A combined elastic–plastic framework unifying the various cyclic softening/hardening behaviors for heat resistant steels: Experiment and modeling

• Published in: International journal of fatigue Vol. 158; p. 106736
• Main Authors: Song, Kai, Wang, Kaimeng, Zhao, Lei, Xu, Lianyong, Han, Yongdian, Hao, Kangda
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2022; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Austenitic stainless steels; Constitutive models; Cyclic elastic–plastic model; Dislocation density; Dislocation mobility; Fatigue tests; Grain structure; Hardening-softening behavior; Heat resistant steels; High temperature; High temperature low cycle fatigue; Hysteresis loops; Low cycle fatigue; Martensitic stainless steels; Materials fatigue; Mathematical models; Microstructure mechanism; Plastic deformation; Secondary hardening; Softening; Strain; Thermal cycling; Microstructure mechanism; High temperature low cycle fatigue; Hardening-softening behavior; Cyclic elastic–plastic model
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106736
• ISSN: 0142-1123

•Cyclic softening, cyclic hardening–softening and cyclic hardening–softening–secondary hardening behaviors were investigated.•A novel factor was introduced to describe the transition of back stress evolution for a wide range of cases.•The isotropic hardening yield surface was modified by two terms of Chaboche model considering the contribution of the secondary hardening.•The predicted results by the proposed model matched well with the experimental data. In this study, the stress–strain responses of G115 martensitic steel, Inconel alloy 750H, and 316H austenitic steel were thoroughly investigated at elevated temperatures via low cycle fatigue tests. The evolutions of effective stress and back stress were determined by stress partition method and were related to cumulative plastic strain. The mobile dislocation density, dislocation structure, and sub-grain structure were discussed to reveal the effect of microstructure on stress–strain responses during fatigue process. Furthermore, a unified elastic–plastic framework was established by introducing a peak plastic strain-dependent relaxation factor, a cumulative plastic strain-modified kinematic hardening model, and a modified isotropic hardening model. The validity of the unified model was discussed based on the maximum stress evolution, stress rate factor, and hysteresis loop. Good consistencies were observed between the experimental and predicted results and showed its strong capability to integrate continuous softening, hardening–softening, and hardening–softening-secondary hardening behaviors into a constitutive model.