The glycaemic index of potatoes: the effect of variety, cooking method and maturity

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI. Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of clinical nutrition Vol. 53; no. 4; pp. 249 - 254
Main Authors Soh, NL, Brand-Miller, J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basingstoke Nature Publishing 01.04.1999
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI. Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food. GI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65+/-9 (canned new potatoes) to 10+/-15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P<0.05). Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure.
AbstractList The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI. Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food. GI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65+/-9 (canned new potatoes) to 10+/-15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P<0.05). Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure.
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI.OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI.Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food.DESIGN AND SUBJECTSTen healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food.GI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65+/-9 (canned new potatoes) to 10+/-15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P<0.05).RESULTSGI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65+/-9 (canned new potatoes) to 10+/-15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P<0.05).Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure.CONCLUSIONSPotatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure.
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI.Design and subjects: Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual’s average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food.Results: GI values (mean±s.e.m.) ranged from 65±9 (canned new potatoes) to 101±15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose=100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P=0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P=0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P=0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r=0.83, P<0.05).Conclusions: Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure.Sponsors: University of Sydney.
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI. Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food. GI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65+/-9 (canned new potatoes) to 10+/-15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P<0.05). Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure.
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI. Design and subjects: Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food. Results: GI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65 +/- 9 (canned new potatoes) to 101 +/- 15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure.
Author Brand-Miller, J
Soh, NL
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: NL
  surname: Soh
  fullname: Soh, NL
– sequence: 2
  givenname: J
  surname: Brand-Miller
  fullname: Brand-Miller, J
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1733574$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10334648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqF0s9rHCEUB3ApCc0m7bm3Im3oKbPR0VEntxD6CwI9ND0PjvNMnM7oVp2S_e_jki0tgdCT4Pt8H_54x-jABw8IvaFkTQlT52lcw2j8mgpCJGUv0IpyKapGcHKAVqRteMVK5QgdpzQSUoqyfomOSpZxwdUKfb-5A3w7bY2G2Rns_AD3OFi8CVnnAOkC5wLAWjB5t_9bRwd5e4ZNCD-dv8Uz5LswYO0HPOu8RJe3r9Ch1VOC1_v1BP349PHm6kt1_e3z16vL68pwonJlG9Eq2ltVD7bWg9WD6AkoxoSwPbPMNrymYMqZW1lzAUowZSQVWhPTCyXZCfrw2HcTw68FUu5mlwxMk_YQltSJVgrF2_9DriRpiRAFvn8Cx7BEXy7R1YLXUvKW79q9e1bRVjQNV3VBb_do6WcYuk10s47b7s_TF3C6BzoZPdmovXHpr5OMNZIXdv7ITAwpRbD_dNo1U10au90MdPsZKInmScK48pku-By1m57NPQAT5bTC
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1601859
crossref_primary_10_1039_C8FO02530D
crossref_primary_10_1080_09637480902849195
crossref_primary_10_5604_01_3001_0014_2493
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11540_008_9111_4
crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afr096
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2005_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0007114517001027
crossref_primary_10_4239_wjd_v12_i2_108
crossref_primary_10_1039_C9FO00928K
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lwt_2020_109363
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2008_11_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nutres_2004_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1079_BJN20051571
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2016_01_120
crossref_primary_10_1002_fsn3_806
crossref_primary_10_1079_PNS2005485
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02987141
crossref_primary_10_1080_10408390903041996
crossref_primary_10_1093_ajcn_78_1_99
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13082614
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foostr_2023_100355
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0216348
crossref_primary_10_1111_dom_14167
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2011_01_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0007_9960_10_70006_7
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1464_5491_2007_02206_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu11081953
crossref_primary_10_1021_jf4010737
crossref_primary_10_1002_star_200800209
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2011_07_029
crossref_primary_10_1038_oby_2005_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12230_012_9269_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clnesp_2021_01_039
crossref_primary_10_1039_D1FO00801C
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2021_681365
crossref_primary_10_1002_jsfa_7848
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1601551
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1602723
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jada_2005_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1039_c3fo60395d
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2011_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11540_014_9262_4
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0255764
crossref_primary_10_1111_1753_0407_12550
crossref_primary_10_1002_jsfa_2035
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0007114508965314
crossref_primary_10_1079_BJN20051597
crossref_primary_10_1080_0367_020291909778
crossref_primary_10_1093_ajcn_76_1_5
crossref_primary_10_3945_an_112_003509
crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2016_1139542
crossref_primary_10_1002_jsfa_10259
crossref_primary_10_1039_c1fo10042d
crossref_primary_10_1039_C6FO00895J
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11694_022_01320_6
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1601386
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12230_013_9320_5
crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2013_840260
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1602677
crossref_primary_10_1079_BJN20041125
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodres_2013_12_020
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1602238
crossref_primary_10_1097_NT_0b013e31826de5ec
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1601592
crossref_primary_10_3923_rjbsci_2010_345_349
crossref_primary_10_52711_0974_360X_2024_00647
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00394_018_1774_2
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 1999 INIST-CNRS
Copyright Macmillan Journals Ltd. Apr 1999
Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999.
Copyright_xml – notice: 1999 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright Macmillan Journals Ltd. Apr 1999
– notice: Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7TK
K9.
NAPCQ
3V.
7RV
7X2
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8C1
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AN0
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
KB0
LK8
M0K
M0S
M1P
M2O
M7P
MBDVC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7S9
L.6
7X8
DOI 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600713
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Agricultural Science Collection
Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Public Health Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Research Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
British Nursing Database
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
SciTech Collection (ProQuest)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Biological Sciences
Agricultural Science Database
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database
Research Library
Biological Science Database
Research Library (Corporate)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Agricultural Science Database
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
Health Research Premium Collection
Natural Science Collection
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest Central Basic
British Nursing Index with Full Text
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
Agricultural Science Database
MEDLINE
AGRICOLA
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
Diet & Clinical Nutrition
EISSN 1476-5640
EndPage 254
ExternalDocumentID 41654583
10334648
1733574
10_1038_sj_ejcn_1600713
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations New South Wales
GeographicLocations_xml – name: New South Wales
GroupedDBID ---
-ET
-Q-
.GJ
0R~
29G
2WC
36B
39C
4.4
406
53G
5GY
5RE
6PF
7RV
7X2
7X7
88E
8AO
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8G5
A8Z
AAHBH
AAIKC
AAMNW
AANZL
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABAWZ
ABBRH
ABCQX
ABDBE
ABDBF
ABFSG
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABOCM
ABUWG
ABZZP
ACAOD
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACKTT
ACMFV
ACMJI
ACPRK
ACRQY
ACSTC
ACUHS
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADFRT
AEFQL
AEJRE
AEMSY
AENEX
AEUYN
AEVLU
AEXYK
AEZWR
AFBBN
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFKRA
AFRAH
AFSHS
AGAYW
AGHAI
AGQEE
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHWEU
AI.
AIGIU
AIXLP
AJRNO
ALFFA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMYLF
AN0
APEBS
ATCPS
ATHPR
AXYYD
AYFIA
AZQEC
B0M
BAWUL
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BKKNO
BKOMP
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBC
EBD
EBLON
EBO
EBS
ECGQY
EE.
EHN
EIHBH
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPL
ESX
F5P
FDQFY
FERAY
FIZPM
FSGXE
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HZ~
IAG
IAO
ICU
IEA
IHR
IHT
IHW
INH
INR
IOF
IWAJR
JSO
JZLTJ
KQ8
M0K
M1P
M2O
M7P
NAPCQ
NQJWS
O9-
OK1
P2P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PSQYO
RNS
RNT
RNTTT
ROL
RXW
SNX
SNYQT
SOHCF
SOJ
SRMVM
SV3
SWTZT
TAE
TAOOD
TBHMF
TDRGL
TH9
TR2
TSG
TUS
UKHRP
VH1
WH7
XOL
ZXP
~02
~8M
~KM
70F
8FE
8FH
8R4
8R5
AACDK
AATNV
ABRTQ
ADHUB
AILAN
BKEYQ
BNQBC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
E.L
EPT
EX3
FIGPU
IQODW
ITC
LGEZI
LOTEE
NADUK
NXXTH
OVD
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PROAC
Q2X
Q~Q
TEORI
WOW
3V.
AAZLF
ADHDB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NAO
NPM
7QP
7TK
K9.
7XB
8FK
LK8
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7S9
L.6
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f56981bf82df2adfad6b0e83366fb3f3f5421ec14797246e8638c716aa0cb6873
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0954-3007
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 17:24:06 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 01:31:39 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 16 19:50:27 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 13:06:57 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:18:33 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:13:33 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:15:03 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:07 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Human
Potato
Cooking
Nutrition
Nutritive value
Caloric balance
Carbohydrate
Glycemia
Food
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c408t-f56981bf82df2adfad6b0e83366fb3f3f5421ec14797246e8638c716aa0cb6873
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 10334648
PQID 2642774947
PQPubID 33883
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_69768497
proquest_miscellaneous_48709066
proquest_journals_2642774947
proquest_journals_219655482
pubmed_primary_10334648
pascalfrancis_primary_1733574
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1600713
crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1600713
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1999-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1999-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 1999
  text: 1999-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace Basingstoke
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Basingstoke
– name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle European journal of clinical nutrition
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur J Clin Nutr
PublicationYear 1999
Publisher Nature Publishing
Nature Publishing Group
Publisher_xml – name: Nature Publishing
– name: Nature Publishing Group
SSID ssj0014772
Score 1.882795
Snippet The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have...
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 249
SubjectTerms Adult
adults
analysis
Area Under Curve
Biological and medical sciences
blood glucose
Blood Glucose - analysis
Bread
Carbohydrates
classification
Cooking
Cooking - methods
cultivars
dietary carbohydrate
digestion
Feeding. Feeding behavior
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Glucose
Glucose - metabolism
Humans
Male
Mathematical analysis
Maturity
maturity stage
Meals
metabolism
methods
New South Wales
Potatoes
Reference Values
Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum - classification
Solanum tuberosum - metabolism
Starch
Vegetables
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
Title The glycaemic index of potatoes: the effect of variety, cooking method and maturity
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10334648
https://www.proquest.com/docview/219655482
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2642774947
https://www.proquest.com/docview/48709066
https://www.proquest.com/docview/69768497
Volume 53
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagvSAhBC2P0Ac-IMSBtEns2A4XtNt2VSGxQkClvUW2Y1estslCUqT998w42YVKLJdEsp1E8Yztbx76hpDXeZVoJpSPTSGC6yaPlZFpLHmlc5tbawLb_qepuLziH2f5bHC4tUNa5XpPDBt11Vj0kZ_CwZ0BVCm4_LD8EWPVKIyuDiU07pNdpC7DlC452xhcKZeheBOgCPT-J3JN7cPUaTs_cXNbo3MF7bQ7p9LDpW5hgnxf2WI79AxH0OQxeTRgRzrqhf2E3HP1Htkf1WA336zoGxqyOYObfI9E599dB20D7-eCTte0-_vkK-gGvV6srMbMeBoIE2nj6bIB5Nm49j0FVEj7TA9s_4X2dLd6Ry06e-tr2pedprqu6A0SgwKSf0quJhffzi7jobhCbHmiutjnogDI6lVW-UxXXlfCJE4xJoQ3zDOf8yx1FuawkBkXTsFCtWBcaZ1YI5Rkz8hO3dTuBaGKG5ZmxgnYC7hKpcYIe1WZwqXSp4WOyMl6cks7MI9jAYxFGSLgTJXtvERplIM0IvJ288CyJ93YPvTojrT-jJeM5ZJH5GAtvXJYnW2ZIY0imGpZRA7_0bvRtIi82nTDqsNQiq5dc9uWYOYlBaC17SNEgSHOAt7xvNeZv_6EMS64evn_jx-QBz1FBGYJHZKd7uetOwIA1JnjoOVwVWfpMdkdjc_HE7iPL6afv_wGe0AH8w
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6V7QEkhKDlEdpSHwBxIG0SO7aDhFChrba0XSFopd5Sx7ErVttkISlo_xS_kXEeC5VYbr0mznMm9vfNTL4BeB7ngaJcWj9LeBO6iX2ZidAXLFexjrXOGrX94xEfnrKPZ_HZEvzq_4VxZZX9nNhM1HmpXYx8GxfuCKFKwsS76TffdY1y2dW-hUbrFodm9hMpW_X2YBft-yKK9vdOPgz9rquAr1kga9_GPEGsZmWU20jlVuU8C4yklHObUUttzKLQ6BDvW0SMG4keqpFVKBXojEtB8by3YJlRpDIDWH6_N_r0eZ63YKJpF4W4xeUbAtGLCVG5XY23zFgXLpzjmOG1dfDuVFVoEtv20lgMdptFb_8-3OvQKtlp3esBLJliBVZ3CmTqlzPykjT1o01gfgW83a-mxm2d0uiEjHqh_1X4gt5ILiYzrVwtPmkkGklpybRErFua6g1BHEra2hK3_Ydj8PXsNdEuvFxckLbRNVFFTi6dFClyh4dweiMv_hEMirIwT4BIltEwygzH2YfJUCiX08_zLDGhsGGiPNjqX26qO61z13JjkjY5dyrTapw6a6SdNTx4NT9g2sp8LB66cc1af8YLSmPBPFjrrZd280GVRk64Eclh5MH6P_bOfduDzflu_M5d8kYVpryqUiSWQYL4cPEInrikaoLneNz6zF9PQinjTD79_8U34fbw5PgoPToYHa7BnVagwtUorcOg_n5lNhB-1dmzzucJnN_0Z_Ybu_ZCRw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9QwEB2VIiEkhKDlI7SlPgDiQLpJ7NgOEkIVy6qlsEKCSnsLtmNXrLbJQrag_Wv8Osb5WKjEcus1cRIlM7bfm5m8AXiSFpGiXLpQZ7wJ3aSh1CIOBStUalJjdKO2_2HMj07Zu0k62YBf_b8wvqyyXxObhbqojI-RD3DjThCqZEwMXFcW8XE4ej3_FvoOUj7T2rfTaF3kxC5_In2rXx0P0dZPk2T09vObo7DrMBAaFslF6FKeIW5zMilcogqnCq4jKynl3GnqqEtZElsT4zuIhHEr0VsNMgylIqO5FBTvew2uC5rGfo6JyYrs4SVN4yhEMD7zEIleVojKQT09sFNT-sCO54iXdsRbc1WjcVzbVWM97G22v9EduN3hVnLYOtpd2LDlFmwflsjZz5fkGWkqSZsQ_RYEw692gcc6zdEZGfeS_9vwCf2SnM2WRvmqfNKINZLKkXmFqLey9UuCiJS0VSb--A_P5RfLF8T4QHN5RtqW10SVBTn3oqTIIu7B6ZV89vuwWValfQhEMk3jRFuO6xCTsVA-u18UOrOxcHGmAjjoP25uOtVz33xjljfZdyrzepp7a-SdNQJ4vrpg3gp-rB-6d8laf8YLSlPBAtjprZd3K0OdJ17CEWliEsDuP86uvDyA_dVpnPE-jaNKW13UOVLMKEOkuH4Ez3x6NcN7PGh95q83oZRxJh_9_-H7cAMnV_7-eHyyAzdbpQpfrLQLm4vvF3YPcdhCP24cnsCXq55hvwEu9UUX
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+glycaemic+index+of+potatoes%3A+The+effect+of+variety%2C+cooking+method+and+maturity&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+clinical+nutrition&rft.au=Soh%2C+N+L&rft.au=Brand-Miller%2C+J&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.pub=Nature+Publishing+Group&rft.issn=0954-3007&rft.eissn=1476-5640&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fsj.ejcn.1600713&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=41654583
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0954-3007&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0954-3007&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0954-3007&client=summon