The Efficacy of Faecal Microbiota Transplant and Rectal Bacteriotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
The most effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); however, the optimal route of administration is thus far unknown. This retrospective cohort study of 343 patients sought to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with FMT caps...
Saved in:
Published in | Cells (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 11; no. 20; p. 3272 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
MDPI AG
18.10.2022
MDPI |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The most effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); however, the optimal route of administration is thus far unknown. This retrospective cohort study of 343 patients sought to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with FMT capsules, FMT enema, and rectal bacteriotherapy (RBT) during a five-year period. The primary endpoint was clinical resolution from CDI after eight weeks, and secondary endpoints were time to recurrence and death during the follow-up period. The proportion of patients with clinical resolution was 79.9% in the FMT capsule group, 53.3% in the FMT enema group, and 61.8% in the RBT group, corresponding to an adjusted odds ratio of 3.79 (CI: 1.82 to 8.26) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 2.92 (CI: 1.49 to 6.03) compared with RBT. The hazards ratio for recurrence within the first 12 months of follow-up was 0.24 (CI: 0.06 to 0.89) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 0.26 (CI: 0.08 to 0.91) compared with RBT. There was no difference in mortality. In conclusion, FMT capsules were more effective than both FMT enema and RBT as treatment of recurrent CDI and reduced the risk of further recurrences. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The most effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); however, the optimal route of administration is thus far unknown. This retrospective cohort study of 343 patients sought to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with FMT capsules, FMT enema, and rectal bacteriotherapy (RBT) during a five-year period. The primary endpoint was clinical resolution from CDI after eight weeks, and secondary endpoints were time to recurrence and death during the follow-up period. The proportion of patients with clinical resolution was 79.9% in the FMT capsule group, 53.3% in the FMT enema group, and 61.8% in the RBT group, corresponding to an adjusted odds ratio of 3.79 (CI: 1.82 to 8.26) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 2.92 (CI: 1.49 to 6.03) compared with RBT. The hazards ratio for recurrence within the first 12 months of follow-up was 0.24 (CI: 0.06 to 0.89) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 0.26 (CI: 0.08 to 0.91) compared with RBT. There was no difference in mortality. In conclusion, FMT capsules were more effective than both FMT enema and RBT as treatment of recurrent CDI and reduced the risk of further recurrences. The most effective treatment for recurrent infection (CDI) is faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); however, the optimal route of administration is thus far unknown. This retrospective cohort study of 343 patients sought to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with FMT capsules, FMT enema, and rectal bacteriotherapy (RBT) during a five-year period. The primary endpoint was clinical resolution from CDI after eight weeks, and secondary endpoints were time to recurrence and death during the follow-up period. The proportion of patients with clinical resolution was 79.9% in the FMT capsule group, 53.3% in the FMT enema group, and 61.8% in the RBT group, corresponding to an adjusted odds ratio of 3.79 (CI: 1.82 to 8.26) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 2.92 (CI: 1.49 to 6.03) compared with RBT. The hazards ratio for recurrence within the first 12 months of follow-up was 0.24 (CI: 0.06 to 0.89) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 0.26 (CI: 0.08 to 0.91) compared with RBT. There was no difference in mortality. In conclusion, FMT capsules were more effective than both FMT enema and RBT as treatment of recurrent CDI and reduced the risk of further recurrences. The most effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); however, the optimal route of administration is thus far unknown. This retrospective cohort study of 343 patients sought to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with FMT capsules, FMT enema, and rectal bacteriotherapy (RBT) during a five-year period. The primary endpoint was clinical resolution from CDI after eight weeks, and secondary endpoints were time to recurrence and death during the follow-up period. The proportion of patients with clinical resolution was 79.9% in the FMT capsule group, 53.3% in the FMT enema group, and 61.8% in the RBT group, corresponding to an adjusted odds ratio of 3.79 (CI: 1.82 to 8.26) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 2.92 (CI: 1.49 to 6.03) compared with RBT. The hazards ratio for recurrence within the first 12 months of follow-up was 0.24 (CI: 0.06 to 0.89) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 0.26 (CI: 0.08 to 0.91) compared with RBT. There was no difference in mortality. In conclusion, FMT capsules were more effective than both FMT enema and RBT as treatment of recurrent CDI and reduced the risk of further recurrences.The most effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); however, the optimal route of administration is thus far unknown. This retrospective cohort study of 343 patients sought to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with FMT capsules, FMT enema, and rectal bacteriotherapy (RBT) during a five-year period. The primary endpoint was clinical resolution from CDI after eight weeks, and secondary endpoints were time to recurrence and death during the follow-up period. The proportion of patients with clinical resolution was 79.9% in the FMT capsule group, 53.3% in the FMT enema group, and 61.8% in the RBT group, corresponding to an adjusted odds ratio of 3.79 (CI: 1.82 to 8.26) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 2.92 (CI: 1.49 to 6.03) compared with RBT. The hazards ratio for recurrence within the first 12 months of follow-up was 0.24 (CI: 0.06 to 0.89) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 0.26 (CI: 0.08 to 0.91) compared with RBT. There was no difference in mortality. In conclusion, FMT capsules were more effective than both FMT enema and RBT as treatment of recurrent CDI and reduced the risk of further recurrences. The most effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); however, the optimal route of administration is thus far unknown. This retrospective cohort study of 343 patients sought to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with FMT capsules, FMT enema, and rectal bacteriotherapy (RBT) during a five-year period. The primary endpoint was clinical resolution from CDI after eight weeks, and secondary endpoints were time to recurrence and death during the follow-up period. The proportion of patients with clinical resolution was 79.9% in the FMT capsule group, 53.3% in the FMT enema group, and 61.8% in the RBT group, corresponding to an adjusted odds ratio of 3.79 (CI: 1.82 to 8.26) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 2.92 (CI: 1.49 to 6.03) compared with RBT. The hazards ratio for recurrence within the first 12 months of follow-up was 0.24 (CI: 0.06 to 0.89) in the FMT capsule group compared with FMT enema, and 0.26 (CI: 0.08 to 0.91) compared with RBT. There was no difference in mortality. In conclusion, FMT capsules were more effective than both FMT enema and RBT as treatment of recurrent CDI and reduced the risk of further recurrences. |
Author | Cold, Frederik Petersen, Andreas Munk Helms, Morten Zangenberg, Mike Ribberholt, Iben Svensson, Camilla Kara Mirsepasi-Lauridsen, Hengameh Chloé |
AuthorAffiliation | 2 Gastro Unit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark 5 Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 4 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark 3 Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen University, 1871 Copenhagen, Denmark 1 Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Gastro Unit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark – name: 3 Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen University, 1871 Copenhagen, Denmark – name: 5 Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark – name: 4 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark – name: 1 Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Camilla Kara surname: Svensson fullname: Svensson, Camilla Kara – sequence: 2 givenname: Frederik orcidid: 0000-0003-2085-8496 surname: Cold fullname: Cold, Frederik – sequence: 3 givenname: Iben orcidid: 0000-0002-2643-6051 surname: Ribberholt fullname: Ribberholt, Iben – sequence: 4 givenname: Mike surname: Zangenberg fullname: Zangenberg, Mike – sequence: 5 givenname: Hengameh Chloé surname: Mirsepasi-Lauridsen fullname: Mirsepasi-Lauridsen, Hengameh Chloé – sequence: 6 givenname: Andreas Munk orcidid: 0000-0003-0531-0553 surname: Petersen fullname: Petersen, Andreas Munk – sequence: 7 givenname: Morten orcidid: 0000-0002-1140-0021 surname: Helms fullname: Helms, Morten |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36291139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkktvEzEQgFeoiJbSI1dkiQuXgB9r75oDUolaiFQEgnC2Zr1242hjp7a3KL-HP4qXtKip8MWvbz6PPPO8OvLBm6p6SfBbxiR-p80wJEIoZrShT6oTihs2q2ssjx6sj6uzlNa4jJYIgvmz6pgJKglh8qT6vVwZdGGt06B3KFh0CUbDgL44HUPnQga0jODTdgCfEfgefTc6F-Aj6GxiAVYmwnaHnEffIDvjc0K_XF5N3Bhj2aP5EFKOrnfB9Sah3k3PucGghbdF5oJ_j84Ln2NI2-ng1qB5WIWY0Y889rsX1VMLQzJnd_Np9fPyYjn_PLv6-mkxP7-a6ZqQPKOUk67jUhPBmejauu0kw7xseGegtVpojqUVhuCWY1ZjDaKh1BLbEQ6SsdNqsff2AdZqG90G4k4FcOrvQYjXCmJ2ejBKkwYz6MECaWvRWKlbSoquFR3VROLi-rB3bcduY3pd_iHCcCA9vPFupa7DrZICY1qLInhzJ4jhZjQpq41LU73BmzAmVQouOWWNJAV9_QhdhzH68lUT1da8wWLK6NXDjP6lct8LBWB7oFQ-pWis0i7DVJ6SoBsUwWpqOnXQdCVq9ijqXvx__g_5ztrD |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ebiom_2023_104821 crossref_primary_10_4239_wjd_v15_i9_1874 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2023_331550 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhin_2024_03_001 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11247472 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lfs_2024_122748 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.07.003 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.019 10.14309/01.ajg.0000702860.45717.bd 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92749-9 10.1128/mSystems.00905-20 10.1111/apt.16309 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.038 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5 10.7326/M16-0271 10.1080/19490976.2017.1299310 10.1056/NEJMra1403772 10.1177/2050640618780762 10.1080/00365521.2021.1922749 10.1093/ageing/afaa073 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017 10.1007/s10096-019-03615-x 10.1111/1469-0691.12046 10.1177/17562848211041004 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000958 10.1080/19490976.2022.2084306 10.3389/fpubh.2020.562957 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.011 10.3390/cells11030435 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.06.017 10.1093/cid/ciaa1486 10.1159/000016879 10.1111/apt.14201 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 10.1128/AAC.02112-17 10.1001/jama.2017.17077 10.1371/journal.pone.0205064 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00276-X 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100642 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.06.004 10.1093/cid/ciu135 10.1056/NEJMoa1910437 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2022 by the authors. 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2022 by the authors. 2022 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 8FD 8FE 8FH ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ HCIFZ LK8 M7P P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS RC3 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.3390/cells11203272 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection Biological Science Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Genetics Abstracts Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology |
EISSN | 2073-4409 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_c1703adafa18467f9c821a6786b2c190 PMC9600246 36291139 10_3390_cells11203272 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 8FE 8FH AADQD AAFWJ AAYXX ABDBF ACUHS ADBBV AFKRA AFPKN AFZYC ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BHPHI CCPQU CITATION DIK EBD ESX GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ HYE IAO IHR ITC KQ8 LK8 M48 M7P MODMG M~E OK1 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PROAC RPM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PQGLB 8FD ABUWG AZQEC DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ P64 PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS RC3 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-2251bb59c16536b848b93056535bea8fc6c509f6e10850340ca6722f1fb15a933 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2073-4409 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:14 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:38:52 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 15:16:55 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 11:56:22 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:08:02 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:00:40 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:33 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 20 |
Keywords | faecal microbiota transplantation CDI Clostridioides difficile infection rectal bacteriotherapy FMT RBT |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c411t-2251bb59c16536b848b93056535bea8fc6c509f6e10850340ca6722f1fb15a933 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-1140-0021 0000-0002-2643-6051 0000-0003-0531-0553 0000-0003-2085-8496 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3390/cells11203272 |
PMID | 36291139 |
PQID | 2728457060 |
PQPubID | 2032536 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c1703adafa18467f9c821a6786b2c190 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9600246 proquest_miscellaneous_2729523791 proquest_journals_2728457060 pubmed_primary_36291139 crossref_citationtrail_10_3390_cells11203272 crossref_primary_10_3390_cells11203272 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20221018 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-10-18 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2022 text: 20221018 day: 18 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Switzerland |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Switzerland – name: Basel |
PublicationTitle | Cells (Basel, Switzerland) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cells |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | MDPI AG MDPI |
Publisher_xml | – name: MDPI AG – name: MDPI |
References | Haifer (ref_39) 2021; 6 Rubak (ref_26) 2020; 49 Wei (ref_36) 2022; 14 ref_13 Cammarota (ref_27) 2017; 66 Charlson (ref_23) 1987; 40 ref_31 Kelly (ref_32) 2016; 165 DeFilipp (ref_34) 2019; 381 Reveles (ref_4) 2014; 42 Rode (ref_28) 2019; 38 Staley (ref_37) 2017; 8 Leffler (ref_1) 2015; 372 Quraishi (ref_9) 2017; 46 Baunwall (ref_21) 2021; 56 Kelly (ref_7) 2012; 18 Rode (ref_19) 2021; 53 Zuo (ref_38) 2018; 67 Ianiro (ref_8) 2018; 6 Hansen (ref_29) 2017; 29 Tvede (ref_17) 2015; 21 Tvede (ref_18) 1989; 1 Zellmer (ref_35) 2020; 72 Duburcq (ref_5) 2015; 91 Cold (ref_22) 2022; 69 ref_25 Ajami (ref_30) 2018; 62 ref_20 Hvas (ref_16) 2019; 156 Baunwall (ref_11) 2020; 29–30 Du (ref_33) 2020; 115 McFarland (ref_3) 1998; 16 Braae (ref_6) 2020; 8 Reigadas (ref_10) 2021; 27 Youngster (ref_14) 2014; 58 Cold (ref_15) 2021; 14 Kao (ref_12) 2017; 318 Magee (ref_2) 2015; 43 Charlson (ref_24) 1994; 47 |
References_xml | – volume: 21 start-page: 48 year: 2015 ident: ref_17 article-title: Rectal bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: Results from a case series of 55 patients in Denmark 2000–2012 publication-title: Clin. Microbiol. Infect. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.07.003 – volume: 156 start-page: 1324 year: 2019 ident: ref_16 article-title: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Is Superior to Fidaxomicin for Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.019 – volume: 115 start-page: S68 year: 2020 ident: ref_33 article-title: S0203 Oral Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Capsules Are Effective and Safe for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis publication-title: Am. J. Gastroenterol. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000702860.45717.bd – volume: 1 start-page: 1156 year: 1989 ident: ref_18 article-title: Bacteriotherapy for chronic relapsing clostridium difficile diarrhoea in six patients publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92749-9 – volume: 6 start-page: e00905-20 year: 2021 ident: ref_39 article-title: Long-Term Bacterial and Fungal Dynamics following Oral Lyophilized Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Clostridioides difficile Infection publication-title: mSystems doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00905-20 – volume: 53 start-page: 999 year: 2021 ident: ref_19 article-title: Randomised clinical trial: A 12-strain bacterial mixture versus faecal microbiota transplantation versus vancomycin for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections publication-title: Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. doi: 10.1111/apt.16309 – volume: 67 start-page: 634 year: 2018 ident: ref_38 article-title: Bacteriophage transfer during faecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection is associated with treatment outcome publication-title: Gut – volume: 27 start-page: S1 year: 2021 ident: ref_10 article-title: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults publication-title: Clin. Microbiol. Infect. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.038 – volume: 47 start-page: 1245 year: 1994 ident: ref_24 article-title: Validation of a combined comorbidity index publication-title: J. Clin. Epidemiol. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5 – volume: 165 start-page: 609 year: 2016 ident: ref_32 article-title: Effect of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrence in Multiply Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Trial publication-title: Ann. Intern. Med. doi: 10.7326/M16-0271 – volume: 8 start-page: 276 year: 2017 ident: ref_37 article-title: Community dynamics drive punctuated engraftment of the fecal microbiome following transplantation using freeze-dried, encapsulated fecal microbiota publication-title: Gut Microbes doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1299310 – volume: 372 start-page: 1539 year: 2015 ident: ref_1 article-title: Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1403772 – volume: 6 start-page: 1232 year: 2018 ident: ref_8 article-title: Efficacy of different faecal microbiota transplantation protocols for Clostridium difficile infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. doi: 10.1177/2050640618780762 – volume: 56 start-page: 1056 year: 2021 ident: ref_21 article-title: Danish national guideline for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection and use of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) publication-title: Scand. J. Gastroenterol. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1922749 – volume: 49 start-page: 1093 year: 2020 ident: ref_26 article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation as a home therapy to frail older people publication-title: Age Ageing doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa073 – volume: 66 start-page: 569 year: 2017 ident: ref_27 article-title: European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017 – volume: 38 start-page: 1837 year: 2019 ident: ref_28 article-title: Establishing a donor stool bank for faecal microbiota transplantation: Methods and feasibility publication-title: Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03615-x – volume: 18 start-page: 21 year: 2012 ident: ref_7 article-title: Can we identify patients at high risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection? publication-title: Clin. Microbiol. Infect. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12046 – volume: 14 start-page: 17562848211041004 year: 2021 ident: ref_15 article-title: Systematic review with meta-analysis: Encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation—Evidence for clinical efficacy publication-title: Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. doi: 10.1177/17562848211041004 – volume: 29 start-page: e36 year: 2017 ident: ref_29 article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation: Establishment of a clinical application framework publication-title: Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000958 – volume: 14 start-page: e2084306-13 year: 2022 ident: ref_36 article-title: Gut microbiota differs between treatment outcomes early after fecal microbiota transplantation against recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection publication-title: Gut Microbes doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2084306 – ident: ref_25 – volume: 69 start-page: A09210712 year: 2022 ident: ref_22 article-title: Successful treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection with single-donor faecal microbiota transplantation capsules publication-title: Dan. Med. J. – volume: 8 start-page: 562957 year: 2020 ident: ref_6 article-title: The Economic Burden of Clostridioides difficile in Denmark: A Retrospective Cohort Study publication-title: Front. Public Health doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.562957 – volume: 42 start-page: 1028 year: 2014 ident: ref_4 article-title: The rise in Clostridium difficile infection incidence among hospitalized adults in the United States: 2001–2010 publication-title: Am. J. Infect. Control doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.011 – ident: ref_20 doi: 10.3390/cells11030435 – volume: 91 start-page: 117 year: 2015 ident: ref_5 article-title: Hospital cost of Clostridium difficile infection including the contribution of recurrences in French acute-care hospitals publication-title: J. Hosp. Infect. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.06.017 – volume: 72 start-page: e876 year: 2020 ident: ref_35 article-title: Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli Transmission via Fecal Microbiota Transplant publication-title: Clin. Infect. Dis. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1486 – volume: 16 start-page: 292 year: 1998 ident: ref_3 article-title: Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Treatments for Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea publication-title: Dig. Dis. doi: 10.1159/000016879 – volume: 46 start-page: 479 year: 2017 ident: ref_9 article-title: Systematic review with meta-analysis: The efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. doi: 10.1111/apt.14201 – volume: 40 start-page: 373 year: 1987 ident: ref_23 article-title: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation publication-title: J. Chronic Dis. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 – volume: 62 start-page: e02112-17 year: 2018 ident: ref_30 article-title: Impact of Oral Fidaxomicin Administration on the Intestinal Microbiota and Susceptibility to Clostridium difficile Colonization in Mice publication-title: Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02112-17 – volume: 318 start-page: 1985 year: 2017 ident: ref_12 article-title: Effect of Oral Capsule- vs Colonoscopy-Delivered Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17077 – ident: ref_13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205064 – ident: ref_31 doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00276-X – volume: 29–30 start-page: 100642 year: 2020 ident: ref_11 article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: eClinicalMedicine doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100642 – volume: 43 start-page: 1148 year: 2015 ident: ref_2 article-title: Impact of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea on acute care length of stay, hospital costs, and readmission: A multicenter retrospective study of inpatients, 2009–2011 publication-title: Am. J. Infect. Control doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.06.004 – volume: 58 start-page: 1515 year: 2014 ident: ref_14 article-title: Fecal Microbiota Transplant for Relapsing Clostridium difficile Infection Using a Frozen Inoculum From Unrelated Donors: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Pilot Study publication-title: Clin. Infect. Dis. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu135 – volume: 381 start-page: 2043 year: 2019 ident: ref_34 article-title: Drug-Resistant E. coli Bacteremia Transmitted by Fecal Microbiota Transplant publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910437 |
SSID | ssj0000816105 |
Score | 2.2646894 |
Snippet | The most effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); however, the optimal route of... The most effective treatment for recurrent infection (CDI) is faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); however, the optimal route of administration is thus far... The most effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); however, the optimal route of... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 3272 |
SubjectTerms | Antibiotics CDI Clostridioides difficile Clostridioides difficile infection Clostridium Infections - therapy Cohort analysis Diarrhea Drug dosages Endoscopy faecal microbiota transplantation Fecal Microbiota Transplantation - adverse effects FMT Hospitals Humans Infectious diseases Laboratories Microbiota Patients RBT rectal bacteriotherapy Rectum Recurrent infection Regression analysis Retrospective Studies Transplantation Transplants & implants Treatment Outcome Variance analysis |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Ni9swEBVlodBL6XfdbssUSk81a8mSYvW2GzZsC1t66MLejCRLrCHYZeM95Pf0j3bGckJcWnppIJd4kiiaGc0bZ-YNY-8jmok0mufohSKXuilzi2E3xye-ZYExPVDv8OVXfXElv1yr64NRX1QTluiB08adeI42aRsbLadQGY2vBLd4xGonPEYzOn0x5h0kU-MZXCGSKVQi1Swxrz-h--AbBBdFKRZiFoRGrv4_Aczf6yQPAs_qEXs4IUY4TSt9zO6F7gm7n2ZIbp-yn6hoOCciCOu30EdY2YD7DpdtolgaLCQC8zXuIdiuAUSKiLjhLPE0Tx1YW2g7-JZIVjdAd2dJLpE3wXLd03iPpu3bJmyAhqq0Ho8T-DyVcnWf4BTlh9t-17kJy_4GkT1QneL2GbtanX9fXuTT5IXcS86HHJ2cO6eM51qV2lWycoZyDVUqF2wVvfYINKIO1LtQlLLwqBEhIo-OK2vK8jk76vouvGRg6OFiI5wqpMPkTjWIKXgUleOSVzFjH3eqqP1ES07TMdY1piekuXqmuYx92Iv_SHwcfxM8I73uhYhGe3wBjauejKv-l3Fl7HhnFfXk25saP7ySiliHMvZufxm9kr7fdqG_G2UMpvgLwzP2IhnRfiUIGTDClCZji5l5zZY6v9K1NyPzt6F_UaV-9T9-22v2QFArB1XnVMfsaLi9C28QYA3u7ehLvwBy9SVS priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9swEBdby2AvY9_z1g0Nxp5mGsm2bO1lNCGhG7SUsULfjCRbrSFYXew-5O_pP9o7S_HmsS2Ql_hCFN_X787S7wj5YMFMUilYDF7I41RUSawg7cbwhq_kkNNrPDt8ciqOz9NvF9lFaLh1YVvlLiYOgbpyBnvkhzyHQJoh18uX658xTo3Cp6thhMZ9sg8huIDia3--PD37PnZZcKwEIAhPrplAfX-I_fAOQMYs4TmfJKOBs_9vQPPP_ZK_JaDVY_IoIEd65FX9hNyr26fkgZ8luX1GbkHhdImEEMpsqbN0pWq4__Sk8VRLvaKeyHwN95KqtqKAGAF507nnaw4nsba0aemZJ1vtKHZpUc6TONHF2uGYj6pxTVV3FIerNAbCCv0atnS1n-kRyPcbtzvBSRfuChA-xf2K2-fkfLX8sTiOwwSG2KSM9TE4O9M6k4aJLBG6SAstsebIkkzXqrBGGAAcVtR4hmGWpDOjRM65ZVazTMkkeUH2WtfWrwiV-NK24jqbpRqKvKwCbMEsLzRLWWEj8mmnitIEenKckrEuoUxBzZUTzUXk4yh-7Xk5_iU4R72OQkinPXzgNpdl8M7SMAh8qlJWMcRjVpqCM_grhdDcAGSKyMHOKsrg4135yyIj8n68DN6Jv6_a2t0MMhJK_VyyiLz0RjSuBKADZJpERiSfmNdkqdMrbXM1MIBLfJqaitf_X9Yb8pDjYQ3cf1MckL1-c1O_BQjV63fBT-4AqEUegw priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | The Efficacy of Faecal Microbiota Transplant and Rectal Bacteriotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36291139 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2728457060 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2729523791 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9600246 https://doaj.org/article/c1703adafa18467f9c821a6786b2c190 |
Volume | 11 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1ti9NAEF7kDsEv4rvxzrKC-Mlod7PZ7Aoi19JyCj0OsXDfwu4m6wVK4rU9ML_HP-pMNq1GT7CQL83kpTszO89sZ58h5KUHMxFashi8kMdCFklsIOzGcMAlGcT0EvcOL87k6VJ8ukgvflEK9QO4uTG1w35Sy_Xqzfer9gM4_HvMOCFlf4tL3BvADeOEZzAbH0JQytBHFz3S7yZlBdCmK2jkYNSxgLQmMG7-fYdBhOqI_G9Cn38WUf4Wleb3yN0eTtKToP_75FZZPyC3Q4PJ9iH5AVZAZ8gSYVxLG0_npgSl0EUV-Je2hgZ28xUMMDV1QQFGwkjQSSBx7rdntbSq6XlgYN1QXLpFucDsRKerBnt_FFVTFeWGYseVysFcQz_2dV71O3oC8tt1s9vWSafNJYw4xSLG9hFZzmdfpqdx35YhdoKxbQwzALM21Y7JNJFWCWU1JiJpktrSKO-kAxTiZYkbG8aJGDsjM84985alRifJY3JQN3X5lFCNH-sLbtOxsJD5pQUADua5skww5SPyeqeK3PWc5dg6Y5VD7oKayweai8irvfi3QNbxL8EJ6nUvhBzb3RfN-mveu2zuGMyGpjDeMARpXjvFGfwUJS13gKMicryzinxntzncXIkUKYki8mJ_GlwWn2_qsrnuZDTk_5lmEXkSjGj_JoAnIPwkOiLZwLwGrzo8U1eXHS24xr9YhXz2H889Inc4buPAyhx1TA626-vyOYCrrR2Rw8ns7PzzqFucGHVO9BMkSSaa |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3daxNBEB9KiuiL-O1p1RXUJ49m9z5XEGliQmKbUKSFvl13927tQbirSYrk7_Hdv9GZ7F00or41kJfcHLdhZmd-Mzf7G4BXFs0klDH3cRcKP4zzwFcYdn384i0JxvSCzg5PpvHoNPx0Fp3twI_2LAy1VbY-ce2o89pQjXxfJOhII-J6-XD51aepUfR2tR2h4czisFh9w5Rt8X78EfX7Wojh4KQ_8pupAr4JOV_6aMBc60gaHkdBrNMw1ZJwdBREulCpNbHBIGrjgvryu0HYNSpOhLDcah4pSQVQdPm7YYCpTAd2e4Pp8edNVYfGWCBicWSeQSC7-1R_XyCo6QYiEVvBbz0j4G_A9s_-zN8C3vAO3G6QKjtwpnUXdorqHtxwsytX9-E7GhgbEAGFMitWWzZUBeqbTUpH7bRUzBGnz1B3TFU5Q4SKSJ_1HD90c_JrxcqKHTty1wWjqjDJOdIo1p_VNFYkL-syLxaMhrmUBt0YGzctZNU7doDyy3ndnhhl_foCMwpG_ZGrB3B6Lbp5CJ2qrorHwCR9tM2FjrqhxqQyyhHLcCtSzUOeWg_etqrITEOHTlM5ZhmmRaS5bEtzHrzZiF86HpB_CfZIrxshou9e_1DPv2SNN8gMR0ercmUVJ_xnpUkFx7-SxloYhGge7LVWkTU-ZZH92gEevNxcRm9Az1dVUV-tZWQkgkRyDx45I9qsBKEKRrZAepBsmdfWUrevVOXFmnFc0tvbMH7y_2W9gJujk8lRdjSeHj6FW4IOilDvT7oHneX8qniG8G2pnzd7hsH5dW_Tn0VaWSo |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtNAEB1VqUC8IO4YCiwS8IRV7_q6SAg1aaKG0ihCVOqb2V17qaXILkkqlO_hL_g6ZrJ2IAh4a6S8xGN5o7mdXc-cAXhh0UwimXAfvVD4UVKEvsK06-MXb0kxp5fUO3wySY5Oo_dn8dkO_Oh6YaissouJ60BdNIbOyPdFioE0Jq6XfduWRUwPR-8uvvo0QYretHbjNJyJHJerb7h9W7wdH6KuXwoxGn4aHPnthAHfRJwvfTRmrnUsDU_iMNFZlGlJmDoOY12qzJrEYEK1SUk1-kEYBUYlqRCWW81jJekwFMP_boq7oqAHu_3hZPpxc8JDIy0QvThizzCUwT6dxS8Q4AShSMVWIlzPC_gbyP2zVvO35De6BTdb1MoOnJndhp2yvgPX3BzL1V34jsbGhkRGocyKNZaNVIm6ZyeVo3laKuZI1GeoR6bqgiFaRdTP-o4ruu0CW7GqZlNH9LpgdEJMco5Aig1mDY0YKaqmKsoFo8EulcGQxsZtOVn9hh2g_HLedN2jbNCc4-6CUa3k6h6cXolu7kOvburyITBJH20LoeMg0rjBjAvENdyKTPOIZ9aD150qctNSo9OEjlmOWyTSXL6lOQ9ebcQvHCfIvwT7pNeNEFF5r39o5l_yNjLkhmPQVYWyihMWtNJkguNfyRItDMI1D_Y6q8jb-LLIf3mDB883lzEy0PNVXTaXaxkZizCV3IMHzog2K0HYglkulB6kW-a1tdTtK3V1vmYfl_QmN0oe_X9Zz-A6umf-YTw5fgw3BPWMUBlQtge95fyyfIJIbqmfti7D4PNVe-lPP3JdXw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Efficacy+of+Faecal+Microbiota+Transplant+and+Rectal+Bacteriotherapy+in+Patients+with+Recurrent+Clostridioides+difficile+Infection%3A+A+Retrospective+Cohort+Study&rft.jtitle=Cells+%28Basel%2C+Switzerland%29&rft.au=Svensson%2C+Camilla+Kara&rft.au=Cold%2C+Frederik&rft.au=Ribberholt%2C+Iben&rft.au=Zangenberg%2C+Mike&rft.date=2022-10-18&rft.issn=2073-4409&rft.eissn=2073-4409&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=20&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390%2Fcells11203272&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2073-4409&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2073-4409&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2073-4409&client=summon |