Optimal Target Region for Subject Classification on the Basis of Amyloid PET Images

Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 56; no. 9; pp. 1351 - 1358
Main Authors Carbonell, Felix, Zijdenbos, Alex P., Charil, Arnaud, Grand’Maison, Marilyn, Bedell, Barry J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society of Nuclear Medicine 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (AβL) and a group with high amyloid levels (AβH) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. In our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for (18)F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. We determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups. We developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease.
AbstractList Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (A...) and a group with high amyloid levels (A...) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. In our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the A... and A... groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for ...F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. We determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the A... and A... groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups. We developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the A... and A... groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)
Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (AβL) and a group with high amyloid levels (AβH) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. In our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for (18)F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. We determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups. We developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease.
Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (Aβ...) and a group with high amyloid levels (Aβ...) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. In our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the Aβ... and Aβ... groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for ...F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. We determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the Aβ... and Aβ... groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups. We developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the Aβ... and Aβ... groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)
Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (AβL) and a group with high amyloid levels (AβH) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study.UNLABELLEDClassification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual assessment is currently the gold standard approach, automated classification techniques are inherently more reproducible and efficient. The objective of this work was to develop a statistical approach for the automated classification of subjects with different levels of cognitive impairment into a group with low amyloid levels (AβL) and a group with high amyloid levels (AβH) through the use of amyloid PET data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study.In our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for (18)F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study.METHODSIn our framework, an iterative, voxelwise, regularized discriminant analysis is combined with a receiver operating characteristic approach that optimizes the selection of a region of interest (ROI) and a cutoff value for the automated classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. The robustness, spatial stability, and generalization of the resulting target ROIs were evaluated by use of the standardized uptake value ratio for (18)F-florbetapir PET images from subjects who served as healthy controls, subjects who had mild cognitive impairment, and subjects who had Alzheimer disease and were participating in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study.We determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups.RESULTSWe determined that several iterations of the discriminant analysis improved the classification of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. We found that an ROI consisting of the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and the medial frontal cortex yielded optimal group separation and showed good stability across different reference regions and cognitive cohorts. A key step in this process was the automated determination of the cutoff value for group separation, which was dependent on the reference region used for the standardized uptake value ratio calculation and which was shown to have a relatively narrow range across subject groups.We developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease.CONCLUSIONWe developed a data-driven approach for the determination of an optimal target ROI and an associated cutoff value for the separation of subjects into the AβL and AβH groups. Future work should include the application of this process to other datasets to facilitate the determination of the translatability of the optimal ROI obtained in this study to other populations. Ideally, the accuracy of our target ROI and cutoff value could be further validated with PET-autopsy data from large-scale studies. It is anticipated that this approach will be extremely useful for the enrichment of study populations in clinical trials involving putative disease-modifying therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease.
Author Bedell, Barry J.
Grand’Maison, Marilyn
Charil, Arnaud
Carbonell, Felix
Zijdenbos, Alex P.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Felix
  surname: Carbonell
  fullname: Carbonell, Felix
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Alex P.
  surname: Zijdenbos
  fullname: Zijdenbos, Alex P.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Arnaud
  surname: Charil
  fullname: Charil, Arnaud
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Marilyn
  surname: Grand’Maison
  fullname: Grand’Maison, Marilyn
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Barry J.
  surname: Bedell
  fullname: Bedell, Barry J.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkUFr2zAYhsXoWNJsP2CXItilF2f6bEuyj11It0KgpclgN_NFljIF20ol-ZB_X7Vpe-hhDAQ66Hk_8b3POTkb3KAJ-QpsntdCft8PY6_bOQCfA6-kLD-QaQ68zoTI_5yRKQMBGeeMT8h5CHvGmKiq6hOZ5AIKDqyakvXtIdoeO7pBv9OR3uuddQM1ztP1uN1rFemiwxCssQrj01M68a-mPzDYQJ2hV_2xc7ald8sNvelxp8Nn8tFgF_SXl3tGfl8vN4tf2er2583iapWpkvGYATeq0lCA1MrUUDGuVc0Eci2QGbVlddGialGoApG1UjBTy6rIUZTYllgXM3J5mnvw7mHUITa9DUp3HQ7ajaEBmWbmIpflf6Dpt5qnThL67R26d6Mf0iKJAmCiyIVM1MULNW6Tg-bgU4v-2Lw2mwA4Acq7ELw2bwiw5slec7LXJHvNyV7KyHcZZeNz69Gj7f6RfARG757i
CODEN JNMEAQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s12149_021_01634_3
crossref_primary_10_3389_fninf_2016_00020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2021_110017
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_118_209130
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_020_05012_5
crossref_primary_10_1177_0271678X16654492
crossref_primary_10_1515_revneuro_2020_0043
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_119_228510
crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_14625
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_019_04596_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jalz_2016_11_007
crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_23622
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nicl_2018_08_019
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_023_01189_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2016_08_056
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jns.2009.06.005
10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823b9c5e
10.2307/2289860
10.2967/jnumed.111.090340
10.1212/01.wnl.0000269790.05105.16
10.1001/jama.2010.2008
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.007
10.1177/0891988710363715
10.1007/s00259-012-2237-2
10.1016/j.jalz.2010.06.004
10.1093/brain/awm238
10.1093/brain/awu103
10.2967/jnumed.114.149732
10.1109/TMI.2002.806283
10.2967/jnumed.108.058529
10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70001-2
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.036
10.1038/jcbfm.2014.66
10.1002/ana.21955
10.1001/archneurol.2011.150
10.1109/42.668698
10.2967/jnumed.109.069088
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.099
10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c918b5
10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70077-1
10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005
10.1002/hbm.1058
10.1002/ana.22068
10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70142-4
10.1155/2014/246586
10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e8e8b8
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.057
10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70044-9
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.06.015
10.1093/brain/awr066
10.2967/jnumed.111.089730
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.041
10.1007/s00259-011-2021-8
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Sep 1, 2015
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
– notice: Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Sep 1, 2015
CorporateAuthor Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
4T-
8FD
FR3
K9.
M7Z
NAPCQ
P64
7X8
7QO
DOI 10.2967/jnumed.115.158774
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Docstoc
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biochemistry Abstracts 1
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Technology Research Database
Docstoc
Biochemistry Abstracts 1
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList Engineering Research Database
MEDLINE
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2159-662X
1535-5667
EndPage 1358
ExternalDocumentID 3803881721
26135108
10_2967_jnumed_115_158774
Genre Journal Article
Feature
GroupedDBID 123
18M
41~
5VS
96U
AAYXX
ACGFO
AEGXH
AIAGR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
GX1
N9A
RHI
TSM
U5U
W8F
---
-~X
.55
.GJ
29L
2WC
3O-
3V.
53G
5RE
7RV
7X7
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
8WZ
A6W
ABEFU
ABSQV
ABUWG
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADDZX
ADMOG
AENEX
AFFNX
AFKRA
AFOSN
AFRAH
AHMBA
AI.
ALIPV
ARAPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBD
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
F5P
F9R
FYUFA
GNUQQ
H13
HCIFZ
HMCUK
I-F
IL9
INIJC
J5H
KQ8
L7B
LK8
M1P
M2P
M2Q
M7P
N4W
NAPCQ
NPM
OK1
P2P
P62
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
R0Z
RHF
RNS
RWL
S0X
SJN
SV3
TAE
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
VH1
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
YHG
YQJ
ZGI
ZXP
4T-
8FD
FR3
K9.
M7Z
P64
7X8
7QO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-15fc8e1317ecf91805ec906a5e6a0fcb093dacda6c3aa0d760f97832a64ad4a93
ISSN 0161-5505
1535-5667
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 11:45:56 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 11:37:58 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 10:53:07 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:57:59 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:45:13 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:11:29 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Keywords 18F-florbetapir
mild cognitive impairment
Alzheimer disease
PET
β-amyloid
Language English
License 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c405t-15fc8e1317ecf91805ec906a5e6a0fcb093dacda6c3aa0d760f97832a64ad4a93
Notes SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/56/9/1351.full.pdf
PMID 26135108
PQID 1711063267
PQPubID 40808
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1780526274
proquest_miscellaneous_1709395510
proquest_journals_1711063267
pubmed_primary_26135108
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_115_158774
crossref_citationtrail_10_2967_jnumed_115_158774
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-09-00
2015-Sep
20150901
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-09-00
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle Journal of Nuclear Medicine
PublicationTitleAlternate J Nucl Med
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publisher_xml – name: Society of Nuclear Medicine
References 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.14
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.36
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.13
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.35
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.34
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.11
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.33
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.18
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.17
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.16
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.38
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.15
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.37
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.19
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.10
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.32
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.31
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.30
Cummings (2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.12) 2011; 7
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.9
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.25
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.8
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.24
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.23
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.22
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.29
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.28
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.27
Perani (2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.39) 2014; 2014
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.26
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.1
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.3
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.2
Chételat (2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.4) 2010; 67
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.5
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.7
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.6
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.21
2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.20
References_xml – ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.38
  doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.06.005
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.27
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823b9c5e
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.35
  doi: 10.2307/2289860
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.25
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.090340
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.13
  doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000269790.05105.16
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.15
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.2008
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.31
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.007
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.7
  doi: 10.1177/0891988710363715
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.1
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2237-2
– volume: 7
  start-page: e13
  year: 2011
  ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.12
  article-title: Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease drug development
  publication-title: Alzheimers Dement.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.06.004
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.2
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awm238
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.9
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awu103
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.19
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.149732
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.30
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2002.806283
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.6
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.058529
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.21
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70001-2
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.32
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.036
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.11
  doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.66
– volume: 67
  start-page: 317
  year: 2010
  ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.4
  article-title: Relationship between atrophy and beta-amyloid deposition in Alzheimer disease
  publication-title: Ann Neurol.
  doi: 10.1002/ana.21955
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.18
  doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.150
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.28
  doi: 10.1109/42.668698
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.17
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.069088
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.16
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.099
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.5
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c918b5
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.23
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70077-1
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.29
  doi: 10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.36
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.1058
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.22
  doi: 10.1002/ana.22068
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.37
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70142-4
– volume: 2014
  start-page: 785039
  year: 2014
  ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.39
  article-title: A survey of FDG- and amyloid-PET imaging in dementia and GRADE analysis
  publication-title: Biomed Res Int.
  doi: 10.1155/2014/246586
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.26
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e8e8b8
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.33
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.057
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.14
  doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.3
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70044-9
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.8
  doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.06.015
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.10
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awr066
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.24
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.089730
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.34
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.041
– ident: 2021051712080497000_56.9.1351.20
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-2021-8
SSID ssj0006888
ssj0062072
Score 2.2667983
Snippet Classification of subjects on the basis of amyloid PET scans is increasingly being used in research studies and clinical practice. Although qualitative, visual...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 1351
SubjectTerms Aged
Algorithms
Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging
Alzheimer Disease - metabolism
Alzheimer's disease
Amyloid beta-Peptides - metabolism
Aniline Compounds - pharmacokinetics
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - metabolism
Classification
Cognition & reasoning
Discriminant analysis
Ethylene Glycols - pharmacokinetics
Female
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Male
Neuropsychology
Nuclear medicine
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Radiopharmaceuticals
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Tissue Distribution
Tomography
Title Optimal Target Region for Subject Classification on the Basis of Amyloid PET Images
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135108
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1711063267
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1709395510
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1780526274
Volume 56
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3rb9MwELdgSIgviDdlAxmJT0wZTho78ccytRqwbiBaqd8ivzJ16gNtrTT467mL3STlMQ2kKmpTJ2l9v1zuzr-7I-QNl1IbnSGpXZVRKpmKcqnLyIF1kOTcOqMx33l4Io7G6ccJnzTUoSq7ZKUPzI8_5pX8j1RhH8gVs2T_QbL1SWEHvAf5whYkDNsbyfgU7vc5JthXdG6YqrMNcRD0AQZYfM9LZAMFy9CTGt-rUIakNwd_fWr3P_dH-x_moFou28ZqkzY283wPgz0m6uX4qsYTuIetYMKhutDLDXFm4GbTqzowPT0HDac9qQ-zaprEMlzx95HoHlxqbRtKUEW6zIZqGtLChjjw-6IdqYh5TcWqg5cijtAjamtfX1Y8oEy2VCm2Dmw9ljcff1X5iRS46Hy-gJNZeADwg5jnme_8s11e--S0GIyPj4tRfzK6Te4k4Fdgy4tPX5ry8iKvGpXWP9Qvg-Ml3v12gW1D5i_eSWWljB6Q-0FatOex8pDccotH5O4wSOwx-RogQz1kqIcMBcjQABm6DRkKL4AMrSBDlyUNkKEAGeoh84SMB_3R4VEU-mpEBszzVRQjb8_FYDk6U8o4Z9wZyYTiTihWGs1k1ypjlTBdpZjNBCsxQJgokSqbKtl9SnYWAKbnhLK0W0qrZBZrlTqhcxNzK3hmUws7ZNwhbDNJhQlF57H3yawA5xPntfDzCo4oL_y8dsjb-pBvvuLKdYP3NjNfhBvzsogzsGkF-CVZh7yuvwa1iWthauGWaxwD_1KCu8CuG4P9PrA5VYc881Ktf1EiEJAsf3GDo3fJveZ22CM7q4u1ewmm7Eq_quD3E831nrs
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal+Target+Region+for+Subject+Classification+on+the+Basis+of+Amyloid+PET+Images&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+nuclear+medicine+%281978%29&rft.au=Carbonell%2C+Felix&rft.au=Zijdenbos%2C+Alex+P&rft.au=Charil%2C+Arnaud&rft.au=Grand%27Maison%2C+Marilyn&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1351&rft.epage=1351&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967%2Fjnumed.115.158774&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon