The glycaemic index of potatoes: the effect of variety, cooking method and maturity
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI. Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equa...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of clinical nutrition Vol. 53; no. 4; pp. 249 - 254 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Basingstoke
Nature Publishing
01.04.1999
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI.
Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food.
GI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65+/-9 (canned new potatoes) to 10+/-15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P<0.05).
Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI. Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food. GI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65+/-9 (canned new potatoes) to 10+/-15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P<0.05). Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI.OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI.Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food.DESIGN AND SUBJECTSTen healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food.GI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65+/-9 (canned new potatoes) to 10+/-15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P<0.05).RESULTSGI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65+/-9 (canned new potatoes) to 10+/-15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P<0.05).Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure.CONCLUSIONSPotatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI.Design and subjects: Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual’s average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food.Results: GI values (mean±s.e.m.) ranged from 65±9 (canned new potatoes) to 101±15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose=100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P=0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P=0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P=0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r=0.83, P<0.05).Conclusions: Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure.Sponsors: University of Sydney. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI. Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food. GI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65+/-9 (canned new potatoes) to 10+/-15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P<0.05). Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have a relatively lower GI. Design and subjects: Ten healthy volunteers were recruited as subjects through advertising on the campus of the University of Sydney. Equal (50 g) carbohydrate portions of eight potato meals (three varieties, four cooking methods, two states of maturity) and two reference white bread meals were fed in random order to each of the subjects over a period of 10 weeks. Capillary blood samples were taken in the fasting state and then at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min from the start of each meal. Samples were analysed for plasma glucose concentrations and incremental areas under plasma glucose curves were calculated. The GI of the potato was calculated as the AUC of the potato expressed as a percentage of the individual's average AUC of the white bread. This was then multiplied by 0.7 to index the GI to glucose as the reference food. Results: GI values (mean +/- s.e.m.) ranged from 65 +/- 9 (canned new potatoes) to 101 +/- 15 (boiled Desiree potatoes), glucose = 100. No significant difference was found among the three varieties of potato tested (P = 0.38) or among the four different cooking methods (P = 0.55). The GI values of the canned new potato and boiled Desiree potato were significantly different (P = 0.047). The average size of the tuber was found to correlate with the GI (r = 0.83, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Potatoes, regardless of variety, cooking method and maturity, have exceptionally high GI values. New potatoes have relatively lower GI values which is attributed to differences in starch structure. |
Author | Brand-Miller, J Soh, NL |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: NL surname: Soh fullname: Soh, NL – sequence: 2 givenname: J surname: Brand-Miller fullname: Brand-Miller, J |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1733574$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10334648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqF0s9rHCEUB3ApCc0m7bm3Im3oKbPR0VEntxD6CwI9ND0PjvNMnM7oVp2S_e_jki0tgdCT4Pt8H_54x-jABw8IvaFkTQlT52lcw2j8mgpCJGUv0IpyKapGcHKAVqRteMVK5QgdpzQSUoqyfomOSpZxwdUKfb-5A3w7bY2G2Rns_AD3OFi8CVnnAOkC5wLAWjB5t_9bRwd5e4ZNCD-dv8Uz5LswYO0HPOu8RJe3r9Ch1VOC1_v1BP349PHm6kt1_e3z16vL68pwonJlG9Eq2ltVD7bWg9WD6AkoxoSwPbPMNrymYMqZW1lzAUowZSQVWhPTCyXZCfrw2HcTw68FUu5mlwxMk_YQltSJVgrF2_9DriRpiRAFvn8Cx7BEXy7R1YLXUvKW79q9e1bRVjQNV3VBb_do6WcYuk10s47b7s_TF3C6BzoZPdmovXHpr5OMNZIXdv7ITAwpRbD_dNo1U10au90MdPsZKInmScK48pku-By1m57NPQAT5bTC |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1601859 crossref_primary_10_1039_C8FO02530D crossref_primary_10_1080_09637480902849195 crossref_primary_10_5604_01_3001_0014_2493 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11540_008_9111_4 crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afr096 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2005_10_008 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0007114517001027 crossref_primary_10_4239_wjd_v12_i2_108 crossref_primary_10_1039_C9FO00928K crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lwt_2020_109363 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2008_11_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nutres_2004_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1079_BJN20051571 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2016_01_120 crossref_primary_10_1002_fsn3_806 crossref_primary_10_1079_PNS2005485 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02987141 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408390903041996 crossref_primary_10_1093_ajcn_78_1_99 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13082614 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foostr_2023_100355 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0216348 crossref_primary_10_1111_dom_14167 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2011_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0007_9960_10_70006_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1464_5491_2007_02206_x crossref_primary_10_3390_nu11081953 crossref_primary_10_1021_jf4010737 crossref_primary_10_1002_star_200800209 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2011_07_029 crossref_primary_10_1038_oby_2005_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12230_012_9269_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clnesp_2021_01_039 crossref_primary_10_1039_D1FO00801C crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2021_681365 crossref_primary_10_1002_jsfa_7848 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1601551 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1602723 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jada_2005_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1039_c3fo60395d crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2011_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11540_014_9262_4 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0255764 crossref_primary_10_1111_1753_0407_12550 crossref_primary_10_1002_jsfa_2035 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0007114508965314 crossref_primary_10_1079_BJN20051597 crossref_primary_10_1080_0367_020291909778 crossref_primary_10_1093_ajcn_76_1_5 crossref_primary_10_3945_an_112_003509 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2016_1139542 crossref_primary_10_1002_jsfa_10259 crossref_primary_10_1039_c1fo10042d crossref_primary_10_1039_C6FO00895J crossref_primary_10_1007_s11694_022_01320_6 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1601386 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12230_013_9320_5 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2013_840260 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1602677 crossref_primary_10_1079_BJN20041125 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodres_2013_12_020 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1602238 crossref_primary_10_1097_NT_0b013e31826de5ec crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1601592 crossref_primary_10_3923_rjbsci_2010_345_349 crossref_primary_10_52711_0974_360X_2024_00647 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00394_018_1774_2 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 1999 INIST-CNRS Copyright Macmillan Journals Ltd. Apr 1999 Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 1999 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright Macmillan Journals Ltd. Apr 1999 – notice: Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7TK K9. NAPCQ 3V. 7RV 7X2 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AN0 ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ KB0 LK8 M0K M0S M1P M2O M7P MBDVC PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600713 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database Agricultural Science Collection Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Research Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland British Nursing Database Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library SciTech Collection (ProQuest) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Biological Sciences Agricultural Science Database Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Medical Database Research Library Biological Science Database Research Library (Corporate) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Agricultural Science Database Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Central Basic British Nursing Index with Full Text ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic Agricultural Science Database MEDLINE AGRICOLA |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology Diet & Clinical Nutrition |
EISSN | 1476-5640 |
EndPage | 254 |
ExternalDocumentID | 41654583 10334648 1733574 10_1038_sj_ejcn_1600713 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study |
GeographicLocations | New South Wales |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: New South Wales |
GroupedDBID | --- -ET -Q- .GJ 0R~ 29G 2WC 36B 39C 4.4 406 53G 5GY 5RE 6PF 7RV 7X2 7X7 88E 8AO 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8G5 A8Z AAHBH AAIKC AAMNW AANZL AASML AAWTL AAYXX AAYZH ABAKF ABAWZ ABBRH ABCQX ABDBE ABDBF ABFSG ABJNI ABLJU ABOCM ABUWG ABZZP ACAOD ACGFO ACGFS ACKTT ACMFV ACMJI ACPRK ACRQY ACSTC ACUHS ACZOJ ADBBV ADFRT AEFQL AEJRE AEMSY AENEX AEUYN AEVLU AEXYK AEZWR AFBBN AFDZB AFHIU AFKRA AFRAH AFSHS AGAYW AGHAI AGQEE AHMBA AHSBF AHWEU AI. AIGIU AIXLP AJRNO ALFFA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMYLF AN0 APEBS ATCPS ATHPR AXYYD AYFIA AZQEC B0M BAWUL BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BKKNO BKOMP CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DNIVK DPUIP DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBC EBD EBLON EBO EBS ECGQY EE. EHN EIHBH EIOEI EJD EMB EMK EMOBN EPL ESX F5P FDQFY FERAY FIZPM FSGXE FYUFA GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ HMCUK HZ~ IAG IAO ICU IEA IHR IHT IHW INH INR IOF IWAJR JSO JZLTJ KQ8 M0K M1P M2O M7P NAPCQ NQJWS O9- OK1 P2P PHGZM PHGZT PSQYO RNS RNT RNTTT ROL RXW SNX SNYQT SOHCF SOJ SRMVM SV3 SWTZT TAE TAOOD TBHMF TDRGL TH9 TR2 TSG TUS UKHRP VH1 WH7 XOL ZXP ~02 ~8M ~KM 70F 8FE 8FH 8R4 8R5 AACDK AATNV ABRTQ ADHUB AILAN BKEYQ BNQBC BPHCQ BVXVI E.L EPT EX3 FIGPU IQODW ITC LGEZI LOTEE NADUK NXXTH OVD PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC Q2X Q~Q TEORI WOW 3V. AAZLF ADHDB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NAO NPM 7QP 7TK K9. 7XB 8FK LK8 MBDVC PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f56981bf82df2adfad6b0e83366fb3f3f5421ec14797246e8638c716aa0cb6873 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0954-3007 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 17:24:06 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 01:31:39 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 16 19:50:27 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 13:06:57 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:18:33 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:13:33 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:15:03 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:07 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Human Potato Cooking Nutrition Nutritive value Caloric balance Carbohydrate Glycemia Food |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c408t-f56981bf82df2adfad6b0e83366fb3f3f5421ec14797246e8638c716aa0cb6873 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 10334648 |
PQID | 2642774947 |
PQPubID | 33883 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_69768497 proquest_miscellaneous_48709066 proquest_journals_2642774947 proquest_journals_219655482 pubmed_primary_10334648 pascalfrancis_primary_1733574 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1600713 crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_sj_ejcn_1600713 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | 1999-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1999-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 1999 text: 1999-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 1990 |
PublicationPlace | Basingstoke |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Basingstoke – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | European journal of clinical nutrition |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Eur J Clin Nutr |
PublicationYear | 1999 |
Publisher | Nature Publishing Nature Publishing Group |
Publisher_xml | – name: Nature Publishing – name: Nature Publishing Group |
SSID | ssj0014772 |
Score | 1.882795 |
Snippet | The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new potatoes may have... Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variety, cooking method and maturity on the GI of potatoes, it was hypothesised that new... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 249 |
SubjectTerms | Adult adults analysis Area Under Curve Biological and medical sciences blood glucose Blood Glucose - analysis Bread Carbohydrates classification Cooking Cooking - methods cultivars dietary carbohydrate digestion Feeding. Feeding behavior Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Glucose Glucose - metabolism Humans Male Mathematical analysis Maturity maturity stage Meals metabolism methods New South Wales Potatoes Reference Values Solanum tuberosum Solanum tuberosum - classification Solanum tuberosum - metabolism Starch Vegetables Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems |
Title | The glycaemic index of potatoes: the effect of variety, cooking method and maturity |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10334648 https://www.proquest.com/docview/219655482 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2642774947 https://www.proquest.com/docview/48709066 https://www.proquest.com/docview/69768497 |
Volume | 53 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagvSAhBC2P0Ac-IMSBtEns2A4XtNt2VSGxQkClvUW2Y1estslCUqT998w42YVKLJdEsp1E8Yztbx76hpDXeZVoJpSPTSGC6yaPlZFpLHmlc5tbawLb_qepuLziH2f5bHC4tUNa5XpPDBt11Vj0kZ_CwZ0BVCm4_LD8EWPVKIyuDiU07pNdpC7DlC452xhcKZeheBOgCPT-J3JN7cPUaTs_cXNbo3MF7bQ7p9LDpW5hgnxf2WI79AxH0OQxeTRgRzrqhf2E3HP1Htkf1WA336zoGxqyOYObfI9E599dB20D7-eCTte0-_vkK-gGvV6srMbMeBoIE2nj6bIB5Nm49j0FVEj7TA9s_4X2dLd6Ry06e-tr2pedprqu6A0SgwKSf0quJhffzi7jobhCbHmiutjnogDI6lVW-UxXXlfCJE4xJoQ3zDOf8yx1FuawkBkXTsFCtWBcaZ1YI5Rkz8hO3dTuBaGKG5ZmxgnYC7hKpcYIe1WZwqXSp4WOyMl6cks7MI9jAYxFGSLgTJXtvERplIM0IvJ288CyJ93YPvTojrT-jJeM5ZJH5GAtvXJYnW2ZIY0imGpZRA7_0bvRtIi82nTDqsNQiq5dc9uWYOYlBaC17SNEgSHOAt7xvNeZv_6EMS64evn_jx-QBz1FBGYJHZKd7uetOwIA1JnjoOVwVWfpMdkdjc_HE7iPL6afv_wGe0AH8w |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6V7QEkhKDlEdpSHwBxIG0SO7aDhFChrba0XSFopd5Sx7ErVttkISlo_xS_kXEeC5VYbr0mznMm9vfNTL4BeB7ngaJcWj9LeBO6iX2ZidAXLFexjrXOGrX94xEfnrKPZ_HZEvzq_4VxZZX9nNhM1HmpXYx8GxfuCKFKwsS76TffdY1y2dW-hUbrFodm9hMpW_X2YBft-yKK9vdOPgz9rquAr1kga9_GPEGsZmWU20jlVuU8C4yklHObUUttzKLQ6BDvW0SMG4keqpFVKBXojEtB8by3YJlRpDIDWH6_N_r0eZ63YKJpF4W4xeUbAtGLCVG5XY23zFgXLpzjmOG1dfDuVFVoEtv20lgMdptFb_8-3OvQKtlp3esBLJliBVZ3CmTqlzPykjT1o01gfgW83a-mxm2d0uiEjHqh_1X4gt5ILiYzrVwtPmkkGklpybRErFua6g1BHEra2hK3_Ydj8PXsNdEuvFxckLbRNVFFTi6dFClyh4dweiMv_hEMirIwT4BIltEwygzH2YfJUCiX08_zLDGhsGGiPNjqX26qO61z13JjkjY5dyrTapw6a6SdNTx4NT9g2sp8LB66cc1af8YLSmPBPFjrrZd280GVRk64Eclh5MH6P_bOfduDzflu_M5d8kYVpryqUiSWQYL4cPEInrikaoLneNz6zF9PQinjTD79_8U34fbw5PgoPToYHa7BnVagwtUorcOg_n5lNhB-1dmzzucJnN_0Z_Ybu_ZCRw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9QwEB2VIiEkhKDlI7SlPgDiQLpJ7NgOEkIVy6qlsEKCSnsLtmNXrLbJQrag_Wv8Osb5WKjEcus1cRIlM7bfm5m8AXiSFpGiXLpQZ7wJ3aSh1CIOBStUalJjdKO2_2HMj07Zu0k62YBf_b8wvqyyXxObhbqojI-RD3DjThCqZEwMXFcW8XE4ej3_FvoOUj7T2rfTaF3kxC5_In2rXx0P0dZPk2T09vObo7DrMBAaFslF6FKeIW5zMilcogqnCq4jKynl3GnqqEtZElsT4zuIhHEr0VsNMgylIqO5FBTvew2uC5rGfo6JyYrs4SVN4yhEMD7zEIleVojKQT09sFNT-sCO54iXdsRbc1WjcVzbVWM97G22v9EduN3hVnLYOtpd2LDlFmwflsjZz5fkGWkqSZsQ_RYEw692gcc6zdEZGfeS_9vwCf2SnM2WRvmqfNKINZLKkXmFqLey9UuCiJS0VSb--A_P5RfLF8T4QHN5RtqW10SVBTn3oqTIIu7B6ZV89vuwWValfQhEMk3jRFuO6xCTsVA-u18UOrOxcHGmAjjoP25uOtVz33xjljfZdyrzepp7a-SdNQJ4vrpg3gp-rB-6d8laf8YLSlPBAtjprZd3K0OdJ17CEWliEsDuP86uvDyA_dVpnPE-jaNKW13UOVLMKEOkuH4Ez3x6NcN7PGh95q83oZRxJh_9_-H7cAMnV_7-eHyyAzdbpQpfrLQLm4vvF3YPcdhCP24cnsCXq55hvwEu9UUX |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+glycaemic+index+of+potatoes%3A+The+effect+of+variety%2C+cooking+method+and+maturity&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+clinical+nutrition&rft.au=Soh%2C+N+L&rft.au=Brand-Miller%2C+J&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.pub=Nature+Publishing+Group&rft.issn=0954-3007&rft.eissn=1476-5640&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fsj.ejcn.1600713&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=41654583 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0954-3007&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0954-3007&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0954-3007&client=summon |