Optimal Target Region for Subject Classification on the Basis of Amyloid PET Images
Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 56; no. 9; pp. 1351 - 1358 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Society of Nuclear Medicine
01.09.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (AβL) and a group with high amyloid levels (AβH) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study.
In our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for (18)F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study.
We determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups.
We developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (A...) and a group with high amyloid levels (A...) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. In our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the A... and A... groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for ...F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. We determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the A... and A... groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups. We developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the A... and A... groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.) Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (AβL) and a group with high amyloid levels (AβH) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. In our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for (18)F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. We determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups. We developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease. Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (Aβ...) and a group with high amyloid levels (Aβ...) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. In our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the Aβ... and Aβ... groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for ...F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. We determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the Aβ... and Aβ... groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups. We developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the Aβ... and Aβ... groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.) Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (AβL) and a group with high amyloid levels (AβH) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study.UNLABELLEDClassification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (AβL) and a group with high amyloid levels (AβH) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study.In our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for (18)F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study.METHODSIn our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for (18)F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study.We determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups.RESULTSWe determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups.We developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease.CONCLUSIONWe developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease. |
Author | Bedell, Barry J. Grand’Maison, Marilyn Charil, Arnaud Carbonell, Felix Zijdenbos, Alex P. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Felix surname: Carbonell fullname: Carbonell, Felix – sequence: 2 givenname: Alex P. surname: Zijdenbos fullname: Zijdenbos, Alex P. – sequence: 3 givenname: Arnaud surname: Charil fullname: Charil, Arnaud – sequence: 4 givenname: Marilyn surname: Grand’Maison fullname: Grand’Maison, Marilyn – sequence: 5 givenname: Barry J. surname: Bedell fullname: Bedell, Barry J. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkUFr2zAYhsXoWNJsP2CXItilF2f6bEuyj11It0KgpclgN_NFljIF20ol-ZB_X7Vpe-hhDAQ66Hk_8b3POTkb3KAJ-QpsntdCft8PY6_bOQCfA6-kLD-QaQ68zoTI_5yRKQMBGeeMT8h5CHvGmKiq6hOZ5AIKDqyakvXtIdoeO7pBv9OR3uuddQM1ztP1uN1rFemiwxCssQrj01M68a-mPzDYQJ2hV_2xc7ald8sNvelxp8Nn8tFgF_SXl3tGfl8vN4tf2er2583iapWpkvGYATeq0lCA1MrUUDGuVc0Eci2QGbVlddGialGoApG1UjBTy6rIUZTYllgXM3J5mnvw7mHUITa9DUp3HQ7ajaEBmWbmIpflf6Dpt5qnThL67R26d6Mf0iKJAmCiyIVM1MULNW6Tg-bgU4v-2Lw2mwA4Acq7ELw2bwiw5slec7LXJHvNyV7KyHcZZeNz69Gj7f6RfARG757i |
CODEN | JNMEAQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s12149_021_01634_3 crossref_primary_10_3389_fninf_2016_00020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2021_110017 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_118_209130 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_020_05012_5 crossref_primary_10_1177_0271678X16654492 crossref_primary_10_1515_revneuro_2020_0043 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_119_228510 crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_14625 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_019_04596_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jalz_2016_11_007 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_23622 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nicl_2018_08_019 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_023_01189_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2016_08_056 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jns.2009.06.005 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823b9c5e 10.2307/2289860 10.2967/jnumed.111.090340 10.1212/01.wnl.0000269790.05105.16 10.1001/jama.2010.2008 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.007 10.1177/0891988710363715 10.1007/s00259-012-2237-2 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.06.004 10.1093/brain/awm238 10.1093/brain/awu103 10.2967/jnumed.114.149732 10.1109/TMI.2002.806283 10.2967/jnumed.108.058529 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70001-2 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.036 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.66 10.1002/ana.21955 10.1001/archneurol.2011.150 10.1109/42.668698 10.2967/jnumed.109.069088 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.099 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c918b5 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70077-1 10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005 10.1002/hbm.1058 10.1002/ana.22068 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70142-4 10.1155/2014/246586 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e8e8b8 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.057 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70044-9 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.06.015 10.1093/brain/awr066 10.2967/jnumed.111.089730 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.041 10.1007/s00259-011-2021-8 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc. Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Sep 1, 2015 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc. – notice: Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Sep 1, 2015 |
CorporateAuthor | Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 4T- 8FD FR3 K9. M7Z NAPCQ P64 7X8 7QO |
DOI | 10.2967/jnumed.115.158774 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Docstoc Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biochemistry Abstracts 1 Nursing & Allied Health Premium Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic Biotechnology Research Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Nursing & Allied Health Premium Technology Research Database Docstoc Biochemistry Abstracts 1 ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic Biotechnology Research Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | Engineering Research Database MEDLINE Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2159-662X 1535-5667 |
EndPage | 1358 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3803881721 26135108 10_2967_jnumed_115_158774 |
Genre | Journal Article Feature |
GroupedDBID | 123 18M 41~ 5VS 96U AAYXX ACGFO AEGXH AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION GX1 N9A RHI TSM U5U W8F --- -~X .55 .GJ 29L 2WC 3O- 3V. 53G 5RE 7RV 7X7 88E 88I 8AF 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 8WZ A6W ABEFU ABSQV ABUWG ACGOD ACIWK ACPRK ADDZX ADMOG AENEX AFFNX AFKRA AFOSN AFRAH AHMBA AI. ALIPV ARAPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CGR CS3 CUY CVF DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EBD EBS ECM EIF EJD EMOBN EX3 F5P F9R FYUFA GNUQQ H13 HCIFZ HMCUK I-F IL9 INIJC J5H KQ8 L7B LK8 M1P M2P M2Q M7P N4W NAPCQ NPM OK1 P2P P62 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X R0Z RHF RNS RWL S0X SJN SV3 TAE TR2 TUS UKHRP VH1 WH7 WOQ WOW X7M YHG YQJ ZGI ZXP 4T- 8FD FR3 K9. M7Z P64 7X8 7QO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-15fc8e1317ecf91805ec906a5e6a0fcb093dacda6c3aa0d760f97832a64ad4a93 |
ISSN | 0161-5505 1535-5667 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 11:45:56 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 11:37:58 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 10:53:07 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:57:59 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:45:13 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:11:29 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Keywords | 18F-florbetapir mild cognitive impairment Alzheimer disease PET β-amyloid |
Language | English |
License | 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c405t-15fc8e1317ecf91805ec906a5e6a0fcb093dacda6c3aa0d760f97832a64ad4a93 |
Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/56/9/1351.full.pdf |
PMID | 26135108 |
PQID | 1711063267 |
PQPubID | 40808 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1780526274 proquest_miscellaneous_1709395510 proquest_journals_1711063267 pubmed_primary_26135108 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_115_158774 crossref_citationtrail_10_2967_jnumed_115_158774 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-09-00 2015-Sep 20150901 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2015 text: 2015-09-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: New York |
PublicationTitle | Journal of Nuclear Medicine |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Nucl Med |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Society of Nuclear Medicine |
Publisher_xml | – name: Society of Nuclear Medicine |
References | 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.14 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.36 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.13 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.35 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.34 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.11 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.33 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.18 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.17 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.16 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.38 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.15 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.37 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.19 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.10 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.32 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.31 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.30 Cummings (2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.12) 2011; 7 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.9 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.25 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.8 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.24 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.23 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.22 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.29 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.28 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.27 Perani (2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.39) 2014; 2014 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.26 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.1 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.3 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.2 Chételat (2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.4) 2010; 67 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.5 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.7 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.6 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.21 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.20 |
References_xml | – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.38 doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.06.005 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.27 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823b9c5e – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.35 doi: 10.2307/2289860 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.25 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.090340 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.13 doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000269790.05105.16 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.15 doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.2008 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.31 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.007 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.7 doi: 10.1177/0891988710363715 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.1 doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2237-2 – volume: 7 start-page: e13 year: 2011 ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.12 article-title: Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease drug development publication-title: Alzheimers Dement. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.06.004 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.2 doi: 10.1093/brain/awm238 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.9 doi: 10.1093/brain/awu103 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.19 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.149732 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.30 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2002.806283 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.6 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.058529 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.21 doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70001-2 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.32 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.036 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.11 doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.66 – volume: 67 start-page: 317 year: 2010 ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.4 article-title: Relationship between atrophy and beta-amyloid deposition in Alzheimer disease publication-title: Ann Neurol. doi: 10.1002/ana.21955 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.18 doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.150 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.28 doi: 10.1109/42.668698 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.17 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.069088 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.16 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.099 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.5 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c918b5 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.23 doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70077-1 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.29 doi: 10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.36 doi: 10.1002/hbm.1058 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.22 doi: 10.1002/ana.22068 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.37 doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70142-4 – volume: 2014 start-page: 785039 year: 2014 ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.39 article-title: A survey of FDG- and amyloid-PET imaging in dementia and GRADE analysis publication-title: Biomed Res Int. doi: 10.1155/2014/246586 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.26 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e8e8b8 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.33 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.057 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.14 doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.3 doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70044-9 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.8 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.06.015 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.10 doi: 10.1093/brain/awr066 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.24 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.089730 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.34 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.041 – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.20 doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-2021-8 |
SSID | ssj0006888 ssj0062072 |
Score | 2.2667983 |
Snippet | Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 1351 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Algorithms Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging Alzheimer Disease - metabolism Alzheimer's disease Amyloid beta-Peptides - metabolism Aniline Compounds - pharmacokinetics Brain - diagnostic imaging Brain - metabolism Classification Cognition & reasoning Discriminant analysis Ethylene Glycols - pharmacokinetics Female Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Male Neuropsychology Nuclear medicine Positron-Emission Tomography - methods Radiopharmaceuticals Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Severity of Illness Index Tissue Distribution Tomography |
Title | Optimal Target Region for Subject Classification on the Basis of Amyloid PET Images |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135108 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1711063267 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1709395510 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1780526274 |
Volume | 56 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3rb9MwELdgSIgviDdlAxmJT0wZTho78ccytRqwbiBaqd8ivzJ16gNtrTT467mL3STlMQ2kKmpTJ2l9v1zuzr-7I-QNl1IbnSGpXZVRKpmKcqnLyIF1kOTcOqMx33l4Io7G6ccJnzTUoSq7ZKUPzI8_5pX8j1RhH8gVs2T_QbL1SWEHvAf5whYkDNsbyfgU7vc5JthXdG6YqrMNcRD0AQZYfM9LZAMFy9CTGt-rUIakNwd_fWr3P_dH-x_moFou28ZqkzY283wPgz0m6uX4qsYTuIetYMKhutDLDXFm4GbTqzowPT0HDac9qQ-zaprEMlzx95HoHlxqbRtKUEW6zIZqGtLChjjw-6IdqYh5TcWqg5cijtAjamtfX1Y8oEy2VCm2Dmw9ljcff1X5iRS46Hy-gJNZeADwg5jnme_8s11e--S0GIyPj4tRfzK6Te4k4Fdgy4tPX5ry8iKvGpXWP9Qvg-Ml3v12gW1D5i_eSWWljB6Q-0FatOex8pDccotH5O4wSOwx-RogQz1kqIcMBcjQABm6DRkKL4AMrSBDlyUNkKEAGeoh84SMB_3R4VEU-mpEBszzVRQjb8_FYDk6U8o4Z9wZyYTiTihWGs1k1ypjlTBdpZjNBCsxQJgokSqbKtl9SnYWAKbnhLK0W0qrZBZrlTqhcxNzK3hmUws7ZNwhbDNJhQlF57H3yawA5xPntfDzCo4oL_y8dsjb-pBvvuLKdYP3NjNfhBvzsogzsGkF-CVZh7yuvwa1iWthauGWaxwD_1KCu8CuG4P9PrA5VYc881Ktf1EiEJAsf3GDo3fJveZ22CM7q4u1ewmm7Eq_quD3E831nrs |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal+Target+Region+for+Subject+Classification+on+the+Basis+of+Amyloid+PET+Images&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+nuclear+medicine+%281978%29&rft.au=Carbonell%2C+Felix&rft.au=Zijdenbos%2C+Alex+P&rft.au=Charil%2C+Arnaud&rft.au=Grand%27Maison%2C+Marilyn&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1351&rft.epage=1351&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967%2Fjnumed.115.158774&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon |