Soil conditioning effects of Phragmites australis on native wetland plant seedling survival

Interactions between introduced plants and soils they colonize are central to invasive species success in many systems. Belowground biotic and abiotic changes can influence the success of introduced species as well as their native competitors. All plants alter soil properties after colonization but,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEcology and evolution Vol. 7; no. 15; pp. 5571 - 5579
Main Authors Crocker, Ellen V., Nelson, Eric B., Blossey, Bernd
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.08.2017
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Interactions between introduced plants and soils they colonize are central to invasive species success in many systems. Belowground biotic and abiotic changes can influence the success of introduced species as well as their native competitors. All plants alter soil properties after colonization but, in the case of many invasive plant species, it is unclear whether the strength and direction of these soil conditioning effects are due to plant traits, plant origin, or local population characteristics and site conditions in the invaded range. Phragmites australis in North America exists as a mix of populations of different evolutionary origin. Populations of endemic native Phragmites australis americanus are declining, while introduced European populations are important wetland invaders. We assessed soil conditioning effects of native and non‐native P. australis populations on early and late seedling survival of native and introduced wetland plants. We further used a soil biocide treatment to assess the role of soil fungi on seedling survival. Survival of seedlings in soils colonized by P. australis was either unaffected or negatively affected; no species showed improved survival in P. australis‐conditioned soils. Population of P. australis was a significant factor explaining the response of seedlings, but origin (native or non‐native) was not a significant factor. Synthesis: Our results highlight the importance of phylogenetic control when assessing impacts of invasive species to avoid conflating general plant traits with mechanisms of invasive success. Both native (noninvasive) and non‐native (invasive) P. australis populations reduced seedling survival of competing plant species. Because soil legacy effects of native and non‐native P. australis are similar, this study suggests that the close phylogenetic relationship between the two populations, and not the invasive status of introduced P. australis, is more relevant to their soil‐mediated impact on other plant species. Organismal photograph of Phragmites australis (EU). Photograph shows assessment of seedlings transplanted into EU patches.
Bibliography:Funding information
and the New York Department of Transportation. The statements, findings, conclusions, views, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of those organizations.
http://www.seagrant.sunysb.edu/
Funding for this work (in part) was provided by project NYSG R/CMB‐33 funded under award NA07OAR4170010 from the National Sea Grant College Program of the US Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to the Research Foundation of the State University of New York on behalf of New York Sea Grant
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Funding for this work (in part) was provided by project NYSG R/CMB‐33 funded under award NA07OAR4170010 from the National Sea Grant College Program of the US Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to the Research Foundation of the State University of New York on behalf of New York Sea Grant (http://www.seagrant.sunysb.edu/) and the New York Department of Transportation. The statements, findings, conclusions, views, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of those organizations.
ISSN:2045-7758
2045-7758
DOI:10.1002/ece3.3024