Improving the Robustness of Diagnostic Accuracy Results By Asking Study Readers to Further Distinguish Subjects Who Appear to be Without the Condition Of Interest

In diagnostic accuracy studies, cases in which a reader does not see the condition of interest are often given the same score for ROC analysis (e.g. confidence score of 0%). However, many of these cases can be further distinguished and doing so may result in more robust ROC results. We examined two...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAcademic radiology Vol. 29; no. 4; p. 550
Main Authors Bullen, Jennifer A, Koo, Chi Wan, Bogoni, Luca, Obuchowski, Nancy A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.04.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In diagnostic accuracy studies, cases in which a reader does not see the condition of interest are often given the same score for ROC analysis (e.g. confidence score of 0%). However, many of these cases can be further distinguished and doing so may result in more robust ROC results. We examined two recent, real-world studies which used different procedures to encourage readers to further distinguish subjects who appear to be without the condition of interest. For each study, we calculated the results under two conditions. In the "zeros distinguished" (ZD) condition, we incorporated the confidence scores collected to further distinguish the normal-looking subjects. In the "zeros not distinguished" (ZND) condition, we disregarded these scores and simply gave the unit of analysis a score of zero whenever the reader did not identify the condition of interest in that unit. We compared the two conditions on (1) coverage of the ROC space and (2) discrepancy between parametric and nonparametric results. Compared to the ZND condition, coverage of the ROC space was improved in the ZD condition for all ROC curves in both studies. In the first study, there was a significant reduction in the discrepancy between parametric and nonparametric results (median discrepancy in ZND vs ZD condition: 0.033 vs 0.011, p = 0.012). A similar reduction was not seen in the second study, though the discrepancies were very low in both conditions (0.003 vs 0.006, p = 0.313). Prompting readers to further distinguish cases in which they do not see the condition of interest may result in more robust ROC results, though further exploration of this topic is warranted.
AbstractList In diagnostic accuracy studies, cases in which a reader does not see the condition of interest are often given the same score for ROC analysis (e.g. confidence score of 0%). However, many of these cases can be further distinguished and doing so may result in more robust ROC results. We examined two recent, real-world studies which used different procedures to encourage readers to further distinguish subjects who appear to be without the condition of interest. For each study, we calculated the results under two conditions. In the "zeros distinguished" (ZD) condition, we incorporated the confidence scores collected to further distinguish the normal-looking subjects. In the "zeros not distinguished" (ZND) condition, we disregarded these scores and simply gave the unit of analysis a score of zero whenever the reader did not identify the condition of interest in that unit. We compared the two conditions on (1) coverage of the ROC space and (2) discrepancy between parametric and nonparametric results. Compared to the ZND condition, coverage of the ROC space was improved in the ZD condition for all ROC curves in both studies. In the first study, there was a significant reduction in the discrepancy between parametric and nonparametric results (median discrepancy in ZND vs ZD condition: 0.033 vs 0.011, p = 0.012). A similar reduction was not seen in the second study, though the discrepancies were very low in both conditions (0.003 vs 0.006, p = 0.313). Prompting readers to further distinguish cases in which they do not see the condition of interest may result in more robust ROC results, though further exploration of this topic is warranted.
Author Bogoni, Luca
Bullen, Jennifer A
Obuchowski, Nancy A
Koo, Chi Wan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jennifer A
  surname: Bullen
  fullname: Bullen, Jennifer A
  email: bullenj@ccf.org
  organization: Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation. 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195. Electronic address: bullenj@ccf.org
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Chi Wan
  surname: Koo
  fullname: Koo, Chi Wan
  organization: Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic. 200 First Street, Rochester, MN 55905
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Luca
  surname: Bogoni
  fullname: Bogoni, Luca
  organization: Siemens Healthineers, 40 liberty Blvd, Malvern PA, 19355
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Nancy A
  surname: Obuchowski
  fullname: Obuchowski, Nancy A
  organization: Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation. 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34366278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1kNtKw0AYhBdR7EFfwAvZF0jcTdJkcxmr1UKh0Cq9LHv406S2u2EPQl_HJzX1cDXwM9_8zIzQpTYaELqjJKaE5g_7mEvL44QkNCZ5TCi9QEPKChZlJMsHaOTcnhA6yVl6jQZpluZ5UrAh-pofO2s-W73DvgG8MiI4r8E5bGr81PKdNs63EldSBsvlCa_AhYN3-PGEK_dx5tY-qPOdK7AOe4NnwfZZtsd7VO9C6xq8DmIPsuc2jcFV1wG3Z6sAvGl9Y4L_eT81WrW-NRovazzXHiw4f4Ouan5wcPunY_Q-e36bvkaL5ct8Wi0imZHCR0IAlFypom9JGGVKUp5wDpMCyrROSwZFRsuMZUVJFQdg_S4TxoGqUojel4zR_W9uF8QR1Laz7ZHb0_Z_rOQboRdw0A
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_211593
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2021 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2021 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2021.06.011
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1878-4046
ExternalDocumentID 34366278
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.FO
.GJ
0R~
1B1
1P~
23M
4.4
457
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXUO
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABWVN
ACGFS
ACRPL
ADBBV
ADMUD
ADNMO
AENEX
AEVXI
AFCTW
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFRHN
AFTJW
AITUG
AJUYK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
C5W
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
EBS
ECM
EFJIC
EIF
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
G-Q
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M41
MO0
NPM
NQ-
O9-
OI~
OU0
P2P
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SEL
SES
SEW
SJN
SSZ
UHS
XH2
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-bbee9add70150818dc1a2aae57e93f398e7419484791daee804658ae1d9bbaae2
IngestDate Thu Apr 03 06:58:29 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Study design
Area under the ROC curve
Multi-reader multi-case studies
Diagnostic accuracy
Language English
License Copyright © 2021 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c407t-bbee9add70150818dc1a2aae57e93f398e7419484791daee804658ae1d9bbaae2
PMID 34366278
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_34366278
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-04-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-04-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Academic radiology
PublicationTitleAlternate Acad Radiol
PublicationYear 2022
SSID ssj0015683
Score 2.331422
Snippet In diagnostic accuracy studies, cases in which a reader does not see the condition of interest are often given the same score for ROC analysis (e.g. confidence...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 550
SubjectTerms Humans
ROC Curve
Title Improving the Robustness of Diagnostic Accuracy Results By Asking Study Readers to Further Distinguish Subjects Who Appear to be Without the Condition Of Interest
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34366278
Volume 29
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3bTttAEF2FIiFeUEsv0JvmoW_IVeJLvPtIaBEqgkgRCN6Q1143ocVGjq2Kfk6_pp_FzF5iN4Bo-2JF3pVjeY5mZ2bPnGXsQxTnnGSfPDGUqUedVF6ipPBinvUzHuESrBPFo-PhwWn45Tw67_V-d1hLTS0_pj_v7Sv5H6viPbQrdcn-g2UXD8Ub-Bvti1e0MF7_ysZtRYDCx0kpm3mtXRdGgJ8Mh470WHfTtKnoWPeJmjff6_nO6AbN8s1ocZOm9MTwmSkO3W8qCglJlZMI0Q0JHqFzudSkj7NpSWEraf_gVKnQp9RTIjbX-vQ72v0mNI1Nd0rldq6cyK2j4ldJNvujmq81wIsu2aYtsR6Wppg7ne2ctUgelV_LwjR2Ny3ZaCwb9OY_7FHceuGwD7J1DUyJWzqMMr6YY4Ib9m2F0jprWx6ZdSsR2vNGRr_2zopgihOXiM6KZKb8gZZrNQ6-A5HrK42RIAxIEZ8_Prqk0u2GVtgK5it0ACtVjexuVjTkgW3YMtzC5ZdZZ2vuAUvpjQ5zTp6yDZufwK4B2zPWU8UmWzuyDIzn7NcCc4BGhxZzUObQYg4c5sBiDkY3YDAHGnNgMQd1CRZz0MEcOMwBYg4M5miqVGAxp_9-gTkY5-Aw94Kd7n8-2Tvw7DkfXhr249qTUimB62xM1TcMILN0kPhJoqJYiSAPBFcY9ooQ4ygxyBKlOGIi4okaZEJKnOe_ZE-KslBbDGg5kmGQRz5OlwKD7TxLAp-4Ab4fD-Nt9sp83YtrI-Zy4b776wdH3rD1Fp9v2WqO3kO9w1C0lu-1nW8BRCCN4A
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving+the+Robustness+of+Diagnostic+Accuracy+Results+By+Asking+Study+Readers+to+Further+Distinguish+Subjects+Who+Appear+to+be+Without+the+Condition+Of+Interest&rft.jtitle=Academic+radiology&rft.au=Bullen%2C+Jennifer+A&rft.au=Koo%2C+Chi+Wan&rft.au=Bogoni%2C+Luca&rft.au=Obuchowski%2C+Nancy+A&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.eissn=1878-4046&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.acra.2021.06.011&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F34366278&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F34366278&rft.externalDocID=34366278