Correlations of patch test reactivity and the repeated open application test (ROAT)/provocative use test (PUT)

The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use test...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood and chemical toxicology Vol. 42; no. 11; pp. 1719 - 1725
Main Authors Villarama, Clarissa D., Maibach, Howard I.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2004
New York, NY Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use tests for particular chemical allergens. Results of patch testing with serial dilutions of colophony, cinnamic aldehyde, and isoeugenol have shown concordance with the outcome of use tests. On the other hand, poor correlations between patch test reactivity and the use test were demonstrated in another study on isoeugenol and on studies on hydroxycitronellal, formaldehyde and chromium. These studies shed light on some factors that may influence the outcome of use tests. Individual factors such as patch test sensitivity, regional variations in reactivity and percutaneous penetration appear to play significant roles. Exposure dose, length of time of exposure, and other factors yet to be determined also affect degree of reactivity. Because patients with low thresholds in serial dilution patch testing are known to react to lower concentrations of products at use testing, results of these studies may be used to help identify subjects with a high risk of developing clinical disease. From the public health standpoint, data obtained may be used as a guide in limiting exposure concentrations in consumer products.
AbstractList The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use tests for particular chemical allergens. Results of patch testing with serial dilutions of colophony, cinnamic aldehyde, and isoeugenol have shown concordance with the outcome of use tests. On the other hand, poor correlations between patch test reactivity and the use test were demonstrated in another study on isoeugenol and on studies on hydroxycitronellal, formaldehyde and chromium. These studies shed light on some factors that may influence the outcome of use tests. Individual factors such as patch test sensitivity, regional variations in reactivity and percutaneous penetration appear to play significant roles. Exposure dose, length of time of exposure, and other factors yet to be determined also affect degree of reactivity. Because patients with low thresholds in serial dilution patch testing are known to react to lower concentrations of products at use testing, results of these studies may be used to help identify subjects with a high risk of developing clinical disease. From the public health standpoint, data obtained may be used as a guide in limiting exposure concentrations in consumer products.The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use tests for particular chemical allergens. Results of patch testing with serial dilutions of colophony, cinnamic aldehyde, and isoeugenol have shown concordance with the outcome of use tests. On the other hand, poor correlations between patch test reactivity and the use test were demonstrated in another study on isoeugenol and on studies on hydroxycitronellal, formaldehyde and chromium. These studies shed light on some factors that may influence the outcome of use tests. Individual factors such as patch test sensitivity, regional variations in reactivity and percutaneous penetration appear to play significant roles. Exposure dose, length of time of exposure, and other factors yet to be determined also affect degree of reactivity. Because patients with low thresholds in serial dilution patch testing are known to react to lower concentrations of products at use testing, results of these studies may be used to help identify subjects with a high risk of developing clinical disease. From the public health standpoint, data obtained may be used as a guide in limiting exposure concentrations in consumer products.
The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use tests for particular chemical allergens. Results of patch testing with serial dilutions of colophony, cinnamic aldehyde, and isoeugenol have shown concordance with the outcome of use tests. On the other hand, poor correlations between patch test reactivity and the use test were demonstrated in another study on isoeugenol and on studies on hydroxycitronellal, formaldehyde and chromium. These studies shed light on some factors that may influence the outcome of use tests. Individual factors such as patch test sensitivity, regional variations in reactivity and percutaneous penetration appear to play significant roles. Exposure dose, length of time of exposure, and other factors yet to be determined also affect degree of reactivity. Because patients with low thresholds in serial dilution patch testing are known to react to lower concentrations of products at use testing, results of these studies may be used to help identify subjects with a high risk of developing clinical disease. From the public health standpoint, data obtained may be used as a guide in limiting exposure concentrations in consumer products.
The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use tests for particular chemical allergens. Results of patch testing with serial dilutions of colophony, cinnamic aldehyde, and isoeugenol have shown concordance with the outcome of use tests. On the other hand, poor correlations between patch test reactivity and the use test were demonstrated in another study on isoeugenol and on studies on hydroxycitronellal, formaldehyde and chromium. These studies shed light on some factors that may influence the outcome of use tests. Individual factors such as patch test sensitivity, regional variations in reactivity and percutaneous penetration appear to play significant roles. Exposure dose, length of time of exposure, and other factors yet to be determined also affect degree of reactivity. Because patients with low thresholds in serial dilution patch testing are known to react to lower concentrations of products at use testing, results of these studies may be used to help identify subjects with a high risk of developing clinical disease. From the public health standpoint, data obtained may be used as a guide in limiting exposure concentrations in consumer products.
Author Maibach, Howard I.
Villarama, Clarissa D.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Clarissa D.
  surname: Villarama
  fullname: Villarama, Clarissa D.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Howard I.
  surname: Maibach
  fullname: Maibach, Howard I.
  email: himjlm@itsa.ucsf.edu
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16103077$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15350669$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkUFr2zAYhsXoWNNuP2CX4cvGerD7ybIkh55KWLdBoWOkZyF_lqiCY3mSEui_n9ykFHboTkKfnkcS73tGTkY_GkI-UqgoUHG5qSymqgZoKuAVwPINWdBWslIwTk_IAmrZlmJJ-Sk5i3EDAJJK8Y6cUs44CLFckHHlQzCDTs6PsfC2mHTChyKZmIpgNCa3d-mx0GNfpAeTR5PRyfSFn8xY6GkaHD65B-Pr77vr9cXlFPzez_O9KXbRHM9-3a8v3pO3Vg_RfDiu5-T-5tt69aO8vfv-c3V9W2JDIZXIms6iwE40vO66honadrZre0RZU2ilRWS1FIzOu05a2fe9XlpbMxQd1-ycfDncm7_yZ5efV1sX0QyDHo3fRSVEyxltl_8FaQscOJvBT0dw121Nr6bgtjo8qucoM_D5COiIerBBj-jiCycoMJAyc_TAYfAxBmNfEFBzrWqjcq1qrlUBV7nW7Mh_HHTpKfcUtBteNa8Opslp750JKqIzI5reBZPZ3rtX7L89rLxp
CODEN FCTOD7
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2015_02_1139
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pop_2016_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0536_2006_00895_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1398_9995_2007_01527_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_15569520802251130
crossref_primary_10_1111_jocd_13502
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40413_016_0098_z
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2133_2007_08162_x
crossref_primary_10_1002_ffj_1923
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0536_2009_01601_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_DER_0000000000000208
crossref_primary_10_1300_J096v12n01_02
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tiv_2013_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1097_DER_0b013e31823d17b8
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1081_1206_10_60305_5
Cites_doi 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.440202.x
10.1006/taap.2000.9095
10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30151-7
10.1111/j.1600-0536.1975.tb05354.x
10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02167.x
10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02244.x
10.1016/S0273-2300(02)00021-1
10.1067/mjd.2003.72
10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01229.x
10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.044004201.x
10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00918.x
10.1080/000155598433476
10.1111/j.1365-2133.1976.tb06125.x
10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.00094.x
10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043001001.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2004
2004 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2004
– notice: 2004 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7U7
C1K
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Toxicology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Toxicology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Toxicology Abstracts
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Economics
Chemistry
Public Health
EISSN 1873-6351
EndPage 1725
ExternalDocumentID 15350669
16103077
10_1016_j_fct_2004_05_009
S0278691504001772
Genre Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.55
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
29H
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AABVA
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALCJ
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATCM
AATLK
AAXUO
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABFYP
ABGRD
ABJNI
ABLST
ABMAC
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ABZDS
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADQTV
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEKER
AENEX
AEQOU
AFKWA
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHEUO
AHHHB
AHPSJ
AI.
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AKIFW
ALCLG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLECG
BLXMC
CBWCG
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HLV
HMT
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
K-O
KCYFY
KOM
LW9
M34
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OGGZJ
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SAB
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SPT
SSA
SSJ
SSP
SSZ
T5K
VH1
WUQ
X7M
ZXP
~G-
~KM
AAHBH
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AGRNS
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
BNPGV
CITATION
SSH
EFKBS
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7U7
C1K
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c34bfc6cb6452bb4362fbfb8dcc721087fcc3276312108b7f7ddda9ff23c6b5a3
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0278-6915
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 05:54:37 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 11:26:52 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:39:47 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:13:47 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:50 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:29:55 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:19:30 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords Repeated open application tests (ROAT)
Serial dilution patch tests
Provocative use test (PUT)
Dilution
Patch
Skin test
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c410t-c34bfc6cb6452bb4362fbfb8dcc721087fcc3276312108b7f7ddda9ff23c6b5a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
PMID 15350669
PQID 18050539
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_66853189
proquest_miscellaneous_18050539
pubmed_primary_15350669
pascalfrancis_primary_16103077
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fct_2004_05_009
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_fct_2004_05_009
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_fct_2004_05_009
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2004-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2004-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2004
  text: 2004-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Oxford
New York, NY
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford
– name: New York, NY
– name: England
PublicationTitle Food and chemical toxicology
PublicationTitleAlternate Food Chem Toxicol
PublicationYear 2004
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier Science
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
– name: Elsevier Science
References Wanscher (BIB17) 1976; 94
Johansen, Andersen, Rastogi, Menne (BIB11) 1996; 34
Svedman, Bruze, Johansen (BIB16) 2003; 48
Ale, Maibach (BIB1) 1995; 43
Farm (BIB6) 1998; 78
Felter, Ryan, Basketter, Gilmour, Gerberick (BIB7) 2003; 37
Marrakchi, Maibach (BIB14) 1994; 12
Andersen, Johansen, Bruze, Frosch, Goosens, Lepoittevin, Rastogi, White, Menne (BIB2) 2001; 170
Fregert (BIB9) 1981
Nakada, Hostynek, Maibach (BIB15) 2000; 43
Wester, Maibach (BIB18) 1999
Johansen, Andersen, Menne (BIB12) 1996; 34
Hannuksela, Salo (BIB10) 1986; 14
Basketter, Horev, Slodovnik, Merimes, Trattner, Ingber (BIB3) 2001; 44
Bruze, Johansen, Andersen, Frosch, Lepoittevin, Rastogi, White, Menne (BIB4) 2003; 48
Flyvholm, Hall, Agner, Tiedmann, Greenhill, Vanderveken, Freeberg, Menne (BIB8) 1997; 36
Zhai, Maibach (BIB19) 2001; 44
Christensen, Moller (BIB5) 1975; 1
Magnusson (BIB13) 1970; 50
Fregert (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB9) 1981
Bruze (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB4) 2003; 48
Marrakchi (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB14) 1994; 12
Magnusson (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB13) 1970; 50
Nakada (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB15) 2000; 43
Wester (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB18) 1999
Felter (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB7) 2003; 37
Zhai (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB19) 2001; 44
Johansen (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB11) 1996; 34
Ale (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB1) 1995; 43
Flyvholm (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB8) 1997; 36
Hannuksela (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB10) 1986; 14
Christensen (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB5) 1975; 1
Svedman (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB16) 2003; 48
Basketter (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB3) 2001; 44
Farm (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB6) 1998; 78
Johansen (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB12) 1996; 34
Wanscher (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB17) 1976; 94
Andersen (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB2) 2001; 170
References_xml – volume: 78
  start-page: 130
  year: 1998
  end-page: 135
  ident: BIB6
  article-title: Repeated open application tests (ROAT) in patients allergic to colophony––evaluated visually and with bioengineering techniques
  publication-title: Acta Derm. Venereol.
– volume: 44
  start-page: 201
  year: 2001
  end-page: 206
  ident: BIB19
  article-title: Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
– volume: 94
  start-page: 451
  year: 1976
  end-page: 455
  ident: BIB17
  article-title: Contact dermatitis from propolis
  publication-title: Br. J. Dermatol.
– volume: 34
  start-page: 165
  year: 1996
  end-page: 171
  ident: BIB11
  article-title: Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methods
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
– volume: 36
  start-page: 26
  year: 1997
  end-page: 33
  ident: BIB8
  article-title: Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients. Relationship to repeated open application test with a product containing a formaldehyde releaser
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
– year: 1981
  ident: BIB9
  article-title: Manual of Contact Dermatitis
– volume: 43
  start-page: 119
  year: 1995
  end-page: 121
  ident: BIB1
  article-title: Clinical relevance in allergic contact dermatitis: an algorithmic approach
  publication-title: Dermatosen
– volume: 170
  start-page: 166
  year: 2001
  end-page: 171
  ident: BIB2
  article-title: The time–dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals
  publication-title: Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1
  year: 2000
  end-page: 3
  ident: BIB15
  article-title: Use tests: ROAT (repeated open application test)/PUT (provocative use test): an overview
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
– start-page: 81
  year: 1999
  end-page: 105
  ident: BIB18
  article-title: Regional variation in percutaneous absorption
  publication-title: Topical Absorption of Dermatological Products
– volume: 48
  start-page: 217
  year: 2003
  end-page: 223
  ident: BIB16
  article-title: Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 10
  ident: BIB7
  article-title: Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis
  publication-title: Regulat. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 477
  year: 1994
  end-page: 484
  ident: BIB14
  article-title: What is occupational contact dermatitis? An operational definition
  publication-title: Dermatol. Clin.
– volume: 14
  start-page: 221
  year: 1986
  end-page: 227
  ident: BIB10
  article-title: The Repeated Open Application Test (ROAT)
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
– volume: 44
  start-page: 70
  year: 2001
  end-page: 74
  ident: BIB3
  article-title: Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
– volume: 34
  start-page: 414
  year: 1996
  end-page: 418
  ident: BIB12
  article-title: Quantitative aspects of isoeugenol contact allergy assessed by use and patch tests
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
– volume: 1
  start-page: 136
  year: 1975
  end-page: 141
  ident: BIB5
  article-title: External and internal exposure to the antigen in the hand eczema of nickel allergy
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
– volume: 48
  start-page: 194
  year: 2003
  end-page: 200
  ident: BIB4
  article-title: Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with cinnamic aldehyde
  publication-title: J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.
– volume: 50
  start-page: 287
  year: 1970
  end-page: 292
  ident: BIB13
  article-title: Terminology of contact dermatitis
  publication-title: Acta Derm. Venereol.
– volume: 44
  start-page: 70
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB3
  article-title: Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.440202.x
– year: 1981
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB9
– volume: 170
  start-page: 166
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB2
  article-title: The time–dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals
  publication-title: Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
  doi: 10.1006/taap.2000.9095
– start-page: 81
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB18
  article-title: Regional variation in percutaneous absorption
– volume: 12
  start-page: 477
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB14
  article-title: What is occupational contact dermatitis? An operational definition
  publication-title: Dermatol. Clin.
  doi: 10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30151-7
– volume: 50
  start-page: 287
  year: 1970
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB13
  article-title: Terminology of contact dermatitis
  publication-title: Acta Derm. Venereol.
– volume: 1
  start-page: 136
  year: 1975
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB5
  article-title: External and internal exposure to the antigen in the hand eczema of nickel allergy
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1975.tb05354.x
– volume: 34
  start-page: 165
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB11
  article-title: Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methods
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02167.x
– volume: 34
  start-page: 414
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB12
  article-title: Quantitative aspects of isoeugenol contact allergy assessed by use and patch tests
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02244.x
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB7
  article-title: Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis
  publication-title: Regulat. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
  doi: 10.1016/S0273-2300(02)00021-1
– volume: 48
  start-page: 194
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB4
  article-title: Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with cinnamic aldehyde
  publication-title: J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.
  doi: 10.1067/mjd.2003.72
– volume: 14
  start-page: 221
  year: 1986
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB10
  article-title: The Repeated Open Application Test (ROAT)
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01229.x
– volume: 44
  start-page: 201
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB19
  article-title: Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.044004201.x
– volume: 36
  start-page: 26
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB8
  article-title: Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients. Relationship to repeated open application test with a product containing a formaldehyde releaser
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00918.x
– volume: 78
  start-page: 130
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB6
  article-title: Repeated open application tests (ROAT) in patients allergic to colophony––evaluated visually and with bioengineering techniques
  publication-title: Acta Derm. Venereol.
  doi: 10.1080/000155598433476
– volume: 94
  start-page: 451
  year: 1976
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB17
  article-title: Contact dermatitis from propolis
  publication-title: Br. J. Dermatol.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1976.tb06125.x
– volume: 48
  start-page: 217
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB16
  article-title: Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.00094.x
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB15
  article-title: Use tests: ROAT (repeated open application test)/PUT (provocative use test): an overview
  publication-title: Contact Dermatitis
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043001001.x
– volume: 43
  start-page: 119
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB1
  article-title: Clinical relevance in allergic contact dermatitis: an algorithmic approach
  publication-title: Dermatosen
SSID ssj0007176
Score 1.861717
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1719
SubjectTerms Acrolein - adverse effects
Acrolein - analogs & derivatives
Biological and medical sciences
Chromium - adverse effects
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis
Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic
Eugenol - adverse effects
Eugenol - analogs & derivatives
Formaldehyde - adverse effects
Humans
Maximum Allowable Concentration
Medical sciences
Patch Tests - methods
Patch Tests - standards
Provocative use test (PUT)
Repeated open application tests (ROAT)
Reproducibility of Results
Resins, Plant - adverse effects
Sensitivity and Specificity
Serial dilution patch tests
Terpenes - adverse effects
Time Factors
Toxicology
Title Correlations of patch test reactivity and the repeated open application test (ROAT)/provocative use test (PUT)
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15350669
https://www.proquest.com/docview/18050539
https://www.proquest.com/docview/66853189
Volume 42
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Rb9MwELam8QDShGCw0QHFD3tgk7ImixPbj1XFVEAbaGulvVk-J9aGUBqt7Su_nTs7oUxie-AlSpxzEvmc82ff-T7GDksNKUitkyrTLhGZhQTwmCgBoApfFdKRR_f8opzOxZfr4nqLTfq9MBRW2dn-aNODte5KRl1rjtrb29EV-cxKjYBGkKmVZIeFkNTLT35twjxwuhL8lSickHTv2QwxXt6FcEoRkndSTOK_x6ad1i6xxXykungYi4Yx6ewFe96BST6O3_uSbdXNLns66Tnc8Lzfd7zcZTtxhY7HjUevWDMhYo4uFI4vPG_RKt9whJ4rjkjSRVoJbpuKI0jEohbNdl1x4tvif_m9Y42Pl9_Gs6OwsW_hQjJxvl7W3b3v89nRazY_-zSbTJOOfSFxIktXicsFeFc6INcngMCRzoMHVTmHs8ZUSe9cformiVKQKZBeVlVltfenuSuhsPke224WTf2GcWGtyByAzyROx-tcFValgq4sCG3rAUv7djeuS01ODBk_TR-D9sOgqogyU5i0MKiqATv-U6WNeTkeExa9Ms29zmVw3His2vCe4jcvKomcTcoB-9D3BIOKJVeLberFemkyRQyBuX5YoiwRKGUKJfZjF9o8vcgLBIL64P---i17FpNR0jLRO7a9ulvX7xE4rWAY_owhezL-_HV68Rt6sxdk
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwELYQPVAJoZa-lrbgQw-lUroJcWL7iFZFCwVatbsSN8vjxCoIZSN298pv74yddIsEHLhEeYwTy2OPP2fG8zH2qdSQgtQ6qTLtEpFZSACPiRIAqvBVIR15dM_Oy_FUnFwUF2ts1O-FobDKzvZHmx6sdXdn2LXmsL28HP4mn1mpEdAIMrUS7fAzgcOXaAy-3q7iPHC9EhyWKJ2QeO_aDEFe3oV4ShGyd1JQ4v2T02Zr59hkPnJdPAxGw6R09IJtdWiSH8YKv2RrdbPNNkY9iRue9xuP59tsM_6i43Hn0SvWjIiZo4uF4zPPWzTLfzhizwVHKOkirwS3TcURJeKtFu12XXEi3OL_Ob5jic-_fhxO9sPOvpkL2cT5cl53z35OJ_uv2fTo22Q0Tjr6hcSJLF0kLhfgXemAfJ8AAqc6Dx5U5RwuG1MlvXP5AdonykGmQHpZVZXV3h_kroTC5m_YejNr6neMC2tF5gB8JnE9XueqsCoVdGVBaFsPWNq3u3FdbnKiyLg2fRDalUFVEWemMGlhUFUD9uVfkTYm5nhMWPTKNHd6l8GJ47Fiu3cUv_pQSexsUg7YXt8TDCqWfC22qWfLuckUUQTm-mGJskSklCmUeBu70OrtRV4gEtQ7T6v1HtsYT85Ozenx-ff37HnMTEn_jD6w9cXNsv6IKGoBu2GU_AWxBRjy
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlations+of+patch+test+reactivity+and+the+repeated+open+application+test+%28ROAT%29%2Fprovocative+use+test+%28PUT%29&rft.jtitle=Food+and+chemical+toxicology&rft.au=Villarama%2C+Clarissa+D.&rft.au=Maibach%2C+Howard+I.&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0278-6915&rft.eissn=1873-6351&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1719&rft.epage=1725&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.fct.2004.05.009&rft.externalDocID=S0278691504001772
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0278-6915&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0278-6915&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0278-6915&client=summon