potentially be used to support assertions that it is equally acceptable to follow up a positive bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) finding for an investigational drug with either the in vivo TGR mutation assay or an in vivo comet assay. For regulatory genotoxicity assessment, the in vivo follow-up for an in vitro bacterial mutation-positive drug, drug-related metabolite, or impurity should be based upon evaluating a similar endpoint (i.e., mutagenicity) as the intent is to determine if the findings of in vitro gene mutation correlate with findings of in vivo gene mutation (i.e., biologically relevant to the in vitro results). Thus, the most scientifically appropriate in vivo assays would be the TGR mutation assay or, in some circumstances, the in vivo Pig-a assay. An in vivo rodent comet assay or combination of the in vivo micronucleus and in vivo rodent comet assays would generally not be an appropriate follow-up test.
Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21-35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommendations on the use of the in vivo comet and transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assays to screen for in vivo mutagenicity. Although it is not directly stated in either of these publications, we are concerned that the reports could potentially be used to support assertions that it is equally acceptable to follow up a positive bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) finding for an investigational drug with either the in vivo TGR mutation assay or an in vivo comet assay. For regulatory genotoxicity assessment, the in vivo follow-up for an in vitro bacterial mutation-positive drug, drug-related metabolite, or impurity should be based upon evaluating a similar endpoint (i.e., mutagenicity) as the intent is to determine if the findings of in vitro gene mutation correlate with findings of in vivo gene mutation (i.e., biologically relevant to the in vitro results). Thus, the most scientifically appropriate in vivo assays would be the TGR mutation assay or, in some circumstances, the in vivo Pig-a assay. An in vivo rodent comet assay or combination of the in vivo micronucleus and in vivo rodent comet assays would generally not be an appropriate follow-up test.Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21-35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommendations on the use of the in vivo comet and transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assays to screen for in vivo mutagenicity. Although it is not directly stated in either of these publications, we are concerned that the reports could potentially be used to support assertions that it is equally acceptable to follow up a positive bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) finding for an investigational drug with either the in vivo TGR mutation assay or an in vivo comet assay. For regulatory genotoxicity assessment, the in vivo follow-up for an in vitro bacterial mutation-positive drug, drug-related metabolite, or impurity should be based upon evaluating a similar endpoint (i.e., mutagenicity) as the intent is to determine if the findings of in vitro gene mutation correlate with findings of in vivo gene mutation (i.e., biologically relevant to the in vitro results). Thus, the most scientifically appropriate in vivo assays would be the TGR mutation assay or, in some circumstances, the in vivo Pig-a assay. An in vivo rodent comet assay or combination of the in vivo micronucleus and in vivo rodent comet assays would generally not be an appropriate follow-up test.
ArticleNumber 503386
Author Manjanatha, Mugimane G.
Elespuru, Rosalie
Heflich, Robert H.
Atrakchi, Aisar
Robison, Timothy W.
Ding, Wei
Mei, Nan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Timothy W.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0352-0426
  surname: Robison
  fullname: Robison, Timothy W.
  email: timothy.robison@fda.hhs.gov
  organization: Division of Pharmacology-Toxicology for Immunology & Inflammation, Office of Immunology and Inflammation, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20903, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Robert H.
  surname: Heflich
  fullname: Heflich, Robert H.
  organization: Division of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR, 72079, United States
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mugimane G.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6296-6271
  surname: Manjanatha
  fullname: Manjanatha, Mugimane G.
  organization: Division of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR, 72079, United States
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Rosalie
  surname: Elespuru
  fullname: Elespuru, Rosalie
  organization: Division of Biology, Chemistry and Materials Science, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20903, United States
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Aisar
  surname: Atrakchi
  fullname: Atrakchi, Aisar
  organization: Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology for Neuroscience, Office of Neuroscience, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20903, United States
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Nan
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3501-9014
  surname: Mei
  fullname: Mei, Nan
  organization: Division of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR, 72079, United States
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Wei
  surname: Ding
  fullname: Ding, Wei
  organization: Division of Clinical Review, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20903, United States
BookMark eNqFkUtr3DAUhU1JoXn9haLlBOKpHn5CFx1CXxDIplkLjXQ9vYMtuZLsdP5pf07luF20m6wkcc93xD3nIjuzzkKWvWV0yyir3h23gz-Aje7nllPOtiUVoqleZeesqdtclC0_S3fRiLysWfMmuwjhSCmngjbn2a_dOHo3elQRCFoy4-xI5_rePeXTSFQI6hRIdETZdRy9I3ulIySkJx5m8AHIMEUV0Vmy2Q0QbkiEEMnoAkacF985vfHwLEmU8dOBaGUNmuXbTbJbZON35QelYYqokwrtwYPBtNnN7TOSe-iT3pABotq7HiPcEuf_neEwTh7j6Sp73ak-wPWf8zJ7_PTx292X_P7h89e73X2uC8ZiXkJhOGjaltTUQGuh1V4wQysNhut9XbS0qJgWvEqDrhMtr8u2UnWtTMGpKsVltll9U4w_prSmHDBo6HtlwU1B8rKqeFkknyR9v0q1dyF46KTGNbboFfaSUbkUKo_yb6FyKVSuhSa8-g9PtQ3Kn14GP6wgpBxmBC-DTrGmDdGDjtI4fMniN_oByGQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_01480545_2024_2378768
crossref_primary_10_47470_0016_9900_2024_103_9_1056_1061
crossref_primary_10_2174_1574885518666230124123054
crossref_primary_10_3389_ftox_2024_1370045
crossref_primary_10_1080_15569543_2022_2124419
crossref_primary_10_1093_mutage_gead037
crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfae112
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007
10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00236-X
10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00348
10.1186/s41021-016-0044-x
10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.09.006
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021
Published by Elsevier B.V.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021
– notice: Published by Elsevier B.V.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386
DatabaseName CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
Biology
EISSN 1879-3592
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_mrgentox_2021_503386
S1383571821000772
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.~1
0R~
123
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
29M
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATCM
AAXUO
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABFYP
ABGSF
ABLST
ABMAC
ABUDA
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ABZDS
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACPRK
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADUVX
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEHWI
AEKER
AENEX
AFKWA
AFRAH
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGRDE
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHEUO
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AKIFW
ALCLG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLECG
BLXMC
CS3
DOVZS
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KCYFY
KOM
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OGGZJ
OZT
P-8
P-9
PC.
PQQKQ
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SSJ
SSP
SSU
SSZ
T5K
Y6R
~G-
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AGRNS
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
BNPGV
CITATION
SSH
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-5e4d2ec0950d7e073cab31d06ced2cb7490461c326cabff3927596a77ad420a53
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 1383-5718
1879-3592
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 10:38:28 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:04:17 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:49:47 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:43:54 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords HESI
In vivo mutagenesis
Micronucleus assay
IWGT
API
TGR mutation assay
Transgenic rodent mutation assay
Pig-a mutation assay
Comet assay
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c411t-5e4d2ec0950d7e073cab31d06ced2cb7490461c326cabff3927596a77ad420a53
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-0352-0426
0000-0002-3501-9014
0000-0001-6296-6271
PQID 2566254490
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2566254490
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_mrgentox_2021_503386
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mrgentox_2021_503386
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_mrgentox_2021_503386
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate August-September 2021
2021-08-00
20210801
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2021
  text: August-September 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
References Hayashi (bib0030) 2016; 38
Safety Testing of Drug Metabolites (March 5, 2020)
Kirkland, Uno, Luijten, Beevers, van Benthem, Burlinson, Dertinger, Douglas, Hamada, Horibata, Lovell, Manjanatha, Martus, Mei, Morita, Ohyama, Williams (bib0005) 2019; 847
Dearfield, Cimino, McCarroll, Mauer, Valcovic (bib0020) 2002; 521
Guidance on Genotoxicity Testing and Data Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals Intended for Human Use (ICH-S2(R1); June 2012)
Kirkland, Levy, LeBaron, Aardema, Beevers, Bhalli, Douglas, Escobar, Farabaugh, Guerard, Johnson, Kulkarni, Le Curieux, Long, Lott, Lovell, Luijteno, Marchetti, Nicolette, Pfuhlerq, Roberts, Stankowski, Thybaud, Weiner, Williams, Witt, Young (bib0010) 2019; 839
M7(R1) Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk: Guidance for Industry (ICH-M7(R1); March 2018)
M3(R2) Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals (January 2010)
Zeller, Brigo, Brink, Guerard, Lang, Muster, Runge, Sutter, Vock, Wichard, Schadt (bib0015) 2020; 33
Speit, Kojima, Burlinson, Collins, Kasper, Plappert-Helbig, Unog, Vasquez, Beevers, De Boeckj, Escobar, Kitamotol, Pant, Pfuhler, Tanaka, Levy (bib0035) 2015; 783
Lambert, Singer, Boucher, Douglas (bib0025) 2005; 590
.
Kirkland (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0005) 2019; 847
10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0040
Kirkland (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0010) 2019; 839
Dearfield (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0020) 2002; 521
10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0050
Lambert (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0025) 2005; 590
Hayashi (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0030) 2016; 38
Speit (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0035) 2015; 783
Zeller (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0015) 2020; 33
10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0045
10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0055
References_xml – volume: 33
  start-page: 10
  year: 2020
  end-page: 19
  ident: bib0015
  article-title: Genotoxicity assessment of drug metabolites in the context of MIST and beyond
  publication-title: Chem. Res. Toxicol.
– volume: 590
  start-page: 1
  year: 2005
  end-page: 280
  ident: bib0025
  article-title: Detailed review of transgenic rodent mutation assays
  publication-title: Mutat. Res./Fund. Mol. Mech. Mutagen.
– reference: M3(R2) Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals (January 2010),
– volume: 839
  start-page: 21
  year: 2019
  end-page: 35
  ident: bib0010
  article-title: A comparison of transgenic rodent mutation and in vivo comet assay responses for 91 chemicals
  publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen.
– volume: 847
  year: 2019
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: In vivo genotoxicity testing strategies: report from the 7th International workshop on genotoxicity testing (IWGT)
  publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen.
– reference: M7(R1) Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk: Guidance for Industry (ICH-M7(R1); March 2018)
– reference: Safety Testing of Drug Metabolites (March 5, 2020),
– volume: 783
  start-page: 6
  year: 2015
  end-page: 12
  ident: bib0035
  article-title: Critical issues with the in vivo comet assay: a report of the comet assay working group in the 6th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT)
  publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen.
– reference: Guidance on Genotoxicity Testing and Data Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals Intended for Human Use (ICH-S2(R1); June 2012)
– volume: 521
  start-page: 121
  year: 2002
  end-page: 135
  ident: bib0020
  article-title: Genotoxicity risk assessment: a proposed classification strategy
  publication-title: Mutat. Res.
– reference: .
– volume: 38
  start-page: 18
  year: 2016
  end-page: 23
  ident: bib0030
  article-title: The micronucleus test - most widely used in vivo genotoxicity test -
  publication-title: Genes Environ.
– volume: 590
  start-page: 1
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0025
  article-title: Detailed review of transgenic rodent mutation assays
  publication-title: Mutat. Res./Fund. Mol. Mech. Mutagen.
– ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0040
– volume: 839
  start-page: 21
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0010
  article-title: A comparison of transgenic rodent mutation and in vivo comet assay responses for 91 chemicals
  publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen.
  doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007
– volume: 521
  start-page: 121
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0020
  article-title: Genotoxicity risk assessment: a proposed classification strategy
  publication-title: Mutat. Res.
  doi: 10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00236-X
– ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0055
– volume: 847
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0005
  article-title: In vivo genotoxicity testing strategies: report from the 7th International workshop on genotoxicity testing (IWGT)
  publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen.
– ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0045
– volume: 33
  start-page: 10
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0015
  article-title: Genotoxicity assessment of drug metabolites in the context of MIST and beyond
  publication-title: Chem. Res. Toxicol.
  doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00348
– ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0050
– volume: 38
  start-page: 18
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0030
  article-title: The micronucleus test - most widely used in vivo genotoxicity test -
  publication-title: Genes Environ.
  doi: 10.1186/s41021-016-0044-x
– volume: 783
  start-page: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0035
  article-title: Critical issues with the in vivo comet assay: a report of the comet assay working group in the 6th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT)
  publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen.
  doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.09.006
SSID ssj0020308
Score 2.4008052
Snippet Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation...
SourceID proquest
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 503386
SubjectTerms Comet assay
In vivo mutagenesis
Micronucleus assay
Pig-a mutation assay
Transgenic rodent mutation assay
Title Appropriate in vivo follow-up assays to an in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test positive investigational drug candidate (active pharmaceutical ingredient), drug-related metabolite, or drug-related impurity
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2566254490
Volume 868-869
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELaqIiQkhKCAKI9qkDi0Ur2b9-O4qqgWVvQAVPQWObYDqchDWWehF34nP4eZOFm1CKkHTqtd7yRRZjz-bM_3mbE3aSEKz_EVV4kOeZA4OU9U6PDQlXmkROLImAjOH86i5Xnw_iK82GEnExeGyirH3G9z-pCtx1_m49uct2U5_-Ti5CrE1OrREjWCRGKwBzFF-ezXtszDIz2WYdKV-Jz-fY0lfDmriOBomp84T_TcGe3oEaf63wPUX6l6GH9OH7IHI3CEhX22R2xH13vsrj1K8mqP3bfrb2BpRY_Z7wWJhbcYXkZDWcOm3DRQoNObH7xvASGzuFqDaUDUttl0DeRWuhlvQ8JO3VpD1dutejhcVHp9BAhMDdhCrw1ddyvSQYAeVNd_BUlEGVpHgEMxJFNov11fN0crnONToZk5Oh5M-ECo0QoqbTAmiRV9DE13s62s2uGgvSfs_PTt55MlH09x4DJwXcNDHShPS4Ryjoo1ZhQpct9VToQe9mQeBylpvkuEkdhQFIjX4jCNRBwLFXiOCP2nbLduav2MgeML7RU6lVGhAhmlIvJ0LBFx64Bk2IJ9Fk6uy-QocU4nbXzPplq2y2xyeUYuz6zL99l8a9dakY9bLdIpMrIb4ZrhSHSr7esplDLsy7RBI2rd9OsM4WdEknGp8_w_rv-C3aNvtkrxJds1Xa9fIXIy-cHQNQ7YncW71fKMPlcfv6z-AKnSIac
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqIgQSQlBAlOcggdRKzW7izWNz4LACqi19XGil3oJjOyUVeSiPLXvhT_Fn-DnMxMmqRUg9oF5jTRx5xuNvnJlvGHsbJiLh9kRZaqo9y53asTVVnm15jox9Jaa2DKjA-fDIn5-4n0-90zX2a6iFobTK3vcbn9556_7JuF_NcZmm4y8OBlceulZOV9QIEvvMyn29vMC4rX6_9xGV_I7z3U_HH-ZW31rAkq7jNJanXcW1RHxhq0CjmUsRTxxl-zgtl3HghkRELhHb4ECSIIgIvNAXQSCUy21BrSLQ799y0V1Q24TRz1VeCScCmC7Km04s-rxLZcnno4wqKpviBwam3BnRL0Qq4v73ifjX2dAdeLsP2P0eqcLMLMZDtqbzDXbb9K5cbrB75sIPTB3TI_Z7RuzkJdpzoyHNYZEuCkjQyooLqy0BMbpY1tAUIHIz3FQFxIYrGqchJqmq1pC1JjcAtmaZrrcBkXADJrNsQe9dsYJQBAGqas9AUmUOXVzAlui8N5TfLl_Uo9RZpSmzrdne6USsroJHK8h0g5uAyrB3oKiujqVZ2XX2e8xObkS3T9h6XuT6KQN7IjRPdCj9RLnSD4XPdSAR4muXeN_cTeYNqotkz6lOrT2-R0Py3Hk0qDwilUdG5ZtsvJIrDavItRLhYBnRlf0R4dF3reybwZQidB70R0jkumjrCPGuTxx1of3sP97_mt2ZHx8eRAd7R_vP2V0aMSmSL9h6U7X6JcK2Jn7VbRNgX296X_4Brppbmg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appropriate+in+vivo+follow-up+assays+to+an+in+vitro+bacterial+reverse+mutation+%28Ames%29+test+positive+investigational+drug+candidate+%28active+pharmaceutical+ingredient%29%2C+drug-related+metabolite%2C+or+drug-related+impurity&rft.jtitle=Mutation+research.+Genetic+toxicology+and+environmental+mutagenesis&rft.au=Robison%2C+Timothy+W.&rft.au=Heflich%2C+Robert+H.&rft.au=Manjanatha%2C+Mugimane+G.&rft.au=Elespuru%2C+Rosalie&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.issn=1383-5718&rft.volume=868-869&rft.spage=503386&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.mrgentox.2021.503386&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_mrgentox_2021_503386
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1383-5718&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1383-5718&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1383-5718&client=summon