Correlations of patch test reactivity and the repeated open application test (ROAT)/provocative use test (PUT)
The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use test...
Saved in:
Published in | Food and chemical toxicology Vol. 42; no. 11; pp. 1719 - 1725 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01.11.2004
New York, NY Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use tests for particular chemical allergens.
Results of patch testing with serial dilutions of colophony, cinnamic aldehyde, and isoeugenol have shown concordance with the outcome of use tests. On the other hand, poor correlations between patch test reactivity and the use test were demonstrated in another study on isoeugenol and on studies on hydroxycitronellal, formaldehyde and chromium.
These studies shed light on some factors that may influence the outcome of use tests. Individual factors such as patch test sensitivity, regional variations in reactivity and percutaneous penetration appear to play significant roles. Exposure dose, length of time of exposure, and other factors yet to be determined also affect degree of reactivity.
Because patients with low thresholds in serial dilution patch testing are known to react to lower concentrations of products at use testing, results of these studies may be used to help identify subjects with a high risk of developing clinical disease. From the public health standpoint, data obtained may be used as a guide in limiting exposure concentrations in consumer products. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use tests for particular chemical allergens. Results of patch testing with serial dilutions of colophony, cinnamic aldehyde, and isoeugenol have shown concordance with the outcome of use tests. On the other hand, poor correlations between patch test reactivity and the use test were demonstrated in another study on isoeugenol and on studies on hydroxycitronellal, formaldehyde and chromium. These studies shed light on some factors that may influence the outcome of use tests. Individual factors such as patch test sensitivity, regional variations in reactivity and percutaneous penetration appear to play significant roles. Exposure dose, length of time of exposure, and other factors yet to be determined also affect degree of reactivity. Because patients with low thresholds in serial dilution patch testing are known to react to lower concentrations of products at use testing, results of these studies may be used to help identify subjects with a high risk of developing clinical disease. From the public health standpoint, data obtained may be used as a guide in limiting exposure concentrations in consumer products.The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use tests for particular chemical allergens. Results of patch testing with serial dilutions of colophony, cinnamic aldehyde, and isoeugenol have shown concordance with the outcome of use tests. On the other hand, poor correlations between patch test reactivity and the use test were demonstrated in another study on isoeugenol and on studies on hydroxycitronellal, formaldehyde and chromium. These studies shed light on some factors that may influence the outcome of use tests. Individual factors such as patch test sensitivity, regional variations in reactivity and percutaneous penetration appear to play significant roles. Exposure dose, length of time of exposure, and other factors yet to be determined also affect degree of reactivity. Because patients with low thresholds in serial dilution patch testing are known to react to lower concentrations of products at use testing, results of these studies may be used to help identify subjects with a high risk of developing clinical disease. From the public health standpoint, data obtained may be used as a guide in limiting exposure concentrations in consumer products. The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use tests for particular chemical allergens. Results of patch testing with serial dilutions of colophony, cinnamic aldehyde, and isoeugenol have shown concordance with the outcome of use tests. On the other hand, poor correlations between patch test reactivity and the use test were demonstrated in another study on isoeugenol and on studies on hydroxycitronellal, formaldehyde and chromium. These studies shed light on some factors that may influence the outcome of use tests. Individual factors such as patch test sensitivity, regional variations in reactivity and percutaneous penetration appear to play significant roles. Exposure dose, length of time of exposure, and other factors yet to be determined also affect degree of reactivity. Because patients with low thresholds in serial dilution patch testing are known to react to lower concentrations of products at use testing, results of these studies may be used to help identify subjects with a high risk of developing clinical disease. From the public health standpoint, data obtained may be used as a guide in limiting exposure concentrations in consumer products. The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch test results. We review studies that have defined correlations between the threshold concentrations at patch testing and the outcome of use tests for particular chemical allergens. Results of patch testing with serial dilutions of colophony, cinnamic aldehyde, and isoeugenol have shown concordance with the outcome of use tests. On the other hand, poor correlations between patch test reactivity and the use test were demonstrated in another study on isoeugenol and on studies on hydroxycitronellal, formaldehyde and chromium. These studies shed light on some factors that may influence the outcome of use tests. Individual factors such as patch test sensitivity, regional variations in reactivity and percutaneous penetration appear to play significant roles. Exposure dose, length of time of exposure, and other factors yet to be determined also affect degree of reactivity. Because patients with low thresholds in serial dilution patch testing are known to react to lower concentrations of products at use testing, results of these studies may be used to help identify subjects with a high risk of developing clinical disease. From the public health standpoint, data obtained may be used as a guide in limiting exposure concentrations in consumer products. |
Author | Maibach, Howard I. Villarama, Clarissa D. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Clarissa D. surname: Villarama fullname: Villarama, Clarissa D. – sequence: 2 givenname: Howard I. surname: Maibach fullname: Maibach, Howard I. email: himjlm@itsa.ucsf.edu |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16103077$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15350669$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkUFr2zAYhsXoWNNuP2CX4cvGerD7ybIkh55KWLdBoWOkZyF_lqiCY3mSEui_n9ykFHboTkKfnkcS73tGTkY_GkI-UqgoUHG5qSymqgZoKuAVwPINWdBWslIwTk_IAmrZlmJJ-Sk5i3EDAJJK8Y6cUs44CLFckHHlQzCDTs6PsfC2mHTChyKZmIpgNCa3d-mx0GNfpAeTR5PRyfSFn8xY6GkaHD65B-Pr77vr9cXlFPzez_O9KXbRHM9-3a8v3pO3Vg_RfDiu5-T-5tt69aO8vfv-c3V9W2JDIZXIms6iwE40vO66honadrZre0RZU2ilRWS1FIzOu05a2fe9XlpbMxQd1-ycfDncm7_yZ5efV1sX0QyDHo3fRSVEyxltl_8FaQscOJvBT0dw121Nr6bgtjo8qucoM_D5COiIerBBj-jiCycoMJAyc_TAYfAxBmNfEFBzrWqjcq1qrlUBV7nW7Mh_HHTpKfcUtBteNa8Opslp750JKqIzI5reBZPZ3rtX7L89rLxp |
CODEN | FCTOD7 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2015_02_1139 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pop_2016_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0536_2006_00895_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1398_9995_2007_01527_x crossref_primary_10_1080_15569520802251130 crossref_primary_10_1111_jocd_13502 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40413_016_0098_z crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2133_2007_08162_x crossref_primary_10_1002_ffj_1923 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0536_2009_01601_x crossref_primary_10_1097_DER_0000000000000208 crossref_primary_10_1300_J096v12n01_02 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tiv_2013_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_DER_0b013e31823d17b8 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1081_1206_10_60305_5 |
Cites_doi | 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.440202.x 10.1006/taap.2000.9095 10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30151-7 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1975.tb05354.x 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02167.x 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02244.x 10.1016/S0273-2300(02)00021-1 10.1067/mjd.2003.72 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01229.x 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.044004201.x 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00918.x 10.1080/000155598433476 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1976.tb06125.x 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.00094.x 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043001001.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2004 2004 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2004 – notice: 2004 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7U7 C1K 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Toxicology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Toxicology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Toxicology Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Economics Chemistry Public Health |
EISSN | 1873-6351 |
EndPage | 1725 |
ExternalDocumentID | 15350669 16103077 10_1016_j_fct_2004_05_009 S0278691504001772 |
Genre | Meta-Analysis Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .55 .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29H 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AABVA AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALCJ AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATCM AATLK AAXUO ABFNM ABFRF ABFYP ABGRD ABJNI ABLST ABMAC ABXDB ABYKQ ABZDS ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIUM ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD ADQTV AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AEQOU AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHEUO AHHHB AHPSJ AI. AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AKIFW ALCLG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLECG BLXMC CBWCG CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HLV HMT HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W K-O KCYFY KOM LW9 M34 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OGGZJ OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAB SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPCBC SPT SSA SSJ SSP SSZ T5K VH1 WUQ X7M ZXP ~G- ~KM AAHBH AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP BNPGV CITATION SSH EFKBS IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7U7 C1K 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c34bfc6cb6452bb4362fbfb8dcc721087fcc3276312108b7f7ddda9ff23c6b5a3 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0278-6915 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 05:54:37 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 11:26:52 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:39:47 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:13:47 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:50 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:29:55 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:19:30 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 11 |
Keywords | Repeated open application tests (ROAT) Serial dilution patch tests Provocative use test (PUT) Dilution Patch Skin test |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c410t-c34bfc6cb6452bb4362fbfb8dcc721087fcc3276312108b7f7ddda9ff23c6b5a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
PMID | 15350669 |
PQID | 18050539 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_66853189 proquest_miscellaneous_18050539 pubmed_primary_15350669 pascalfrancis_primary_16103077 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fct_2004_05_009 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_fct_2004_05_009 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_fct_2004_05_009 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2004-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2004-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2004 text: 2004-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford New York, NY |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford – name: New York, NY – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Food and chemical toxicology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Food Chem Toxicol |
PublicationYear | 2004 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Science |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier Science |
References | Wanscher (BIB17) 1976; 94 Johansen, Andersen, Rastogi, Menne (BIB11) 1996; 34 Svedman, Bruze, Johansen (BIB16) 2003; 48 Ale, Maibach (BIB1) 1995; 43 Farm (BIB6) 1998; 78 Felter, Ryan, Basketter, Gilmour, Gerberick (BIB7) 2003; 37 Marrakchi, Maibach (BIB14) 1994; 12 Andersen, Johansen, Bruze, Frosch, Goosens, Lepoittevin, Rastogi, White, Menne (BIB2) 2001; 170 Fregert (BIB9) 1981 Nakada, Hostynek, Maibach (BIB15) 2000; 43 Wester, Maibach (BIB18) 1999 Johansen, Andersen, Menne (BIB12) 1996; 34 Hannuksela, Salo (BIB10) 1986; 14 Basketter, Horev, Slodovnik, Merimes, Trattner, Ingber (BIB3) 2001; 44 Bruze, Johansen, Andersen, Frosch, Lepoittevin, Rastogi, White, Menne (BIB4) 2003; 48 Flyvholm, Hall, Agner, Tiedmann, Greenhill, Vanderveken, Freeberg, Menne (BIB8) 1997; 36 Zhai, Maibach (BIB19) 2001; 44 Christensen, Moller (BIB5) 1975; 1 Magnusson (BIB13) 1970; 50 Fregert (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB9) 1981 Bruze (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB4) 2003; 48 Marrakchi (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB14) 1994; 12 Magnusson (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB13) 1970; 50 Nakada (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB15) 2000; 43 Wester (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB18) 1999 Felter (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB7) 2003; 37 Zhai (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB19) 2001; 44 Johansen (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB11) 1996; 34 Ale (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB1) 1995; 43 Flyvholm (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB8) 1997; 36 Hannuksela (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB10) 1986; 14 Christensen (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB5) 1975; 1 Svedman (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB16) 2003; 48 Basketter (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB3) 2001; 44 Farm (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB6) 1998; 78 Johansen (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB12) 1996; 34 Wanscher (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB17) 1976; 94 Andersen (10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB2) 2001; 170 |
References_xml | – volume: 78 start-page: 130 year: 1998 end-page: 135 ident: BIB6 article-title: Repeated open application tests (ROAT) in patients allergic to colophony––evaluated visually and with bioengineering techniques publication-title: Acta Derm. Venereol. – volume: 44 start-page: 201 year: 2001 end-page: 206 ident: BIB19 article-title: Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview publication-title: Contact Dermatitis – volume: 94 start-page: 451 year: 1976 end-page: 455 ident: BIB17 article-title: Contact dermatitis from propolis publication-title: Br. J. Dermatol. – volume: 34 start-page: 165 year: 1996 end-page: 171 ident: BIB11 article-title: Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methods publication-title: Contact Dermatitis – volume: 36 start-page: 26 year: 1997 end-page: 33 ident: BIB8 article-title: Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients. Relationship to repeated open application test with a product containing a formaldehyde releaser publication-title: Contact Dermatitis – year: 1981 ident: BIB9 article-title: Manual of Contact Dermatitis – volume: 43 start-page: 119 year: 1995 end-page: 121 ident: BIB1 article-title: Clinical relevance in allergic contact dermatitis: an algorithmic approach publication-title: Dermatosen – volume: 170 start-page: 166 year: 2001 end-page: 171 ident: BIB2 article-title: The time–dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals publication-title: Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. – volume: 43 start-page: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 3 ident: BIB15 article-title: Use tests: ROAT (repeated open application test)/PUT (provocative use test): an overview publication-title: Contact Dermatitis – start-page: 81 year: 1999 end-page: 105 ident: BIB18 article-title: Regional variation in percutaneous absorption publication-title: Topical Absorption of Dermatological Products – volume: 48 start-page: 217 year: 2003 end-page: 223 ident: BIB16 article-title: Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal publication-title: Contact Dermatitis – volume: 37 start-page: 1 year: 2003 end-page: 10 ident: BIB7 article-title: Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis publication-title: Regulat. Toxicol. Pharmacol. – volume: 12 start-page: 477 year: 1994 end-page: 484 ident: BIB14 article-title: What is occupational contact dermatitis? An operational definition publication-title: Dermatol. Clin. – volume: 14 start-page: 221 year: 1986 end-page: 227 ident: BIB10 article-title: The Repeated Open Application Test (ROAT) publication-title: Contact Dermatitis – volume: 44 start-page: 70 year: 2001 end-page: 74 ident: BIB3 article-title: Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium publication-title: Contact Dermatitis – volume: 34 start-page: 414 year: 1996 end-page: 418 ident: BIB12 article-title: Quantitative aspects of isoeugenol contact allergy assessed by use and patch tests publication-title: Contact Dermatitis – volume: 1 start-page: 136 year: 1975 end-page: 141 ident: BIB5 article-title: External and internal exposure to the antigen in the hand eczema of nickel allergy publication-title: Contact Dermatitis – volume: 48 start-page: 194 year: 2003 end-page: 200 ident: BIB4 article-title: Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with cinnamic aldehyde publication-title: J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. – volume: 50 start-page: 287 year: 1970 end-page: 292 ident: BIB13 article-title: Terminology of contact dermatitis publication-title: Acta Derm. Venereol. – volume: 44 start-page: 70 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB3 article-title: Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium publication-title: Contact Dermatitis doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.440202.x – year: 1981 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB9 – volume: 170 start-page: 166 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB2 article-title: The time–dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals publication-title: Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. doi: 10.1006/taap.2000.9095 – start-page: 81 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB18 article-title: Regional variation in percutaneous absorption – volume: 12 start-page: 477 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB14 article-title: What is occupational contact dermatitis? An operational definition publication-title: Dermatol. Clin. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30151-7 – volume: 50 start-page: 287 year: 1970 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB13 article-title: Terminology of contact dermatitis publication-title: Acta Derm. Venereol. – volume: 1 start-page: 136 year: 1975 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB5 article-title: External and internal exposure to the antigen in the hand eczema of nickel allergy publication-title: Contact Dermatitis doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1975.tb05354.x – volume: 34 start-page: 165 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB11 article-title: Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methods publication-title: Contact Dermatitis doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02167.x – volume: 34 start-page: 414 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB12 article-title: Quantitative aspects of isoeugenol contact allergy assessed by use and patch tests publication-title: Contact Dermatitis doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02244.x – volume: 37 start-page: 1 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB7 article-title: Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis publication-title: Regulat. Toxicol. Pharmacol. doi: 10.1016/S0273-2300(02)00021-1 – volume: 48 start-page: 194 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB4 article-title: Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with cinnamic aldehyde publication-title: J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2003.72 – volume: 14 start-page: 221 year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB10 article-title: The Repeated Open Application Test (ROAT) publication-title: Contact Dermatitis doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01229.x – volume: 44 start-page: 201 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB19 article-title: Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview publication-title: Contact Dermatitis doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.044004201.x – volume: 36 start-page: 26 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB8 article-title: Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients. Relationship to repeated open application test with a product containing a formaldehyde releaser publication-title: Contact Dermatitis doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00918.x – volume: 78 start-page: 130 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB6 article-title: Repeated open application tests (ROAT) in patients allergic to colophony––evaluated visually and with bioengineering techniques publication-title: Acta Derm. Venereol. doi: 10.1080/000155598433476 – volume: 94 start-page: 451 year: 1976 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB17 article-title: Contact dermatitis from propolis publication-title: Br. J. Dermatol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1976.tb06125.x – volume: 48 start-page: 217 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB16 article-title: Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal publication-title: Contact Dermatitis doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.00094.x – volume: 43 start-page: 1 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB15 article-title: Use tests: ROAT (repeated open application test)/PUT (provocative use test): an overview publication-title: Contact Dermatitis doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043001001.x – volume: 43 start-page: 119 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009_BIB1 article-title: Clinical relevance in allergic contact dermatitis: an algorithmic approach publication-title: Dermatosen |
SSID | ssj0007176 |
Score | 1.861717 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | The clinical relevance of patch test reactions is often difficult to determine. Use tests have been developed to further evaluate the significance of patch... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1719 |
SubjectTerms | Acrolein - adverse effects Acrolein - analogs & derivatives Biological and medical sciences Chromium - adverse effects Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic Eugenol - adverse effects Eugenol - analogs & derivatives Formaldehyde - adverse effects Humans Maximum Allowable Concentration Medical sciences Patch Tests - methods Patch Tests - standards Provocative use test (PUT) Repeated open application tests (ROAT) Reproducibility of Results Resins, Plant - adverse effects Sensitivity and Specificity Serial dilution patch tests Terpenes - adverse effects Time Factors Toxicology |
Title | Correlations of patch test reactivity and the repeated open application test (ROAT)/provocative use test (PUT) |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.009 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15350669 https://www.proquest.com/docview/18050539 https://www.proquest.com/docview/66853189 |
Volume | 42 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Rb9MwELam8QDShGCw0QHFD3tgk7ImixPbj1XFVEAbaGulvVk-J9aGUBqt7Su_nTs7oUxie-AlSpxzEvmc82ff-T7GDksNKUitkyrTLhGZhQTwmCgBoApfFdKRR_f8opzOxZfr4nqLTfq9MBRW2dn-aNODte5KRl1rjtrb29EV-cxKjYBGkKmVZIeFkNTLT35twjxwuhL8lSickHTv2QwxXt6FcEoRkndSTOK_x6ad1i6xxXykungYi4Yx6ewFe96BST6O3_uSbdXNLns66Tnc8Lzfd7zcZTtxhY7HjUevWDMhYo4uFI4vPG_RKt9whJ4rjkjSRVoJbpuKI0jEohbNdl1x4tvif_m9Y42Pl9_Gs6OwsW_hQjJxvl7W3b3v89nRazY_-zSbTJOOfSFxIktXicsFeFc6INcngMCRzoMHVTmHs8ZUSe9cformiVKQKZBeVlVltfenuSuhsPke224WTf2GcWGtyByAzyROx-tcFValgq4sCG3rAUv7djeuS01ODBk_TR-D9sOgqogyU5i0MKiqATv-U6WNeTkeExa9Ms29zmVw3His2vCe4jcvKomcTcoB-9D3BIOKJVeLberFemkyRQyBuX5YoiwRKGUKJfZjF9o8vcgLBIL64P---i17FpNR0jLRO7a9ulvX7xE4rWAY_owhezL-_HV68Rt6sxdk |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwELYQPVAJoZa-lrbgQw-lUroJcWL7iFZFCwVatbsSN8vjxCoIZSN298pv74yddIsEHLhEeYwTy2OPP2fG8zH2qdSQgtQ6qTLtEpFZSACPiRIAqvBVIR15dM_Oy_FUnFwUF2ts1O-FobDKzvZHmx6sdXdn2LXmsL28HP4mn1mpEdAIMrUS7fAzgcOXaAy-3q7iPHC9EhyWKJ2QeO_aDEFe3oV4ShGyd1JQ4v2T02Zr59hkPnJdPAxGw6R09IJtdWiSH8YKv2RrdbPNNkY9iRue9xuP59tsM_6i43Hn0SvWjIiZo4uF4zPPWzTLfzhizwVHKOkirwS3TcURJeKtFu12XXEi3OL_Ob5jic-_fhxO9sPOvpkL2cT5cl53z35OJ_uv2fTo22Q0Tjr6hcSJLF0kLhfgXemAfJ8AAqc6Dx5U5RwuG1MlvXP5AdonykGmQHpZVZXV3h_kroTC5m_YejNr6neMC2tF5gB8JnE9XueqsCoVdGVBaFsPWNq3u3FdbnKiyLg2fRDalUFVEWemMGlhUFUD9uVfkTYm5nhMWPTKNHd6l8GJ47Fiu3cUv_pQSexsUg7YXt8TDCqWfC22qWfLuckUUQTm-mGJskSklCmUeBu70OrtRV4gEtQ7T6v1HtsYT85Ozenx-ff37HnMTEn_jD6w9cXNsv6IKGoBu2GU_AWxBRjy |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlations+of+patch+test+reactivity+and+the+repeated+open+application+test+%28ROAT%29%2Fprovocative+use+test+%28PUT%29&rft.jtitle=Food+and+chemical+toxicology&rft.au=Villarama%2C+Clarissa+D.&rft.au=Maibach%2C+Howard+I.&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0278-6915&rft.eissn=1873-6351&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1719&rft.epage=1725&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.fct.2004.05.009&rft.externalDocID=S0278691504001772 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0278-6915&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0278-6915&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0278-6915&client=summon |