Prognostic Factors in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Resection

• Published in: The American surgeon Vol. 88; no. 6; p. 1172
• Main Authors: Ren, Weizheng, Xourafas, Dimitrios, Ashley, Stanley W, Clancy, Thomas E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.06.2022
• Subjects: Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy; Adenocarcinoma - surgery; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - pathology; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - surgery; Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; prognostic factor; margin negative resection; upfront resection; neoadjuvant treatment; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
• ISSN: 1555-9823
• DOI: 10.1177/0003134821991962

Neoadjuvant treatment (NT) has become standard in the management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BR-PDAC), improving prognosis. The primary mechanism for this improvement remains unclear. Clinicopathological data of patients with BR-PDAC who underwent resection between January 2008 and December 2018 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Univariable and multivariate analyses were used to compare survival between patients who received NT vs. those who underwent upfront resection (UR). A total of 138 patients were included, 64 underwent UR and 74 NT. Neoadjuvant treatment resulted in higher margin-negative (R0) resection rate (68.9%) than UR (43.8%, = .005). Neoadjuvant treatment was associated with improved overall survival (OS, = .009) and progression-free survival (PFS, = .027). R0 resection was also associated with improved OS ( < .001) and PFS ( < .001). On multivariable analysis, when adjusting for clinically relevant variables without considering R status, NT was an independent predictor for improved OS ( = .046) and PFS ( = .040). When additionally accounting for margin status, R0 was an independent predictor for improved OS ( < .001) and PFS ( < .001), while NT was not. Subgroup analysis, stratified by margin status, revealed that NT was not an independent predictor for OS or PFS for either subgroup. Neoadjuvant treatment is associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with BR-PDAC; however, this effect is outweighed by margin status. These results suggest that the primary benefit of NT was dependent on facilitating R0 resection. Upfront resection might remain a valid treatment option if R0 resection could be accurately predicted.