Appropriate in vivo follow-up assays to an in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test positive investigational drug candidate (active pharmaceutical ingredient), drug-related metabolite, or drug-related impurity
Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommenda...
Saved in:
Published in | Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis Vol. 868-869; p. 503386 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.08.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommendations on the use of the in vivo comet and transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assays to screen for in vivo mutagenicity. Although it is not directly stated in either of these publications, we are concerned that the reports could potentially be used to support assertions that it is equally acceptable to follow up a positive bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) finding for an investigational drug with either the in vivo TGR mutation assay or an in vivo comet assay. For regulatory genotoxicity assessment, the in vivo follow-up for an in vitro bacterial mutation-positive drug, drug-related metabolite, or impurity should be based upon evaluating a similar endpoint (i.e., mutagenicity) as the intent is to determine if the findings of in vitro gene mutation correlate with findings of in vivo gene mutation (i.e., biologically relevant to the in vitro results). Thus, the most scientifically appropriate in vivo assays would be the TGR mutation assay or, in some circumstances, the in vivo Pig-a assay. An in vivo rodent comet assay or combination of the in vivo micronucleus and in vivo rodent comet assays would generally not be an appropriate follow-up test. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommendations on the use of the in vivo comet and transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assays to screen for in vivo mutagenicity. Although it is not directly stated in either of these publications, we are concerned that the reports could potentially be used to support assertions that it is equally acceptable to follow up a positive bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) finding for an investigational drug with either the in vivo TGR mutation assay or an in vivo comet assay. For regulatory genotoxicity assessment, the in vivo follow-up for an in vitro bacterial mutation-positive drug, drug-related metabolite, or impurity should be based upon evaluating a similar endpoint (i.e., mutagenicity) as the intent is to determine if the findings of in vitro gene mutation correlate with findings of in vivo gene mutation (i.e., biologically relevant to the in vitro results). Thus, the most scientifically appropriate in vivo assays would be the TGR mutation assay or, in some circumstances, the in vivo Pig-a assay. An in vivo rodent comet assay or combination of the in vivo micronucleus and in vivo rodent comet assays would generally not be an appropriate follow-up test. Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21-35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommendations on the use of the in vivo comet and transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assays to screen for in vivo mutagenicity. Although it is not directly stated in either of these publications, we are concerned that the reports could potentially be used to support assertions that it is equally acceptable to follow up a positive bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) finding for an investigational drug with either the in vivo TGR mutation assay or an in vivo comet assay. For regulatory genotoxicity assessment, the in vivo follow-up for an in vitro bacterial mutation-positive drug, drug-related metabolite, or impurity should be based upon evaluating a similar endpoint (i.e., mutagenicity) as the intent is to determine if the findings of in vitro gene mutation correlate with findings of in vivo gene mutation (i.e., biologically relevant to the in vitro results). Thus, the most scientifically appropriate in vivo assays would be the TGR mutation assay or, in some circumstances, the in vivo Pig-a assay. An in vivo rodent comet assay or combination of the in vivo micronucleus and in vivo rodent comet assays would generally not be an appropriate follow-up test.Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 839 (2019): 21-35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007] made recommendations on the use of the in vivo comet and transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assays to screen for in vivo mutagenicity. Although it is not directly stated in either of these publications, we are concerned that the reports could potentially be used to support assertions that it is equally acceptable to follow up a positive bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) finding for an investigational drug with either the in vivo TGR mutation assay or an in vivo comet assay. For regulatory genotoxicity assessment, the in vivo follow-up for an in vitro bacterial mutation-positive drug, drug-related metabolite, or impurity should be based upon evaluating a similar endpoint (i.e., mutagenicity) as the intent is to determine if the findings of in vitro gene mutation correlate with findings of in vivo gene mutation (i.e., biologically relevant to the in vitro results). Thus, the most scientifically appropriate in vivo assays would be the TGR mutation assay or, in some circumstances, the in vivo Pig-a assay. An in vivo rodent comet assay or combination of the in vivo micronucleus and in vivo rodent comet assays would generally not be an appropriate follow-up test. |
ArticleNumber | 503386 |
Author | Manjanatha, Mugimane G. Elespuru, Rosalie Heflich, Robert H. Atrakchi, Aisar Robison, Timothy W. Ding, Wei Mei, Nan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Timothy W. orcidid: 0000-0003-0352-0426 surname: Robison fullname: Robison, Timothy W. email: timothy.robison@fda.hhs.gov organization: Division of Pharmacology-Toxicology for Immunology & Inflammation, Office of Immunology and Inflammation, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20903, United States – sequence: 2 givenname: Robert H. surname: Heflich fullname: Heflich, Robert H. organization: Division of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR, 72079, United States – sequence: 3 givenname: Mugimane G. orcidid: 0000-0001-6296-6271 surname: Manjanatha fullname: Manjanatha, Mugimane G. organization: Division of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR, 72079, United States – sequence: 4 givenname: Rosalie surname: Elespuru fullname: Elespuru, Rosalie organization: Division of Biology, Chemistry and Materials Science, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20903, United States – sequence: 5 givenname: Aisar surname: Atrakchi fullname: Atrakchi, Aisar organization: Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology for Neuroscience, Office of Neuroscience, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20903, United States – sequence: 6 givenname: Nan orcidid: 0000-0002-3501-9014 surname: Mei fullname: Mei, Nan organization: Division of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR, 72079, United States – sequence: 7 givenname: Wei surname: Ding fullname: Ding, Wei organization: Division of Clinical Review, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20903, United States |
BookMark | eNqFkUtr3DAUhU1JoXn9haLlBOKpHn5CFx1CXxDIplkLjXQ9vYMtuZLsdP5pf07luF20m6wkcc93xD3nIjuzzkKWvWV0yyir3h23gz-Aje7nllPOtiUVoqleZeesqdtclC0_S3fRiLysWfMmuwjhSCmngjbn2a_dOHo3elQRCFoy4-xI5_rePeXTSFQI6hRIdETZdRy9I3ulIySkJx5m8AHIMEUV0Vmy2Q0QbkiEEMnoAkacF985vfHwLEmU8dOBaGUNmuXbTbJbZON35QelYYqokwrtwYPBtNnN7TOSe-iT3pABotq7HiPcEuf_neEwTh7j6Sp73ak-wPWf8zJ7_PTx292X_P7h89e73X2uC8ZiXkJhOGjaltTUQGuh1V4wQysNhut9XbS0qJgWvEqDrhMtr8u2UnWtTMGpKsVltll9U4w_prSmHDBo6HtlwU1B8rKqeFkknyR9v0q1dyF46KTGNbboFfaSUbkUKo_yb6FyKVSuhSa8-g9PtQ3Kn14GP6wgpBxmBC-DTrGmDdGDjtI4fMniN_oByGQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_01480545_2024_2378768 crossref_primary_10_47470_0016_9900_2024_103_9_1056_1061 crossref_primary_10_2174_1574885518666230124123054 crossref_primary_10_3389_ftox_2024_1370045 crossref_primary_10_1080_15569543_2022_2124419 crossref_primary_10_1093_mutage_gead037 crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfae112 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007 10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00236-X 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00348 10.1186/s41021-016-0044-x 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.09.006 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 – notice: Published by Elsevier B.V. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Public Health Biology |
EISSN | 1879-3592 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_mrgentox_2021_503386 S1383571821000772 |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29M 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATCM AAXUO ABFNM ABFRF ABFYP ABGSF ABLST ABMAC ABUDA ABXDB ABYKQ ABZDS ACDAQ ACGFS ACIUM ACPRK ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD ADUVX AEBSH AEFWE AEHWI AEKER AENEX AFKWA AFRAH AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGRDE AGUBO AGYEJ AHEUO AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AKIFW ALCLG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLECG BLXMC CS3 DOVZS DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KCYFY KOM M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OGGZJ OZT P-8 P-9 PC. PQQKQ Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SSJ SSP SSU SSZ T5K Y6R ~G- AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU BNPGV CITATION SSH 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-5e4d2ec0950d7e073cab31d06ced2cb7490461c326cabff3927596a77ad420a53 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 1383-5718 1879-3592 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 10:38:28 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:17 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:49:47 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:43:54 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | HESI In vivo mutagenesis Micronucleus assay IWGT API TGR mutation assay Transgenic rodent mutation assay Pig-a mutation assay Comet assay |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c411t-5e4d2ec0950d7e073cab31d06ced2cb7490461c326cabff3927596a77ad420a53 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-0352-0426 0000-0002-3501-9014 0000-0001-6296-6271 |
PQID | 2566254490 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2566254490 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_mrgentox_2021_503386 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mrgentox_2021_503386 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_mrgentox_2021_503386 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | August-September 2021 2021-08-00 20210801 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2021 text: August-September 2021 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Elsevier B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V |
References | Hayashi (bib0030) 2016; 38 Safety Testing of Drug Metabolites (March 5, 2020) Kirkland, Uno, Luijten, Beevers, van Benthem, Burlinson, Dertinger, Douglas, Hamada, Horibata, Lovell, Manjanatha, Martus, Mei, Morita, Ohyama, Williams (bib0005) 2019; 847 Dearfield, Cimino, McCarroll, Mauer, Valcovic (bib0020) 2002; 521 Guidance on Genotoxicity Testing and Data Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals Intended for Human Use (ICH-S2(R1); June 2012) Kirkland, Levy, LeBaron, Aardema, Beevers, Bhalli, Douglas, Escobar, Farabaugh, Guerard, Johnson, Kulkarni, Le Curieux, Long, Lott, Lovell, Luijteno, Marchetti, Nicolette, Pfuhlerq, Roberts, Stankowski, Thybaud, Weiner, Williams, Witt, Young (bib0010) 2019; 839 M7(R1) Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk: Guidance for Industry (ICH-M7(R1); March 2018) M3(R2) Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals (January 2010) Zeller, Brigo, Brink, Guerard, Lang, Muster, Runge, Sutter, Vock, Wichard, Schadt (bib0015) 2020; 33 Speit, Kojima, Burlinson, Collins, Kasper, Plappert-Helbig, Unog, Vasquez, Beevers, De Boeckj, Escobar, Kitamotol, Pant, Pfuhler, Tanaka, Levy (bib0035) 2015; 783 Lambert, Singer, Boucher, Douglas (bib0025) 2005; 590 . Kirkland (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0005) 2019; 847 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0040 Kirkland (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0010) 2019; 839 Dearfield (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0020) 2002; 521 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0050 Lambert (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0025) 2005; 590 Hayashi (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0030) 2016; 38 Speit (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0035) 2015; 783 Zeller (10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0015) 2020; 33 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0045 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0055 |
References_xml | – volume: 33 start-page: 10 year: 2020 end-page: 19 ident: bib0015 article-title: Genotoxicity assessment of drug metabolites in the context of MIST and beyond publication-title: Chem. Res. Toxicol. – volume: 590 start-page: 1 year: 2005 end-page: 280 ident: bib0025 article-title: Detailed review of transgenic rodent mutation assays publication-title: Mutat. Res./Fund. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. – reference: M3(R2) Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals (January 2010), – volume: 839 start-page: 21 year: 2019 end-page: 35 ident: bib0010 article-title: A comparison of transgenic rodent mutation and in vivo comet assay responses for 91 chemicals publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. – volume: 847 year: 2019 ident: bib0005 article-title: In vivo genotoxicity testing strategies: report from the 7th International workshop on genotoxicity testing (IWGT) publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. – reference: M7(R1) Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk: Guidance for Industry (ICH-M7(R1); March 2018) – reference: Safety Testing of Drug Metabolites (March 5, 2020), – volume: 783 start-page: 6 year: 2015 end-page: 12 ident: bib0035 article-title: Critical issues with the in vivo comet assay: a report of the comet assay working group in the 6th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. – reference: Guidance on Genotoxicity Testing and Data Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals Intended for Human Use (ICH-S2(R1); June 2012) – volume: 521 start-page: 121 year: 2002 end-page: 135 ident: bib0020 article-title: Genotoxicity risk assessment: a proposed classification strategy publication-title: Mutat. Res. – reference: . – volume: 38 start-page: 18 year: 2016 end-page: 23 ident: bib0030 article-title: The micronucleus test - most widely used in vivo genotoxicity test - publication-title: Genes Environ. – volume: 590 start-page: 1 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0025 article-title: Detailed review of transgenic rodent mutation assays publication-title: Mutat. Res./Fund. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. – ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0040 – volume: 839 start-page: 21 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0010 article-title: A comparison of transgenic rodent mutation and in vivo comet assay responses for 91 chemicals publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007 – volume: 521 start-page: 121 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0020 article-title: Genotoxicity risk assessment: a proposed classification strategy publication-title: Mutat. Res. doi: 10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00236-X – ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0055 – volume: 847 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0005 article-title: In vivo genotoxicity testing strategies: report from the 7th International workshop on genotoxicity testing (IWGT) publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. – ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0045 – volume: 33 start-page: 10 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0015 article-title: Genotoxicity assessment of drug metabolites in the context of MIST and beyond publication-title: Chem. Res. Toxicol. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00348 – ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0050 – volume: 38 start-page: 18 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0030 article-title: The micronucleus test - most widely used in vivo genotoxicity test - publication-title: Genes Environ. doi: 10.1186/s41021-016-0044-x – volume: 783 start-page: 6 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386_bib0035 article-title: Critical issues with the in vivo comet assay: a report of the comet assay working group in the 6th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) publication-title: Mutat. Res./Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.09.006 |
SSID | ssj0020308 |
Score | 2.4008052 |
Snippet | Kirkland et al. [Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 847 (2019) 403035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.03.008; Mutation... |
SourceID | proquest crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 503386 |
SubjectTerms | Comet assay In vivo mutagenesis Micronucleus assay Pig-a mutation assay Transgenic rodent mutation assay |
Title | Appropriate in vivo follow-up assays to an in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test positive investigational drug candidate (active pharmaceutical ingredient), drug-related metabolite, or drug-related impurity |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503386 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2566254490 |
Volume | 868-869 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELaqIiQkhKCAKI9qkDi0Ur2b9-O4qqgWVvQAVPQWObYDqchDWWehF34nP4eZOFm1CKkHTqtd7yRRZjz-bM_3mbE3aSEKz_EVV4kOeZA4OU9U6PDQlXmkROLImAjOH86i5Xnw_iK82GEnExeGyirH3G9z-pCtx1_m49uct2U5_-Ti5CrE1OrREjWCRGKwBzFF-ezXtszDIz2WYdKV-Jz-fY0lfDmriOBomp84T_TcGe3oEaf63wPUX6l6GH9OH7IHI3CEhX22R2xH13vsrj1K8mqP3bfrb2BpRY_Z7wWJhbcYXkZDWcOm3DRQoNObH7xvASGzuFqDaUDUttl0DeRWuhlvQ8JO3VpD1dutejhcVHp9BAhMDdhCrw1ddyvSQYAeVNd_BUlEGVpHgEMxJFNov11fN0crnONToZk5Oh5M-ECo0QoqbTAmiRV9DE13s62s2uGgvSfs_PTt55MlH09x4DJwXcNDHShPS4Ryjoo1ZhQpct9VToQe9mQeBylpvkuEkdhQFIjX4jCNRBwLFXiOCP2nbLduav2MgeML7RU6lVGhAhmlIvJ0LBFx64Bk2IJ9Fk6uy-QocU4nbXzPplq2y2xyeUYuz6zL99l8a9dakY9bLdIpMrIb4ZrhSHSr7esplDLsy7RBI2rd9OsM4WdEknGp8_w_rv-C3aNvtkrxJds1Xa9fIXIy-cHQNQ7YncW71fKMPlcfv6z-AKnSIac |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqIgQSQlBAlOcggdRKzW7izWNz4LACqi19XGil3oJjOyUVeSiPLXvhT_Fn-DnMxMmqRUg9oF5jTRx5xuNvnJlvGHsbJiLh9kRZaqo9y53asTVVnm15jox9Jaa2DKjA-fDIn5-4n0-90zX2a6iFobTK3vcbn9556_7JuF_NcZmm4y8OBlceulZOV9QIEvvMyn29vMC4rX6_9xGV_I7z3U_HH-ZW31rAkq7jNJanXcW1RHxhq0CjmUsRTxxl-zgtl3HghkRELhHb4ECSIIgIvNAXQSCUy21BrSLQ799y0V1Q24TRz1VeCScCmC7Km04s-rxLZcnno4wqKpviBwam3BnRL0Qq4v73ifjX2dAdeLsP2P0eqcLMLMZDtqbzDXbb9K5cbrB75sIPTB3TI_Z7RuzkJdpzoyHNYZEuCkjQyooLqy0BMbpY1tAUIHIz3FQFxIYrGqchJqmq1pC1JjcAtmaZrrcBkXADJrNsQe9dsYJQBAGqas9AUmUOXVzAlui8N5TfLl_Uo9RZpSmzrdne6USsroJHK8h0g5uAyrB3oKiujqVZ2XX2e8xObkS3T9h6XuT6KQN7IjRPdCj9RLnSD4XPdSAR4muXeN_cTeYNqotkz6lOrT2-R0Py3Hk0qDwilUdG5ZtsvJIrDavItRLhYBnRlf0R4dF3reybwZQidB70R0jkumjrCPGuTxx1of3sP97_mt2ZHx8eRAd7R_vP2V0aMSmSL9h6U7X6JcK2Jn7VbRNgX296X_4Brppbmg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appropriate+in+vivo+follow-up+assays+to+an+in+vitro+bacterial+reverse+mutation+%28Ames%29+test+positive+investigational+drug+candidate+%28active+pharmaceutical+ingredient%29%2C+drug-related+metabolite%2C+or+drug-related+impurity&rft.jtitle=Mutation+research.+Genetic+toxicology+and+environmental+mutagenesis&rft.au=Robison%2C+Timothy+W.&rft.au=Heflich%2C+Robert+H.&rft.au=Manjanatha%2C+Mugimane+G.&rft.au=Elespuru%2C+Rosalie&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.issn=1383-5718&rft.volume=868-869&rft.spage=503386&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.mrgentox.2021.503386&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_mrgentox_2021_503386 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1383-5718&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1383-5718&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1383-5718&client=summon |