Efficacy of dietary supplement with nutraceutical composed combined with extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields in carpal tunnel syndrome

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effects of a nutraceutical composed (Xinepa®) combined with extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields in the carpal tunnel syndrome. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty-one patients with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized into group...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Physical Therapy Science Vol. 30; no. 6; pp. 777 - 784
Main Authors Saraceni, Vincenzo Maria, Marsilli, Gabriella, Torre, Giuseppe La, Vulpiani, Maria Chiara, Villani, Ciro, Piccinini, Giulia, Paolucci, Teresa, Nusca, Sveva Maria, Mannocci, Alice
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Society of Physical Therapy Science 01.01.2018
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0915-5287
2187-5626
DOI10.1589/jpts.30.777

Cover

More Information
Summary:[Purpose] The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effects of a nutraceutical composed (Xinepa®) combined with extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields in the carpal tunnel syndrome. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty-one patients with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized into group 1-A (N=16) (nutraceutical + extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields) and group 2-C (n=15) (placebo + extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields). The dietary supplement with nutraceutical was twice daily for one month in the 1-A group and both groups received extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields at the level of the carpal tunnel 3 times per week for 12 sessions. The Visual Analogue Scale for pain, the Symptoms Severity Scale and Functional Severity Scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire were used at pre-treatment (T0), after the end of treatment (T1) and at 3 months post-treatment (T2). [Results] At T1 and T2 were not significant differences in outcome measures between the two groups. In group 1-A a significant improvement in the scales were observed at T1 and T2. In group 2-C it was observed only at T1. [Conclusion] Significant clinical effects from pre-treatment to the end of treatment were shown in both groups. Only in group 1-A they were maintained at 3 months post-treatment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0915-5287
2187-5626
DOI:10.1589/jpts.30.777