Could situational judgement tests be used for selection into dental foundation training?

• Published in: British dental journal Vol. 213; no. 1; pp. 23 - 26
• Main Authors: Patterson, F., Ashworth, V., Mehra, S., Falcon, H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 14.07.2012; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 692/1537; 706/648/160; Adult; Candidates; Dentistry; education; Education, Dental - organization & administration; Empathy; Female; Humans; Judgment; Leadership; Male; Medicine; Methods; Pilot Projects; Psychometrics; Quantitative psychology; Reproducibility of Results; School Admission Criteria; Surveys and Questionnaires; United Kingdom; Validity; United Kingdom > UK
• ISSN: 0007-0610; 1476-5373
• DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.560

Key Points Questions the current method of selection into dental foundation training and its ability to meet the requirements of recruitment best practice. Demonstrates the overall benefits of a situational judgement test (SJT) for dental foundation training selection over current selection methods. Outlines plans to implement a SJT nationally for all candidates applying for dental training posts in 2012. Objective To pilot and evaluate a machine-markable situational judgement test (SJT) designed to select candidates into UK dental foundation training. Design Single centre pilot study. Setting UK postgraduate deanery in 2010. Participants and methods Seventy-four candidates attending interview for dental foundation training in Oxford and Wessex Deaneries volunteered to complete the situational judgement test. Interventions The situational judgement test was developed to assess relevant professional attributes for dentistry (for example, empathy and integrity) in a machine-markable format. Test content was developed by subject matter experts working with experienced psychometricians. Main outcome measures Evaluation of psychometric properties of the pilot situational judgement test (for example, reliability, validity and fairness). Scores in the dental foundation training selection process (short-listing and interviews) were used to examine criterion-related validity. Candidates completed an evaluation questionnaire to examine candidate reactions and face validity of the new test. Results Forty-six candidates were female and 28 male; mean age was 23.5-years-old (range 22-32). Situational judgement test scores were normally distributed and the test showed good internal reliability when corrected for test length (α = 0.74). Situational judgement test scores positively correlated with the management, leadership and professionalism interview (N = 50; r = 0.43, p <0.01) but not with the clinical skills interview, providing initial evidence of criterion-related validity as the situational judgement test is designed to test non-cognitive professional attributes beyond clinical knowledge. Most candidates perceived the situational judgement test as relevant to dentistry, appropriate for their training level, and fair. Conclusion This initial pilot study suggests that a situational judgement test is an appropriate and innovative method to measure professional attributes (eg empathy and integrity) for selection into foundation training. Further research will explore the long-term predictive validity of the situational judgement test once candidates have entered training.