Exploring GVS as a display modality: signal amplitude and polarity, in various environments, impacts on posture, and with dual-tasking

• Published in: Experimental brain research Vol. 242; no. 10; pp. 2443 - 2455
• Main Authors: Temple, David R., Pepper, Sarah, Hogoboom, Brady C., Klausing, Lanna N., Datta, Abhishek, Burkhart, Cody, Clark, Torin K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.10.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: ambient temperature; Balance; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; brain; Brain research; cold; Experiments; Neurology; Neurosciences; Polarity; posture; Questionnaires; Research Article; Sensory integration; Vestibular system; Visual perception; Visual stimuli; Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS); Temperature; Postural control; Information transfer; Vestibular
• ISSN: 0014-4819; 1432-1106; 1432-1106
• DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06908-6

Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) has been proposed as an alternative display modality to relay information without increasing demands on the visual or auditory sensory modalities of the wearer or in environments where those modalities cannot be used (e.g., covert night operations). We further investigated this concept with four experiments designed to test: (1) thresholds at which subjects could distinguish between different GVS current amplitudes and polarities, (2) thresholds at which different bipolar (i.e., sinusoidal waveform with current oscillating between left and right directions) current frequencies were distinguishable among room temperature, hot, cold, and windy environments, (3) effects of unipolar (i.e., sinusoidal waveform with current occurring in only the left or right direction) currents on balance performance, and (4) dual-task performance among frequency and polarity modulated GVS conditions during a concordant visual search task. Subjects reliably distinguished between current amplitudes that varied from a pedestal of ± 0.6 mA by a median of 0.03 mA (range of 0.02–0.32 mA) and between unipolar currents at a median amplitude of 0.55 mA (range of 0.32–0.83 mA). GVS frequency thresholds were robust to the environment conditions tested, with no statistical differences found. Sway and balance errors were increased with unipolar currents. GVS thresholds were not impacted by the dual-task paradigm, but the visual search scores were slightly elevated when congruently performing a polarity thresholding task. Overall findings continue to support GVS use as a display modality, but some limitations are noted, such as the use of unipolar currents under scenarios where postural control is important.