Foregut function before and after lung transplant

• Published in: The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Vol. 158; no. 2; pp. 619 - 629
• Main Authors: Masuda, Takahiro, Mittal, Sumeet K., Kovács, Balázs, Smith, Michael A., Walia, Rajat, Huang, Jasmine L., Bremner, Ross M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2019
• Subjects: Aged; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Esophageal Motility Disorders - etiology; Esophagus - physiopathology; Female; Gastric Emptying - physiology; Gastroesophageal Reflux - etiology; gastroesophageal reflux disease; high-resolution manometry; Humans; lung transplant; Lung Transplantation - adverse effects; Male; Manometry; Middle Aged; obstructive lung disease; restrictive lung disease; HRM; EGD; ELI; TAPG; lung transplant; obstructive lung disease; high-resolution manometry; EGJ; restrictive lung disease; AL; DCI; AP; GERD; LTx; LESP; LES; LESPI; TP; gastroesophageal reflux disease; OL; IPF; BMI; COPD
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.128
• ISSN: 0022-5223

Esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux disease are common in patients with advanced lung disease and can potentially affect outcomes of lung transplant; however, the effects of lung transplant on foregut function remain unknown. We assessed foregut function before and after bilateral lung transplant. We attempted complete foregut function testing before and after lung transplant. We compared patients with obstructive lung disease and patients with restrictive lung disease who underwent lung transplant between 2015 and 2016. In total, 112 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 62.2 years, and 62 patients were men. A total of 51 patients (45.5%) were diagnosed with obstructive lung disease, and 56 patients (50.0%) were diagnosed with restrictive lung disease. Approximately half of these patients had a change in manometric diagnosis before and after lung transplant, with most achieving increased peristaltic vigor. Pre–lung transplant gastroesophageal reflux disease was more prevalent in the restrictive lung disease cohort than in the obstructive lung disease cohort (42.9% vs 19.6%, P = .010). Thoracoabdominal pressure gradient before lung transplantation was greater in the restrictive lung disease group than in the obstructive lung disease group (23.4 vs 14.7 mm Hg, P < .001), which may explain the mechanism of increased reflux in patients with restrictive lung disease. No differences were seen in the post–lung transplant prevalence of pathological reflux and thoracoabdominal pressure gradient between groups. Esophageal motility and reflux parameters vary significantly between patients with obstructive lung disease and patients with restrictive lung disease, and can be explained by differences in underlying pulmonary dynamics. Restoring pulmonary physiology after lung transplant ameliorates the effects of esophageal dysmotility and reflux. Improved peristaltic vigor after lung transplant in patients with hypomotility is important, which may make them eligible for antireflux surgery if gastroesophageal reflux disease persists after lung transplant.