Validating alternative methodologies to estimate the regime of temporary rivers when flow data are unavailable

• Published in: The Science of the total environment Vol. 565; pp. 1001 - 1010
• Main Authors: Gallart, F., Llorens, P., Latron, J., Cid, N., Rieradevall, M., Prat, N.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15.09.2016
• Subjects: Aquatic state; Intermittent river; Interview; Mediterranean; Stream regime; Water Framework Directive; Europe; ANE, Spain; Mediterranean; Water Framework Directive; Stream regime; Intermittent river; Aquatic state; Interview
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.116

Hydrological data for assessing the regime of temporary rivers are often non-existent or scarce. The scarcity of flow data makes impossible to characterize the hydrological regime of temporary streams and, in consequence, to select the correct periods and methods to determine their ecological status. This is why the TREHS software is being developed, in the framework of the LIFE Trivers project. It will help managers to implement adequately the European Water Framework Directive in this kind of water body. TREHS, using the methodology described in Gallart et al. (2012), defines six transient ‘aquatic states’, based on hydrological conditions representing different mesohabitats, for a given reach at a particular moment. Because of its qualitative nature, this approach allows using alternative methodologies to assess the regime of temporary rivers when there are no observed flow data. These methods, based on interviews and high-resolution aerial photographs, were tested for estimating the aquatic regime of temporary rivers. All the gauging stations (13) belonging to the Catalan Internal Catchments (NE Spain) with recurrent zero-flow periods were selected to validate this methodology. On the one hand, non-structured interviews were conducted with inhabitants of villages near the gauging stations. On the other hand, the historical series of available orthophotographs were examined. Flow records measured at the gauging stations were used to validate the alternative methods. Flow permanence in the reaches was estimated reasonably by the interviews and adequately by aerial photographs, when compared with the values estimated using daily flows. The degree of seasonality was assessed only roughly by the interviews. The recurrence of disconnected pools was not detected by flow records but was estimated with some divergences by the two methods. The combination of the two alternative methods allows substituting or complementing flow records, to be updated in the future through monitoring by professionals and citizens. [Display omitted] •The regimes of temporary rivers control the temporal patterns of aquatic life.•As most temporary rivers are ungauged other methods than flow records are needed.•Interviews and aerial photographs series were tested versus flow records.•Both methods are best used together, giving information additional to flow records.•Temporary aquatic states must be noted down when biological samples are taken.